1
|
Liu R, Weldon CB, Linehan E, Gordon N, Abbe T, Hennings M, James H, Katzel J, Ng C, Tomita M, Velotta JB, Ossowski S, Sakoda LC, Sprague SL, Dowling A, Beringer K, Ravelo A, Yu E, Trosman JR. Fostering a High-Functioning Team in Cancer Care Using the 4R Oncology Model: Assessment in a Large Health System and a Blueprint for Other Institutions. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e125-e137. [PMID: 36178937 PMCID: PMC10166419 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Delivering cancer care by high-functioning multidisciplinary teams promises to address care fragmentation, which threatens care quality, affects patient outcomes, and strains the oncology workforce. We assessed whether the 4R Oncology model for team-based interdependent care delivery and patient self-management affected team functioning in a large community-based health system. METHODS 4R was deployed at four locations in breast and lung cancers and assessed along four characteristics of high-functioning teams: recognition as a team internally and externally; commitment to an explicit shared goal; enablement of interdependent work to achieve the goal; and engagement in regular reflection to adapt objectives and processes. RESULTS We formed an internally and externally recognized team of 24 specialties committed to a shared goal of delivering multidisciplinary care at the optimal time and sequence from a patient-centric viewpoint. The team conducted 40 optimizations of interdependent care (22 for breast, seven for lung, and 11 for both cancers) at four points in the care continuum and established an ongoing teamwork adaptation process. Half of the optimizations entailed low effort, while 30% required high level of effort; 78% resulted in improved process efficiency. CONCLUSION 4R facilitated development of a large high-functioning team and enabled 40 optimizations of interdependent care along the cancer care continuum in a feasible way. 4R may be an effective approach for fostering high-functioning teams, which could contribute to improving viability of the oncology workforce. Our intervention and taxonomy of results serve as a blueprint for other institutions motivated to strengthen teamwork to improve patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Liu
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Christine B. Weldon
- Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Elizabeth Linehan
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nancy Gordon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Thea Abbe
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marti Hennings
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Modesto, CA
| | - Henie James
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA
| | - Jed Katzel
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | - Chun Ng
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Modesto, CA
| | - Megumi Tomita
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Modesto, CA
| | - Jeffrey B. Velotta
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA
| | - Stephanie Ossowski
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lori C. Sakoda
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Anna Dowling
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimberly Beringer
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Elaine Yu
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Julia R. Trosman
- Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smeltzer MP, Ray MA, Faris NR, Meadows-Taylor MB, Rugless F, Berryman C, Jackson B, Fehnel C, Pacheco A, McHugh L, Robbins ET, Ward KD, Klesges LM, Osarogiagbon RU. Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Care Within a Community-Based Health Care System. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e15-e24. [PMID: 35609221 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Multidisciplinary lung cancer care is assumed to improve care delivery by increasing transparency, objectivity, and shared decision making; however, there is a lack of high-level evidence demonstrating its benefits, especially in community-based health care systems. We used implementation and team science principles to establish a colocated multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic in a large community-based health care system and evaluated patient experience and outcomes within and outside this clinic. METHODS We conducted a prospective frequency-matched comparative effectiveness study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02123797) evaluating the thoroughness of lung cancer staging, receipt of stage-appropriate treatment, and survival between patients receiving care in the multidisciplinary clinic and those receiving usual serial care. Target enrollment was 150 patients on the multidisciplinary arm and 300 on the serial care arm. We frequency-matched patients by clinical stage, performance status, insurance type, race, and age. RESULTS A total of 526 patients were enrolled: 178 on the multidisciplinary arm and 348 on the serial care arm. After adjusting for other factors, multidisciplinary patients had significantly higher odds (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5 to 3.4]) of trimodality staging compared with serial care. Patients on the multidisciplinary arm also had higher odds of receiving invasive stage confirmation (OR: 2.0 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.1]) and mediastinal stage confirmation (OR: 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8]). Additionally, patients receiving multidisciplinary care were significantly more likely to receive stage-appropriate treatment (OR: 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1 to 3.0]). We found no significant difference in overall or progression-free survival between study arms. CONCLUSION The multidisciplinary clinic delivered significant improvements in evidence-based quality care on multiple levels. Even in the absence of a demonstrable survival benefit, these findings provide a strong rationale for recommending this model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Meredith A Ray
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Nicholas R Faris
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Meghan B Meadows-Taylor
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.,Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Fedoria Rugless
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Courtney Berryman
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Bianca Jackson
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Carrie Fehnel
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Alicia Pacheco
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Laura McHugh
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Edward T Robbins
- Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Kenneth D Ward
- Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Lisa M Klesges
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferrara L, Otto M, Aapro M, Albreht T, Jonsson B, Oberst S, Oliver K, Pisani E, Presti P, Rubio IT, Terkola R, Tarricone R. How to improve efficiency in cancer care: dimensions, methods, and areas of evaluation. J Cancer Policy 2022; 34:100355. [PMID: 36007873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Efficiency in healthcare is crucial since available resources are scarce, and the opportunity cost of an inefficient allocation is measured in health outcomes foregone. This is particularly relevant for cancer. The aim of this paper was to gain a comprehensive overview of how efficiency in cancer care is defined, and what the indicators, different methods, perspectives, and areas of evaluation are, to provide recommendations on the areas and dimensions where efficiency can be improved. METHODS: A comprehensive scoping literature review was performed searching four databases. Studies published between 2000-2021 were included if they described experiences and cases of efficiency in cancer care or methods to evaluate efficiency. The results of the literature review were then discussed during two rounds of online consultation with a panel of 15 external experts invited to provide their insights and comments to deliberate policy recommendations. RESULTS: 46 papers met the inclusion criteria. Based on the papers retrieved we have identified six areas for achieving efficiency gains throughout the entire care pathway and, for each area of efficiency, we have categorized the methods and outcome used to measure efficiency gain CONCLUSION: This is the first attempt to systematize a scattered body of literature on how to improve efficiency in cancer care and identify key areas to improve it. Based on the findings of the literature review and on the opinion of the experts involved in the consultation, we propose seven recommendations that are intended to improve efficiency in cancer care throughout the care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Ferrara
- Cergas SDA Bocconi School of management, via Sarfatti, 11 - 20136 Milano (Italy).
| | - Monica Otto
- Cergas SDA Bocconi School of management, via Sarfatti, 11 - 20136 Milano (Italy).
| | - Matti Aapro
- Genolier Hospital Genolier Cancer Center, SPCC - Sharing Progress in Cancer Care, Route du Muids 3, 1272 Genolier (Switzerland).
| | - Tit Albreht
- Centre for Health Care, National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, (Slovenia) iPAAC - Innovative Partnership for Action against Cancer.
| | - Bengt Jonsson
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simon Oberst
- OECI - Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, rue d'Egmont 11, B-1000 Brussels (Belgium).
| | - Kathy Oliver
- IBTA - International Brain Tumor Alliance, Tadworth, Surrey (United Kingdom).
| | - Eduardo Pisani
- All.Can - All.Can International asbl, Brussels, rue du Luxemburg 22-24, BE-1000 Brussels (Belgium).
| | - Pietro Presti
- SPCC - Sharing Progress in Cancer Care, Piazza Indipendenza 2, 6500 Bellinzona (Switzerland).
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, ESSO - European Society of Surgical Oncology, Av. de Pío XII, 36, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra (Spain).
| | - Robert Terkola
- University Medical Center Groningen; University of Florida -College of Pharmacy; ESOP - European Society of oncology pharmacy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guirado M, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Pijuan L, Teixido C, Gómez-Caamaño A, Cilleruelo-Ramos Á. Quality indicators and excellence requirements for a multidisciplinary lung cancer tumor board by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:446-459. [PMID: 34665437 PMCID: PMC8525055 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02712-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary care is needed to decide the best therapeutic approach and to provide optimal care to patients with lung cancer (LC). Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are optimal strategies for the management of patients with LC and have been associated with better outcomes, such as an increase in quality of life and survival. The Spanish Lung Cancer Group has promoted this review about the current situation of the existing national LC-MDTs, which also offers a set of excellence requirements and quality indicators to achieve the best care in any patient with LC. Time and sufficient resources; leadership; administrative and institutional support; and recording of activity are key factors for the success of LC-MDTs. A set of excellence requirements in terms of staff, resources and organization of the LC-MDT have been proposed. At last, a list of quality indicators has been agreed to achieve and measure the performance of current LC-MDTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Guirado
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, 03203, Elche, Spain
| | - A Sanchez-Hernandez
- Medical Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, 12002, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - L Pijuan
- Pathology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - C Teixido
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Department of Pathology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Á Cilleruelo-Ramos
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid, 47005, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brade A, Jao K, Yu S, Cheema P, Doucette S, Christofides A, Schellenberg D. A Canadian Perspective on the Challenges for Delivery of Curative-Intent Therapy in Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1618-1629. [PMID: 33923355 PMCID: PMC8161772 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a highly heterogenous group of patients with regards to patient fitness and tumour size and distribution, resulting in a wide range of treatment goals and therapy options. Curative-intent multimodality treatment should be considered in all patients with stage III NSCLC. For patients with unresectable disease who are fit, have adequate lung function, and have a disease that can be encompassed within a radical radiation volume, concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) is the standard of care and can produce cure rates of 20–30%. Recently, consolidation immunotherapy with durvalumab has been recognized as the standard of care following cCRT based on significant improvement rates in overall survival at 4 years. The large heterogeneity of the stage III NSCLC population, along with the need for extensive staging procedures, multidisciplinary care, intensive cCRT, and now consolidation therapy makes the delivery of timely and optimal treatment for these patients complex. Several logistical, communication, and education factors hinder the delivery of guideline-recommended care to patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. This commentary discusses the potential challenges patients may encounter at different points along their care pathway that can interfere with delivery of curative-intent therapy and suggests strategies for improving care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Brade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, ON L5M 2N1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Kevin Jao
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada;
| | - Simon Yu
- Department of Medicine, Burnaby Hospital Cancer Centre, Burnaby, BC V5G 2X6, Canada;
| | - Parneet Cheema
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada;
- William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON L6R 3J7, Canada
| | - Sarah Doucette
- Senior Medical Writer, IMPACT Medicom Inc., Toronto, ON M6S 3K2, Canada; (S.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Anna Christofides
- Senior Medical Writer, IMPACT Medicom Inc., Toronto, ON M6S 3K2, Canada; (S.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Devin Schellenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Surrey, BC V2V 1Z2, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rankin NM, Fradgley EA, Barnes DJ. Implementation of lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: a review of evidence-practice gaps. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1667-1679. [PMID: 32953540 PMCID: PMC7481625 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary care (MDC) is considered best practice in lung cancer care. Health care services have made significant investments in MDC through the establishment of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. This investment is likely to be sustained in future. It is imperative that MDT meetings are efficient, effective, and sufficiently nimble to introduce new innovations to enable best practice. In this article, we consider the ‘evidence-practice gaps’ in the implementation of lung cancer MDC. These gaps were derived from the recurrent limitations outlined in existing studies and reviews. We address the contributions that implementation science and quality improvement can make to bridge these gaps by increasing translation and improving the uptake of innovations by teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Fradgley
- University of Newcastle Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research, Innovation and Translation, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Newcastle Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine & Public Health, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J Barnes
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|