Burden of skeletal-related events in prostate cancer: unmet need in pain improvement

Real-world impact of acupuncture on analgesics and healthcare resource utilization in breast cancer survivors with pain

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the real-world impact of acupuncture on analgesics and healthcare resource utilization among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

From a United States (US) commercial claims database (25% random sample of IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics), we selected 18-63 years old malignant breast cancer survivors experiencing pain and ≥ 1 year removed from cancer diagnosis. Using the difference-in-difference technique, annualized changes in analgesics [prevalence, rates of short-term (< 30-day supply) and long-term (≥ 30-day supply) prescription fills] and healthcare resource utilization (healthcare costs, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits) were compared between acupuncture-treated and non-treated patients.

RESULTS

Among 495 (3%) acupuncture-treated patients (median age: 55 years, stage 4: 12%, average 2.5 years post cancer diagnosis), most had commercial health insurance (92%) and experiencing musculoskeletal pain (98%). Twenty-seven percent were receiving antidepressants and 3% completed ≥ 2 long-term prescription fills of opioids. Prevalence of opioid usage reduced from 29 to 19% (P < 0.001) and NSAID usage reduced from 21 to 14% (P = 0.001) post-acupuncture. The relative prevalence of opioid and NSAID use decreased by 20% (P < 0.05) and 19% (P = 0.07), respectively, in the acupuncture-treated group compared to non-treated patients (n = 16,129). However, the reductions were not statistically significant after adjustment for confounding. Patients receiving acupuncture for pain (n = 264, 53%) were found with a relative decrease by 47% and 49% (both P < 0.05) in short-term opioid and NSAID fills compared to those treated for other conditions. High-utilization patients (≥ 10 acupuncture sessions, n = 178, 36%) were observed with a significant reduction in total healthcare costs (P < 0.001) unlike low-utilization patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although adjusted results did not show that patients receiving acupuncture had better outcomes than non-treated patients, exploratory analyses revealed that patients treated specifically for pain used fewer analgesics and those with high acupuncture utilization incurred lower healthcare costs. Further studies are required to examine acupuncture effectiveness in real-world settings.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Pathological Fractures in Patients Referred to Specialist Palliative Care: A Retrospective Study From India

Background: Prevalence of pathological fractures in palliative care is less studied. This study aimed to determine the annual prevalence of pathological fractures and describe the characteristics and treatments in patients with pathological fractures referred to a specialist palliative care clinic in a tertiary care cancer center in India. Methods: Data of adult cancer patients newly referred to the specialist palliative care clinic over 1 year with a clinico-radiological diagnosis of pathological fracture was included. Key outcomes of interest were annual prevalence, clinical characteristics, symptoms and treatments offered. Results: 75 out of 5800 (1.29%) patients newly referred to the clinic over 1 year had pathological fractures. Lung cancer was the most common primary diagnosis (n = 23).Dorsal spine (n = 25) was the most common site of fracture. Pain was the predominant symptom. Mean pain score was 7.04(SD = 1.75) and 42 patients (56%) required strong opioids for analgesia. Only 11 (16%) patients underwent surgical fixation. Median duration from diagnosis of cancer to occurrence of fracture was found to be 329 days. Treatment goals changed to best supportive care in 33 patients (44%) post fracture. Patients with bone and soft tissue neoplasms and those who received only chemotherapy previously had a higher risk of occurrence of fractures. Conclusion: Annual prevalence of pathological fractures in patients referred to the specialist palliative care clinic was 1.29%. It was associated with significant symptom burden and affected oncological treatments. Close monitoring of patients with bone metastases is crucial and proactive implementation of prophylactic measures to prevent such skeletal related events is warranted.

Costs to Medicare of Nonrecommended Bone-Modifying Agent Use for Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) do not prevent skeletal-related events among patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC), but many patients receive BMAs unnecessarily. The costs to Medicare from overuse have not been assessed.

METHODS

We used linked SEER-Medicare data 2011-2015 to measure the frequency and number of doses of zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab received during CSPC (between diagnosis and initiation of metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer therapy). We estimated excess BMA among patients who received BMA therapy for CSPC and did not have an indication for osteoporosis fracture prevention. We used the Medicare fee schedule for drug prices and peer-reviewed sources to estimate adverse event frequencies and costs.

RESULTS

Median CSPC duration was 387 days (IQR, 253-573), during which time 42% of patients received ≥one dose of denosumab (mean doses, 7) and 18% received ≥one dose of ZA (mean doses, 7). Thirty-eight percent of those receiving denosumab and 47% of those receiving ZA had a history of osteoporosis, osteopenia, spine or hip fracture, or hypercalcemia. The estimated, annual excess BMA cost to Medicare was $44,105,041 in US dollars (USD), composed of $43,303,078 USD and $45,512 USD in drug costs for denosumab and ZA, respectively, and $682,865 USD and $75,585 USD in adverse event costs, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the estimate was most sensitive to denosumab dosing frequency (estimate range, $28,469,237 USD-$98,830,351 USD) and duration of CSPC (estimate range, $36,823,311 USD-$99,015,908 USD).

CONCLUSION

BMA overuse in CSPC incurs substantial cost to Medicare, largely because of denosumab drug costs. Excess costs may be reduced by greater adherence to guideline-concordant BMA use.

Physician knowledge, practice patterns, and barriers encountered regarding guideline-concordant use of bone modifying agents for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend bone-modifying agents (BMAs) for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastasis, but not for castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Physicians beliefs and practices regarding BMA therapy are poorly understood.

METHODS

This was a qualitative interview study with embedded Likert-scale elements. Study participants were physicians who treat prostate cancer, located within an academic cancer center or an affiliated community-based network. Participants were asked about their experiences and practice patterns regarding BMA therapy. Participants used Likert-scale items to identify the most common barriers to guideline-concordant BMA use and the most effective potential interventions. Participants were subsequently asked to rank the three most common barriers and the three most effective interventions to reduce underuse (for CRPC) and overuse (for CSPC).

RESULTS

Nineteen physicians were invited and 15 participated; one physician did not answer some questions as outside of their practice scope. All were aware of the recommendation for BMAs in CRPC. 14% (2/14) were unaware of the recommendation against BMA use for CSPC; an additional 29% (4/14) believed that BMA use could be appropriate for CSPC depending on the metastatic disease burden. 36% (5/14) were unaware of recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density. The most common barriers (occurring "often" or "sometimes") were obtaining dental clearance (11/15) and insufficient clinic time (6/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce underuse were dental navigation (11/15) and electronic medical record (EMR)-based guidance (9/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce overuse were peer-to-peer education (14/15) and EMR-based guidance (13/15).

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of guideline recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density and against BMA use for CSPC was good, but not complete. Dental navigation, peer-to-peer education, and EMR-based guidance were preferred intervention strategies to improve guideline-concordant use.

A Case of Success: Complete Response to Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Radium-223 dichloride (Ra223) is the first targeted alpha agent approved for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with bone-exclusive disease. A benefit in overall survival and time to the first symptomatic skeletal-related event was shown in the Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer Patients (ALSYMPCA) trial. However, this trial did not describe a bone scan response to Ra223, and there is no universal consensus about how it should be monitored. Furthermore, a scintigraphy flare phenomenon may lead to false-positive tracer uptake in responsive cases, thereby misleading the interpretation of imaging results.  We present the case of a 67-year-old male with mCRPC and exclusive bone disease treated with Ra223. The bone scintigraphy after the end of the treatment showed an apparent aggravation of the lesions, corresponding to a flare phenomenon, with an almost complete resolution after three months. The patient maintained a scintigraphic response for seven months.

Pain Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with 223Ra: PARABO, a Prospective, Noninterventional Study

223Ra, a targeted α-therapy, is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have bone metastases. In the phase 3 ALSYMPCA study, 223Ra prolonged survival and improved quality of life versus placebo. Our real-world study, PARABO, investigated pain and bone pain-related quality of life in patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bone metastases receiving 223Ra in clinical practice. Methods: PARABO was a prospective, observational, noninterventional single-arm study conducted in nuclear medicine centers across Germany (NCT02398526). The primary endpoint was a clinically meaningful pain response (≥2-point improvement from baseline for the worst-pain item score in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form). Results: The analysis included 354 patients, who received a median of 6 223Ra injections (range, 1-6). Sixty-seven percent (236/354) received 5-6 injections, and 33% (118/354) received 1-4 injections. Of 216 patients with a baseline worst-pain score of more than 1, 59% (128) had a clinically meaningful pain response during treatment. Corresponding rates were 67% (range, 98/146) with 5-6 223Ra injections versus 43% (range, 30/70) with 1-4 injections, 60% (range, 60/100) in patients with no more than 20 lesions versus 59% (range, 65/111) in those with more than 20 lesions, and 65% (range, 69/106) in patients without prior or concomitant opioid use versus 54% (range, 59/110) in those with prior or concomitant opioid use. Mean subscale scores (pain severity and pain interference) on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form improved during treatment. Conclusion: 223Ra reduced pain in patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bone metastases, particularly in patients who received 5-6 injections. The extent of metastatic disease did not impact pain response.

Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers.

METHODS

Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson), SocINDEX with Full Text, ERIC, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 6 December 2022. No database limits were applied. The included studies were methodologically appraised. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included with 10 categories of interventions identified. Over 300 outcomes were measured, and more than 100 instruments were used. Multicomponent interventions generally led to positive changes in physiological outcomes like body mass index, as well as exercise tolerance and quality of life. This change, however, was not sustained in the long term. Cognitive-behavioural interventions significantly improved psychological symptoms but seldom physical symptoms. Telephone and web-based interventions showed great promise in improving outcomes like depression, positive affect, negative affect, perceived stress, spiritual wellbeing and fatigue. Findings from physical activity/exercise-based interventions were promising for both, physical and psychological outcomes. Rehabilitative interventions were associated with significant improvements in quality of life, urinary symptoms and psychological symptoms, albeit in the short term. Mixed results were reported for nurse-led interventions, family-based interventions and nutritional interventions.

CONCLUSION

All but one study focused exclusively on prostate cancer. The included studies were significantly heterogeneous. Multicomponent, cognitive-behavioural, telephone and web-based, physical activity/exercise-based and rehabilitative interventions showed great promise in improving various outcomes. This improvement, however, was often short-lived.

A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the Incidence of Bone-Only Disease at PSMA PET/CT in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

PSMA PET/CT has unprecedented accuracy for localization of initial or recurrent prostate cancer (PC), which can be applied in a metastasis-directed therapy approach. PSMA PET/CT (PET) also has a role in the selection of patients for metastasis-directed therapy or radioligand therapy and therapy assessment in CRPC patients. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to determine the incidence of bone-only metastasis in CRPC patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT for restaging, as well as identifying potential predictors of bone-only PET positivity. The study analyzed data from 179 patients from two centers in Essen and Bologna. Results showed that 20.1% of the patients had PSMA uptake only in the bone, with the most frequent lesions located in the vertebrae, ribs, and hip bone. Half half of the patients showed oligo disease in bone and may benefit from a bone-metastasis-directed therapy. Initial positive nodal status and solitary ADT were shown to be negative predictors of osseous metastasis. The role of PSMA PET/TC in this patient population needs to be further explored in terms of its role in the evaluation and adoption of bone-specific therapies.

Real-world use of bone modifying agents in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Bone modifying agents (BMAs) prevent skeletal related events among patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) involving bone and prevent osteoporotic fractures among patients at high risk. BMA utilization for patients with mCRPC has not been well quantified.

METHODS

We used linked SEER registry and Medicare claims data. We included men diagnosed with stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma during 2007-2015, aged > = 66 at diagnosis, with sufficient continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, who received androgen deprivation therapy. We limited to those who subsequently received a CRPC-defining treatment (CDT). We identified patients with evidence of bone metastasis using claims. Our primary outcome was receipt of a BMA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) within 180 days of initiating CDT.

RESULTS

Among 1292 included patients, 1034 (80%) had bone metastasis. BMA use within 180 days of initiating CDT was higher among patients with bone metastases than those without (705/1034 [68%] vs 56/258 [22%]). Among patients without bone metastasis, those with high osteoporotic fracture risk were more likely than those without to receive a BMA (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.17, 5.29); however, only 26% of patients with high fracture risk received a BMA. Among patients who received BMAs, most (62%) first initiated them >90 days before initiating CDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of patients with mCRPC and bone metastases received BMAs within 180 days after initiating CDT. A greater proportion of patients without bone metastasis may warrant BMA therapy for osteoporotic fracture prevention. Some patients with bone metastasis may be able to delay BMA initiation until CRPC.

Improving Bone Health in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer with the Use of Algorithm-Based Clinical Practice Tool

Background: The bone health of patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer is at risk from treatment-related bone density loss and skeletal-related events from metastatic disease in bones. Evidence-based guidelines recommend using denosumab or zoledronic acid at bone metastasis-indicated dosages in the setting of castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases and at the osteoporosis-indicated dosages in the hormone-sensitive setting in patients with a significant risk of fragility fracture. For the concerns of jaw osteonecrosis, a dental evaluation is recommended before starting bone-modifying agents. The literature review suggests a limited evidence-based practice for bone health with prostate cancer in the real world. Both under-treatment and inappropriate dosing of bone remodeling therapies place additional risks to bone health. An incomplete dental work up before starting bone-modifying agents increases the risk of jaw osteonecrosis. Methods: We created an algorithm-based clinical practice tool to minimize the deviation from evidence-based guidelines at our center and provide appropriate bone health care to our patients by ensuring indication-appropriate dosing and dental screening rates. This order set was incorporated into the electronic medical record system for ordering a bone remodeling agent for prostate cancer. The tool prompts the clinicians to follow the appropriate algorithm in a stepwise manner to ensure a pretreatment dental evaluation and use of the correct dosage of drugs. Results: We analyzed the data from Sept 2019 to April 2022 following the incorporation of this tool. 0/35 (0%) patients were placed on inappropriate bone modifying agent dosing, and dental health was addressed in every patient before initiating treatment. We compared the change in the practice of prescribing and noted a significant difference in the clinician’s practice while prescribing denosumab/zoledronic acid before and after implementation of this tool [incorrect dosing: 24/41 vs. 0/35 (p < 0.00001)]; and an improvement in pretreatment dental checkup before and after implementation of the tool was noted to be [missed dental evaluation:12/41 vs. 0/35 (p < 0.00001)]. Conclusion: We found that incorporating an evidence-based algorithm in the order set while prescribing bone remodeling agents significantly improved our institutional clinical practice of indication-appropriate dosing and dental screening rates, and facilitated high-quality, evidence-based care to our patients with prostate cancer.

An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective

Background

Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective.

Methods

Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care.

Results

At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care.

Conclusion

The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x.

Prevalence of skeletal-related events in hormone-naive prostate cancer in a low resource setting

BACKGROUND

Presentation with symptoms of advanced prostate cancer is prevalent in developing societies. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of and factors associated with skeletal-related events (SREs) at presentation with hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

METHODS

Records of 331 consecutive prostate cancer patients from January 2009 to April 2018 were reviewed. The prevalence of SRE at the presentation was determined. In addition, the relationships between SRE and age of patient, duration of clinical features, serum total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and biopsy Gleason score (GS) at presentation were evaluated. Analyses were done with IBM SPSS® version 25.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69.8 ± 8.0 years. While 43.8% of patients had lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) only, 51.4% had LUTS and other features of disease progression. Only 2.1% of the cases were confirmed from screen detection of elevated serum tPSA. SREs were observed in 11.8% at first presentations with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Symptom duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.99; P = 0.02), anaemia that could not be attributed to gross haematuria or external blood loss (OR 9.6; 95% CI 3.12-29.52; P < 0.001) and transrectal biopsy GS (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.17-2.22; P = 0.003 ) were significantly associated with SREs at presentation with hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence exists that patients who present with SREs from more aggressive prostate cancers may have had more rapid symptom progression, but not a longer delay before presentation.

Hematologic toxicity profile and efficacy of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 α-radioligand therapy of patients with extensive skeletal metastases of castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Actinium-225-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA-617) is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). No study has specifically assessed its safety in patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC. We aimed to investigate the hematologic toxicity and efficacy of [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 therapy in patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of patients treated with [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 for mCRPC. We included patients with a superscan pattern of skeletal metastases and those with 20 or more multifocal sites of skeletal metastases on baseline [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. We reviewed the levels of hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC), and platelet prior to each cycle of treatment and determined the presence of impaired bone marrow function at baseline and the grade of toxicity in the hematologic parameters induced by treatment. We evaluated the predictors of hematologic toxicity using binary logistic regression analysis. We also determined the presence of renal dysfunction before or during treatment. We assessed response to treatment using prostate-specific antigen response and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were included. Skeletal metastasis was in the superscan pattern in 34 patients (32.1%) and multifocal in 72 patients (67.9%). The median treatment cycle was 4 (range = 1-9). Ninety-eight patients (92.5%) had abnormal baseline hematologic parameters. One patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 1 (0.9%), 3 (2.8%), and 2 (1.9%) patients, respectively. Age, the number of treatment cycles, and the presence of renal dysfunction were significant predictors of hematologic toxicity. Eighty-five patients (80.2%) achieved PSA response. The median PFS and OS of the study population were 14:00 (95%CI: 8.15-19.86) months and 15.0 (95%CI: 12.8-17.2) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

[²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 induces a good anti-tumor effect in about 80% of patients with extensive skeletal metastases of mCRPC with a rare incidence of severe hematologic toxicity. Age, number of treatment cycles, and the presence of renal dysfunction were significant risk factors for hematologic toxicity of [²²⁵Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 therapy.

Oligometastatic Disease in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Update

Simple Summary

Approximately 7–50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop oligometastases, which are new tumors found in another part of the body, arising from cancer cells of the original tumor that have travelled through the body. In recent years, these patients have been increasingly regarded as a distinct group that could benefit from treatment that intends to cure the disease, rather than palliative care, to achieve a better clinical outcome. Various treatment procedures have been developed for treating NSCLC patients with different oligometastatic sites. In addition, the newly proposed uniform definition for oligometastases as well as ongoing trials may lead to increased appropriate patient selection and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The aim of this review article is to summarize the latest evidence regarding optimal management strategies for NSCLC patients with oligometastases.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct entity that is different from localized and disseminated diseases. The definition of oligometastatic NSCLC varies across studies in past decades owing to the use of different imaging modalities; however, a uniform definition of oligometastatic NSCLC has been proposed, and this may facilitate trial design and evaluation of certain interventions. Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC are candidates for curative-intent management, in which local ablative treatment, such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend that local therapy for thoracic and metastatic lesions should be considered for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC with stable disease after systemic therapy, optimal management strategies for different oligometastatic sites have not been established. Additionally, the development of personalized therapies for individual patients with oligometastatic NSCLC to improve their quality of life and overall survival should also be addressed. Here, we review relevant articles on the management of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and categorize the disease according to the site of metastases. Ongoing trials are also summarized to determine future directions and expectations for new treatment modalities to improve patient management.

Symptomatic Skeletal Events and the Use of Bone Health Agents in a Real-World Treated Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Population: Results From the CAPRI-Study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are at risk of symptomatic skeletal events (SSE). Bone health agents (BHA, ie bisphosphonates and denosumab) and new life-prolonging drugs (LPDs) can delay SSEs. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of BHAs in relation to SSEs in treated real-world mCRPC population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients from the CAPRI registry who were treated with at least one LPD and diagnosed with bone metastases prior to the start of first LPD (LPD1). Outcomes were SSEs (external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the bone, orthopedic surgery, pathologic fracture or spinal cord compression) and SSE-free survival (SSE-FS) since LPD1.

RESULTS

One-thousand nine hundred and twenty-three patients were included with a median follow-up from LPD1 of 16.7 months. Fifty-two percent (n = 996) started BHA prior or within 4 weeks after the start of LPD1 (early BHA). In total, 41% experienced at least one SSE. SSE incidence rate was 0.29 per patient year for patients without BHA and 0.27 for patients with early BHA. Median SSE-FS from LPD1 was 12.9 months. SSE-FS was longer in patients who started BHA early versus patients without BHA (13.2 vs. 11.0 months, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world population we observed an undertreatment with BHAs, although patients with early BHA use had lower incidence rates of SSEs and longer SSE-FS. This finding was irrespective of type of SSE and presence of risk factors. In addition to LPD treatment, timely initiation of BHAs is recommended in bone metastatic CRPC-patients with both pain and/or opioid use and prior SSE.

Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Current Challenges and Trends

Prostate carcinoma is a highly prevalent biologically and clinically diverse disease, generally associated with a consistent elevation of prostate-specific antigen levels. Castration-resistant prostate cancer represents a heterogeneous clinical setting that ranges from patients with an asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen elevation after hormone blockade failure and good performance status to patients with significant debilitating symptoms and rapidly progressive disease, leading to death. Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a transient disease stage defined over specific criteria established within a sensitive time period. The majority of the patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer will eventually develop metastatic lesions, associated with prostate cancer-specific morbidity and mortality. However, progression to metastatic disease is a heterogeneous process still not fully understood, with studies suggesting that younger age, high Gleason score (> 7), high prostate-specific antigen levels, reduced prostate-specific antigen doubling time (< 6 months), and a rapid alkaline phosphatase rise as potentially associated factors. Although the nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape has substantially evolved in recent years, the disease heterogeneity makes treatment decisions for this population challenging in the effort to achieve a balance between the risk of disease progression and the toxicity of new treatments in patients who often have associated comorbidities, yet are generally asymptomatic. The present article addresses the current main challenges in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer management, including in diagnosis, owing to the development of new imaging modalities with a direct impact in disease detection, prognostic classification, as a result of the traditionally oversimplified definition of disease aggressiveness (mainly based on prostate-specific antigen doubling time), and patient selection for the most adequate treatment.

Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients with Painful Spinal Bone Metastases

This study examined changes in the quality of life (QOL), as well as the factors affecting QOL, among patients with painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis for 1 month after radiotherapy. Methods: This study included 79 participants (40 male and 39 female; median age, 65 (42–88) years) who had undergone radiotherapy for painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis. Patients’ age, sex, activities of daily living (Barthel index), pain, spinal instability (spinal instability neoplastic score [SINS]), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were investigated. Results: Having an unstable SINS score was a positive factor for global health status (p < 0.05). The improvement in activities of daily living and response to pain were positive factors for physical function (p < 0.05). A positive effect on emotional function was confirmed among female patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Engaging in rehabilitation along with radiotherapy leads to improvements in QOL for patients with spinal bone metastases.

Real-World Use of Bone Modifying Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Bone modifying agent (BMA) therapy is recommended for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but not metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). BMA treatment in mCSPC may therefore constitute overuse.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we included patients diagnosed with stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma from 2007-2015, who were age ≥66 years at diagnosis and received androgen deprivation or antiandrogen therapy. We excluded patients who had previously received BMAs or had existing osteoporosis, osteopenia, hypercalcemia, or prior bone fracture. The primary outcome was receipt of BMA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) within 180 days of diagnosis (emergence of CRPC within this time frame is unlikely). Secondary outcome was BMA within 90 days. Exposures of interest included practice location (physician office vs. hospital outpatient) and specialty (medical oncologist vs. urologist) of treating physician.

RESULTS

Our sample included 2,627 patients, of which 52.9% were treated by medical oncologists and 47.1% by urologists; 77.7% and 22.3% received care in physician office and hospital outpatient locations, respectively. Overall, 23.6% received a BMA within 180 days; 18.4% did within 90 days. BMA therapy was more common among patients treated by oncologists (odds ratio = 8.23, 95% confidence interval = 6.41 to 10.57) and in physician office locations (odds ratio = 1.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.06 to 1.69). Utilization has increased: 17.3% of patients received BMAs from 2007-2009 (17.3% zoledronic acid, 0% denosumab), and 28.1% from 2012-2015 (8.4% zoledronic acid, 20.3% denosumab).

CONCLUSIONS

Among mCSPC patients who had no evidence of high osteoporotic fracture risk, over one-quarter received BMAs in recent years. This overuse may lead to excess costs and toxicity.

Risk factors of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing treatment with zoledronate

BACKGROUND

Skeletal-related events (SREs) are related to morbidity and mortality in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer, and preventive strategies based on patient risk assessment are recommended. However, potentiating factors for SREs in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer are not well elucidated.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data from a controlled arm of a clinical trial comparing denosumab with zoledronate in patients with bone metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT00321620) available at Project Data Sphere, a broad-access research platform. The primary endpoint was the first SRE after the inclusion to the trial, and the time to the first SRE was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model based on patients' baseline characteristics including age, race, ECOG performance status (PS), Gleason score, TNM stage at diagnosis, metastasis pattern, and urine and serum laboratory data.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ten patients without documented history of osteopenia or osteoporosis whose data was available in the zoledronate arm of the trial were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 71 years old, the median follow-up was 225 days, and 295 patients (42%) had at least one SRE during this period. The univariate analysis showed that history of SREs, Gleason score ≥ 7, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and high urine N-telopeptide cross-links/creatinine ratio (NTx/Cre) are significant baseline risk factors for SREs. Patients with the characteristics of history of SREs, Gleason score ≥ 7 and elevated serum ALP also showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of SREs in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SREs in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer may be higher in those with history of SREs, Gleason ≥ 7, and elevated serum ALP.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of radium-223 in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastasis: exploratory analysis, based on the results of post-marketing surveillance, according to prior chemotherapy status and in patients without concomitant use of second-generation androgen-receptor axis-targeted agents

BACKGROUND

Based on results from Japanese post-marketing surveillance, exploratory analyses were performed to investigate real-world outcomes of radium-223 for metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) according to patient characteristics.

METHODS

This non-interventional, prospective study enrolled mCRPC patients selected for radium-223 treatment in clinical practice. Six-month safety and effectiveness were evaluated in subgroups who had/had not received prior chemotherapy (prior-chemo/no prior-chemo groups), and a subgroup who had not received concomitant androgen-receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs).

RESULTS

In the overall population (n = 296), the prior-chemo group (n = 126) tended to have more bone metastases, more analgesic use, and higher prostate-specific antigen values than the no prior-chemo group (n = 170). Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), drug-related TEAEs, and ≥ grade 3 drug-related hematological TEAEs were 47% vs. 53%, 25% vs. 29%, and 4% vs. 7% in the no prior-chemo and prior-chemo groups, respectively. Incidences of TEAEs (61%), drug-related TEAEs (36%), and ≥ grade 3 drug-related hematological events (12%) were numerically higher in 33 patients who had received two lines of prior chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that two lines of prior chemotherapy, and hemoglobin, platelet, and lactate dehydrogenase values were baseline factors significantly related to ≥ grade 2 platelet count decreased. Safety and effectiveness in patients without concomitant ARATs (n = 201) were similar to those in the overall population.

CONCLUSION

In a real-life setting, radium-223 was well tolerated irrespective of prior chemotherapy, but relatively higher incidences of TEAEs and hematotoxicities were suggested in patients with two lines of prior chemotherapy, possibly reflecting more advanced disease. Radium-223 safety and effectiveness in patients without concomitant ARATs were favorable.

The burden of skeletal-related events in four Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico

AIM

Skeletal-related events (SREs) are major bone complications that frequently occur in patients with solid tumors (ST) and bone metastases, and in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). SREs include pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone, and surgery to bone. Limited data are available regarding the burden of SREs in Latin America. We built an economic model to quantify the current and future economic burden of SREs among adults in four Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review with a systematic search strategy was conducted to parameterize the economic burden of illness (BOI) model. Economic analyses were conducted using a prevalence-based model. Aggregate SRE costs obtained from country-specific sources were used. We also included patient productivity losses. Costs were expressed in 2020 USD for the total annual burden, annual burden per 1,000 at risk, and projected five-year burden.

RESULTS

The estimated total number of SREs was 251,503 in 2020, amounting to a total annual cost of USD 1.4 billion. The total projected five-year cost was USD 6.9 billion. Annual costs were highest in Brazil (USD 779.1 million), followed by Mexico (USD 281.8 million), Argentina (USD 174.6 million), and Colombia (USD 120.1 million). The average financial burden per 1,000 at risk was greatest in Brazil (USD 3.6 million), followed by Mexico (USD 3.4 million), Colombia (USD 2.9 million), and Argentina (USD 2.7 million).

CONCLUSION

Despite recommendations by medical societies for the use of bone-targeted agents in patients with solid tumors and bone metastasis or with multiple myeloma and bone lesions, a large proportion of patients at risk of experiencing SREs are not treated. Early detection of bone metastases and SREs and the use of the most effective preventative treatments are needed to decrease the clinical and economic burden of SREs in Latin America.

Pathogenesis, Assessments, and Management of Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment (CRCI): An Updated Literature Review

There are various cancer treatments at present, and chemotherapy is one of the main methods. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), as one of the side effects of chemotherapy, has gradually attracted the attention of more and more researchers. CRCI has been verified by subjective reports and objective neuropsychological tests so far. But oncologists' understanding of it and its treatments are still incomplete. In this review, we mainly give a comprehensive overview of the mechanism of CRCI, then describe a variety of evaluation methods, and finally summarize the treatment approaches under current medical conditions and compare it with an excellent article published in 2015 with the aim of providing directions for future research and better understanding of CRCI for clinicians.

Exercise training as part of lung cancer therapy

Exercise training is playing an increasing role in lung cancer care. Lung cancer is associated with significant burden to the individual and healthcare system. There is now substantial evidence that exercise training is safe, feasible and effective at improving several outcomes in people with lung cancer, especially in those with NSCLC. Exercise is beneficial across the lung cancer disease and treatment pathway, including in patients with early stage disease before and after surgery, and in patients with advanced disease. This review describes the impact of lung cancer and lung cancer treatment on patient health outcomes and summarizes the aims, safety, feasibility and effects of exercise training in the context of both early stage and advanced stage lung cancer. The paper also includes a discussion of current topical discussion areas including the use of exercise in people with bone metastases and the potential effect of exercise on suppression of tumour growth. Finally, seven clinical questions are included, which are a priority to be addressed by future research over the next decade as we strive to progress the field of lung cancer and improve patient outcomes.

Combination radium-223 therapies in patients with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer: A review

Chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), hormonal therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide) and radium-223 improve survival in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Combinations of radium-223 with these agents or novel drugs have been investigated in order to improve survival and decrease bone-related morbidity. In mCRPC, clinical and preclinical data indicate that radium-223, abiraterone and enzalutamide have a direct effect on prostate cancer cells and bone microenvironment when administered as single agents. Initial results from studies of radium-223 and abiraterone, enzalutamide or docetaxel demonstrated efficacy without any safety concern in pre-treated mCRPC; however, this safety profile changed when radium-based combination therapies were administered in un-pretreated mCRPC. This review underline the biological rationale for combining radium strategies, investigating their effects on bone in terms of control of skeletal-related events and bone disease progression. The aim is to understand the possible reasons why different radium-based combination treatments can led to different clinical outcomes.

Clinical and translational pharmacology of drugs for the prevention and treatment of bone metastases and cancer-induced bone loss

Bone disease is a frequent event in cancer patients, both due to cancer spread to bone and to cancer therapies. Bone is the organ most frequently affected by metastatic disease when considering the two most frequent cancers in the Western world (breast and prostate cancers). Bone metastases can have a substantial detrimental effect on patients' quality of life, as well as significant morbidity due to complications collectively known as skeletal-related events (SREs), which include hypercalcaemia, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and need of radiotherapy or surgery to the bone. These have been successfully mitigated with the development of bone-targeted agents (BTAs; bisphosphonates and denosumab), focused on inhibiting osteoclast activity. The potential direct antitumour effect of bisphosphonates, as well as the impact of osteoclast inhibition with subsequent decrease in bone metabolism, have also propelled investigation on the role of BTAs in preventing cancer relapse in bone. In this review, the authors aimed to discuss the role of BTAs in the treatment and prevention of bone metastases, as well as their potential value in preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). The review will focus on breast and prostate cancers, with the aim of providing the most relevant clinical data emerging from bench to bedside translational research in the field of cancer-induced bone disease.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

A real-world study assessing the use of bone-targeted agents and their impact on bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer treated in clinical practice in Europe

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases (BMs) are common in patients with prostate cancer and can lead to skeletal-related events (SREs), which are associated with increased pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Bone-targeted agents (BTAs), such as zoledronic acid and denosumab, reduce the incidence of SREs and delay progression of bone pain.

METHODS

We evaluated the management of BMs and pain in six European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) using the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Programme. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were used to assess the impact of BMs on pain and QoL.

RESULTS

In total, 358 physicians completed Patient Record Forms, of whom 246 were oncologists and 112 were urologists. Data were collected on 3667 patients with prostate cancer, including 1971 with BMs and 551 with metastases at sites other than bone (non-BMs). PROs were assessed in 573 patients with BMs and 220 with non-BMs. Most patients with BMs (74%) received a BTA and 53% received treatment within 3 months of BM diagnosis. Patients treated by oncologists were more likely than those treated by urologists to receive a BTA (78% vs. 60%) and to have treatment initiated within 3 months of BM diagnosis (56% vs. 43%). For patients who did not receive a BTA, the main reasons for not treating were very recent BM diagnosis and a perceived low risk of bone complications. Data collected by physicians showed that most patients with BMs (97%) were taking analgesics, with 30% receiving strong opioids. Despite this, 70% were currently experiencing bone pain and 28% were experiencing moderate to severe pain. PRO pain measures showed that 70% of patients with BMs were experiencing moderate to extreme pain, suggesting a disparity between pain levels reported by physicians and by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients with BMs receive a BTA, there remain a proportion of patients who are not receiving adequate treatment to prevent SREs or manage pain. Oncologists are more likely to adhere to clinical guidelines than urologists for the prescription of BTAs. Bone pain is common and undertreated. Increasing awareness of SRE prevention and bone pain management might improve patient care.

Harnessing the potential of therapeutic agents to safeguard bone health in prostate cancer

Background

Patients with prostate cancer are at risk of impaired bone health. Prostate cancer has a propensity to metastasize to bone, after which patients are at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). These complications are associated with increased mortality, substantial pain, and reduced quality of life. Patients are also at risk of bone loss due to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which can be compounded in elderly patients with reduced bone density. It is essential, therefore, that aspects of bone health and therapies able to prevent the occurrence of SREs are considered throughout the clinical course of prostate cancer.

Methods

We reviewed the literature regarding the molecular mechanisms underpinning bone lesion formation, the modes of action of therapies that prevent SREs, and the efficacy and safety of these therapies in patients with hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Results

Therapies such as denosumab (a RANKL inhibitor) and zoledronic acid (a bisphosphonate) were indicated for prevention of SREs. Radium-223 dichloride also has proven efficacy in delaying symptomatic SREs, as well as in improving overall survival through effects on bone metastases. Before development of bone metastases, low-dose denosumab may also be used for treatment of ADT-associated bone loss. Denosumab may also have the potential to delay bone metastases development in patients with CRPC, although this is not currently an approved indication. The safety profile of therapies to prevent SREs should be considered. This review consolidates the available evidence on use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in prostate cancer, differentiated by hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease.

Conclusions

There is convincing evidence to support the use of denosumab and bisphosphonates to maintain bone health in patients with prostate cancer. Clinicians should be mindful of the adverse event risk profile of these therapies.

Economic Evaluation of Treating Skeletal-Related Events among Prostate Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the economic burden of treating skeletal-related events (SREs) in prostate cancer (PC) patients with bone metastasis from an insurer perspective.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using claims data. PC patients with bone metastasis were identified in the MarketScan Databases between January 1, 2004, and March 1, 2014. The propensity score matching approach was used to match patients with SREs to those without SREs. A pseudo-SRE date was assigned to the control group. We compared 6-month and 12-month total costs of patients between two groups after the SRE or pseudo-SRE date. All costs were adjusted to 2014 US$.

RESULTS

We identified 4083 PC men with bone metastasis, from which 787 patients with SREs were matched (1:1) to those without SREs. On average, the total 6-month cost of treating patients with SREs was $43,746 compared with $25,956 in the matched control cohort (P < 0.05). The largest proportion of differences in costs between the two groups was incurred in the first month after the SRE index date or the pseudo-SRE date ($14,979 vs. $4,849; P < 0.05) and was mostly attributable to outpatient visits (43.4%; P < 0.05) and inpatient hospitalization (33.1%; P < 0.05). The total cost per patient over the 12-month period was $22,171 higher among patients with SREs than among patients without SREs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that SREs impose considerable burden on health resource utilization for payers. Costs attributable to SREs were substantial. Most costs were incurred in the first month after the occurrence of SREs. Although costs decreased thereafter, they remained significantly higher for patients with SREs in subsequent months compared with patients without SREs.

An observational time and motion study of denosumab subcutaneous injection and zoledronic acid intravenous infusion in patients with metastatic bone disease: results from three European countries

Purpose

Denosumab (administered via subcutaneous injection) demonstrated superior efficacy versus the intravenously administered zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in an integrated analysis of three head-to-head phase III trials in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors. To date, no studies have evaluated treatment administration duration endpoints of these two agents.

Methods

A multinational, multi-site, observational time and motion study conducted in 10 day oncology units (DOUs) across Belgium, Germany, and Italy. Observations of process time included task time and active healthcare professional (HCP) time for pre-defined tasks. Patient time measurements included entering/exiting the DOU, treatment room, and treatment chair or examination table.

Results

A total of 189 patients were enrolled (82 received zoledronic acid and 107 received denosumab) and 238 observations were recorded (104 for zoledronic acid and 134 for denosumab). Mean total task time was reduced by 81% when denosumab was used versus zoledronic acid (8.4 versus 44.2 min; p < 0.0001; pooled analysis across all countries). Pooled estimates for active HCP time were 12.2 min for zoledronic acid and 6.9 min for denosumab (44% reduction; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In the countries studied, using denosumab compared with zoledronic acid reduced total task time and active HCP time. Thus, HCPs have more time to dedicate to other patients or care activities. An ability to increase the volume of appointments within DOUs could reduce waiting lists in sites operating at full capacity and increase overall productivity and efficiency in hospital processes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3697-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Skeletal Complications and Mortality in Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Study

CONTEXT

Although bone is a common site for tumor metastases, the burden of bone events [bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs)] in patients with thyroid cancer is not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the prevalence of bone events and their impact on mortality in patients with thyroid cancer.

PATIENTS, DESIGN, AND SETTING

We identified patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer between 1991 and 2011 from the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare dataset. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for bone metastases and SREs. We used Cox proportional hazards regressions to assess the impact of these events on mortality, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 30,063 patients with thyroid cancer, 1173 (3.9%) developed bone metastases and 1661 patients (5.5%) developed an SRE. Compared with papillary thyroid cancer, the likelihood of developing bone metastases or an SRE was higher in follicular thyroid cancer [odds ratio (OR), 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.85 to 2.74 and OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.68, respectively] and medullary thyroid cancer (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.86 and OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.11, respectively). The occurrence of a bone event was associated with greater risk of overall and disease-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 2.14; 95% CI, 1.94 to 2.36 and HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.48 to 1.71, respectively]. Bone events were a poor prognostic indicator even when compared with patients with other distant metastases (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 for overall and disease-specific mortality, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone events in patients with thyroid cancer are a poor prognostic indicator. Patients with follicular and medullary thyroid cancers are at especially high risk for skeletal complications.

Rationale for Modernising Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

To effectively manage patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC), it is essential to have accurate, reproducible, and validated methods for detecting and quantifying the burden of bone and soft tissue metastases and for assessing their response to therapy. Current standard of care imaging with bone and computed tomography (CT) scans have significant limitations for the assessment of bone metastases in particular.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to undertake a critical comparative review of imaging methods used for diagnosis and disease monitoring of metastatic APC from the perspective of their availability and ability to assess disease presence, extent, and response of bone and soft tissue disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An expert panel of radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and medical physicists with the greatest experience of imaging in advanced prostate cancer prepared a review of the practicalities, performance, merits, and limitations of currently available imaging methods.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Meta-analyses showed that positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with different radiotracers and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) are more accurate for bone lesion detection than CT and bone scans (BSs). At a patient level, the pooled sensitivities for bone disease by using choline (CH)-PET/CT, WB-MRI, and BS were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83-96%), 97% (95% CI, 91-99%), and 79% (95% CI, 73-83%), respectively. The pooled specificities for bone metastases detection using CH-PET/CT, WB-MRI, and BS were 99% (95% CI, 93-100%), 95% (95% CI, 90-97%), and 82% (95% CI, 78-85%), respectively. The ability of PET/CT and WB-MRI to assess therapeutic benefits is promising but has not been comprehensively evaluated. There is variability in the cost, availability, and quality of PET/CT and WB-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardisation of acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of WB-MRI and PET/CT scans is required to assess the performance of these techniques in clinical trials of treatment approaches in APC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

PET/CT and whole-body MRI scans have the potential to improve detection and to assess response to treatment of all states of advanced prostate cancer. Consensus recommendations on quality standards, interpretation, and reporting are needed but will require validation in clinical trials of established and new treatment approaches.

Radium-223 Inhibits Osseous Prostate Cancer Growth by Dual Targeting of Cancer Cells and Bone Microenvironment in Mouse Models

Purpose: Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223, Xofigo), a targeted alpha therapy, is currently used for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastases. This study examines the mode-of-action and antitumor efficacy of radium-223 in two prostate cancer xenograft models.Experimental Design: Mice bearing intratibial LNCaP or LuCaP 58 tumors were randomized into groups (n = 12-17) based on lesion grade and/or serum PSA level and administered radium-223 (300 kBq/kg) or vehicle, twice at 4-week intervals. X-rays and serum samples were obtained biweekly. Soft tissue tumors were observed macroscopically at sacrifice. Tibiae were analyzed by gamma counter, micro-CT, autoradiography and histology.Results: Radium-223 inhibited tumor-induced osteoblastic bone growth and protected normal bone architecture, leading to reduced bone volume in LNCaP and abiraterone-resistant LuCaP 58 models. Furthermore, radium-223 resulted in lower PSA values and reduced total tissue and tumor areas, indicating that treatment constrains prostate cancer growth in bone. In addition, radium-223 suppressed abnormal bone metabolic activity as evidenced by decreased number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and reduced level of the bone formation marker PINP. Mode-of-action studies revealed that radium-223 was deposited in the intratumoral bone matrix. DNA double-strand breaks were induced in cancer cells within 24 hours after radium-223 treatment, and PSA levels were significantly lower 72 hours after treatment, providing further evidence of the antitumor effects.Conclusions: Taken together, radium-223 therapy exhibits a dual targeting mode-of-action that induces tumor cell death and suppresses tumor-induced pathologic bone formation in tumor microenvironment of osseous CRPC growth in mice. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4335-46. ©2017 AACR.

Bone-targeted therapy use in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced lung cancer commonly have bone metastases. Compared with other malignancies, the use of bone-targeted agents (e.g. bisphosphonates and denosumab) is less common in lung cancer patients. This may be due to the perception that bone-targeted agents are less effective in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review to evaluate data from randomized trials of bone-targeted agents in lung cancer patients with bone metastases.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials through May 2015 was performed. Randomized trials of bone-targeted therapies in lung cancer patients with bone metastases were sought. Outcomes studied included skeletal related events (SREs), pain, quality of life, progression-free survival and overall survival. Random effects meta-analyses were planned if studies were judged homogeneous.

RESULTS

Of 632 abstracts, 17 publications describing 13 studies were included. Sample sizes ranged between 50 and 1776. Of 3379 patients, 1903 had lung cancer, with subgroup data available for 8 of 13 studies. Patient demographics were comparable, but enrollment criteria and endpoints were heterogeneous across studies, precluding meta-analysis. Study-specific results suggested that bone-modifying agents reduce the incidence of SREs and bone pain in lung cancer patients. Three studies suggested a survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

Data from included trials suggests benefit of bone-targeted agents in lung cancer for the prevention of SREs and bone pain. There is a trend toward improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival, although further research is needed. Impact on quality of life and key subgroups for benefit both require future research.

Opioid Use Among Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients With Skeletal-related Events

PURPOSE

The development of skeletal-related events (SREs) (pathologic fracture, need for surgery and/or radiation to bone, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy) in metastatic prostate cancer (MPC) is associated with worsened pain and compromised quality of life. Opioids are frequently used throughout the course of SRE treatment. This study describes the treatment patterns and incremental use of opioids in MPC patients diagnosed with SREs.

METHODS

PC patients with bone metastases newly diagnosed with an SRE between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2014, were identified using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. Included patients were aged ≥40 years, had medical/pharmacy benefits for ≥12 months before (preindex) and ≥6 months after (postindex) diagnosis, and were without evidence of other primary cancers. Patients were categorized as nonusers of opioids (<10 days), short-term users (≥10 and <60 days), or long-term users (≥60 days) and further by SRE type. Opioid type, proportion of time on opioids, morphine-equivalent dose, adjuvant medications, and radiation use before and after SRE diagnosis were evaluated.

FINDINGS

A total of 1071 eligible patients were identified (mean age, 71 years; 10.8% had chronic pain at baseline). The most common SRE types present were radiation (60.2%), radiation and bone surgery (15.0%), pathologic fracture (7.2%), and bone surgery (6.5%). Opioid use increased from 49.9% preindex to 53.3% postindex (P < 0.0001). The proportion of time on opioids doubled after SRE (pre, 0.3 vs post, 0.6; P < 0.0001). A greater percentage of patients used only opioids after an SRE (pre, 11.0%; post, 46.1% [P < 0.0001]), while a lesser percentage of patients used only radiation after an SRE (pre, 36.0%; post, 4.7% [P < 0.0001]). An increase was observed in patients using neither radiation nor opioids (pre, 14.5%; post, 42.0% [P < 0.0001]). An increase of ~50% was noted in long-term opioid users (from 22.1% to 32.1%). The use of monotherapy with a short-acting opioid decreased (pre, 35.1%; post, 32.5% [P < 0.0001]), while use of mixed opioids increased (pre, 13.7%; post, 19.1% [P < 0.0001]). Mean morphine-equivalent dose increased from pre- to post-SRE (9.1 vs 13.1 mg). Bisphosphonate and NSAID users decreased from before to after an SRE diagnosis (bisphosphonates, 40.2% vs 8.6%; NSAIDs, 26.7% vs 17.5% [both, P < 0.0001]).

IMPLICATIONS

Long-term opioid use and dose were significantly increased after SRE development in MPC. The high percentage of patients not treated with an opioid or radiation potentially supports the need for additional treatment options for controlling pain if medically necessary and/or to prevent SREs.

Skeletal metastases and impact of anticancer and bone-targeted agents in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

Incidence of bone metastases is very high in advanced prostate cancer patients. Bone metastases likely have a significant impact on functional status and quality of life, not only related to pain, but also to the relevant risk of skeletal-related events. A better understanding of mechanisms associated with bone metastatic disease secondary to prostate cancer and more specifically to the cross-talk between tumor cells and bone microenvironment in metastatic progression represented the background for the development of new effective bone-targeted therapies. Furthermore, a better knowledge of biological mechanisms driving disease progression led to significant advances in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, with the development and approval of new effective drugs. Aim of this review is to outline the physiopathology of bone metastases in prostate cancer and summarize the main results of clinical trials conducted with different drugs to control morbidity induced by skeletal metastases and bone disease progression. For each agent, therapeutic effect on bone metastases has been measured in terms of pain control and/or incidence of skeletal-related events, usually defined as a composite endpoint, including the need for local treatment (radiation therapy or surgery), spinal cord compression, pathological bone fractures. In details, data obtained with chemotherapy (mitoxantrone, docetaxel, cabazitaxel), new generation hormonal agents (abiraterone, enzalutamide), radium-223, bone-targeted agents (zoledronic acid, denosumab) and with several experimental agents (cabozantinib, dasatinib, anti-endothelin and other agents) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer are reviewed.

Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of radium-223 in prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer metastatic to bone is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Bone pain and other skeletal events negatively impact the quality of life in patients who might otherwise be functioning well. As such, there has been intense interest in the development of strategies and pharmaceuticals to address this problem.

AREAS COVERED

The authors reviewed the current literature for articles relevant to metastatic prostate cancer, clinical radiopharmaceuticals, castrate-resistant prostate cancer and development of Radium-223 . The authors have referenced primary literature, clinical trials and relevant review articles that summarize the history, development and current utilization of radiopharmaceuticals for management of bone metastases from prostate cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Radium-223 is the first radiopharmaceutical with an overall survival benefit approved for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, symptomatic bone metastasis and no known visceral metastatic disease. The additional benefit of clinically significant improved overall survival should lead to exploration of whether this agent can be used earlier in the treatment algorithm or combined with chemotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. An individualized approach needs to be tailored to each patient based on their overall symptoms, disease burden, hematologic profile and goals of care.