Physical function and health-related quality of life in the convalescent phase in surgically treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Feasibility Pilot Study

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a significant health burden, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Despite advances in pharmacological and surgical interventions, the role of rehabilitation in MPM management remains underexplored. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a tailored pulmonary rehabilitation intervention addressing physical and respiratory function in MPM patients. A prospective pilot study was conducted on surgically treated MPM patients referred to a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation service. The intervention comprised multidisciplinary educational sessions, physical rehabilitation, and respiratory physiotherapy. Feasibility was evaluated based on dropout rates, adherence to the rehabilitation program, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Twelve patients were initially enrolled, with seven completing the study. High adherence to physical (T1: 93.43%, T2: 82.56%) and respiratory (T1: 96.2%, T2: 92.5%) rehabilitation was observed, with minimal adverse events reported. Patient satisfaction remained high throughout the study (GPE scores at T1: 1.83 ± 1.17; T2: 2.0 ± 1.15), with improvements noted in physical function, pain management, and health-related quality of life. However, some issues, such as time constraints and lack of continuous supervision, were reported by participants. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefits of a tailored pulmonary rehabilitation intervention in MPM patients. Despite its promising outcomes, further research with larger samples is warranted to validate its efficacy and integrate rehabilitation as a component into the multidisciplinary management of MPM.

Association between functional aspects and health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: can handgrip strength be the measure of choice in clinical practice?

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). A cross-sectional study was conducted including CRC patients.

METHODS

We performed an assessment of aspects of functional health using the criteria of frailty phenotype (defined by Fried et al., 2001), sarcopenia (defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2, 2018) and by HGS, which measures muscle strength using a manual dynamometer. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC questionnaire QLQ-C30. Analyses of variance and multivariate linear regression were used to compare frailty, sarcopenia, and HGS with HRQoL.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included (age 62.7 ± 11.4 years; 56.3% women; 18.3% of patients with frailty; 9.9% with sarcopenia, and 15.5% had low HGS). After adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and nutritional variables, the regression analysis showed that frailty and sarcopenia were associated with worse HRQoL. Low HGS was associated with worse HRQoL in patients with CRC regardless of both frailty components (global health status: B =  - 13.4, p = 0.004; physical function: B =  - 10.4, p = 0.006; emotional function: B =  - 18.1, p = 0.041; fatigue: B = 9.1, p = 0.027; dyspnea: B = 10.7, p = p = 0.024; appetite loss: B = 12.4, p = 0.041) and sarcopenia components (global health status: B =  - 13.2, p = 0.004; physical function: B =  - 15.0, p = 0.001; emotional function: B =  - 25.1, p = 0.006; fatigue: B = 15.2, p = 0.007; pain: B = 18.7, p = 0.024, dyspnea: B = 11.4, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that HGS was positively associated with HRQoL in patients with CRC and may initially be the variable of choice in clinical practice, which is associated with HRQoL.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors of residual thoracic spaces after pleurectomy/decortication for mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES

The residual thoracic spaces (RTS) after pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) remain unexplored to date. Hence, this study aims to examine the details and risk factors of RTS during the 3 post-P/D months.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by P/D for malignant pleural mesothelioma from September 2012 to December 2020. The RTS group included cases of residual thoracic cavity unaccompanied by pleural effusion on 3 postoperative months computed tomography. We determined risk factors for RTS using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Of 170 patients examined, 58 (34.1%) were in the RTS group and 112 (65.9%) in the non-RTS group. In the RTS group, 43 patients recovered from RTS during the follow-up period; 4 patients developed chronic fistular empyema, while 2 required fenestration and 2 were thoracoscopic debridement. Besides, 11 patients exhibited RTS continuously. The univariable analysis revealed that compared with the non-RTS group, the RTS group reported a significantly longer postoperative air leak (>7 days; P < 0.01) and right P/D (P = 0.04). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that longer postoperative air leak (>7 days) remained a risk factor for RTS (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-4.9, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RTS was a postoperative event that frequently observed in patients undergoing P/D. Overall, the current study findings suggest longer postoperative air leak (>7 days) as a significant risk factor for RTS.

Examining the impact of physical function performance in predicting patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of physical function performance and pulmonary function on patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 54 patients with MPM from 2015 to 2020 was performed. The primary objective was to assess whether physical function, as measured by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and pulmonary function tests were predictive of postoperative patient outcomes (ventilator days, chest tube days, hospital length of stay). A secondary objective was to explore demographic and preoperative variables that best predict postoperative physical function and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Data include 54 patients who underwent extended pleurectomy-decortication. Preoperative ECOG was a significant predictor of postoperative patient outcomes while preoperative lung function lacked predictive ability. Preoperative ECOG was also predictive of preoperative lung function. Age on the day of surgery was the best predictor of postoperative physical function, which was significantly reduced postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative physical function performance was a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. The results of our study highlight the importance of physical function in patients with MPM and support the need for early rehabilitation and further research to determine optimal rehabilitation interventions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPreoperative physical function can predict outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).Physical function in patients with MPM should be carefully examined.To accurately reflect patients' abilities, patient assessment should include both patient-reported outcomes and performance-based measures.Patients with MPM should receive rehabilitation early after diagnosis and throughout the continuum of care.

Relationship Between Physical Function and Health Utility in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSE

Health utility, which is a measure of patient-reported outcome (PRO), has recently been used in health-related quality of life for patients with various cancers. However, the relationship between health utility and the physical function and of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has not been reported in the perioperative and convalescent phases. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative health utility of patients undergoing P/D for MPM at one year postoperatively and to examine the relationship with physical function.

METHODS

We included patients underwent P/D. Grip strength, knee extension strength, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured to assess physical function, and the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) was completed to assess health utility. These assessments were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and one year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for comparison of pre and postoperative and one year mean values.

RESULTS

There were 24 subjects (23 males, 65.5±8.3 year). SF-6D, 6MWD, FVC, and FEV1 values one year operatively improved significantly compared with postoperative. Additionally, SF-6D was correlated with 6MWD.

CONCLUSION

Health utility were also correlated with exercise capacity.

Utilization of Isometric Strength Training and Interval Training With a Patient With Cancer in the Acute Care Setting

The onset of cancer and subsequent treatments often result in deficits in physical function and quality of life (QoL). Available research has demonstrated that an individualized exercise program has the ability to reduce fatigue, optimize physical function, and improve QoL. However, the exercise program is often lacking appropriate intensity and volume resulting in negligent improvement or even further reduction in function. Thus, the purpose of this case report is to demonstrate the application of isometric strength training (IST) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the acute care setting with an individual with a history of malignant mesothelioma. The patient demonstrated improvement in functional mobility evidenced by improvement in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) score through the hospitalization along with increased ambulation distance. No adverse events occurred during any physical therapy (PT) visits while utilizing HIIT or IST.

Should Lung-Sparing Surgery Be the Standard Procedure for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma?

BACKGROUND

Surgical procedures for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) include extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), extended pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and P/D. EPP has been applied to MPM for a long time, but the postoperative status is extremely poor due to the loss of one whole lung. We compared the mortality, morbidity and median survival time (MST) of lung-sparing surgery (extended P/D or P/D) and lung-sacrificing surgery (EPP) for MPM by performing a systematic review.

METHODS

We extracted the number of events and patients from the literature identified in electronic databases. Ultimately, 15 reports were selected, and 2674 MPM patients, including 1434 patients undergoing EPP and 1240 patients undergoing extended P/D or P/D, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Our systematic review showed that lung-sparing surgery was significantly superior to lung-sacrificing surgery in both the surgical-related mortality (extended P/D vs. EPP: 3.19% vs. 7.65%, p < 0.01; P/D vs. EPP: 1.85% vs. 7.34%, p < 0.01) and morbidity (extended P/D vs. EPP: 35.7% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.01; P/D vs. EPP: 9.52% vs. 20.89%, p < 0.01). Lung-sparing surgery was not inferior to EPP in terms of MST.

CONCLUSION

Although no prospective randomized controlled trial has been conducted, it may be time to change the standard surgical method for MPM from lung-sacrificing surgery to lung-sparing surgery.