1
|
Coronatto LH, Formentin C. Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e2024S122. [PMID: 38865542 PMCID: PMC11164275 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2024s122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ligia Henriques Coronatto
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Neuro-Oncology Sector, Department of Neurosurgery – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Cleiton Formentin
- Hospital Sírio Libanês – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery Discipline – Campinas (SP), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rzadki K, Baqri W, Yermakhanova O, Habbous S, Das S. Choreographed expansion of services results in decreased patient burden without compromise of outcomes: An assessment of the Ontario experience. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:178-187. [PMID: 38496909 PMCID: PMC10940827 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Neuro-oncology care in Ontario, Canada has been historically centralized, at times requiring significant travel on the part of patients. Toward observing the goal of patient-centered care and reducing patient burden, 2 additional regional cancer centres (RCC) capable of neuro-oncology care delivery were introduced in 2016. This study evaluates the impact of increased regionalization of neuro-oncology services, from 11 to 13 oncology centers, on healthcare utilization and travel burden for glioblastoma (GBM) patients in Ontario. Methods We present a cohort of GBM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. Incidence of GBM and treatment modalities were identified using provincial health administrative databases. A geographic information system and spatial analysis were used to estimate travel time from patient residences to neuro-oncology RCCs. Results Among the 5242 GBM patients, 79% received radiation as part of treatment. Median travel time to the closest RCC was higher for patients who did not receive radiation as part of treatment than for patients who did (P = .03). After 2016, the volume of patients receiving radiation at their local RCC increased from 62% to 69% and the median travel time to treatment RCCs decreased (P = .0072). The 2 new RCCs treated 35% and 41% of patients within their respective catchment areas. Receipt of standard of care, surgery, and chemoradiation (CRT), increased by 11%. Conclusions Regionalization resulted in changes in the healthcare utilization patterns in Ontario consistent with decreased patient travel burden for patients with GBM. Focused regionalization did not come at the cost of decreased quality of care, as determined by the delivery of a standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Rzadki
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wafa Baqri
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Steven Habbous
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liguori GL. Challenges and Promise for Glioblastoma Treatment through Extracellular Vesicle Inquiry. Cells 2024; 13:336. [PMID: 38391949 PMCID: PMC10886570 DOI: 10.3390/cells13040336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) is a rare but extremely aggressive brain tumor that significantly impacts patient outcomes, affecting both duration and quality of life. The protocol established by Stupp and colleagues in 2005, based on radiotherapy and chemotherapy with Temozolomide, following maximum safe surgical resection remains the gold standard for GB treatment; however, it is evident nowadays that the extreme intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity, as well as the invasiveness and tendency to recur, of GB are not compatible with a routine and unfortunately ineffective treatment. This review article summarizes the main challenges in the search for new valuable therapies for GB and focuses on the impact that extracellular vesicle (EV) research and exploitation may have in the field. EVs are natural particles delimited by a lipidic bilayer and filled with functional cellular content that are released and uptaken by cells as key means of cell communication. Furthermore, EVs are stable in body fluids and well tolerated by the immune system, and are able to cross physiological, interspecies, and interkingdom barriers and to target specific cells, releasing inherent or externally loaded functionally active molecules. Therefore, EVs have the potential to be ideal allies in the fight against GB and to improve the prognosis for GB patients. The present work describes the main preclinical results obtained so far on the use of EVs for GB treatment, focusing on both the EV sources and molecular cargo used in the various functional studies, primarily in vivo. Finally, a SWOT analysis is performed, highlighting the main advantages and pitfalls of developing EV-based GB therapeutic strategies. The analysis also suggests the main directions to explore to realize the possibility of exploiting EVs for the treatment of GB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna L Liguori
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics (IGB) "Adriano Buzzati-Traverso", National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Byrne A, Torrens-Burton A, Sivell S, Moraes FY, Bulbeck H, Bernstein M, Nelson A, Fielding H. Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 1:CD013440. [PMID: 34988973 PMCID: PMC8733789 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013440.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary malignant brain tumours can have an unpredictable course, but high-grade gliomas typically have a relentlessly progressive disease trajectory. They can cause profound symptom burden, affecting physical, neurocognitive, and social functioning from an early stage in the illness. This can significantly impact on role function and on the experiences and needs of informal caregivers. Access to specialist palliative and supportive care early in the disease trajectory, for those with high-grade tumours in particular, has the potential to improve patients' and caregivers' quality of life. However, provision of palliative and supportive care for people with primary brain tumours - and their informal caregivers - is historically ill-defined and ad hoc, and the benefits of early palliative interventions have not been confirmed. It is therefore important to define the role and effectiveness of early referral to specialist palliative care services and/or the effectiveness of other interventions focused on palliating disease impact on people and their informal caregivers. This would help guide improvement to service provision, by defining those interventions which are effective across a range of domains, and developing an evidence-based model of integrated supportive and palliative care for this population. OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence base for early palliative care interventions, including referral to specialist palliative care services compared to usual care, for improving outcomes in adults diagnosed with a primary brain tumour and their carers. SEARCH METHODS We conducted searches of electronic databases, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (last searched 16 November 2021). We conducted searches to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative search terms. In addition to this, we searched for any currently recruiting trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal, and undertook citation tracking via Scopus. We also handsearched reference lists of potentially eligible systematic review articles to identify any other relevant studies, contacted experts in the field and searched key authors via Web of Science and searched SIGLE (System of Information on Grey Literature in Europe). SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies looking at early referral to specialist palliative care services - or early targeted palliative interventions by other healthcare professionals - for improving quality of life, symptom control, psychological outcomes, or overall survival as a primary or secondary outcome measure. Studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies (NRS), as well as qualitative and mixed-methods studies where both qualitative and quantitative data were included. Participants were adults with a confirmed radiological and/or histological diagnosis of a primary malignant brain tumour, and/or informal adult carers (either at individual or family level) of people with a primary malignant brain tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodological procedures for data extraction, management, and analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for symptom control, i.e. cognitive function. MAIN RESULTS We identified 9748 references from the searches, with 8337 remaining after duplicates were removed. After full-text review, we included one trial. There were no studies of early specialist palliative care interventions or of early, co-ordinated generalist palliative care approaches. The included randomised trial addressed a single symptom area, focusing on early cognitive rehabilitation, administered within two weeks of surgery in a mixed brain tumour population, of whom approximately half had a high-grade glioma. The intervention was administered individually as therapist-led computerised exercises over 16 one-hour sessions, four times/week for four weeks. Sessions addressed several cognitive domains including time orientation, spatial orientation, visual attention, logical reasoning, memory, and executive function. There were no between-group differences in outcome for tests of logical-executive function, but differences were observed in the domains of visual attention and verbal memory. Risk of bias was assessed and stated as high for performance bias and attrition bias but for selective reporting it was unclear whether all outcomes were reported. We considered the certainty of the evidence, as assessed by GRADE, to be very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Currently there is a lack of research focusing on the introduction of early palliative interventions specifically for people with primary brain tumours, either as co-ordinated specialist palliative care approaches or interventions focusing on a specific aspect of palliation. Future research should address the methodological shortcomings described in early palliative intervention studies in other cancers and chronic conditions. In particular, the specific population under investigation, the timing and the setting of the intervention should be clearly described and the standardised palliative care-specific components of the intervention should be defined in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Byrne
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, UK
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre (MCPCRC), Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Anna Torrens-Burton
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre (MCPCRC), Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Stephanie Sivell
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre (MCPCRC), Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Mark Bernstein
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre (MCPCRC), Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Helen Fielding
- Palliative Medicine, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmer JD, Chavez G, Furnback W, Chuang PY, Wang B, Proescholdt C, Tang CH. Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients Receiving Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772261. [PMID: 34926281 PMCID: PMC8675863 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, there has been no large-scale, real-world study of the health-related quality of life outcomes for patients using tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. Methods A survey was mailed to 2,815 patients actively using TTFields for treatment of GBM in the USA (n = 2,182) and Europe (n = 633). The survey included patient-reported demographic and clinical information, as well as EuroQol’s EQ-5D-5L and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) overall health score. Results A total of 1,106 applicable patients responded to the survey (USA = 782 and Europe = 324), with a mean age of 58.6 years (SD = 12.3). The average time since diagnosis and time using TTFields were 21.5 months (SD = 25.1) and 13.5 months (SD = 13.2), respectively. Over 61% of patients had been diagnosed at least 1 year prior and 28.4% at least 2 years prior; 45 patients (4.2%) had been diagnosed at least 5 years prior. Progressed disease was reported in 307 patients, while 690 reported non-progressed disease. Regression analyses showed that GBM disease progression and older age had predictable negative associations (p < 0.001) with most EQ-5D-5L dimensions and the EQ-VAS. However, longer time since diagnosis was associated with improved self-care (p < 0.05), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) overall and in patients with progressed disease (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively). Additionally, longer time using TTFields was associated with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.001), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.01) overall; with improved EQ-VAS in progression-free patients (p < 0.05); and with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.01), usual activities (p < 0.05), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) in patients with progressed disease. Conclusion This is the largest real-world study of patient-reported quality of life in GBM and TTFields treatment to date. It shows unsurprising negative associations between quality of life and disease progression and older age, as well as more novel, positive associations between quality of life and longer time since diagnosis and time using TTFields therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Gordon Chavez
- Department of Global Value, Novocure, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wesley Furnback
- Department of Value and Access, Real Chemistry, New York, NY, United States
| | - Po-Ya Chuang
- Department of Value and Access, Real Chemistry, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bruce Wang
- Department of Value and Access, Real Chemistry, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Chao-Hsiun Tang
- School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Preclinical models of glioblastoma: limitations of current models and the promise of new developments. Expert Rev Mol Med 2021; 23:e20. [PMID: 34852856 DOI: 10.1017/erm.2021.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour, yet little progress has been made towards providing better treatment options for patients diagnosed with this devastating condition over the last few decades. The complex nature of the disease, heterogeneity, highly invasive potential of GBM tumours and until recently, reduced investment in research funding compared with other cancer types, are contributing factors to few advancements in disease management. Survival rates remain low with less than 5% of patients surviving 5 years. Another important contributing factor is the use of preclinical models that fail to fully recapitulate GBM pathophysiology, preventing efficient translation from the lab into successful therapies in the clinic. This review critically evaluates current preclinical GBM models, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of using such models, and outlines several emerging techniques in GBM modelling using animal-free approaches. These novel approaches to a highly complex disease such as GBM show evidence of a more truthful recapitulation of GBM pathobiology with high reproducibility. The resulting advancements in this field will offer new biological insights into GBM and its aetiology with potential to contribute towards the development of much needed improved treatments for GBM in future.
Collapse
|
7
|
Golla H, Nettekoven C, Bausewein C, Tonn JC, Thon N, Feddersen B, Schnell O, Böhlke C, Becker G, Rolke R, Clusmann H, Herrlinger U, Radbruch L, Vatter H, Güresir E, Stock S, Müller D, Civello D, Papachristou I, Hellmich M, Hamacher S, Voltz R, Goldbrunner R. Effect of early palliative care for patients with glioblastoma (EPCOG): a randomised phase III clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034378. [PMID: 31915175 PMCID: PMC6955518 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a positive effect of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) in various advanced cancer entities regarding patients' quality of life (QoL), survival, mood, caregiver burden and reduction of aggressiveness of treatment near the end of life. However, RCTs investigating the positive effect of EIPC for patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are lacking. After modelling work identifying the specific needs of GBM patients and their caregivers, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of EIPC in this particular patient group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The recruitment period of this multicenter RCT started in May 2019. GBM patients (n=214) and their caregivers will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving proactive EIPC on a monthly basis) or the control group (receiving treatment according to international standards and additional, regular assessment of QoL ('optimised' standard care)).The primary outcome is QoL assessed by subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for brain tumour (FACT-Br) from baseline to 6 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes are changes in QoL after 12 (end of intervention), 18 and 24 months (end of follow-up), the full FACT-Br scale, patients' palliative care needs, depression/anxiety, cognitive impairment, caregiver burden, healthcare use, cost-effectiveness and overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the local ethics committees of the University Clinics of Cologne, Aachen, Bonn, Freiburg and Munich (LMU). Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed, open access journal and disseminated through presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) (DRKS00016066); Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Charlotte Nettekoven
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Berend Feddersen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Böhlke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roman Rolke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Clusmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniele Civello
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Irini Papachristou
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Clinical Studies (ZKS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hamacher
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Clinical Studies (ZKS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Health Services Research (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dillen K, Ebke M, Koch A, Becker I, Ostgathe C, Voltz R, Golla H. Validation of a palliative care outcome measurement tool supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+): Identification of palliative concerns of neurological patients. Palliat Med 2019; 33:1221-1231. [PMID: 31280657 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319861927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest to integrate palliative care and its structures into the care of neurological patients. However, in Germany there is no comprehensive assessment tool capturing the symptoms of patients with advanced neurological diseases. AIM To validate a newly developed palliative care measurement tool based on an extension of the validated core documentation system Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation considering additional neurological issues (HOPE+). DESIGN Prospective, observational study using HOPE+ and as external criteria, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and the 12 months "surprise" question (12-SQ) in a neurological population, and assessment for its construct validity and diagnostic accuracy. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS All newly admitted patients to the Department of Neurorehabilitation, Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg-Clinic aged 18-100 years (#DRKS00010947). RESULTS Data from 263 patients (63 ± 14 years of age) were analyzed. HOPE+ revealed a moderately correlated six-factor structure (r = -0.543-0.525). Correlation analysis to evaluate discriminant validity using ECOG as external criterion was high (rs(261) = 0.724, p < 0.001) and confirmed for severely affected patients by adding the 12-SQ ("No"-group: 48.00 ± 14.92 vs "Yes"-group: 18.67 ± 7.57, p < 0.009). Operating characteristics show satisfactory diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve: 0.746 ± 0.049, 95% confidence interval = 0.650-0.842). CONCLUSION HOPE+ demonstrates promising psychometric properties. It helps to assess palliative care issues of patients in neurological settings and, in combination with the 12-SQ, conceivably conditions when to initiate the palliative care approach in a population underrepresented in palliative care structures so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Dillen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Ebke
- Neurological Centre for Rehabilitation-MEDIAN-Clinics, Bad Salzuflen, Germany.,Dr. Becker Rhein Sieg Clinic, Nümbrecht, Germany
| | - Andreas Koch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ingrid Becker
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Clinical Trials, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Health Services Research (ZVFK), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pollom EL, Sborov KD, Soltys SG, Asch SM, Sudore RL, Aslakson RA. Advance Care Planning Needs in Patients With Glioblastoma Undergoing Radiotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:e6-e8. [PMID: 30201484 PMCID: PMC6338473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
| | - Katherine D Sborov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rebecca A Aslakson
- Department of Medicine and Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ebke M, Koch A, Dillen K, Becker I, Voltz R, Golla H. The "Surprise Question" in Neurorehabilitation-Prognosis Estimation by Neurologist and Palliative Care Physician; a Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational Study. Front Neurol 2018; 9:792. [PMID: 30319526 PMCID: PMC6165871 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The 12-months “surprise” question (12-SQ) for estimating prognosis and the need for integrating palliative care (PC) services has not yet been investigated for neurological patients. Objective: Test the value of the 12-SQ on a sample of neurorehabilitation patients. Methods: All patients newly registered in the Department of Neurorehabilitation, Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg-Clinic (8/2016-03/2017) were asked to participate. The treating neurorehabilitation physicians (NP) and an external consulting PC physician (PCP) independently estimated patients' prognosis using the 12-SQ; while symptom burden was independently assessed using the standardized palliative outcome measurement HOPE-SP-CL, a set of additional neurological issues, and ECOG. Follow-up with consenting patients 12 months later was via telephone. Descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized in data analysis. Results: Of 634 patients, 279 (44%) patients (male: 57.7%, female: 42.3%; mean age: 63 ± 14) (or, alternatively, their legal representative) consented and were assessed at baseline. Per patient NP and PCP both answered the 12-SQ with “Yes” (164), with “No” (42), or had different opinions (73). The “No” group displayed the highest symptom burden on all three measures for both disciplines. Overall, PCP scored higher (i.e., worse) than NP on all measures used. Follow-up was possible for 236 (drop-out: 15.4%) patients (deceased: 34 (14.4%), alive: 202 (85.6%)). Baseline scores on all measures were higher for deceased patients compared to those still living. Prognostic characteristics were: sensitivity: NP 50%, PCP 67.6%; specificity: NP 86.1%, PCP 70.3%, p < 0.001; positive predictive value: NP 37.8%, PCP 27.7%; negative predictive value: NP 91.1%, PCP 92.8%; area under the curve: NP 0.68, PCP 0.69; success rate: NP 80.9%, PCP 69.9%, p = 0.002. Regression analysis indicated that age, dysphagia and overburdening of family (NP answering the 12-SQ), dysphagia and rehabilitation phase (PCP answering the 12-SQ) were associated with increased likelihood of dying within 12 months. Without the 12-SQ as relevant predictor, age, dysphagia and ECOG were significant predictors (NP and PCP). Conclusion: Combining the 12-SQ with a measurement assessing PC and neurological issues could potentially improve the 12-SQ's predictive performance of 12-month survival and help to identify when to initiate the PC approach. Clinical experiences influence assessment and prognosis estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Ebke
- Neurological Centre for Rehabilitation-MEDIAN-Clinics, Bad Salzuflen, Germany.,Dr. Becker Rhein Sieg Clinic, Nümbrecht, Germany
| | - Andreas Koch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kim Dillen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ingrid Becker
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Clinical Trials, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Center for Health Services Research (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seibl-Leven M, von Reeken C, Goldbrunner R, Grau S, Ruge MI, Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Kocher M, Voltz R, Golla H. Clinical routine assessment of palliative care symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden in glioblastoma patients: an explorative field study. J Neurooncol 2018; 138:321-333. [PMID: 29464662 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2800-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of self-reported outcome measurements into clinical routine was tested to help facilitate early access to palliative care (PC) for glioblastoma (GBM)-patients. Measures detail PC symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden. Between January 2014 and December 2016, a total of 337 GBM-patients were discussed during meetings of the neuro-oncology tumor board to examine further treatment options. Each patient, along with their caregivers, was requested to participate in self-assessment using the palliative outcome scale (POS) and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Analyses encompassed summary statistics, non-parametric tests, visual graphic analysis, content analysis and assessing the utilization of the specialized PC consulting service (SPCCS). Ninety-five (28%) GBM-patients and 71 (21%) caregivers completed the self-assessment. Of these, 20 patients and 12 caregivers repeated the assessment at least once more during follow-up. POS total scores were similar in the group of patients with initial diagnosis [10 (0-31)] and those with later disease stages like recurrent diagnosis [9 (0-25)], but ZBI total scores differed [14 (0-51) vs. 24 (2-62)]. Single item analysis demonstrated that anxiety and worries about the future predominated. Caregivers were torn between high engagement in caring and feeling overburdened. Still, requests for the SPCCS showed no increase. Actual implementation of measures like POS and ZBI for detecting PC concerns and caregiver burden with GBM-patients in the field remains challenging as indicated by the limited response rate and lack of increased requests for the SPCCS. Modified clinical routines including strengthening awareness of PC, and allowing proxy-assessment might help to overcome barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Seibl-Leven
- Center of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian von Reeken
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Grau
- Center of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ingolf Ruge
- Center of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Veronika Dunkl
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Clinical Trials, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Center for Health Services Research (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Heidrun Golla
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany. .,Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pace A, Dirven L, Koekkoek JAF, Golla H, Fleming J, Rudà R, Marosi C, Rhun EL, Grant R, Oliver K, Oberg I, Bulbeck HJ, Rooney AG, Henriksson R, Pasman HRW, Oberndorfer S, Weller M, Taphoorn MJB. European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with glioma. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e330-e340. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30345-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
Kuchinad KE, Strowd R, Evans A, Riley WA, Smith TJ. End of life care for glioblastoma patients at a large academic cancer center. J Neurooncol 2017; 134:75-81. [PMID: 28528421 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2487-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a universally fatal disease, complicated by significant cognitive and physical disabilities, inherent to the disease course. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze end-of-life care for GBM patients at an academic center and compare utilization of these services to national quality of care guidelines, with the goal of identifying opportunities to improve end-of-life care. Single center retrospective cohort study of GBM patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) between 2009 and 2014, using electronic medical records and hospice records. Comprehensive medical record review of 100 randomly selected patients with GBM, who were actively treated at JHH. Secondary analysis of all JHH GBM patients (n = 45) who received hospice care at Gilchrist Services, our largest provider, during this time period. Of 100 patients, 76 were referred to hospice. Despite the poor survival and changes in mental capacity associated with this disease, only 40% of individuals had documentation of code status and only 17% had any documentation of advance directives (ADs). None had documentation by a health care provider of a formal symptom, psychosocial, or spiritual assessment at greater than 50% of clinic visits. Only 17% used chemotherapy in their last month of life. 37% were hospitalized in the last month of life for an average of 9 days. Of the Gilchrist Services patients, the median length of stay in hospice was 21 days and 64% of these patients died in their residence with hospice services. Documentation of palliative care and end-of-life measures could improve quality of care for GBM patients, especially in the use of ADs, symptom, spiritual, and psychosocial assessments, with earlier use of hospice to prevent end-of-life hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roy Strowd
- Brain Tumor Program, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas J Smith
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Harry J. Duffey Family Professor of Palliative Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 369, Baltimore, MD, 21287-0005, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Du Le VN, Provias J, Murty N, Patterson MS, Nie Z, Hayward JE, Farrell TJ, McMillan W, Zhang W, Fang Q. Dual-modality optical biopsy of glioblastomas multiforme with diffuse reflectance and fluorescence: ex vivo retrieval of optical properties. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2017; 22:27002. [PMID: 28157245 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.2.027002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Glioma itself accounts for 80% of all malignant primary brain tumors, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) accounts for 55% of such tumors. Diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy have the potential to discriminate healthy tissues from abnormal tissues and therefore are promising noninvasive methods for improving the accuracy of brain tissue resection. Optical properties were retrieved using an experimentally evaluated inverse solution. On average, the scattering coefficient is 2.4 times higher in GBM than in low grade glioma (LGG), and the absorption coefficient is 48% higher. In addition, the ratio of fluorescence to diffuse reflectance at the emission peak of 460 nm is 2.6 times higher for LGG while reflectance at 650 nm is 2.7 times higher for GBM. The results reported also show that the combination of diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy could achieve sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90% in discriminating GBM from LGG during ex vivo measurements of 22 sites from seven glioma specimens. Therefore, the current technique might be a promising tool for aiding neurosurgeons in determining the extent of surgical resection of glioma and, thus, improving intraoperative tumor identification for guiding surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinh Nguyen Du Le
- McMaster University, Radiation Sciences Graduate Program, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Provias
- McMaster University, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naresh Murty
- McMaster University, Department of Surgery, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Zhaojun Nie
- McMaster University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph E Hayward
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadafMcMaster University, School of Interdisciplinary Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas J Farrell
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadafMcMaster University, School of Interdisciplinary Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William McMillan
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadagMcMaster University, Department of Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wenbin Zhang
- Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiyin Fang
- McMaster University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaiMcMaster University, Department of Engineering Physics, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song K, Amatya B, Voutier C, Khan F. Advance Care Planning in Patients with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2016; 6:223. [PMID: 27822458 PMCID: PMC5075571 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of reflection and communication of a person's future health care preferences, and has been shown to improve end-of-life (EOL) care for patients. The aim of this systematic review is to present an evidence-based overview of ACP in patients with primary malignant brain tumors (pmBT). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical and health science electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Social Care Online, Scopus, and Web of Science) up to July 2016. Manual search of bibliographies of articles and gray literature search were also conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodologic quality of the studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program's appraisal tools. All studies were included irrespective of the study design. A meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity amongst included studies; therefore, a narrative analysis was performed for best evidence synthesis. Overall, 19 studies were included [1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 17 cohort studies, 1 qualitative study] with 4686 participants. All studies scored "low to moderate" on the methodological quality assessment, implying high risk of bias. A single RCT evaluating a video decision support tool in facilitating ACP in pmBT patients showed a beneficial effect in promoting comfort care and gaining confidence in decision-making. However, the effect of the intervention on quality of life and care at the EOL were unclear. There was a low rate of use of ACP discussions at the EOL. Advance directive completion rates and place of death varied between different studies. Positive effects of ACP included lower hospital readmission rates, and intensive care unit utilization. None of the studies assessed mortality outcomes associated with ACP. In conclusion, this review found some beneficial effects of ACP in pmBT. The literature still remains limited in this area, with lack of intervention studies, making it difficult to identify superiority of ACP interventions in pmBT. More robust studies, with appropriate study design, outcome measures, and defined interventions are required to inform policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystal Song
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bhasker Amatya
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine Voutier
- Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fary Khan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The end-of-life (EOL) phase of patients with a glioma starts when symptom prevalence increases and antitumor treatment is no longer effective. During the EOL phase, care is primarily aimed at reducing symptom burden while maintaining quality of life as long as possible without inappropriate prolongation of life. Palliative care during the EOL phase also involves complex medical decisions for the prevention and relief of suffering. We discuss the prevalence and treatment of the most common EOL symptoms, decision making in the EOL phase, the organization of EOL care, and the role of the patient's caregiver. Treating disease-specific symptoms, such as impaired consciousness, seizures, focal neurologic deficits and cognitive disturbances, is a major concern during the EOL phase, as these symptoms may interfere with EOL decision making. Advance care planning is aimed at reaching consensus about possible EOL decisions between all participants, respecting the values of patients and their informal caregivers. In order to prevent the possibility that the patient becomes incompetent to make informed decisions, we recommend initiating EOL conversations at a relatively early stage in the disease course.
Collapse
|