1
|
Allan LL, Skene SS, Eastley KB, Herbertson R, Smith E, Michael A. Can we improve the management of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction? Results of a feasibility study of elemental diet as an alternative to parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced gynaecological cancer. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:567. [PMID: 39093327 PMCID: PMC11297088 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08709-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nutrition support in inoperable bowel obstruction (IBO) remains challenging. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recommended if the prognosis is > 2 months. An elemental diet (ED) is licensed for strictures in Crohn's disease but has not been used in malignant bowel obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ED in patients with IBO and provide a proof of concept of ED as an acceptable feeding option. METHODS This was a mixed-methods single-arm feasibility study. The primary endpoint was to provide a 'proof of concept' of ED as an acceptable feeding option for patients with IBO. Secondary endpoints included taste acceptability, incidences of vomiting and pain, the proportion of women who tolerated ED, the number of cartons drunk, quality of life (QOL) and the number of women treated with chemotherapy. Patients (> 18 years) with CT-confirmed IBO who could tolerate 500 ml of liquid in 24 h remained on the trial for 2 weeks. RESULTS A total of 29 patients were recruited; of those, 19 contributed to the analysis for the primary endpoint; 13 (68.4%) participants tolerated the ED; 26 patients contributed to MSAS and EORTC QLQ questionnaires at baseline to allow for the assessment of symptoms. At the start of the study, 18 (69%) of patients experienced vomiting, reducing to 4 (25%) by the end of day 15 of the study; 24 (92%) of patients reported pain at consent, reducing to 12 (75%) by the end of day 15. QOL scores improved from 36.2 (95% CI 27.7-44.7) at baseline to 53.1 (95% CI 40.3-66) at the end of day 15; 16 (84%) participants commenced chemotherapy within the first week of starting ED. The number of cartons across all participants showed a median of 1.3 cartons per day (range 0.8 to 2.5). CONCLUSION ED is well tolerated by patients with IBO caused by gynaecological malignancies and may have a positive effect on symptom burden and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey L Allan
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
| | - Simon S Skene
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XP, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Bennett Eastley
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XP, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Herbertson
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Sussex Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor Smith
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XP, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clark K, Boland JW, Currow DC. Letter to the Editor. A Response to: Palliative Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Prospective, Open Label, Phase 2 Study at an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e919-e920. [PMID: 38342475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Clark
- Palliative Care Network (K.C.), Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia; Northern Clinical School (K.C.), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Jason W Boland
- Hull York Medical School (J.W.B.), University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - David C Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health (D.C.C.), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mercadante S. Triple or Drug Combination for the Medical Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Does It Make a Difference? J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e917-e918. [PMID: 38244705 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Main Regional Center of Pain Relief and Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy; Regional Home Care Program, SAMOT, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu N, Sun BJ, Yue TM, Lee B. Factors Predicting Readmission and Mortality in Patients Admitted for Malignant Bowel Obstruction. Am Surg 2024:31348241250045. [PMID: 38676624 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241250045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of patients with advanced malignancies and has poor prognosis. Currently, there are limited guidelines for MBO management or predicting outcomes for these patients. OBJECTIVE To identify patient factors associated with readmission and mortality after hospital admission for MBO. PARTICIPANTS A 5-year retrospective review was performed from 2017 to 2022 at a single tertiary institution to evaluate patients admitted for MBO. All patients had advanced cancer of gastrointestinal or gynecologic primary. Patient demographics, socioeconomic factors, tumor characteristics, and inpatient outcomes were collected. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine variables predicting hospital readmission for recurrent MBO and 90-day mortality. RESULTS 210 patients were included. Mean age was 61 years, 28% were male, and 19% did not primarily speak English. 35% of patients lived over 50 miles from the hospital. On multivariable analysis, non-English speaking patients exhibited increased risk of readmission for MBO (OR = 2.82, P = .039). Older age was associated with decreased risk for MBO readmission (OR = .96, P = .007). Ascites was associated with increased mortality (OR = 2.17, P = .043). Earlier palliative care (PC) consultation predicted decreased readmission (OR = .24, P < .001) yet increased mortality at 90 days (OR = 3.20, P = .003). CONCLUSION Patient age, primary language, and PC consult were predictors for MBO readmission, which may impact 90-day mortality. Given the palliative nature of MBO, modifiable factors such as PC consultation and multidisciplinary goals of care discussions should be prioritized in order to reduce readmissions and focus on quality of life (QOL) for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nova Xu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Beatrice J Sun
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany M Yue
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walter M, Hansen E, Hamid S, Carozza D, Mann G, Roche C, George A, Attwood K, Case A. Palliative Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Prospective, Open Label, Phase 2 Study at an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:20-26. [PMID: 37769820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of intra-abdominal cancer, frequently seen in advanced gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancer. Management of MBO can be challenging, particularly if the patient is not a surgical candidate. No consensus exists on how best to manage these patients medically. Retrospective studies suggest that the combination of dexamethasone, octreotide and metoclopramide may lead to relief of obstruction and improvement in symptoms associated with the obstruction. OBJECTIVES This study seeks to prospectively evaluate the combination of drug "triple therapy" dexamethasone 4 mg BID, metoclopramide 10 mg Q6 and octreotide 300 mcg TID to assess tolerability, safety, and effect on symptoms and deobstruction. METHODS Adults admitted at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center with malignant bowel obstruction were eligible. Eligible patients who constented to the study were started on the triple therapy with close monitoring of symptoms and for adverse effects. RESULTS A total of 15 patients enrolled in the study. Two patients experienced bradycardia as adverse effect and there was no incidence of bowel perforation. All patients who completed the study had complete resolution of their nausea, and improvement in other symptoms including pain, constipation, tolerance of oral intake and resumption of bowel movements. Only two of the 15 patients were alive to complete the six-month post study follow up. CONCLUSION "Triple therapy" with dexamethasone, metoclopramide, and octreotide for management of nonsurgical MBO in this small sample size appears safe and well tolerated however a diagnosis of inoperable MBO remains associated with poor prognosis and death within months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Walter
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care (M.W., E.H., D.C., A.C.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | - Eric Hansen
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care (M.W., E.H., D.C., A.C.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Showkat Hamid
- Department of Medicine (S.H.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Desi Carozza
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care (M.W., E.H., D.C., A.C.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Gary Mann
- Department of Surgical Oncology (G.M.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Charles Roche
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology (C.R.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Anthony George
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (A.G., K.A.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kristopher Attwood
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (A.G., K.A.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Amy Case
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care (M.W., E.H., D.C., A.C.), Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mercadante S. Management of malignant bowel obstruction. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:14. [PMID: 38070515 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00319-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Main Regional Center for Pain Relief and Supportive-Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wallace A, Phillips-Clarke C, Peiris S, Thiruppathy K. Cancer management from a chronic gastrointestinal function perspective. Clin Med (Lond) 2023; 23:545-548. [PMID: 38065593 PMCID: PMC11298502 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-ga1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Bowel dysfunction in cancer is a significant and challenging issue for both clinicians and patients. As cancer survival improves, the impact of gastrointestinal symptoms on quality of life is of ever-increasing relevance. This review aims to provide an overview of the common gastrointestinal complaints seen in cancer sufferers and discuss the principles of management and up to date treatment options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Wallace
- Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | | | - Seth Peiris
- Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Kumaran Thiruppathy
- Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK, and Henley Business School, Reading University, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Otte J, Love R. Response to Demarest et al. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2023; 37:218-220. [PMID: 37074960 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2201271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
|
9
|
Chang VT, Sandifer C, Zhong F. GI Symptoms in Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:24-33. [PMID: 36623952 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This review will apply a multidisciplinary approach to GI symptoms with attention to symptom assessment (instruments and qualitative aspects), differential diagnosis, and recent findings relevant to management of symptoms and underlying diseases. We conclude that further development of supportive interventions for GI symptoms for both patient and caregivers has the potential to reduce distress from GI symptoms, and anticipate better symptom control with advances in scientific knowledge and improvement of the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor T Chang
- Section Hematology Oncology (111), VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ; Department of Medicine, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| | | | - Fengming Zhong
- Section Hematology Oncology (111), VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ; Department of Medicine, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Demarest K, Lavu H, Collins E, Batra V. Comprehensive Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Review. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2023; 37:91-105. [PMID: 36377820 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2022.2106012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant bowel obstruction is a common complication of advanced gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and genitourinary tumors. Patients present with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation. Cross-sectional imaging is essential to make a diagnosis of bowel obstruction. Initial management is conservative with fluid replacement, electrolyte replacement, bowel rest and sometimes nasogastric decompression. Numerous advanced options exist for definitive management, though none are overly promising but nevertheless may improve quality and quantity of life. Surgical bypass, endoscopic stenting, and endoscopic decompression are some of the options with variable efficacy and are employed in select patients. Chemotherapy may be utilized if the bowel obstruction resolves to reduce tumor burden in a limited number of patients. Parenteral nutrition is an option and should typically be used in surgical patients with good functional and nutritional status with limited tumor burden or curative intent. Palliative care and hospice should be discussed in patients with advanced malignancy who present with peritoneal carcinomatosis or multiple levels of obstruction. Overall prognosis of malignant bowel obstruction is poor, and median survival ranges from 26 to 192 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Demarest
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Harish Lavu
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Collins
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivek Batra
- Kaitlin Demarest, MD, is with, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Harish Lavu, MD, is with the Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Elizabeth Collins, MD, is with the Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Vivek Batra, MD, is with the Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bravington A, Obita G, Baddeley E, Johnson MJ, Murtagh FE, Currow DC, Boland EG, Nelson A, Seddon K, Oliver A, Noble SI, Boland JW. The range and suitability of outcome measures used in the assessment of palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2022; 36:1336-1350. [PMID: 36131489 PMCID: PMC10150264 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221122352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant bowel obstruction, a complication of certain advanced cancers, causes severe symptoms which profoundly affect quality of life. Clinical management remains complex, and outcome assessment is inconsistent. AIM To identify outcomes evaluating palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction, as part of a four-phase study developing a core outcome set. DESIGN The review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019150648). Eligible studies included at least one subgroup with obstruction below the ligament of Treitz undergoing palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. Study quality was not assessed because the review does not evaluate efficacy. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database, CINAHL, PSYCinfo Caresearch, Open Grey and BASE were searched for trials and observational studies in October 2021. RESULTS A total of 4769 studies were screened, 290 full texts retrieved and 80 (13,898 participants) included in a narrative synthesis; 343 outcomes were extracted verbatim and pooled into 90 unique terms across six domains: physiological, nutrition, life impact, resource use, mortality and survival. Prevalent outcomes included adverse events (78% of studies), survival (54%), symptom control (39%) and mortality (31%). Key individual symptoms assessed were vomiting (41% of studies), nausea (34%) and pain (33%); 19% of studies assessed quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Assessment focuses on survival, complications and overall symptom control. There is a need for definitions of treatment 'success' that are meaningful to patients, a more consistent approach to symptom assessment, and greater consideration of how to measure wellbeing in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Bravington
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | | | - Elin Baddeley
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Fliss Em Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | | | - Elaine G Boland
- Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Cottingham, Hull, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kathy Seddon
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alfred Oliver
- National Cancer Research Institute, Consumer Liaison Group, Trans-Humber Consumer Research Panel, London, UK
| | - Simon Ir Noble
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jason W Boland
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Madariaga A, Lau J, Ghoshal A, Dzierżanowski T, Larkin P, Sobocki J, Dickman A, Furness K, Fazelzad R, Crawford GB, Lheureux S. MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4711-4728. [PMID: 35274188 PMCID: PMC9046338 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06889-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) MBO study group conducted a systematic review of databases (inception to March 2021) to identify studies about patients with advanced cancer and MBO that reported on the following outcomes: symptom management, bowel obstruction resolution, prognosis, overall survival, and quality of life. The review was restricted to studies published in English, but no restrictions were placed on publication year, country, and study type. As per the MASCC Guidelines Policy, the findings were synthesized to determine the levels of evidence to support each MBO intervention and, ultimately, the graded recommendations and suggestions. RESULTS The systematic review identified 17,656 published studies and 397 selected for the guidelines. The MASCC study group developed a total of 25 evidence-based suggestions and recommendations about the management of MBO-related nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, pain, inflammation, bowel decompression, and nutrition. Expert consensus-based guidance about advanced care planning and psychosocial support is also provided. CONCLUSION This MASCC Guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations about MBO management for patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,12 Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jenny Lau
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arunangshu Ghoshal
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tomasz Dzierżanowski
- Laboratory of Palliative Medicine, Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Philip Larkin
- Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jacek Sobocki
- Department of General Surgery and Clinical Nutrition, Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrew Dickman
- Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, England, UK
| | - Kate Furness
- Department of Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Library and information services, University of Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory B Crawford
- Northern Adelaide Palliative Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|