Sleep disturbance in cancer survivors with lymphedema: a scoping review

Lymphedema after saphenous harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery: case report and literature review

Different causes have been described for secondary lymphedema as reported in this article. A 75-year-old man was diagnosed with lymphedema about one decade after saphenous harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. It took two years for him to find out his diagnosis and receive the proper treatment. After standard complete decongestive therapy, his volume and pain decreased and his quality of life was improved, especially its physical aspect. It is important to recognize the possibility of lymphedema development after saphenous harvesting among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery to prevent significant disturbance of quality of life with timely management.

The effect of complex decongestive physiotherapy applied with different compression pressures on skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a double-blinded randomized comparison trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of compression bandage applied with different pressures on the skin and subcutaneous thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

21 individuals with stage 2 unilateral BCRL participated in the study. Individuals were randomly allocated into two groups as low-pressure bandage (20-30 mmHg) (n: 11) and high-pressure bandage (45-55 mmHg) (n: 10). Skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness, extremity volume, sleep quality, treatment benefit, and comfort were evaluated by ultrasound from 6 reference points (as hand dorsum, wrist volar, forearm volar, arm volar, forearm dorsum, and arm dorsum), volumetric measurement, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema, and visual analog scale, respectively. Complex decongestive physiotherapy was applied to both groups. Compression bandage was applied according to their group. Individuals were evaluated at the baseline, 1st session, 10th session, 20th session, and at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Skin thickness decreased significantly in the volar reference points of the extremity in the high-pressure bandage group (p = 0.004, p = 0.031, and p = 0.003). Subcutaneous tissue thickness significantly decreased at all reference points in the high-pressure bandage group (p < 0.05). In the low-pressure bandage group, skin thickness only decreased in the forearm dorsum and the arm dorsum (p = 0.002, p = 0.035) and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed for all points (p < 0.05) except for hand and arm dorsum (p = 0.064, p = 0.236). Edema decreased in a shorter time in the high-pressure bandage group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in sleep quality, treatment benefit, and comfort for both groups (p = 0.316, p = 0.300, and p = 0.557, respectively).

CONCLUSION

High pressure was more effective in reducing subcutaneous tissue thickness in the dorsum of hand and arm. The usage of high-pressure can be recommended especially in cases which have edema in the dorsum of hand and arm which is difficult to resolve. Also, high-pressure bandage can provide faster edema resolution and can be used in rapid volume reduction as desired. Treatment outcomes may improve with high-pressure bandage without any impairment in comfort, sleep quality, and treatment benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE

NCT05660590, 12/26/2022 retrospectively registered.