Long-term unmet supportive care needs of teenage and young adult (TYA) childhood brain tumour survivors and their caregivers: a cross-sectional survey

Experiences of families post treatment for childhood brain tumours during medical clinic consultations regarding health-related quality of life, unmet needs and communication barriers: A qualitative exploration

BACKGROUND

Many studies highlight poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children treated for brain tumours and their parents. However, little is known about the extent to which their informational, healthcare and communication needs regarding HRQoL are met during medical outpatient consultations.

AIM

To explore the experiences of families regarding communication with physicians about HRQoL issues during consultations after treatment for childhood brain tumours.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with 18 families of children and adolescents aged 8-17 years after completion of brain tumour treatment. Participants had completed treatment within the last 5 years and were receiving regular outpatient follow-up care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the Framework Method.

RESULTS

Five main themes were identified: (i) unmet emotional and mental health needs; (ii) double protection; (iii) unmet information needs; (iv) communication barriers within consultations; and (v) finding a new normal.

CONCLUSION

There was a need to improve communication between clinicians and these families, improve information provision, and overcome barriers to conversing with children within these outpatient consultations. Children and their parents should be supported to voice their current needs and concerns regarding their HRQoL. These findings will inform further development of the UK version of the 'KLIK' patient- and parent-reported outcome (PROM) portal.

The information needs of relatives of childhood cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review of quantitative evidence

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to: (1) summarize the quantitative evidence on the information needs of relatives of childhood cancer patients, survivors, and children deceased from cancer; and (2) identify factors associated with these needs.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL were systematically searched. The methodological quality of all included publications was assessed, and the extracted data were analyzed using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Of 5810 identified articles, 45 were included. Information needs were classified as unmet, met (satisfied), and unspecified and categorized into five domains: medical information, cancer-related consequences, lifestyle, family, and support. Most unmet information needs concerned cancer-related consequences (e.g., late effects), while information needs on support were generally met. Migrant background and higher education were associated with higher information needs among parents. Siblings had lower information needs than parents.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the information needs of relatives in the context of childhood cancer, showing that information on cancer-related consequences is needed most often. The socioeconomic background of the relatives needs continued consideration throughout the cancer trajectory.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest the need for personalized information. Healthcare professionals should adapt their communication strategies to respond to the different and evolving needs of all affected relatives.

From Storage to Survivorship: A Scoping Review of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Experiences and Preferences in Reproductive Survivorship Care After Fertility Tissue Preservation

Despite improved survival rates for childhood cancer, around 60% of survivors suffer lifelong health problems due to their treatment, including fertility issues which account for one third of these problems. Ovarian or testicular tissue cryopreservation can be offered to patients whose cancer treatment puts them at high risk of subsequent subfertility, but it presents unique challenges compared to standard methods of fertility preservation. We report the available information on the experiences of cancer survivors who preserved tissue for future fertility, to support the development of survivorship care informed by recipients' perspectives and experiences to identify future research priorities. We conducted a scoping review following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). From 1956 unique records, 5 met our inclusion criteria. No literature was found reporting on the experiences of people who stored testicular tissue. We found that young women who had stored ovarian tissue faced complex emotional and ethical dilemmas in reproductive decisions post cancer and strongly desired their own biological children. This scoping review is the first to report beyond clinical outcomes by focusing specifically on the self-reported outcomes of patients who preserved ovarian tissue in early life after a cancer diagnosis. Separate consideration of the needs of patients with stored fertility tissue is needed to enable personalized survivorship care. Patient-reported outcomes are also needed from individuals with stored testicular tissue, parents who consented to their child's tissue storage, and the healthcare professionals involved in their care.

Inequalities in access to neuro-oncology supportive care and rehabilitation: A survey of healthcare professionals' perspectives

Background

Neuro-oncology patients and caregivers should have equitable access to rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care. To investigate existing issues and potential solutions, we surveyed neuro-oncology professionals to explore current barriers and facilitators to screening patients' needs and referral to services.

Methods

Members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-BTG) were invited to complete a 39-item online questionnaire covering the availability of services, screening, and referral practice. Responses were analyzed descriptively; associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and screening/referral practice were explored.

Results

In total, 103 participants completed the survey (67% women and 57% medical doctors). Fifteen professions from 23 countries were represented. Various rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care services were available yet rated "inadequate" by 21-37% of participants. Most respondents with a clinical role (n = 94) declare to screen (78%) and to refer (83%) their patients routinely for physical/cognitive/emotional issues. Survey completers (n = 103) indicated the main reasons for not screening/referring were (1) lack of suitable referral options (50%); (2) shortage of healthcare professionals (48%); and (3) long waiting lists (42%). To improve service provision, respondents suggested there is a need for education about neuro-oncology-specific issues (75%), improving the availability of services (65%) and staff (64%), developing international guidelines (64%), and strengthening the existing evidence-base for rehabilitation (60%).

Conclusions

Detecting and managing neuro-oncology patients' and caregivers' rehabilitation, supportive,- and palliative care needs can be improved. Better international collaboration can help address healthcare disparities.

Unmet needs in people with high-grade glioma: defining criteria for stepped care intervention

BACKGROUND

We aimed to define levels of unmet supportive care needs in people with primary brain tumor and to reach expert consensus on feasibility of addressing patients' needs in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of people diagnosed with high-grade glioma (n = 116) who completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form during adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Participants were allocated to 1 of 3 categories: no need ("no need" for help on all items), low need ("low need" for help on at least 1 item, but no "moderate" or "high" need), or moderate/high need (at least 1 "moderate" or "high" need indicated). Clinical capacity to respond to the proportion of patients needing to be prioritized was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 13% (n = 5) were categorized as no need, 23% (n = 27) low need, and 64% (n = 74) moderate/high need. At least 1 moderate/high need was reported in the physical and daily living domain (42%) and the psychological (34%) domain. In recognition of health system capacity, the moderate/high need category was modified to distinguish between moderate need ("moderate" need indicated for at least 1 item but "high" need was not selected for any item) and high need (at least 1 "high" need indicated). Results revealed 24% (n = 28) moderate need and 40% (n = 46) high need. Those categorized as high need indicated needing assistance navigating the health system and information.

CONCLUSIONS

Using four step allocations resulted in 40% of patients indicating high need. Categories may facilitate appropriate triaging and guide stepped models of healthcare delivery.

The development and validation of a needs assessment tool for use with YOUng adult survivors of a CentrAl Nervous system tumor (YOU-CAN)

Background

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of a central nervous system (CNS) tumor represent a vulnerable group who can experience: social isolation, low rates of employment, and achieving independence can be compromised, leading to poorer quality of life compared with survivors of other cancer types. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the validity of a needs assessment tool (NAT) for AYA survivors of a CNS tumor.

Methods

Items generated using data from 29 qualitative studies and cognitive interviews (n = 8) produced NAT V1.1 (49 items). 128 of 316 eligible participants attending neuro-oncology clinics at 4 NHS sites between June 2022 and March 2023 completed the NAT V1.1 to allow for item reduction and refinement and to evaluate reliability and validity. A pilot study (n = 6) using YOU-CAN in routine follow-up concluded the study.

Results

Hierarchical analysis and Rasch analysis identified 18- and 15-items for removal, respectively. YOU-CAN, comprised of the remaining 16 items, demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.901, n = 40) and sufficient correlation with the European Quality of Life questionnaire and Supportive Care Needs Survey (Pearson r = 0.433 and 0.590, respectively). Pilot testing showed YOU-CAN triggered discussions of unmet needs in consultations and highlighted the importance of multidisciplinary support.

Conclusions

YOU-CAN is a valid and reliable instrument containing items related to concerns about physical and emotional health; family and relationships; self-acceptance; and independence. Future efforts should examine YOU-CAN's feasibility, and develop guidance for managing unmet needs. Routine use of YOU-CAN may improve the identification of otherwise undiscussed unmet needs and opportunities to deliver personalized support.

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of a Central Nervous System Tumor: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To identify and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship-related concepts for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methods: We searched five electronic databases. Two researchers independently screened all titles for inclusion and used consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidance to grade the quality of evidence for each measurement property. Results: Four studies met eligibility criteria: single-item pain thermometer; single-item fatigue thermometer; 37-item pediatric functional assessment of cancer therapy-brain tumor survivors, measuring quality of life; and 12-item Perceived Barriers Scale to assess barriers to employment. The Perceived Barrier Scale showed high-quality evidence for internal consistency and moderate quality evidence for construct and structural validity. Evidence for the measurement properties of the other PROMs was low-to-moderate quality. Conclusion: We found one PROM with sufficient evidence for good measurement properties to support its use. This warrants development and evaluation of further PROMs to inform ongoing supportive care for this population. Implications for Cancer Survivors: The Perceived Barriers Scale is sufficiently validated and could be considered to guide support for AYA survivors of CNS tumors to achieve their employment goals.

Quality of life and family functioning soon after paediatric brain tumour diagnosis: A cross-sectional observational study

PURPOSE

There is scant scholarly exploration of quality of life in families with a child who has a brain tumour early after diagnosis, despite this being a pivotal point in their illness trajectory. We aimed to describe quality of life in children and their parents, and family functioning, within six months of diagnosis; and to examine if this differed for various subpopulations.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of an ongoing longitudinal survey. Parents/carers of a child who had a diagnosis of a malignant or non-malignant brain tumour and were receiving care at the Queensland Children's Hospital were invited to complete an electronic survey. Univariate analyses were conducted with potential covariates and each dependent variable (child quality of life, caregiver quality of life, family functioning). Potential relationships between the outcome variables were explored through Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine diverse families completed the survey between August 2020 and September 2022. Caregiver quality of life did not differ by the child's tumour risk grade. It was lowest for those with a child who had undergone chemotherapy and/or radiation compared to surgery only, and for those with a child who had been diagnosed 6 months prior to survey completion compared to more recent diagnoses. A third of families reported problematic family functioning. Lower levels of problematic family functioning were associated with higher caregiver quality of life (r = -.49, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest caregivers need greater psychosocial support early after diagnosis, and supports the need for family-centred care that fosters communication and cohesiveness.

Employment among Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To date, there are heterogeneous studies related to childhood cancer survivors’ (CCS) employment rates. Given the importance of this topic, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence of employment among CCS and to examine its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to search for pertinent articles in relevant electronic databases. Eighty-nine articles comprising 93 cohorts were included. The overall prevalence of employment was 66% (CI: 95% 0.63–0.69). Subgroup meta-analyses showed that lower rates were found for central nervous system tumor survivors (51%, CI: 95% 0.43–0.59), and for CCS treated with cranial-radiotherapy (53%, CI: 95% 0.42–0.64) or haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (56%, CI: 95% 0.46–0.65). The studies conducted in Asia highlighted employment rates of 47% (CI: 95%, 0.34–0.60). Univariate meta-regressions identified the following socio-demographic factors associated with higher rates of employment: a female gender (p = 0.046), a higher mean age at the time of investigation (p = 0.00), a longer time since diagnosis (p = 0.00), a higher educational level (p = 0.03), and a married status (p = 0.00). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that two-thirds of CCS are employed worldwide. Identifying vulnerable groups of CCS may allow for the design of multidisciplinary support strategies and interventions to promote employment in this population.

Lived experiences with unmet supportive care needs in pediatric cancer: Perspective of Chinese children and their parents

Objective

Unmet supportive care needs(SCNs) impact pediatric cancer patients and their parents. This study aimed to explore the unmet SCNs from the perspective of Chinese children with cancer and their parents through lived experiences.

Methods

The data of this study was collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The participants were recruited from the oncology units of three children’s hospitals in China’s cities (Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Hefei) from October 2020 to December 2021. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step phenomenological analysis method.

Results

Eight pediatric cancer patients and twenty-four parents were enrolled in the study. Four main themes and eight subthemes (both children’s and parent’s perspectives) were generated: 1) meeting the ongoing needs along the cancer trajectory (can you tell me what comes next; our needs are growing); 2) communicating with a family focus (they only talk to my parents; let each family member have a voice); 3) providing care beyond the treatment (I am bigger than my body [the children’s needs for emotional consolidation and information about their prognosis]; there are things beyond treatment); 4) getting support from the community (I am not a monster [the children were unhappy about being treated differently]; we want to connect with the resources near us).

Conclusion

This study revealed multiple unmet SCNs from the perspective of Chinese children with cancer and their parents. The findings call for comprehensive and in-depth supportive care beyond treatment, integration of the family member voice in pediatric cancer care, and a coordinated pediatric cancer support mechanism in the Chinese healthcare system.