1
|
Zhang T, Ren Z, Wakefield CE, Hui BPH, Akechi T, Shi C, Du X, Chen W, Lai L, Zhao C, Li Y, Zhou Y. Are digital psychological interventions for psychological distress and quality of life in cancer patients effective? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2025; 115:102520. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
|
2
|
Cabreira V, Wilkinson T, Frostholm L, Stone J, Carson A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standalone digital interventions for cognitive symptoms in people without dementia. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:278. [PMID: 39390236 PMCID: PMC11467311 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01280-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Cognitive symptoms are prevalent across neuropsychiatric disorders, increase distress and impair quality of life. Self-guided digital interventions offer accessibility, scalability, and may overcome the research-to-practice treatment gap. Seventy-six trials with 5214 participants were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis investigated the effects of all digital self-guided interventions, compared to controls, at post-treatment. We found a small-to-moderate positive pooled effect on cognition (k = 71; g = -0.51, 95%CI -0.64 to -0.37; p < 0.00001) and mental health (k = 30; g = -0.41, 95%CI -0.60 to -0.22; p < 0.0001). Positive treatment effects on fatigue (k = 8; g = -0.27, 95%CI -0.53 to -0.02; p = 0.03) and quality of life (k = 22; g = -0.17, 95%CI -0.34 to -0.00; p = 0.04) were only marginally significant. No significant benefit was found for performance on activities of daily living. Results were independent of control groups, treatment duration, risk of bias and delivery format. Self-guided digital transdiagnostic interventions may benefit at least a subset of patients in the short run, yet their impact on non-cognitive outcomes remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Cabreira
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisbeth Frostholm
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakamura ZM, Ali NT, Crouch A, Dhillon H, Federico A, Gates P, Grech L, Kesler SR, Ledbetter L, Mantovani E, Mayo S, Ng DQ, Pembroke L, Pike KE, Tamburin S, Tan CJ, Toh YL, Yang Y, Von Ah D, Allen DH. Impact of Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Adult Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151696. [PMID: 39048409 PMCID: PMC11402594 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021275421) synthesized evidence on the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive and functional outcomes in adult cancer survivors. METHODS Articles were identified though PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception through June 30, 2023. Studies included participants ≥18 years old, diagnosed with cancer. Primary outcomes were validated measures of subjective and objective cognition. Articles were dual reviewed for eligibility and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed with the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. RESULTS The search yielded 3,811 articles; 65 full-text articles were reviewed; 53 articles (15 cognitive training, 14 strategy-based, 21 combinations, three inpatient rehabilitation), representing 52 unique studies, were included. Positive effects were observed in at least one objective cognitive measure in 93% of strategy training, 81% of cognitive training, 79% of combination rehabilitation interventions. Positive effects were observed in subjective cognition in 100% of strategy training, 55% of cognitive training, and 92% of combination interventions. Among studies with comparator groups, processing speed improved in 60% of cognitive training studies, while strategy training did not improve processing speed; otherwise, cognitive domain effects were similar between intervention types. Impact on functional outcomes was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive rehabilitation appear beneficial for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). Differential effects on specific cognitive domains (eg, processing speed) and subjective cognition may exist between intervention types. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses should increase patient and provider awareness of the benefits of cognitive rehabilitation for CRCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | | | - Adele Crouch
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Haryana Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Federico
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, GB Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Priscilla Gates
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Center, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Grech
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke University Medical Center Library, DUMC 3702, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elisa Mantovani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, GB Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Ding Quan Ng
- University of California Irvine, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Lorna Pembroke
- School of Psychological Sciences Level 3, Australian Hearing Hub, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerryn E Pike
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stefano Tamburin
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, GB Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Chia Jie Tan
- College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Yi Long Toh
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yesol Yang
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Colombus, Ohio
| | - Diane Von Ah
- The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Colombus, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geels PL, Flynn K, Fogarty KJ, Lyerla R. Self-Report of Changes in Cognitive-Communication Function and Social Engagement Among Adults With Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024:1-12. [PMID: 39074112 DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the prevalence of cognitive-communication deficits in adult cancer survivors who reported experiencing cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). The study also aimed to determine how these problems impact their ability to engage socially and find satisfaction in their social roles. METHOD This study employed a cross-sectional survey to collect data from adult cancer survivors. The survey included questions on demographic characteristics, self-perceived cognitive-communication abilities, social engagement, and satisfaction with social participation. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman rank-order correlation, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. RESULTS Of 172 participants, 78% completed the survey, with 109 self-reporting CRCI. The participants predominantly had breast cancer, and most were diagnosed with Stage II cancers. The results indicated self-perceived impairment in various cognitive-communication domains, with functional daily communication being the most affected. Participants reported more difficulty participating in social roles and activities than their overall satisfaction with social participation. This study explored the relationships between cognitive-communication scores and social engagement, considering variables such as education, cancer type, stage, age, and treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the multidimensional nature of CRCI, emphasizing the importance of addressing both cognitive-communication and social aspects in interventions and support services. It highlights the clinical implications for speech-language pathology, suggesting a potential role in identifying and addressing cognitive-communication deficits. Future research needs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rob Lyerla
- Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rick O, Gerhardt A, Schilling G. Cancer-Related Cognitive Dysfunction: A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice. Oncol Res Treat 2024; 47:218-223. [PMID: 38471462 DOI: 10.1159/000538277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) is a major functional disorder in patients with cancer. This central nervous dysfunction is found in up to 60% of patients after tumour therapy, often significantly limits the quality of life, and significantly impedes participation in working life. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment of CRCD are of central importance. This narrative review is intended to provide an overview and support for practical clinical care with regard to diagnostics and therapeutic options. SUMMARY In Germany, CRCD has received insufficient attention in clinical practice due to the lack of guidelines for diagnosis and therapy. The pathophysiology is complex and cannot be explained by chemotherapeutic treatment alone. In addition to the tumour disease as such and the tumour therapy, psychological factors such as anxiety and depression as well as sleep disorders also play a significant role. Today, it is known that in addition to age, molecular genetic changes also have an effect on cognitive function. Morphologically, CRCD can be located in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. In addition to easy-to-use screening instruments such as the visual analogue scale, validated questionnaires such as the Questionnaire of Subjectively Experienced Deficits in Attention (FEDA) developed in Germany are also available. These allow the suspected diagnosis to be substantiated and the patient to be referred to further neurological, neuropsychological, or psycho-oncological diagnostics. Within the framework of further neuropsychological diagnostics, the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) recommends testing learning, memory, processing speed, and executive functions. From the authors' point of view, a step-by-step diagnosis is recommended in order to avoid overdiagnosis. In clinical practice, graduation according to the "Common Terminology Criteria for Adversity Events" (CTCAE Version 5.0) is suitable for assessing the degree of severity. Cognitive training should be behaviourally oriented and include regular practice of cognitive skills to restore attention, psychomotor speed, memory, and executive functions. The best evidence is currently found for web-based training programmes that can be used by the patient at home. There is also evidence for mindfulness training and physical exercises. In particular, the combination of these three therapeutic elements currently seems to be the optimal treatment strategy for CRCD. KEY MESSAGES Cognitive dysfunction should be given much more attention in the clinical care of cancer patients. Diagnostic tools for this purpose and evidence-based therapeutic interventions are available. In the future, networks should be created that allow for better care of patients with CRCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|