1
|
Firouzabadi D, Ahmadi H. Cancer-Related Malnutrition and the Role of Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer; A Narrative Review. Nutr Cancer 2024; 76:870-884. [PMID: 39039741 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2024.2381271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
The growing incidence rate of cancer and its associated morbidity and mortality prompts the need to identify factors that could improve the quality of life (QoL) and survival of a patient with cancer. Cancer-associated malnutrition is a common complication that could start at the early stages of cancer and could further develop into advanced cachexia. Response to treatment, length of hospital stay, progression of infection, and other complications of cancer including chemotherapy adverse events could all be influenced by the progression of malnutrition. Nutritional interventions may vary from oral to enteral and parenteral therapy. Parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy may benefit patients at certain stages of cancer in whom contraindications or inefficacy of other modalities of nutritional support are present. This method may seem invasive, costly, and risky but at the same time may improve certain patients' QoL and chance of survival. In trained settings with proper facilities, this method of nutritional support can benefit patients; However, the indication for starting PN must be carefully supervised considering that other nutritional support methods may be equally efficient and at the same time easier to access and apply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena Firouzabadi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Shiraz School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hossein Ahmadi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Shiraz School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Løhre ET, Solheim TS, Jakobsen G, Vagnildhaug OM, Schmidberger Karlsen TL, Habberstad RH, Balstad TR, Thronæs M. Parenteral Nutrition in Palliative Cancer Care: Detrimental, Futile, or Beneficial? Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2748-2757. [PMID: 38785489 PMCID: PMC11120543 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Palliative cancer care patients may live for a long time, but malnutrition worsens the prognosis. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is suitable for replenishing a calorie deficit, but its advantages and tolerance late in the cancer trajectory are debated. We examined symptom development in hospitalized patients with and without PN. A total of 21 palliative cancer care patients receiving PN and 155 palliative cancer care patients not receiving PN during hospitalization in a specialized unit were retrospectively compared. We studied symptom intensity at admission, symptom relief during the hospital stay, and survival. The patients had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, a mean age of 70 years, and their median ECOG performance status was III. Symptom burden at admission was similar in the compared groups. Symptom relief during hospitalization was also similar. However, patients already on PN at admission reported more nausea and patients receiving PN during hospitalization reported better nausea relief compared to patients not receiving this intervention. Overall median survival was less than two months and similar in the compared groups. Based on a limited number of observations and a suboptimal study design, we were not able to demonstrate an increased symptom burden for palliative cancer care patients receiving PN late in the disease trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Torbjørn Løhre
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Centre for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gunnhild Jakobsen
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ola Magne Vagnildhaug
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Terese Louise Schmidberger Karlsen
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Trude Rakel Balstad
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Nutrition Research Group, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Morten Thronæs
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Centre for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McClement SE. Toward a holistic understanding of cancer cachexia: Application of the human response to illness model. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100306. [PMID: 38197036 PMCID: PMC10772185 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Cachexia is a commonly presenting multidimensional syndrome in individuals living with advanced cancer. Given its prevalence of between 50% and 80%, nurses are going to encounter individuals manifesting ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that can be partially but not entirely reversed by conventional nutritional support. Thus nurses require a comprehensive understanding of this complex clinical problem. Research suggests, however, that nurses receive minimal education about cachexia or its management. Limited understanding undermines the ability to confidently care for patients with cachexia and their families, thereby hampering effective practice. The human response to illness model provides nurses with an organizing framework to guide and make sense of their assessments in clinical practice when caring for patients with cancer cachexia and provides direction for appropriate intervention. This article illustrates the integration of the human response to illness model to clinical practice, thereby assisting nurses to develop a comprehensive understanding of the physiological, pathophysiological, behavioral, and experiential facets of cachexia in advanced cancer patients. Contemporary areas of further interest and research will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E. McClement
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peinoit A, Muzellec L, Som M, Edeline J, Thibault R, Neveu E, Vauleon E. Evolution of parenteral nutrition practices in a comprehensive cancer center: Comparative audits. Bull Cancer 2023:S0007-4551(23)00138-8. [PMID: 36935318 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malnutrition affects 20% to 70% of oncology patients depending on the patient's age, type and stage of cancer. Two audits were carried out in 2016 and 2019 to evaluate the practice of Parenteral Nutrition (PN). METHODS Records of adult medical inpatients who received PN between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Twenty criteria were defined. We conducted a statistical analysis to compare the two audit data. RESULTS Between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019, 86 hospitalizations with a PN prescription were analysed. Of the 69 patients, 66% were female, the mean and median age was 60 years. These were most often medical oncology patients in palliative care. Gynecological and digestive tumors were the two main tumor localization. Bowel obstruction and palliative care management were the two main reasons for hospitalization. Nutritional assessment, amount of energy prescribed, monitoring, and duration of PN remain with poor results. CONCLUSION Our study seems to show improvements in the relevance of PN indications, the prescription, and monitoring in patients due to the computerization of prescription and training of professionals. PN remains often prescribed in exclusive palliative situations. We need to continue our improvements, particularly for the initial clinical and biological assessment, and the monitoring. It requires a referral team to improve management of patients treated with PN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Peinoit
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35042 Rennes, France.
| | - Léa Muzellec
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Mickael Som
- Service de nutrition, Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint Grégoire, 6 Boulevard de la Boutière, 35760 Saint-Grégoire, France
| | - Julien Edeline
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Ronan Thibault
- CHU Rennes, Nutrition unit, NuMeCan, Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer, INSERM, INRAE, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Estelle Neveu
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Elodie Vauleon
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35042 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gonzalez-Ochoa E, Alqaisi HA, Bhat G, Jivraj N, Lheureux S. Inoperable Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges. Int J Womens Health 2022; 14:1849-1862. [PMID: 36597479 PMCID: PMC9805709 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s366680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is one of the most severe complications in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, with an estimated incidence up to 50%. Its presence is related to poor prognosis and a life expectancy measured in weeks for inoperable cases. Symptoms are usually difficult to manage and often require hospitalization, which carries a high burden on patients, caregivers and the healthcare system. Management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to improve clinical outcomes. Patients with inoperable MBO are treated medically with analgesics, antiemetics, steroids and antisecretory agents. Parenteral nutrition and gut decompression with nasogastric tube, venting gastrostomy or stenting may be used as supportive therapy. Treatment decision-making is challenging and often based on clinical expertise and local policies, with lack of high-quality evidence to optimally standardize management. The present review summarizes current literature on inoperable bowel obstruction in ovarian cancer, focusing on epidemiology, prognostic factors, clinical outcomes, medical management, multidisciplinary interventions and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Gonzalez-Ochoa
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Husam A Alqaisi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gita Bhat
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazlin Jivraj
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence: Stephanie Lheureux, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada, Tel +1 416-946-2818, Email
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mor E, Shemla S, Assaf D, Laks S, Benvenisti H, Hazzan D, Shiber M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Margalit O, Halpern N, Boursi B, Beller T, Perelson D, Purim O, Zippel D, Ben-Yaacov A, Nissan A, Adileh M. Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8566-8579. [PMID: 35941342 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Mor
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shanie Shemla
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Dan Assaf
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shachar Laks
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Haggai Benvenisti
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - David Hazzan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Mai Shiber
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ofer Margalit
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Naama Halpern
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ben Boursi
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tamar Beller
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Daria Perelson
- The Department of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ofer Purim
- The Department of Oncology, Assuta Ashdod Public Hospital, Affiliated with the Faculty of Health and Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheba, Israel, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Douglas Zippel
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Almog Ben-Yaacov
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Aviram Nissan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Mohammad Adileh
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zanatto RM, Lisboa CN, de Oliveira JC, dos Reis TCDS, Cabral Ferreira de Oliveira A, Coelho MJP, Vidigal BDÁ, Ribeiro HSDC, Ribeiro R, Fernandes PHDS, Braun AC, Pinheiro RN, Oliveira AF, Laporte GA. Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology guidelines for malignant bowel obstruction management. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:48-56. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.26930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Naylor Lisboa
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer José Alencar Gomes da Silva—INCA Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Manoel J. P. Coelho
- Departament of Surgical Oncology Hospital Santo Alberto Manaus Amazonas Brazil
| | | | | | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Department of Surgical Oncology Erasto Gaertner Hospital Curitiba Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Alexandre F. Oliveira
- Department of Surgical Oncology Juiz de Fora Federal University Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais Brazil
| | - Gustavo A. Laporte
- Department of Surgical Oncology Santa Casa de Porto Alegre/Santa Rita Hospital/Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Madariaga A, Lau J, Ghoshal A, Dzierżanowski T, Larkin P, Sobocki J, Dickman A, Furness K, Fazelzad R, Crawford GB, Lheureux S. MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4711-4728. [PMID: 35274188 PMCID: PMC9046338 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06889-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) MBO study group conducted a systematic review of databases (inception to March 2021) to identify studies about patients with advanced cancer and MBO that reported on the following outcomes: symptom management, bowel obstruction resolution, prognosis, overall survival, and quality of life. The review was restricted to studies published in English, but no restrictions were placed on publication year, country, and study type. As per the MASCC Guidelines Policy, the findings were synthesized to determine the levels of evidence to support each MBO intervention and, ultimately, the graded recommendations and suggestions. RESULTS The systematic review identified 17,656 published studies and 397 selected for the guidelines. The MASCC study group developed a total of 25 evidence-based suggestions and recommendations about the management of MBO-related nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, pain, inflammation, bowel decompression, and nutrition. Expert consensus-based guidance about advanced care planning and psychosocial support is also provided. CONCLUSION This MASCC Guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations about MBO management for patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,12 Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jenny Lau
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arunangshu Ghoshal
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tomasz Dzierżanowski
- Laboratory of Palliative Medicine, Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Philip Larkin
- Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jacek Sobocki
- Department of General Surgery and Clinical Nutrition, Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrew Dickman
- Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, England, UK
| | - Kate Furness
- Department of Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Library and information services, University of Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory B Crawford
- Northern Adelaide Palliative Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cato LD, Evans T, Ward ST. A single-centre ten-year retrospective cohort study of malignant small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021; 103:738-744. [PMID: 34436951 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) is challenging. The decision to perform an operation evaluates the perceived chance of success against a patient's fitness for operation. The aim of this study was to characterise the mSBO patient population in a tertiary UK centre and assess the patient's treatment pathway including use and effects of palliative surgery, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), Gastrografin and dexamethasone as well as preoperative stratification. METHODS Patients were included if they had mSBO confirmed on computed tomography imaging due to a primary or metastatic neoplasm. Data were collected on pathway and management, and Cox proportional hazard methods were utilised to observe effects on survival. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were included, with 104 inpatient episodes. Mean age was 67.4 (SD 13.7), with 57 (60.6%) females. Most (89.4%) had only one admission for mSBO. Eighty-four (89.4%) patients died over the ten-year period, 18 (17.3%) within 30 days of admission. Fifty patients (53.1%) underwent operative management: 70% bypass, 24% stoma formation and 6% open-close laparotomies. Log rank testing of survival probability analysis was significant (p = 0.00018), with 50% survival probability at 107.32 days for operative management and 47.87 days for non-operative. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Operative management forms part of the treatment pathway for a significant proportion of patients with mSBO, offering a survival benefit, though quality of survival is not known. Case selection is good, with few open-close laparotomies. Trials of non-operative interventions such as Gastrografin and dexamethasone are not utilised fully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L D Cato
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - T Evans
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S T Ward
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ong XYS, Sultana R, Tan JWS, Tan QX, Wong JSM, Chia CS, Ong CAJ. The Role of Total Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4156. [PMID: 34439309 PMCID: PMC8393754 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often associated with malnutrition and an inability to tolerate enteral feeding. Although total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be lifesaving for patients with no other means of nutritional support, its use in the management of PC patients remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the benefit of TPN on the overall survival of PC patients, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 187 articles were screened; 10 were included in this review and eight were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled median overall survival of patients who received TPN was significantly higher than patients who did not receive TPN (p = 0.040). When only high-quality studies were included, a significant survival advantage was observed in PC patients receiving TPN (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving chemotherapy demonstrated a significant survival benefit (p = 0.008) associated with the use of TPN. In conclusion, TPN may improve survival outcomes in PC patients. However, further studies are needed to conclude more definitively on the effect of TPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Yi Sarah Ong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore;
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | | | - Joey Wee-Shan Tan
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - Qiu Xuan Tan
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - Jolene Si Min Wong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; (X.-Y.S.O.); (J.W.-S.T.); (Q.X.T.); (J.S.M.W.); (C.S.C.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR Research Entities, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saavedra R, Fahy BN. Artificial Nutrition in Patients with Advanced Malignancy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:505-518. [PMID: 34053665 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a progressive disease that can lead to malnutrition and cachexia. Artificial nutrition is a medical therapy used to combat malnutrition in these patients. In this article, the authors discuss factors affecting the decision to use artificial nutrition, including the patient's mental and physical health, technical factors of the procedures used to deliver artificial nutrition, and the oncologic factors affecting treatment. Through this review, the authors provide guidelines on who is and is not likely to benefit from therapy, available routes of administration, and necessary factors to consider for appropriate decision-making for palliative patients and those with advanced cancers."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramses Saavedra
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 07-4025, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Bridget N Fahy
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 07-4025, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effects of parenteral nutrition and hydration on survival in advanced cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction: secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7541-7549. [PMID: 34114097 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06293-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefits of parenteral nutrition and hydration (PNH) in patients with advanced cancer remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study to assess the effects of PNH on survival in patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). METHODS The present study was a secondary analysis. Data on primary nutritional administration routes during the first week of admission to palliative care units, i.e., parenteral nutrition and parenteral hydration, were obtained. Data on the averaged calorie sufficiency rate/total calorie intake (75% ≤ or 750 kcal/day ≤ , 50-75% or 500-750 kcal/day, 25-50% or 250-500 kcal/day, and < 25% or < 250 kcal/day) were also obtained. Participants with MBO were included and divided into two groups: PNH-high (25% ≤ or 250 kcal/day ≤) and PNH-low (< 25% or < 250 kcal/day). We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Patients were divided into the PNH-high (n = 68) and PNH-low (n = 76) groups. A significant difference was observed in survival rates between the two groups (log-rank P < 0.001). Median survival times were 35.5 (95% CI 27-44) and 17.5 (95% CI 13-21) days, respectively. In the multivariate-adjusted model, a significantly lower risk of mortality was observed in Cox's proportional hazard model in the PNH-high group (HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.36-0.83), P = 0.005) than in the PNH-low group. CONCLUSION The present results indicated the beneficial effects of PNH for prolonging survival in advanced cancer patients with MBO in palliative care units.
Collapse
|
13
|
Salonen BR, Mundi MS, Hurt RT, Bonnes SL. The Role of Parenteral Nutrition for Incurable Cancer: Bridging Expectations and Reality. Curr Nutr Rep 2021; 10:226-231. [PMID: 34047939 DOI: 10.1007/s13668-021-00361-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this review, we examine the role for parenteral nutrition (PN) for nutritional support of patients with advanced, incurable cancer with an emphasis on bridging the divide between expectations and reality. RECENT FINDINGS As the rates of cancer have continued to rise worldwide, the utility of PN has continued to be studied. Due to multiple reasons, high-quality research studies have been scarce, and much of the data is based on observational studies. The recent trend appears to support the use of PN in carefully selected patients. Importantly, the effect on quality of life also should be considered when deciding to initiate PN. PN can be a supportive lifeline for patients with advanced, incurable cancer. The medical team should consider each patient individually to decide if PN should be offered. It is of paramount important for the medical team to engage in shared decision-making with the patient and caregiver(s) to ensure that PN is aligned with their goals and wishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley R Salonen
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Manpreet S Mundi
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan T Hurt
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.,Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Sara L Bonnes
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsugihashi Y, Akahane M, Nakanishi Y, Myojin T, Kubo S, Nishioka Y, Noda T, Hayashi S, Furihata S, Higashino T, Imamura T. Long-term prognosis of enteral feeding and parenteral nutrition in a population aged 75 years and older: a population-based cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:80. [PMID: 33509118 PMCID: PMC7842076 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-02003-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Enteral feeding and parenteral nutrition (PN) using gastrostomy (GS) and a nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) and PN should be initiated for older patients based on their prognoses. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognosis of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent enteral feeding via GS and NGT as well as PN. Methods A population-based cohort study was conducted using Japan’s universal health insurance claims in the Nara Prefecture. This study enrolled 3,548 patients aged ≥75 years who received GS (N=770), NGT (N=2,370), and PN (N=408) during hospital admissions between April 2014 and March 2016. The GS group was further categorized into secondary GS (N=400) with preceding NGT or PN within 365 days and primary GS (N=370) without preceding NGT or PN groups. In the secondary GS group, 356 (96%) patients received NGT (versus PN). The outcome was mortality within 730 days after receiving GS, NGT, and PN. Cox regression analyses in cases with or without malignant diseases, adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, and hospital type, were performed to compare mortality in the groups. Results Of the 3,548 participants, 2,384 (67%) died within 730 days after the initiation of GS and NGT and PN. The 2-year mortality rates in the secondary GS, primary GS, NGT, and PN groups were 58%, 66%, 68%, and 83% in patients without malignancies and 67%, 71%, 74%, and 87% in those with malignancies, respectively. In the non-malignant group, Cox regression analysis revealed that secondary GS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.34–0.54), primary GS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.40–0.64), and NGT (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.87) were statistically significantly associated with lower mortality compared with PN. Conclusions Approximately 58% to 87% patients aged ≥75 years died within 730 days after initiation of nutrition through GS, NGT, or PN. Patients with non-malignant diseases who received secondary GS exhibited better 2-year prognosis than those who received NGT or PN. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the effectiveness and limitations of enteral feeding and PN when considering their initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukio Tsugihashi
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
| | - Manabu Akahane
- Department of Health and Welfare Services, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, 351-0197, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakanishi
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Tomoya Myojin
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Kubo
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nishioka
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Noda
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Hayashi
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shiori Furihata
- Healthcare and Wellness Division, Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc, 10-3, Nagatacho 2-Chome, Chiyoda-Ku, 100-8141, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuneyuki Higashino
- Healthcare and Wellness Division, Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc, 10-3, Nagatacho 2-Chome, Chiyoda-Ku, 100-8141, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Imamura
- Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, 634-8521, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ruggeri E, Giannantonio M, Agostini F, Ostan R, Pironi L, Pannuti R. Home artificial nutrition in palliative care cancer patients: Impact on survival and performance status. Clin Nutr 2020; 39:3346-3353. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
16
|
Nutrition and gastroenterological support in end of life care. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 48-49:101692. [PMID: 33317794 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Malnutrition and the broad spectrum of cancer cachexia frequently occur in patients with malignant disease of all tumour stages and impact on survival and quality of life of patients. Structured screening for the risk of malnutrition with validated tools and nutritional assessment are the prerequisite for adequate nutritional support in cancer patients. In patients receiving tumour directed therapy, the patients diet should meet the requirements to give optimal support, while later on comfort feeding is part of symptom focused palliation. The basis of nutritional support in a malnourished patient is nutritional counselling, and nutritional support can be offered within a step-up approach meeting the patient's needs. A combination of nutritional support with interventions targeting metabolic changes and physical exercise is suggested to treat cancer cachexia.
Collapse
|
17
|
Supplemental home parenteral nutrition improved nutrition status with comparable quality of life in malnourished unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer receiving salvage chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:1977-1988. [PMID: 32827265 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05687-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even with significant advances in surgical techniques and treatment, salvage chemotherapy remains the major treatment strategy for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Practical and technical advances have simplified safe and convenient use of supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN). We aimed to clarify the role of HPN in patients with incurable GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy. METHODS We enrolled 25 patients with GC with a nutritional risk index (NRI) of ≦ 97.5 undergoing HPN. Their nutritional status, laboratory data, and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed using the Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30 before and after HPN administration at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 months. We enrolled 25 patients with an NRI of > 97.5 not undergoing HPN as the control group. RESULTS Total protein (P = 0.008), prealbumin (P < 0.001), and total cholesterol (P = 0.023) levels improved significantly after 0.5 months of HPN administration. The study group also demonstrated a marked improvement in nitrogen balance (P = 0.004) and prealbumin levels (P < 0.012) after 1 month. Gains in body weight after 1 month and body mass index after 2 months of HPN administration remained comparable with those of the control group. Global QoL scores were maintained and comparable with those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS Supplemental HPN therapy for malnourished patients with unresectable or metastatic GC undergoing salvage chemotherapy is feasible and revealed marked improvement in nutritional status. Early HPN intervention should be considered an important part of palliative treatment for advanced GC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bozzetti F. Is there a place for nutrition in palliative care? Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4069-4075. [PMID: 32417968 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05505-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although nutritional interventions are becoming widely used in cancer patients, purposes and results of such treatment are not always well-defined. This is because nutrition is traditionally considered a palliative treatment to be confined to the area of palliative cares, whereas the modern approach includes nutrition as an early supplemental support to improve compliance of patients with the oncologic therapies and total parenteral nutrition may be recommended in patients who would be destined to succumb prior from starvation-malnutrition than from tumour progression. Purpose of this paper if to define the potential as well as the limitations of nutritional interventions on both the survival and the quality of life of the advanced cancer patients. RECENT FINDINGS Some RCT on the use of oral, enteral and supplemental parenteral nutrition in patients on oncologic therapy show some benefit on compliance with therapy and in some domains of quality of life. Some malnourished (hypo)aphagic incurable cancer patients may survive longer thanks to parenteral nutrition, while few data suggest that quality of life may be maintained for a limited period of time. With a few exceptions, oncology and nutrition have till recently travelled on parallel tracks without talking each other. The oncologist who knows the natural history of the patients should understand which risk of complication and of poor tolerance to the treatment can malnourished patients carry and which is the potential of parenteral nutrition in hypophagic incurable patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current review discusses current practices regarding appropriate indications for parenteral nutrition in acutely ill hospitalized patients. We address-specific indications for parenteral nutrition in the perioperative period, and in inflammatory bowel disease, oncology, hepatobiliary, critical care and end-stage renal disease patients. RECENT FINDINGS Acutely ill hospitalized patients can develop intestinal failure requiring parenteral nutrition. Recent studies have provided insight into the main indications. The most common indications for inpatient parenteral nutrition include postsurgical complications, including prolonged ileus, sepsis, fistula and leaks, and bowel obstruction, predominantly malignant. Severe or complicated inflammatory bowel disease and cancer treatment-related mucosal enteropathies (mucositis, enterocolitis, gut graft-versus-host disease) are the next commonest indications. Less frequent indications are primary motility disorders and inability to secure enteral access for enteral nutrition. Gastrointestinal failure of the intensive care patient is a separate entity resulting from multiple mechanisms, including an enteropathy and dysmotility. SUMMARY Despite the wider availability of nutrition support teams, use of parenteral nutrition is not without risk. The risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in the acute setting need to be carefully considered even when it is indicated.
Collapse
|