1
|
Dhanani S, Ramlakhan JU, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review. Health Expect 2023; 26:1404-1417. [PMID: 37227115 PMCID: PMC10349246 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Question prompt lists (QPLs) are lists of questions that patients may want to discuss with clinicians. QPLs support person-centred care and have been associated with many beneficial outcomes including improved patient question-asking, and the amount and quality of the information provided by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to review published research on QPLs to explore how QPL design and implementation can be optimized. METHODS We performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Database from inception to 8 May 2022, for English language studies of any design that evaluated QPLs. We used summary statistics and text to report study characteristics, and QPL design and implementation. RESULTS We included 57 studies published from 1988 to 2022 by authors in 12 countries on a range of clinical topics. Of those, 56% provided the QPL, but few described how QPLs were developed. The number of questions varied widely (range 9-191). Most QPLs were single-page handouts (44%) but others ranged from 2 to 33 pages. Most studies implemented a QPL alone with no other accompanying strategy; most often in a print format before consultations by mail (18%) or in the waiting room (66%). Both patients and clinicians identified numerous benefits to patients of QPLs (e.g., increased patient confidence to ask questions, and patient satisfaction with communication or care received; and reduced anxiety about health status or treatment). To support use, patients desired access to QPLs in advance of clinician visits, and clinicians desired information/training on how to use the QPL and answer questions. Most (88%) studies reported at least one beneficial impact of QPLs. This was true even for single-page QPLs with few questions unaccompanied by other implementation strategies. Despite favourable views of QPLs, few studies assessed outcomes amongst clinicians. CONCLUSION This review identified QPL characteristics and implementation strategies that may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Future research should confirm these findings via systematic review and explore the benefits of QPLs from the clinician's perspective. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Following this review, we used the findings to develop a QPL on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and interviewed women and clinicians about QPL design including content, format, enablers and barriers of use, and potential outcomes including beneficial impacts and possible harms (will be published elsewhere).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shazia Dhanani
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Jessica U. Ramlakhan
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Whitney B. Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rincones O, Smith A‘B, Chong P, Mancuso P, Wu VS, Sidhom M, Wong K, Ngo D, Gassner P, Girgis A. Encouraging Patients to Ask Questions: Development and Pilot Testing of a Question Prompt List for Patients Undergoing a Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2088-2104. [PMID: 36826123 PMCID: PMC9954987 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a question prompt list (QPL) to facilitate informed treatment decision-making in men with suspected localised prostate cancer, which involves values-based choices between options with similar efficacy but different side effects. The QPL was developed through iterative consultation with consumers, clinicians and researchers. Acceptability was assessed using study-specific questions regarding QPL satisfaction and usefulness and qualitative interviews. Feasibility was determined via the proportion of men given the QPL according to medical records and the completion of standardised measures of decisional outcomes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Fifty-two men consented; 34 provided data for analysis. The QPL recipients reported moderate-high content satisfaction (70.6%) and perceived usefulness in guiding appointments when receiving biopsy results (64.7%). Two main qualitative themes also indicated the QPL acceptability: (1) the freedom to ask-acceptable timing, flexible usage and usefulness of the QPL, and (2) satisfaction with the QPL content. However, only 18.4% of eligible men received the QPL, indicating limited feasibility. The QPL is safe and acceptable, but further research is needed regarding how to facilitate the uptake of the question prompt list in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando Rincones
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Allan ‘Ben’ Smith
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Peter Chong
- Lake Macquarie Urology, Newcastle 2290, Australia
| | - Pascal Mancuso
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- Department of Urological Surgery, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Verena Shuwen Wu
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Karen Wong
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Diana Ngo
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Paul Gassner
- Department of Urological Surgery, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsai PS, Wang CC, Lan YH, Tsai HW, Hsiao CY, Wu JC, Sheen-Chen SM, Hou WH. Effectiveness of question prompt lists in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2984-2994. [PMID: 35697559 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of a question prompt list (QPL) in decision self-efficacy, decision-making participation, patient-physician communication, decisional conflict or regret, and health status in patients with breast cancer. METHODS A total of 240 patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to a QPL group or control group (n = 120 each). The intervention and control groups received an additional educational QPL booklet and routine care, respectively. RESULTS The intervention group exhibited significant improvements in decision self-efficacy, perceived patient-physician interactions, and patient-physician communication compared with the control group. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed significant group-time interaction effects on decision self-efficacy (β = 9.99, P < 0.01), perceived patient-physician interactions (β = 8.10, P < 0.01), patient-physician communication (β = 5.02, P < 0.01), and anxiety status (β = -3.78, P < 0.05). The QPL intervention exerted more favorable effects than routine care, with repeated measurements of the same patients and the data of patients under the care of the same surgeons accounted for. CONCLUSIONS The QPL intervention exerted multidimensional effects on decision-making outcomes among patients with breast cancer. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Clinicians can integrate a QPL into routine care for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Shan Tsai
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Center for Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chien Wang
- Graduate Institute of Information Management, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsuan Lan
- School of Gerontology and Long-term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Wei Tsai
- School of Gerontology and Long-term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Yin Hsiao
- School of Gerontology and Long-term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Cheng Wu
- Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Wen-Hsuan Hou
- School of Gerontology and Long-term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fahmer N, Faller H, Engehausen D, Hass HG, Reuss-Borst M, Duelli K, Wöckel A, Heuschmann PU, Meng K. Patients' challenges, competencies, and perceived support in dealing with information needs - A qualitative analysis in patients with breast and gynecological cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2382-2390. [PMID: 34930628 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate challenges, competencies, and support in breast and gynecological cancer patients when dealing with information needs and how health literacy as an interplay of these factors might be improved. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients in acute care (n = 19), undergoing rehabilitation (n = 20) or attending self-help groups (n = 16). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS Challenges: gain information according to own needs, internet as information source, information evaluation and decisions, doctor-patient communication, situationally limited information processing, difficult access to information. Competencies: self-regulation of information needs, media and social competencies, communication skills in the doctor-patient conversation, internet competencies, self-directed decisions according to own needs, interest/self-efficacy, previous knowledge, trust in the doctor. SUPPORT by professionals (e.g., patient-centered communication), relatives (e.g., support during consultations), peers (e.g., exchange), facilities (e.g., clinics). CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide insight into challenges and competencies relevant to patients' health literacy and the influence of support. The individuality of the interplay highlights the relevance of an active patient role and patient-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Patients' health literacy should be improved in (psycho)oncological work by both reducing challenges (e.g., by communication skills training, involving relatives) and promoting competencies (e.g., by needs- and competence-oriented information offers).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natascha Fahmer
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Hermann Faller
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Holger G Hass
- Paracelsus Clinic Scheidegg, 88175 Scheidegg, Germany
| | - Monika Reuss-Borst
- Center for Rehabilitation and Prevention Bad Bocklet, 97708 Bad Bocklet, Germany
| | - Kristin Duelli
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter U Heuschmann
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; Clinical Trial Center Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Karin Meng
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Svensberg K, Khashi M, Dobric S, Guirguis M, Ljungberg Persson C. Making medication communication visible in community pharmacies-pharmacists' experience using a question prompt list in the patient meeting. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022; 18:4072-4082. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
6
|
Brédart A, Rault A, Terrasson J, Seigneur E, De Koning L, Hess E, Savignoni A, Cottu P, Pierga JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Rodrigues M, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Helping Patients Communicate With Oncologists When Cancer Treatment Resistance Occurs to Develop, Test, and Implement a Patient Communication Aid: Sequential Collaborative Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e26414. [PMID: 35019850 PMCID: PMC8792782 DOI: 10.2196/26414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most cancer-related deaths result from disseminated diseases that develop resistance to anticancer treatments. Inappropriate communication in this challenging situation may result in unmet patient information and support needs. Patient communication aids such as question prompt lists (QPLs) may help. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop and pilot-test a specific QPL in the following two contrasting clinical contexts in France after cancer resistance has developed: triple-negative and luminal B metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM). METHODS A sequential study design with a mixed methods collaborative approach will be applied. The first step aims to build a specific QPL. Step 1a will explore oncologist-patient communication issues from oncology professionals' interviews (n=20 approximately). Step 1b will appraise information and support needs experienced by patients with MBC or MUM both quantitatively (n=80) and qualitatively (n=40 approximately). These data will be used to develop and pilot-test a QPL specific to patients with cancer experiencing initial or acquired resistance to treatment. We expect to obtain a core QPL that comprises questions and concerns commonly expressed by patients with resistant cancer and is complemented by specific issues for either MBC or MUM cancer sites. In step 1c, 2 focus groups of patients with any type of metastatic cancer (n=4) and health care professionals (n=4) will be conducted to revise the content of a preliminary QPL and elaborate an acceptable and feasible clinical implementation. In step 1d, the content of the QPL version 1 and implementation guidance will be validated using a Delphi process. Step 2 will pilot-test the QPL version 1 in real practice with patients with MBC or MUM (n=80). Clinical utility will be assessed by comparing responses to questionnaires administered in step 1b (QPL-naive historical control group) and step 2 (QPL intervention group). RESULTS This study received grants in March and December 2019 and was approved by the French national ethics committee in July 2019. As of October 2021, interviews with oncology professionals have been conducted and analyzed (N=26 to reach saturation), and 39 and 27 patients with MBC and MUM, respectively, have been recruited. CONCLUSIONS A clinically and culturally tailored QPL is expected to facilitate patients' participation in consultations, improve oncologists' responses to patients' information and support needs, and thus foster patients' psychological adjustment to the diagnosis and follow-up of cancer resistance to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118062; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04118062. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/26414.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
- Psychopathology and Health Process, Paris University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Aude Rault
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Johanna Terrasson
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Seigneur
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Leanne De Koning
- Research Centre, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Hess
- Research Centre, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Direction Recherche Ensemble Hospitalier, Data Management Unit, Biometry Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Faculty of medicine, Paris University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Carole Bouleuc
- Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie, Department of Supportive Care, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
- Research Centre in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, U1018, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bouleuc C, Savignoni A, Chevrier M, Renault-Tessier E, Burnod A, Chvetzoff G, Poulain P, Copel L, Cottu P, Pierga JY, Brédart A, Dolbeault S. A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:331-341.e8. [PMID: 32739563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations. METHODS In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months. RESULTS Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P = 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm. CONCLUSION Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Bouleuc
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Curie, Biometric Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marion Chevrier
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Curie, Biometric Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Evelyne Renault-Tessier
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexis Burnod
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Phillipe Poulain
- Palliative Care Department, Polyclinique de l'Ormeau, Tarbes, France
| | - Laure Copel
- Palliative Care Department, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France; Institute of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France; CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roch C, Schendzielorz P, Scherzad A, van Oorschot B, Scheich M. [Needs and burdens of palliative care patients with advanced and/or metastatic head and neck tumors]. HNO 2020; 68:510-516. [PMID: 32430668 PMCID: PMC8241647 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00888-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Neue Therapieformen ermöglichen auch bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen und metastasierten Kopf-Hals-Tumoren gute Behandlungsansätze. Gespräche über das Lebensende, vorausschauende Versorgungsplanung und auch palliativmedizinische Konzepte geraten dadurch oft in den Hintergrund. Ziel der Arbeit Analyse von Symptomen, Belastungen sowie dem Vorliegen von Vorsorgedokumenten, von stationär palliativmedizinisch mitbetreuten Patienten durch Selbsteinschätzung. Erhebung der Integration der spezialisierten Palliativversorgung in die Versorgung stationär verstorbener Patienten anhand des Qualitätsindikators nach Earle. Material und Methoden Retrospektive Analyse der vom Palliativdienst mitbetreuten Patienten mit Kopf-Hals-Tumoren durch Nutzung des standardisierten IPOS Fragebogens. Ergebnisse Die häufigsten physischen Symptome waren „Schwäche“ (77 %), „Appetitlosigkeit“ (65 %) und „eingeschränkte Mobilität“ (65 %). „Schmerzen“ wurden von 42 % der Patienten angegeben. Die häufigsten emotionalen und psychosozialen Belastungen waren „Traurigkeit“ (97 %) und „Sorgen des Patienten“ (94 %), die „fehlende Möglichkeit Gefühle“ zu teilen (77 %), „unzureichende Informiertheit“ (85 %) und „organisatorische Probleme“ (77 %). Bei 23 % der Patienten lagen Vorsorgedokumente vor. Das Qualitätsziel nach Earle wurde nicht erreicht. Diskussion Die Patienten berichten in der Auswertung in hohem Maß Symptome und Belastungen, am häufigsten im emotionalen Bereich und bezüglich kommunikativer und praktischer Bedürfnisse. Hier zeigt sich möglicherweise auch ein Gesprächsbedarf über Wünsche und Vorstellungen im Hinblick auf das Lebensende. Palliativdienste sollten deshalb besonders auf die psychosozialen Bedürfnisse einzugehen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Roch
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| | - P Schendzielorz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - A Scherzad
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - B van Oorschot
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - M Scheich
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|