The role of parenteral nutrition in patients with malignant bowel obstruction

Cancer-Related Malnutrition and the Role of Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer; A Narrative Review

The growing incidence rate of cancer and its associated morbidity and mortality prompts the need to identify factors that could improve the quality of life (QoL) and survival of a patient with cancer. Cancer-associated malnutrition is a common complication that could start at the early stages of cancer and could further develop into advanced cachexia. Response to treatment, length of hospital stay, progression of infection, and other complications of cancer including chemotherapy adverse events could all be influenced by the progression of malnutrition. Nutritional interventions may vary from oral to enteral and parenteral therapy. Parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy may benefit patients at certain stages of cancer in whom contraindications or inefficacy of other modalities of nutritional support are present. This method may seem invasive, costly, and risky but at the same time may improve certain patients' QoL and chance of survival. In trained settings with proper facilities, this method of nutritional support can benefit patients; However, the indication for starting PN must be carefully supervised considering that other nutritional support methods may be equally efficient and at the same time easier to access and apply.

Parenteral Nutrition in Palliative Cancer Care: Detrimental, Futile, or Beneficial?

Palliative cancer care patients may live for a long time, but malnutrition worsens the prognosis. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is suitable for replenishing a calorie deficit, but its advantages and tolerance late in the cancer trajectory are debated. We examined symptom development in hospitalized patients with and without PN. A total of 21 palliative cancer care patients receiving PN and 155 palliative cancer care patients not receiving PN during hospitalization in a specialized unit were retrospectively compared. We studied symptom intensity at admission, symptom relief during the hospital stay, and survival. The patients had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, a mean age of 70 years, and their median ECOG performance status was III. Symptom burden at admission was similar in the compared groups. Symptom relief during hospitalization was also similar. However, patients already on PN at admission reported more nausea and patients receiving PN during hospitalization reported better nausea relief compared to patients not receiving this intervention. Overall median survival was less than two months and similar in the compared groups. Based on a limited number of observations and a suboptimal study design, we were not able to demonstrate an increased symptom burden for palliative cancer care patients receiving PN late in the disease trajectory.

Toward a holistic understanding of cancer cachexia: Application of the human response to illness model

Cachexia is a commonly presenting multidimensional syndrome in individuals living with advanced cancer. Given its prevalence of between 50% and 80%, nurses are going to encounter individuals manifesting ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that can be partially but not entirely reversed by conventional nutritional support. Thus nurses require a comprehensive understanding of this complex clinical problem. Research suggests, however, that nurses receive minimal education about cachexia or its management. Limited understanding undermines the ability to confidently care for patients with cachexia and their families, thereby hampering effective practice. The human response to illness model provides nurses with an organizing framework to guide and make sense of their assessments in clinical practice when caring for patients with cancer cachexia and provides direction for appropriate intervention. This article illustrates the integration of the human response to illness model to clinical practice, thereby assisting nurses to develop a comprehensive understanding of the physiological, pathophysiological, behavioral, and experiential facets of cachexia in advanced cancer patients. Contemporary areas of further interest and research will be presented.

Evolution of parenteral nutrition practices in a comprehensive cancer center: Comparative audits

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition affects 20% to 70% of oncology patients depending on the patient's age, type and stage of cancer. Two audits were carried out in 2016 and 2019 to evaluate the practice of Parenteral Nutrition (PN).

METHODS

Records of adult medical inpatients who received PN between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Twenty criteria were defined. We conducted a statistical analysis to compare the two audit data.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019, 86 hospitalizations with a PN prescription were analysed. Of the 69 patients, 66% were female, the mean and median age was 60 years. These were most often medical oncology patients in palliative care. Gynecological and digestive tumors were the two main tumor localization. Bowel obstruction and palliative care management were the two main reasons for hospitalization. Nutritional assessment, amount of energy prescribed, monitoring, and duration of PN remain with poor results.

CONCLUSION

Our study seems to show improvements in the relevance of PN indications, the prescription, and monitoring in patients due to the computerization of prescription and training of professionals. PN remains often prescribed in exclusive palliative situations. We need to continue our improvements, particularly for the initial clinical and biological assessment, and the monitoring. It requires a referral team to improve management of patients treated with PN.

Inoperable Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is one of the most severe complications in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, with an estimated incidence up to 50%. Its presence is related to poor prognosis and a life expectancy measured in weeks for inoperable cases. Symptoms are usually difficult to manage and often require hospitalization, which carries a high burden on patients, caregivers and the healthcare system. Management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to improve clinical outcomes. Patients with inoperable MBO are treated medically with analgesics, antiemetics, steroids and antisecretory agents. Parenteral nutrition and gut decompression with nasogastric tube, venting gastrostomy or stenting may be used as supportive therapy. Treatment decision-making is challenging and often based on clinical expertise and local policies, with lack of high-quality evidence to optimally standardize management. The present review summarizes current literature on inoperable bowel obstruction in ovarian cancer, focusing on epidemiology, prognostic factors, clinical outcomes, medical management, multidisciplinary interventions and quality of life.

Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.

MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations on the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) for patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) MBO study group conducted a systematic review of databases (inception to March 2021) to identify studies about patients with advanced cancer and MBO that reported on the following outcomes: symptom management, bowel obstruction resolution, prognosis, overall survival, and quality of life. The review was restricted to studies published in English, but no restrictions were placed on publication year, country, and study type. As per the MASCC Guidelines Policy, the findings were synthesized to determine the levels of evidence to support each MBO intervention and, ultimately, the graded recommendations and suggestions.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 17,656 published studies and 397 selected for the guidelines. The MASCC study group developed a total of 25 evidence-based suggestions and recommendations about the management of MBO-related nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, pain, inflammation, bowel decompression, and nutrition. Expert consensus-based guidance about advanced care planning and psychosocial support is also provided.

CONCLUSION

This MASCC Guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations about MBO management for patients with advanced cancer.

A single-centre ten-year retrospective cohort study of malignant small bowel obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) is challenging. The decision to perform an operation evaluates the perceived chance of success against a patient's fitness for operation. The aim of this study was to characterise the mSBO patient population in a tertiary UK centre and assess the patient's treatment pathway including use and effects of palliative surgery, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), Gastrografin and dexamethasone as well as preoperative stratification.

METHODS

Patients were included if they had mSBO confirmed on computed tomography imaging due to a primary or metastatic neoplasm. Data were collected on pathway and management, and Cox proportional hazard methods were utilised to observe effects on survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included, with 104 inpatient episodes. Mean age was 67.4 (SD 13.7), with 57 (60.6%) females. Most (89.4%) had only one admission for mSBO. Eighty-four (89.4%) patients died over the ten-year period, 18 (17.3%) within 30 days of admission. Fifty patients (53.1%) underwent operative management: 70% bypass, 24% stoma formation and 6% open-close laparotomies. Log rank testing of survival probability analysis was significant (p = 0.00018), with 50% survival probability at 107.32 days for operative management and 47.87 days for non-operative.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Operative management forms part of the treatment pathway for a significant proportion of patients with mSBO, offering a survival benefit, though quality of survival is not known. Case selection is good, with few open-close laparotomies. Trials of non-operative interventions such as Gastrografin and dexamethasone are not utilised fully.

The Role of Total Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often associated with malnutrition and an inability to tolerate enteral feeding. Although total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be lifesaving for patients with no other means of nutritional support, its use in the management of PC patients remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the benefit of TPN on the overall survival of PC patients, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 187 articles were screened; 10 were included in this review and eight were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled median overall survival of patients who received TPN was significantly higher than patients who did not receive TPN (p = 0.040). When only high-quality studies were included, a significant survival advantage was observed in PC patients receiving TPN (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving chemotherapy demonstrated a significant survival benefit (p = 0.008) associated with the use of TPN. In conclusion, TPN may improve survival outcomes in PC patients. However, further studies are needed to conclude more definitively on the effect of TPN.

Artificial Nutrition in Patients with Advanced Malignancy

Cancer is a progressive disease that can lead to malnutrition and cachexia. Artificial nutrition is a medical therapy used to combat malnutrition in these patients. In this article, the authors discuss factors affecting the decision to use artificial nutrition, including the patient's mental and physical health, technical factors of the procedures used to deliver artificial nutrition, and the oncologic factors affecting treatment. Through this review, the authors provide guidelines on who is and is not likely to benefit from therapy, available routes of administration, and necessary factors to consider for appropriate decision-making for palliative patients and those with advanced cancers."

Effects of parenteral nutrition and hydration on survival in advanced cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction: secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The benefits of parenteral nutrition and hydration (PNH) in patients with advanced cancer remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study to assess the effects of PNH on survival in patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO).

METHODS

The present study was a secondary analysis. Data on primary nutritional administration routes during the first week of admission to palliative care units, i.e., parenteral nutrition and parenteral hydration, were obtained. Data on the averaged calorie sufficiency rate/total calorie intake (75% ≤ or 750 kcal/day ≤ , 50-75% or 500-750 kcal/day, 25-50% or 250-500 kcal/day, and < 25% or < 250 kcal/day) were also obtained. Participants with MBO were included and divided into two groups: PNH-high (25% ≤ or 250 kcal/day ≤) and PNH-low (< 25% or < 250 kcal/day). We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into the PNH-high (n = 68) and PNH-low (n = 76) groups. A significant difference was observed in survival rates between the two groups (log-rank P < 0.001). Median survival times were 35.5 (95% CI 27-44) and 17.5 (95% CI 13-21) days, respectively. In the multivariate-adjusted model, a significantly lower risk of mortality was observed in Cox's proportional hazard model in the PNH-high group (HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.36-0.83), P = 0.005) than in the PNH-low group.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicated the beneficial effects of PNH for prolonging survival in advanced cancer patients with MBO in palliative care units.

The Role of Parenteral Nutrition for Incurable Cancer: Bridging Expectations and Reality

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we examine the role for parenteral nutrition (PN) for nutritional support of patients with advanced, incurable cancer with an emphasis on bridging the divide between expectations and reality.

RECENT FINDINGS

As the rates of cancer have continued to rise worldwide, the utility of PN has continued to be studied. Due to multiple reasons, high-quality research studies have been scarce, and much of the data is based on observational studies. The recent trend appears to support the use of PN in carefully selected patients. Importantly, the effect on quality of life also should be considered when deciding to initiate PN. PN can be a supportive lifeline for patients with advanced, incurable cancer. The medical team should consider each patient individually to decide if PN should be offered. It is of paramount important for the medical team to engage in shared decision-making with the patient and caregiver(s) to ensure that PN is aligned with their goals and wishes.

Long-term prognosis of enteral feeding and parenteral nutrition in a population aged 75 years and older: a population-based cohort study

Background

Enteral feeding and parenteral nutrition (PN) using gastrostomy (GS) and a nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) and PN should be initiated for older patients based on their prognoses. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognosis of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent enteral feeding via GS and NGT as well as PN.

Methods

A population-based cohort study was conducted using Japan’s universal health insurance claims in the Nara Prefecture. This study enrolled 3,548 patients aged ≥75 years who received GS (N=770), NGT (N=2,370), and PN (N=408) during hospital admissions between April 2014 and March 2016. The GS group was further categorized into secondary GS (N=400) with preceding NGT or PN within 365 days and primary GS (N=370) without preceding NGT or PN groups. In the secondary GS group, 356 (96%) patients received NGT (versus PN). The outcome was mortality within 730 days after receiving GS, NGT, and PN. Cox regression analyses in cases with or without malignant diseases, adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, and hospital type, were performed to compare mortality in the groups.

Results

Of the 3,548 participants, 2,384 (67%) died within 730 days after the initiation of GS and NGT and PN. The 2-year mortality rates in the secondary GS, primary GS, NGT, and PN groups were 58%, 66%, 68%, and 83% in patients without malignancies and 67%, 71%, 74%, and 87% in those with malignancies, respectively. In the non-malignant group, Cox regression analysis revealed that secondary GS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.34–0.54), primary GS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.40–0.64), and NGT (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.87) were statistically significantly associated with lower mortality compared with PN.

Conclusions

Approximately 58% to 87% patients aged ≥75 years died within 730 days after initiation of nutrition through GS, NGT, or PN. Patients with non-malignant diseases who received secondary GS exhibited better 2-year prognosis than those who received NGT or PN. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the effectiveness and limitations of enteral feeding and PN when considering their initiation.

Nutrition and gastroenterological support in end of life care

Malnutrition and the broad spectrum of cancer cachexia frequently occur in patients with malignant disease of all tumour stages and impact on survival and quality of life of patients. Structured screening for the risk of malnutrition with validated tools and nutritional assessment are the prerequisite for adequate nutritional support in cancer patients. In patients receiving tumour directed therapy, the patients diet should meet the requirements to give optimal support, while later on comfort feeding is part of symptom focused palliation. The basis of nutritional support in a malnourished patient is nutritional counselling, and nutritional support can be offered within a step-up approach meeting the patient's needs. A combination of nutritional support with interventions targeting metabolic changes and physical exercise is suggested to treat cancer cachexia.

Supplemental home parenteral nutrition improved nutrition status with comparable quality of life in malnourished unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer receiving salvage chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Even with significant advances in surgical techniques and treatment, salvage chemotherapy remains the major treatment strategy for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Practical and technical advances have simplified safe and convenient use of supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN). We aimed to clarify the role of HPN in patients with incurable GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 patients with GC with a nutritional risk index (NRI) of ≦ 97.5 undergoing HPN. Their nutritional status, laboratory data, and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed using the Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30 before and after HPN administration at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 months. We enrolled 25 patients with an NRI of > 97.5 not undergoing HPN as the control group.

RESULTS

Total protein (P = 0.008), prealbumin (P < 0.001), and total cholesterol (P = 0.023) levels improved significantly after 0.5 months of HPN administration. The study group also demonstrated a marked improvement in nitrogen balance (P = 0.004) and prealbumin levels (P < 0.012) after 1 month. Gains in body weight after 1 month and body mass index after 2 months of HPN administration remained comparable with those of the control group. Global QoL scores were maintained and comparable with those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplemental HPN therapy for malnourished patients with unresectable or metastatic GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy is feasible and revealed marked improvement in nutritional status. Early HPN intervention should be considered an important part of palliative treatment for advanced GC.

Is there a place for nutrition in palliative care?

PURPOSE

Although nutritional interventions are becoming widely used in cancer patients, purposes and results of such treatment are not always well-defined. This is because nutrition is traditionally considered a palliative treatment to be confined to the area of palliative cares, whereas the modern approach includes nutrition as an early supplemental support to improve compliance of patients with the oncologic therapies and total parenteral nutrition may be recommended in patients who would be destined to succumb prior from starvation-malnutrition than from tumour progression. Purpose of this paper if to define the potential as well as the limitations of nutritional interventions on both the survival and the quality of life of the advanced cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some RCT on the use of oral, enteral and supplemental parenteral nutrition in patients on oncologic therapy show some benefit on compliance with therapy and in some domains of quality of life. Some malnourished (hypo)aphagic incurable cancer patients may survive longer thanks to parenteral nutrition, while few data suggest that quality of life may be maintained for a limited period of time. With a few exceptions, oncology and nutrition have till recently travelled on parallel tracks without talking each other. The oncologist who knows the natural history of the patients should understand which risk of complication and of poor tolerance to the treatment can malnourished patients carry and which is the potential of parenteral nutrition in hypophagic incurable patients.

When is parenteral nutrition indicated in the hospitalized, acutely ill patient?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review discusses current practices regarding appropriate indications for parenteral nutrition in acutely ill hospitalized patients. We address-specific indications for parenteral nutrition in the perioperative period, and in inflammatory bowel disease, oncology, hepatobiliary, critical care and end-stage renal disease patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acutely ill hospitalized patients can develop intestinal failure requiring parenteral nutrition. Recent studies have provided insight into the main indications. The most common indications for inpatient parenteral nutrition include postsurgical complications, including prolonged ileus, sepsis, fistula and leaks, and bowel obstruction, predominantly malignant. Severe or complicated inflammatory bowel disease and cancer treatment-related mucosal enteropathies (mucositis, enterocolitis, gut graft-versus-host disease) are the next commonest indications. Less frequent indications are primary motility disorders and inability to secure enteral access for enteral nutrition. Gastrointestinal failure of the intensive care patient is a separate entity resulting from multiple mechanisms, including an enteropathy and dysmotility.

SUMMARY

Despite the wider availability of nutrition support teams, use of parenteral nutrition is not without risk. The risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in the acute setting need to be carefully considered even when it is indicated.