A cohort study on protocol-based nurse-led out-patient management of post-chemotherapy low-risk febrile neutropenia

Can Risk Stratification Tools Be Utilized to Safely Discharge Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenic Patients from the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the more common oncological emergencies. Despite evidence in the oncology literature suggesting that low-risk cases of FN can be managed safely at home, most patients with FN who present to the emergency department (ED) are admitted. FN risk stratification methods, such as Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores, may be useful when considering patient disposition. We sought to address whether the existing body of literature is adequate to support the use of these methods when treating patients with FN in the ED.

METHODS

A PubMed search from January 1, 2016 to March 19, 2021 was performed using the following search strategy: "febrile neutropenia" OR (fever AND neutropenia)) AND (emerg* OR outpatient) AND (admit OR admission OR hospitalization). General review articles and case reports were omitted. Each of the articles selected underwent a structured review.

RESULTS

The search yielded 371 articles, which were independently screened for relevance by two authors, and 23 articles were selected for inclusion. MASCC score was used in 10 of the identified studies and each of these studies concluded that the score was useful in the ED. Most of the identified studies found that CISNE score had a higher sensitivity than MASCC score (96.7% vs. 32.9%, respectively), but a lower specificity (22.2% vs. 89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

FN risk stratifications tools, such as MASCC and CISNE scores, are supported by the existing literature and may be included as part of the decision-making process when considering patient disposition.

Cuidados de enfermería para reducir infecciones por microorganismos oportunistas en pacientes oncológicos

Introducción: las infecciones generadas por microorganismos oportunistas (MO) o infecciones oportunistas (IO) son causa importante de morbimortalidad en pacientes oncológicos y se les atribuyen factores relacionados con los cuidados específicos de la atención en salud. Las alteraciones en el sistema inmunológico, la multirresistencia antimicrobiana, la neutropenia febril y la interrupción de la integridad cutánea son los factores más influyentes. Objetivo: describir las principales intervenciones y estrategias para reducir IO en pacientes oncológicos. Metodología: revisión integrativa de la literatura. Se incluyeron artículos en español, inglés y portugués indexados a los tesauros MeSH Y DeCS, en las bases de datos CINAHL, Nursing Ovid, Clinicalkey; el metabuscador de Google académico y la interfaz Pubmed. Resultados: se revisaron 56 estudios, fueron organizados en tres temáticas: factores de riesgo que influyen para adquirir una IO en pacientes oncológicos, infecciones por MO y cuidados de enfermería, los cuales se agruparon en subtemas como: educación, medidas estándar, de barrera, farmacológicas, nutrición, manejo de catéteres, cavidad bucal, piel y aspectos emocionales. Discusión: se evidencian factores que influyen en la no adherencia por parte de los profesionales que están relacionados con sus posturas, el contexto social, el sistema sanitario y características de las GPC. Conclusión: fue posible describir las intervenciones y estrategias de prevención que permiten reducir de manera importante la morbimortalidad en pacientes oncológicos.

Incidence and predictive risk factors of neutropenic sepsis in post-chemotherapy febrile patients in emergency department: A single-center retrospective longitudinal study

Introduction:

Neutropenic sepsis is an emergency sequela in post-chemotherapy fever. Its definition comprises of spectrums of diseases with variable quoted mortality. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of “modified” neutropenic sepsis, with a more stringent definition employed. Predictive risk factors toward occurrence of “modified” neutropenic sepsis among Chinese patients would also be explored.

Methods:

A single-center retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in a medium-sized regional hospital in Hong Kong. All patients with diagnoses of post-chemotherapy fever fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Baseline characteristics and outcome variables of each case subject were collected. Six potential predictive risk factors were chosen for further analysis. Case subjects were followed up for the inpatient progress and outcomes. Relative risks of each risk factor to “modified” neutropenic sepsis were calculated.

Results:

A total of 135 case subjects were recruited. Five developed “modified” neutropenic sepsis, that is, incidence 3.70% (95% confidence interval = 1.59%–8.38%). Only background hematological malignancy was found to be significantly associated with the outcome of “modified” neutropenic sepsis (Relative Risk [RR] 13.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.56–115.70, p = 0.010), with an incidence of 12.9% (95% confidence interval = 5.14%–28.85%). Hematological malignancy was also found to be significantly associated with lower median absolute neutrophil counts (0.95 × 109/L vs 2.3 × 109/L, p = 0.005) and longer median hospital stay (8 days vs 6 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Incidence of “modified” neutropenic sepsis is low. Hematological malignancy is associated with significantly higher rate of “modified” neutropenic sepsis.

Bundle for the prevention and management of complications of neutropenia in cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

to construct and assess bundle content for the prevention and management of complications in neutropenia in cancer patients.

METHODS

a methodological study developed in four stages: scoping review; bundle construction; material assessment by experts (developed according to Pasquali's psychometry); pilot test in a High Complexity Assistance Unit in Oncology. For content assessment, the Delphi technique was applied in two rounds and those items with Content Validation Coefficient (CVC)> 0.78 and agreement> 80.0% were considered valid. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

all bundle requirements reached agreement between judges above 80.0%, in addition to statistically significant levels of assessment. At the end of the Delphi technique, bundle was significantly valid with CVC = 0.92 and CVC = 0.93, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

bundle content proved to be valid and highly credible.

National cost savings from an ambulatory program for low-risk febrile neutropenia patients in Australia

Objective The management of low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) patients through ambulatory programs has demonstrated comparative safety and effectiveness to in-patient strategies. However, there is limited evidence of benefits of changing practice, particularly on a national scale. The aim of this study was to estimate costs and benefits of the program over a 10-year time horizon. Methods A comparative cost analysis from a health system perspective was performed, comparing costs and length of stay (LOS) of patients enrolled in an ambulatory program to a historical cohort who did not receive the program. Generalised linear models were used for analysis and bootstrapped to account for uncertainty. National data of identified FN admissions were used to inform future projections, with varying proportions of low-risk patients and eligibility for the ambulatory program. Results The overall LOS for patients in ambulatory cohort was 1.9 days shorter (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.8 days), a 50% reduction in in-patient bed-days. Although patients in the ambulatory cohort incurred additional costs due to care received outside hospital (mean (± s.d.) A$828.03 ± 124.30), the mean total cost incurred remained substantially lower than that of the historical cohort (A$2979 lower; 95% CI A$772-5391). On a national scale, this could translate into A$62.7 million in costs averted and 41347 bed-days saved over 10 years if the low-risk prediction rate and eligibility for ambulatory programs remained at currently observed rates. Conclusions The wider implementation of a safe and effective ambulatory program to manage low-risk FN patients can result in significant return-on-investment for the healthcare system by eliminating avoidable costs due to unnecessary lengthy hospital admissions. What is known about the topic? There is strong evidence demonstrating out-patient treatment of low-risk FN patients to be an effective and cost-effective strategy compared with continued in-patient hospitalisation. What does this paper add? This study demonstrates the sustainability of the ambulatory program in ensuring cost benefits and in-patient beds through real-life implementation data. It also provides evidence of the substantial cost and bed-days potentially averted when the cost savings and difference in LOS are estimated on a national scale over a 10-year time horizon. What are the implications for practitioners? The management of low-risk FN patients through ambulatory or out-patient programs is a safe and effective approach. There is strong evidence demonstrating the likely cost savings and considerable bed-days saved, which can be reallocated to meet other medical demands.

A nurse-led paediatric oncology fast-track clinic proves a successful ambulatory intervention for patients

AIM

To assess the impact of a pilot nurse-led paediatric oncology fast-track clinic (OFTC) for complications and side effects following chemotherapy within a paediatric tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Prospective clinical data from the first 100 patients seen in the OFTC were compared with retrospective data of oncology patient presentations to the emergency department (ED) (over a 1-year period, n = 196) who would have been eligible for review in the OFTC. Parent and patient satisfaction of clinical care were also assessed via surveys pre- and post-OFTC implementation.

RESULTS

Analysis which achieved statistical difference was a reduction in the number of blood tubes taken in OFTC (average 1.9 for those discharged from clinic, 2.9 for those admitted from clinic) in comparison to those seen in the ED (average 3.2) (p = 0.0027). The average number of interventions per patient seen in the ED were 2.1 (standard deviation 1.64) compared with 1.7 (standard deviation 1.55) interventions per patient seen in the OFTC, and who were not admitted following review. This result approached statistical significance with p = 0.0963. Other results which did not meet statistical significance included a reduction in treatment times, hospital admissions and medical oncology reviews.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study implementing an OFTC for the triage and assessment of chemotherapy-related complications has proven successful from an operational and consumer perspective. The clinic improved care by ensuring expedited review, more streamlined interventions, and less overall hospital admissions. The improvements in efficiency were also mirrored by increased parent and patient satisfaction.