1
|
Lam CS, Lee CP, Chan JWY, Cheung YT. Patterns and factors associated with the prescription of psychotropic medications after diagnosis of cancer in Chinese patients: A population-based cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2024; 33:e5754. [PMID: 38362653 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer may be prescribed psychotropic medications to address their psychiatric symptoms and disorders. This study examined the patterns and factors associated with the prescription of psychotropics after cancer diagnosis using a population-based database in Hong Kong. METHODS Patients who were diagnosed with malignant cancer and had no documented psychiatric diagnosis or psychotropic medications prior to cancer diagnosis, were included. Multivariable log-binomial models were used to explore the associations between predictive factors and psychotropic medications use. RESULTS Among 9337 patients, 1868 patients (20.0%) were newly prescribed with psychotropic medications after cancer diagnoses, most commonly hypnotics (50.3%) and antidepressants (32.8%). About one-third (31.4%) were prescribed chronic psychotropics (≥90 days). Approximately 48.3% of patients who were prescribed psychotropic medications received their prescriptions within 1 year after diagnosed with cancer. Only 18.6% of those prescribed psychotropic medications had a registered psychiatric diagnosis. Patients with multiple comorbidities (adjusted risk ratio[aRR] = 2.74; CI = 2.46-3.05) and diagnosed with oral (aRR = 1.89; CI = 1.52-2.35) or respiratory cancers (aRR = 1.62; CI = 1.36-1.93) were more likely to be prescribed psychotropics. CONCLUSIONS The use of psychotropic medication is common (20%) among patients with cancer. Our findings highlight the importance of identification and documentation of psychiatric needs among patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Sing Lam
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chui Ping Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joey Wing Yan Chan
- Li Chiu Kong Family Sleep Assessment Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Solsky I, Patel A, Valenzuela CD, Russell G, Perry K, Duckworth K, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients Taking Opioids and Psychotropic Medications Before Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:577-593. [PMID: 37891454 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14215-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) on quality of life (QoL) for patients taking opioids and psychotropic medications preoperatively is unclear. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed a CRS-HIPEC single-center prospectively maintained database for 2012-2016. Demographics and clinical data on opioids/psychotropic medication use were collected via chart review. The study collected QoL outcomes at baseline, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Brief Pain Inventory, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Differences in QoL between the groups were calculated using repeated measures analysis of variance regression. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 388 patients, 44.8% were taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively. At baseline, those taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively versus those not taking these medications had significantly worse QoL. By 1 year postoperatively, the QoL measures did not differ significantly except for emotional functioning (e.g., no medications vs. opioids/psychotropic medications: CES-D, 5.6 vs. 10.1). Median survival did not differ significantly (opioids/psychotropic medications vs. no medications: 52.3 vs. 60.6 months; p = 0.66). At 1 year after surgery, a greater percentage of patients were taking opioids, psychotropic medications, or both than at baseline (63.2% vs. 44.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite worse baseline QoL, patients who took opioids/psychotropic medications had QoL scores 1 year postoperatively similar to the scores of those who did not except in the emotional domains. These data point to the potential utility of a timed psychosocial intervention to enhance emotional adaptation and further support the role of CRS-HIPEC in improving QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Solsky
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ana Patel
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Gregory Russell
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathleen Perry
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Katie Duckworth
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Horsbøl TA, Kjaer SK, Andersen EW, Ammitzbøll G, Thygesen LC, Johansen C, Jensen PT, Frøding LP, Lajer H, Dalton SO. Use of hypnotics among women diagnosed with cervical cancer – A population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:300-307. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
4
|
Jazzar U, Bergerot CD, Shan Y, Wallis CJD, Freedland SJ, Kamat AM, Tyler DS, Baillargeon J, Kuo YF, Klaassen Z, Williams SB. Use of psychotropic drugs among older patients with bladder cancer in the United States. Psychooncology 2021; 30:832-843. [PMID: 33507622 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Older patients diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk of physical and emotional distress; however, prescription utilization patterns largely remain to be elucidated. Our objective was to comprehensively assess prescription patterns and predictors in older patients with bladder cancer. METHODS A total of 10,516 older patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1-T4a, N0, M0 bladder urothelial carcinoma from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare were analyzed. We used multivariable analysis to determine predictors associated with psychotropic prescription rates (one or more). Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used as an index to measure adherence in intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Evaluation of psychotropic prescribing patterns and adherence across different drugs and demographic factors was done. RESULTS Of the 10,516 older patients, 5621 (53%) were prescribed psychotropic drugs following cancer diagnosis. Overall, 3972 (38%) patients had previous psychotropic prescriptions prior to cancer diagnosis, and these patients were much more likely to receive a post-cancer diagnosis prescription. Prescription rates for psychotropic medications were higher among patients with higher stage BC (p < 0.001). Gamma aminobutyric acid modulators/stimulators and serotonin reuptake inhibitors/stimulators were the highest prescribed psychotropic drugs in 21% of all patients. Adherence for all drugs was 32% at 3 months and continued to decrease over time. CONCLUSION Over half of the patients received psychotropic prescriptions within 2 years of their cancer diagnosis. Given the chronicity of psychiatric disorders with observed significantly low adherence to medications that warrants an emphasis on prolonged patient monitoring and further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usama Jazzar
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Cristiane D Bergerot
- Centro de Câncer de Brasília, Instituto Unity de Ensino e Pesquisa, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | - Yong Shan
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Urology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Jacques Baillargeon
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Sealy Center of Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Sealy Center of Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Biringen EK, Cox-Martin E, Niemiec S, Wood C, Purcell WT, Kolva E. Psychotropic medications in oncology. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:6801-6806. [PMID: 33993408 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06283-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer, and oncology providers are often tasked with utilizing psychotropic medications to treat such symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study aims to characterize how oncology providers prescribe psychotropic medications and to assess their comfort level with prescribing these medications. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was sent to oncology medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who prescribe psychotropic medications to patients with cancer at a large academic medical center in the Mountain West. The survey included questions regarding provider subspecialty, degree, comfort with prescribing psychotropic medications, and factors that informed their prescribing. RESULTS Oncology providers (n = 65) reported equal proportions of comfort and discomfort with prescribing psychotropic medications. The medication class with the most prescribers was benzodiazepines, with 89.2% (n = 58) of the respondents prescribing those medications. The least prescribed category was mood stabilizers, with 4.6% (n = 3) prescribing this category. Prescribers identified that barriers to their comfort included difficulty connecting patients to follow-up care with mental health professionals and inadequate mental health education for providers. Providers responded that continuing mental health education and increasing patient access to mental health resources would increase their prescribing comfort. CONCLUSION Providers reported equal parts comfort and discomfort with prescribing psychotropic medications; avenues to increase comfort should involve focused mental health education during formal training and continued education throughout their oncology careers. A clinical pathway for prescribing psychotropic medications with resources to connect patients to long-term mental health care may also increase prescribing comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Biringen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | | | - Sierra Niemiec
- Center for Innovative Design and Analysis, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cheyret Wood
- Center for Innovative Design and Analysis, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - W Thomas Purcell
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elissa Kolva
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiao D, Guizard AV, Daubisse-Marliac L, Woronoff AS, Trétarre B, Delafosse P, Molinié F, Cowppli-Bony A, Lapôtre-Ledoux B, Bara S, Marrer E, Velten M, Laroche L, Heutte N, Grosclaude P, Joly F. Evaluation of long-term living conditions in patients treated for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 30:e13333. [PMID: 32969128 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the evolution of living conditions (LC) in long-term survivors of localised prostate cancer 10 years after treatment compared with those of a same-age control group from the general population. METHODS Two hundred and eighty-seven patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2001 were selected in 11 French cancer registries. They were matched with controls randomly selected for age and residency. Both patients and controls completed a self-administered LC questionnaire concerning their familial, social and professional life, and general and specific quality of life (QoL) and anxiety and depression questionnaires. RESULTS Compared with controls, patients reported more sexual modifications (p < .0001), but without any difference in marital status. Patients' circle of friends was more stable than that of the controls (91% vs. 63%; p < .0001) and patients reported fewer friendship modifications than controls (p < .0006). Their professional and physical activities were also preserved. They reported more anxiolytic intake (p = .002) but did not consult their general practitioner more often. Type of specialist consulted differed in the two groups. CONCLUSION Patients treated for localised prostate cancer had the same living conditions as men of the same age. Their social life was satisfying on the whole, albeit they reported more sexual difficulties than their counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingyu Xiao
- General Cancer Registry of Calvados, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Anne-Valérie Guizard
- General Cancer Registry of Calvados, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France.,UMR 1086 « Cancers et Préventions », Inserm - University of Basse-Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac
- Claudius Regaud Institute, IUCT-O, Tarn Cancer Registry, Toulouse, France.,UMR1027, University of Toulouse, UPS, Inserm, Toulouse, France.,FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Woronoff
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Doubs, Besançon, France
| | - Brigitte Trétarre
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Hérault, Montpellier, France
| | - Patricia Delafosse
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Isère, Grenoble, France
| | - Florence Molinié
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Loire-Atlantique-Vendée, Nantes, France
| | - Anne Cowppli-Bony
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Vendée, Nantes, France
| | - Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Somme, Amiens, France
| | - Simona Bara
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Manche, Cherbourg, France
| | - Emilie Marrer
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Haut-Rhin, Mulhouse, France
| | - Michel Velten
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France.,General Cancer Registry of Bas-Rhin, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lucie Laroche
- General Cancer Registry of Calvados, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Natacha Heutte
- CETAPS EA 3832, Normandie University, UNIROUEN, Mont Saint Aignan, France.,Quality of Life in Oncology National Platform, France
| | - Pascale Grosclaude
- Claudius Regaud Institute, IUCT-O, Tarn Cancer Registry, Toulouse, France.,UMR1027, University of Toulouse, UPS, Inserm, Toulouse, France.,FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Joly
- UMR 1086 « Cancers et Préventions », Inserm - University of Basse-Normandie, Caen, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France.,CHU Côte de Nacre, University of Basse-Normandie, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alhazami M, Pontinha VM, Patterson JA, Holdford DA. Medication Adherence Trajectories: A Systematic Literature Review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26:1138-1152. [PMID: 32857646 PMCID: PMC10391275 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional adherence measures such as proportion of days covered (PDC) and medication possession ratio (MPR) are limited in their ability to explain patient medication adherence over time. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) is a new methodological approach that visually describes the dynamics of long-term medication adherence and classifies adherence behavior into groups. OBJECTIVES To describe and compare trajectories of medication nonadherence reported in the medical literature, including identifying consistent trends in adherence trajectories and disease and patient characteristics that predict trajectory group membership. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in April 2020 in PubMed and CINAHL using MeSH terms and key words in appropriate combinations. Citations were screened for relevance using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated according to variables associated with group-based trajectory models. RESULTS 21 articles met the study criteria and were reviewed. Generally, studies identified 4 to 6 trajectory groups that described longitudinal medication adherence behavior. Most commonly identified trajectories were labeled as (a) consistent, high adherence, (b) declining adherence, (c) early and consistent nonadherence, and (d) initial nonadherence followed by an increase. Several predictors, including socioeconomic status, disease characteristics, and therapy initiation were routinely associated with group membership. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that adherence trajectories and predictors of specific group membership may be similar across diverse disease states. GBTM describes longitudinal, dynamic patterns of medication adherence that may facilitate the development of targeted interventions to promote adherence. Implications for value-based payment systems are discussed in this review. DISCLOSURES No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
|
8
|
Reich M, Bondenet X. Place des psychotropes en oncologie. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE 2018. [DOI: 10.3166/pson-2018-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Wong RL, El-Jawahri A, D'Arpino SM, Fuh CX, Johnson PC, Lage DE, Irwin KE, Pirl WF, Traeger L, Cashavelly BJ, Jackson VA, Greer JA, Ryan DP, Hochberg EP, Temel JS, Nipp RD. Use of Antidepressant Medications Moderates the Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Oncologist 2018; 24:117-124. [PMID: 30082486 PMCID: PMC6324633 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with cancer, depressive symptoms are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including greater health care utilization. As use of antidepressant medications can improve depressive symptoms, we sought to examine relationships among depressive symptoms, antidepressant medications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2014 to May 2016, we prospectively enrolled patients with advanced cancer who had an unplanned hospitalization. We performed chart review to obtain information regarding documented depressive symptoms in the 3 months prior to admission and use of antidepressant medications at the time of admission. We compared differences in hospital LOS by presence or absence of depressive symptoms and used adjusted linear regression to examine if antidepressant medications moderated these outcomes. RESULTS Of 1,036 patients, 126 (12.2%) had depressive symptoms documented prior to admission, and 288 (27.8%) were taking antidepressant medications at the time of admission. Patients with depressive symptoms experienced longer hospital LOS (7.25 vs. 6.13 days; p = .036). Use of antidepressant medications moderated this relationship; among patients not on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were associated with longer hospital LOS (7.88 vs. 6.11 days; p = .025), but among those on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were not associated with hospital LOS (6.57 vs. 6.17 days; p = .578). CONCLUSION Documented depressive symptoms prior to hospital admission were associated with longer hospital LOS. This effect was restricted to patients not on antidepressant medications. Future studies are needed to investigate if use of antidepressant medications decreases LOS for patients hospitalized with advanced cancer and the mechanisms by which this may occur. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study investigated the prevalence of documented depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer in the 3 months prior to an unplanned hospitalization and the prevalence of use of antidepressant medications at time of hospital admission. The relationship of these variables with hospital length of stay was also examined, and it was found that documented depressive symptoms were associated with prolonged hospital length of stay. Interestingly, antidepressant medications moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and hospital length of stay. These findings support the need to recognize and address depressive symptoms among patients with advanced cancer, with potential implications for optimizing health care utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa L Wong
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara M D'Arpino
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charn-Xin Fuh
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - P Connor Johnson
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel E Lage
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kelly E Irwin
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William F Pirl
- Department of Psychiatry, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lara Traeger
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara J Cashavelly
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vicki A Jackson
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ephraim P Hochberg
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryan D Nipp
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|