Predictive value of preoperative handgrip strength on postoperative outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of adherence to oral nutritional supplements on nutrition status and muscle strength in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A prospective observational longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of evidence regarding the effects of adherence to oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and the types of formulas used in clinical practice, we aimed to assess the impact of adherence to ONS and the high-protein formula on the nutrition status and muscle strength in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

This study evaluated newly diagnosed outpatients with esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer prescribed ONS. Nutrition status was assessed using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), and muscle strength was assessed using handgrip strength (HGS) dynamometry. ONS adherence was calculated as the ratio of self-reported intake to the prescribed amount and categorized as ≥80% or <80%.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were included. Most patients were ≥60 years of age (63%), were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (63%), were classified as stage III and IV (83%), and exhibited nutrition risk or malnutrition according to PG-SGA (89%). Patients with adherence ≥80% to ONS exhibited less weight loss and HGS reduction compared with patients with adherence <80% (P < 0.05). Although patients consuming a high-protein formula maintained HGS and those on a standard formula experienced a reduction, formula type did not predict HGS change in the multivariate analysis. ONS protein intake, adjusted for adherence, was a predictor of weight change (β: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02-0.2; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Patients with adherence ≥80% to ONS experienced less reduction in both weight and HGS, whereas those consuming a high-protein formula maintained HGS. Notably, ONS protein intake, adjusted for adherence, was an independent predictor of weight change.

Significance of Comprehensive Analysis of Preoperative Sarcopenia Based on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function for the Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The assessment of muscle mass loss, muscle strength, and physical function has been recommended in diagnosing sarcopenia. However, only muscle mass has been assessed in previous studies. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of comprehensively diagnosed preoperative sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study analyzed 115 patients with esophageal cancer (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent curative esophagectomy. Preoperative sarcopenia was analyzed using the skeletal mass index (SMI), handgrip strength, and gait speed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Clinicopathologic factors, incidence of postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. The significance of the three individual parameters also was evaluated.

RESULTS

The evaluation identified 47 (40.9%) patients with low SMI, 31 (27.0%) patients with low handgrip strength, and 6 (5.2%) patients with slow gait speed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 23 patients (20%) and associated with older age and advanced pT stage. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the three parameters, only slow gait speed was associated with Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater complications. The sarcopenia group showed significantly worse OS than the non-sarcopenia group. Those with low handgrip strength tended to have worse OS, and those with slow gait speed had significantly worse OS than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative sarcopenia diagnosed using skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function may have an impact on the survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Effects of measurement protocols and repetitions on handgrip strength weakness and asymmetry in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of handgrip strength (HGS) in clinical cancer research is surging. The association between HGS and outcomes in patients with cancer varied across studies, which might be due to the different measurement protocols for HGS. We aimed to answer three questions: (1) Did the use of various protocols for HGS, along with different numbers of repetitions, lead to significant differences in maximum HGS values? (2) If yes, were these differences clinically significant? (3) Did the differences in HGS protocols and repetitions affect the identification of HGS weakness or HGS asymmetry?

METHODS

We continuously recruited adult patients with solid tumours. Two protocols were used to measure HGS: Method A, following the American Society of Hand Therapists guidelines, and Method B, following the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey guidelines. To analyse HGS, we used the maximal value obtained from either two or three repetitions of the dominant hand or four or six repetitions of both hands.

RESULTS

We included 497 patients (326 men and 171 women, median age: 58 years). The maximal HGS values, measured with Method B, were significantly higher than those measured by Method A in both men and women, despite repetitions (all P < 0.05). The maximum HGS values were significantly different across the repetition groups, regardless of measurement protocols and sex (all P < 0.01). The protocol-induced differences in maximal HGS values might be clinically meaningful in over 60% of men and 40% of women despite repetitions. The repetition-induced difference was only clinically significant in 4.3-17.8% of men and 4.1-14.6% of women. To identify HGS weakness, using Method A (six repetitions) as the 'gold' standard, the other protocols demonstrated an overall accuracy of 0.923-0.997 in men and 0.965-1 in women. To identify HGS asymmetry, using Method A (six repetitions) as the 'gold' standard, Method B (six repetitions) demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 0.972 in men and 0.971 in women. Method A (four repetitions) showed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.837 in men and 0.825 in women, while Method B (four repetitions) showed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.825 in men and 0.807 in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Both measurement protocols and repetitions significantly affect the maximal HGS values. The identification of HGS weakness is not significantly affected by either protocols or repetitions, while the identification of HGS asymmetry may be affected by different repetitions but not protocols.

Prolonged preoperative sedentary time is a risk factor for postoperative ileus in patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the association between prolonged preoperative sedentary time (ST) and postoperative ileus (POI) after adjusting for confounders in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled 155 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for primary CRC. A diagnosis of POI was made by the surgeons if the Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) grade is ≥ 2 within 30 days after surgery. Preoperative ST was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire usual week short version (Japanese version). Patients were classified into two groups (ST < 6 h/day and ST ≥ 6 h/day) based on results from the questionnaire, and data were analyzed using a propensity score-matching strategy to adjust for confounders. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff value of preoperative ST for predicting POI.

RESULTS

Of the 155 patients, 134 were included in the analysis. POI occurred in 16 (11.9%) patients of overall patients and 11 (12.5%) of the 88 matched patients. The logistic regression analysis after propensity score-matching showed that prolonged preoperative ST (ST ≥ 6 h/day) was associated with POI (odds ratio 5.40 (95% confidence interval: 1.09 - 26.60), p = 0.038). The ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cutoff value of preoperative ST for predicting POI was 6 h/day.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged preoperative ST is a risk factor for POI in patients with CRC. Therefore, reducing preoperative ST may play an important role in preventing POI.

Preoperative low handgrip strength (HGS) with HGS asymmetry is associated with adverse outcomes among older adults with gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to explore the associations of low hand grip strength (HGS), HGS asymmetry, their combinations, and frailty on hospital readmissions, total complications, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) among older adults with gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 342 patients with gastric cancer aged ≥60 years who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) was used to collect information on frailty. HGS was measured twice for each hand using an electronic handgrip dynamometer. The highest HGS readings on each hand were used for calculating the HGS asymmetry ratio: non-dominant HGS (kg)/dominant HGS (kg). The Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazard model and the logistic regression model were used for the analyses, with covariates adjusted.

RESULTS

Low HGS (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR] = 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-3.93, P = 0.036) and low HGS with HGS asymmetry (SHR = 3.95, 95% CI = 1.50-10.36, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with hospital readmissions. Frailty was associated with total complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.61-5.13, P < 0.001) and PLOS (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.19-3.29, P < 0.001). Low HGS, HGS asymmetry, and their combinations were not significantly associated with total complications and PLOS.

DISCUSSION

Preoperative low HGS and low HGS with HGS asymmetry were associated with hospital readmissions, while frailty was associated with total complications and PLOS among older adults with gastric cancer. In the future, more rigorously designed studies are needed to verify our results further to improve preoperative clinical assessment and frailty evaluation among older adults with gastric cancer.

Preoperative low absolute and relative handgrip strength as predictors of postoperative short-term outcomes: a prospective study based on patients aged 60 years and older with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the association of absolute and relative HGS indicators with postoperative short-term outcomes in older patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The prospective, single-center, observational study involved 230 patients (age ≥ 60 years) who underwent radical gastrectomy. Absolute HGS was directly obtained from results measured by a hand dynamometer, while relative HGS was calculated as the value of absolute HGS divided by body mass index (BMI), appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) and age, respectively. Low absolute HGS was defined according to the criterion in AWGS 2019 consensus and the first gender-specific quartile. Low relative handgrip strength was defined if it was below the first gender-specific quartile of the distribution. Postoperative outcomes included total complications, malnutrition and length of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to investigate and compare the predictive values of different HGS indicators.

RESULTS

For the five HGS indicators, multivariate analyses showed that low absolute HGS (AWGS consensus), low HGS/BMI and HGS/age were independent risk factors for both postoperative total complications (absolute HGS(AWGS consensus): OR  2.03, 95%CI:1.05-3.93; HGS/BMI: OR  2.12, 95%CI 1.05-4.28; HGS/age: OR  2.79, 95%CI 1.40-5.54) and malnutrition (absolute HGS(AWGS consensus): OR   2.01, 95%CI 1.10-3.67; HGS/BMI: OR  2.28, 95%CI 1.20-4.33; HGS/age: OR   2.70, 95%CI 1.42-5.14). Low absolute HGS (quartile) was an independent risk factor for malnutrition (OR   1.96, 95%CI 1.04-3.71). Moreover, Low HGS/age was associated with lengthened postoperative hospital stay (OR  2.07, 95%CI 1.12-3.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Except HGS/ASMI, both absolute and relative HGS indicators were associated with postoperative short-term outcomes. Particularly, HGS/age revealed relatively better predictive value for the studied outcomes.