Characteristics associated with inter-individual differences in the trajectories of self-reported attentional function in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

Cognitive effects of chemotherapy: An integrative review

PURPOSE

An estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) were diagnosed worldwide in 2020. Despite a rising incidence of cancers worldwide, in developed countries with strong healthcare systems, survival rates are improving as a result of early detection, improved treatments and survivorship care (World Health Organisation (WHO), 2021). Whilst living longer, cancer survivors are often living with side effects of treatment, including chemotherapy related cognitive impairment, often termed "chemobrain".

METHOD

An integrative review of contemporary literature answering the research question how does chemotherapy affect cognitive function? was undertaken utilising three computerised databases CINAHL, Medline and PUBMED, between 2015 and 2021. Data was thematically analysed to identify themes within published literature.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis identified four broad themes within the literature regarding chemotherapy induced cognitive impairment. Identified themes included; cognition as part of a complex scenario, proof of existence and searching for the cause, learning to play the game and timing of cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive treatment with chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting has drastically improved the survival of cancer patients. Subsequent to aggressive treatments, side effects such as cognitive impairment have presented, which may persist in the long term. Despite the exact aetiology of chemotherapy induced cognitive impairment being largely unknown, the consequences of the condition are impacting cancer survivors and their quality of life.

Psychological Symptoms and Stress Are Associated With Decrements in Attentional Function in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Decrements in attentional function-perceived effectiveness in everyday functioning related to cognitive dysfunction-are frequently reported by cancer patients during treatment. However, patients vary widely in their experiences of changes in attentional function.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to understand differences in attentional function among cancer patients during chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1329) undergoing chemotherapy were assessed at 6 time points during 2 rounds of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients based on patterns in changes on the Attentional Function Index. Differences among the subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics, psychological symptoms, and stress were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three latent classes (ie, high, moderate, and low attentional function) were identified. Patients in the low and moderate classes were younger, more likely to be female, and less likely to be employed compared with those in the high class. Patients in the low class had higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms, cancer-related distress, and perceived stress compared with those in the moderate class, who, in turn, reported higher levels of these symptoms compared with those in the high class.

CONCLUSIONS

Different experiences of changes in self-perceived attentional function are associated with psychological symptoms in cancer patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Relationships between changes in attentional function and psychological symptoms and stress suggest that clinicians should attend to the potential that patients' cognitive and psychological experiences may be closely linked and may need to be addressed as related phenomena. Clinical trials are needed that evaluate treatments for both attentional and psychological symptoms.

The impact of chemotherapy on cognitive function: a multicentre prospective cohort study in testicular cancer

PURPOSE

The causal link between chemotherapy and cognitive impairment is unclear. We studied testicular cancer patients' objective and subjective cognitive function longitudinally, comparing a surgery group with a surgery + chemotherapy group, addressing prior methodological issues using a computerized test to limit assessment issues, and controlling for confounding variables.

METHODS

Prospectively, of 145 patients from 16 centres with sufficient data, n = 61 receiving surgery + chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin ± bleomycin, BEP/EP; or single agent carboplatin) were compared to n = 41 receiving surgery alone. CogHealth assessed six objective cognitive tasks. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire assessed self-perceived cognitive dysfunction. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale assessed psychological influences. Linear mixed models compared changes from baseline (< 6 months post-surgery/pre-chemotherapy) to follow-up (12-18 months post-baseline), controlling covariates.

RESULTS

There were no significant interaction effects for five objective cognitive function tasks suggesting that changes over time were not due to group membership. However, psychomotor function (controlling for age) and physical well-being were significantly worse for the chemotherapy versus the surgery group at baseline, with groups converging by follow-up. Groups showed no differences in subjective cognitive dysfunction. The chemotherapy group showed higher anxiety, poorer functional well-being and worse fatigue compared to the surgery-only group at baseline, but not by follow-up. For both groups, emotional well-being, functional well-being and anxiety significantly improved over time.

CONCLUSION

No substantive differences in objective or subjective cognitive dysfunction in either group persisted 12-18 months post-baseline. Patients undergoing chemotherapy for testicular cancer differ from findings in breast cancer populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ACTRN12609000545268.