Clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Quality of Life in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus that can adversely affect the quality of life (QOL) in children. We aim to investigate the burden of EoE on the QOL in children aged 2-18 years and identify factors that influence their QOL.

METHOD

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in six Saudi pediatric hospitals. Pediatric Quality of Life 3.0 EoE Module was used to measure the QOL of children with EoE.

RESULTS

Thirty-six families (36 parents and 33 children) were enrolled. The most reported symptoms were vomiting (50%), dysphagia (44.4%), and food impaction (36.1%). The mean total score of the parent-proxy report of the Pediatric Quality of Life EoE was 82.9 ± 10.3 versus the children's self-reported score of 77.28 ± 13.6 (p = .043).

DISCUSSION

Recurrent emergency department visits were associated with a lower QOL, and a positive family history of EoE was associated with a better QOL.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Japan: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasingly diagnosed globally. However, there have been few general population-based studies in Asia. The aim of this study was to investigate EoE epidemiology in the Japanese general population.

METHODS

We analyzed an employer-based health insurance claim database from January 2005 to September 2022. EoE cases were identified on the basis of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health-related Problems, 10th Revision code, K20.0. We calculated the incidence and prevalence of EoE using Poisson regression and binomial distribution, respectively. Using 10 matched controls for each EoE case, a nested case-control study was performed to identify potential risk factors for EoE.

RESULTS

Of 15,200,895 individuals, 1010 EoE cases were identified. The incidence and prevalence of EoE were 2.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-3.26) per 100,000 person-years and 10.68 (95% CI, 10.01-11.37) per 100,000 people in 2022, nearly 3 and 8 times as high as those in 2017, respectively. Smoking was associated with decreased risk of EoE (odds ratio [OR], 0.45, 0.36-0.56, P < .001), whereas alcohol consumption (OR, 1.51, 1.21-1.88, P < .001) was associated with increased risk of EoE along with several allergic conditions and psychiatric disorders. EoE was not related to either body mass index or lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and prevalence of EoE in Japan have steadily increased over the past 2 decades. Nevertheless, EoE remains less common in Japan compared with the United States and Western Europe. Factors contributing to the epidemiology of EoE on a global basis may improve our understanding of the contribution of genetic and environmental risk factors.

A case of non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease diagnosed by mucosal incision-assisted biopsy

A 46-year-old woman presented at our hospital with anorexia, vomiting, and diarrhea. Blood tests indicated markedly increased eosinophil counts, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed slight erythema in the gastric body. Computed tomography showed edematous thickening of the stomach and small intestinal walls and peritonitis. Thus, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease was suspected. Endoscopic biopsies from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were collected, but no significant increases in eosinophil counts were observed. Little ascites effusion was detected and puncture cytology was difficult to perform. Thus, a sample of the muscularis propria layer was obtained by mucosal incision-assisted biopsy. Histopathological examination of the biopsy revealed significant eosinophilic infiltration within the muscularis propria layer of the stomach, confirming the diagnosis of non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease. The patient was treated with a leukotriene receptor antagonist and prednisolone, and her clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal wall thickening rapidly improved. The Japanese diagnostic guideline for non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease requires endoscopic biopsy or eosinophilic infiltration of ascites fluid. When diagnosis is difficult using conventional methods, as in this case, mucosal incision-assisted biopsy is useful as a next step.

Exploration of useful clinical laboratory values as diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare eosinophilic infiltrative disorder. In Japan, EGE is diagnosed using clinical symptoms as well as microscopic, haematologic and histopathological findings. In this study, we examined the usefulness of laboratory data in the diagnosis of EGE.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with EGE at Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital between April 2015 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study and their data was retrospectively analysed. We evaluated their medical history, laboratory data including leukocyte count, eosinophil count, immunoglobulin (Ig) E, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), C-reactive protein (CRP), etc. and histopathological data were collected from the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve of 168 patients who were treated for EGE could be analysed. The peripheral eosinophil count was correlated with the duodenal or ascending colon eosinophil count; moreover, the blood lymphocyte count and the TARC were correlated with the transverse colon eosinophil count. Multivariate regression analysis showed correlations only in the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum. Specifically, correlations were noted between blood eosinophils and gastric eosinophils, blood eosinophils and duodenal eosinophils, blood lymphocytes and gastric eosinophils, blood IgE and oesophageal, gastric and duodenal eosinophils and CRP and oesophageal eosinophils.

CONCLUSION

The extent of blood eosinophil count, lymphocyte count, IgE and CRP elevation together with clinical features and pathology can be incorporated into a diagnostic scoring criteria system to improve the accuracy of diagnosing this uncommon condition in the future.

A case report of eosinophilic jejunal enteritis with spared stomach presenting as abdominal pain

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) is a group of infrequent conditions that arise from the accumulation of eosinophils in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract without any secondary causes of eosinophilia. Most cases of EoGE cases show involvement of different parts of the GI tract. Herein, we report a case of EoGE with the sole involvement of Jejunum. A 57-year-old male patient presented to our center with a chief complaint of acute abdominal pain. The patient had experienced chronic abdominal pain and intermittent diarrhea for several years, but he presented to the emergency department with severe acute flank pain. The patient was first diagnosed with renal stone and treated accordingly. However, the computed tomography (CT) scan also showed other incidental findings related to his chronic abdominal pain from several years ago, including mesenteric infiltration which shows fluid appearance in some areas, mild wall thickening, and mucosal edema of the duodenum and jejunal loops with normal appearance of the ileum. Complete blood count (CBC) showed increased eosinophil (15.5%) and decreased lymphocytes (13.1%) percent. Pathological examination of enteroscopy samples of jejunum showed a mild increase in the number of eosinophils in lamina propria. Neither parasites nor granuloma was detected. However, no such changes were found in other parts of the GI tracts. Based on pathological examination, the patient was diagnosed with eosinophilic enteritis of the jejunum. EoGE does not typically involve a specific part of the GI and generally affects both the stomach and intestine. This study reported the first case of EoGE where only the jejunal part of the intestine was involved and other parts of the GI tract were spared.

Review of Non-Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease (Non-EoE-EGID) and a Case Series of Twenty-Eight Affected Patients

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (non-EoE-EGID) based on the involved gastrointestinal segments. Reports regarding non-EoE-EGID are limited, in part because of its rarity. The present study was performed to review non-EoE-EGID, including its pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Additionally, details regarding 28 cases of non-EoE-EGID recently diagnosed at our Japanese tertial medical center are presented and compared with 20 EoE cases diagnosed during the same period at the same medical center. Comparisons of the two groups clarified differences regarding age- and gender-dependent prevalence between the two conditions, and also showed that systemic involvement and disease severity were greater in the non-EoE-EGID patients. Notably, diagnosis of non-EoE-EGID is difficult because of its lack of specific or characteristic symptoms and endoscopic findings. The clinical characteristics of EoE and non-EoE-EGID differ in many ways, while they also share several genetic, clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features.

Discrepancy between Abdominal Symptoms and Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Gastro-duodenal Eosinophilia: A Case Series

Some patients present gastro-duodenal eosinophilia without abdominal symptoms. Nine cases with gastro-duodenal eosinophilia were seen at the Tohoku University Hospital between January 2011 and June 2022. Seven (78%) patients had a background of allergic or hyper-eosinophilic disease. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed erosions (n=6), discoloration (n=4), ulcers (n=3), erythema (n=3), muskmelon-like appearance (n=2), and cracks (n=1). Two cases were asymptomatic with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE)-like endoscopic findings, and two were symptomatic with normal endoscopic findings. The discrepancy between the abdominal symptoms and esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings suggests that clinicians should assess patients for background allergic disease, regardless of abdominal symptoms.

Prevalence of elderly eosinophilic esophagitis and their clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is predominantly found in middle-aged men among adults. There are few reports about EoE in the elderly, despite an ageing population. The study aimed to define the prevalence and clinical characteristics of EoE amongst older adults.

METHODS

Elderly patients (defined as those ≥65 years) were compared to younger adults (18-64) in terms of clinical characteristics (age, gender, presenting symptoms, comorbidities), histological activity (eosinophil count), treatment modality and response to treatment. A pre- existing prospectively generated database of all EoE patients presenting to our department between February 2010 and December 2022 was interrogated. 309 patients who underwent endoscopy and esophageal biopsy and were found to have ≥15 eosinophils/HPF were defined as having EoE and were included for study. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's extract test or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

309 cases of EoE were recorded, mean age 45.7, range (21-88 years), of which20 patients were aged 65 years and over. Compared to younger patients, those aged ≥65 had more medical comorbidities (15 [75%] vs 111[38%], p = 0.002), and instead a non-significant trend toward less fibrosis (0.25 vs 0.46, p = 0.117). Although rate of cases required topical steroid (TCS) therapy was similar, none received repeated or maintenance TCS therapy in elderly.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, only 20 patients (6%) were aged 65 years or older, suggesting that EoE is uncommon in the elderly. The clinical characteristics of EoE in the older age group were similar to the younger patients. Future studies with prospective data collection may determine if EoE disappears with age, or if the younger mean age is reflective of an increasing prevalence in recent years, that may be realized in the elderly EoE population in the future.

A Marked Eosinophilic Infiltration in Mucosa Could Be a Better Predictive Factor for Intractable Non-Esophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

INTRODUCTION

Non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (non-EoE EGIDs) are rare, but their prevalence has recently increased. Although it has been reported that one-half of patients with non-EoE EGIDs have intractable clinical courses, their clinical features are not fully understood.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study in which 10 institutions in Japan participated. Clinical databases from January 1998 to December 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with non-EoE EGIDs. A total of 44 patients were identified; they were divided into two groups based on their clinical course: an intractable group and a non-intractable group. The clinical features were compared between the two groups by a logistic regression analysis. Remarkable eosinophilic infiltration (REI) was defined histologically when the maximal counts of mucosal eosinophils reached a threshold level in the respective area of biopsy.

RESULTS

Prevalence of drug allergy and eosinophil counts more than 500/μL (EOS), vomiting symptoms, abnormalities of the stomach, duodenum, and jejunum on computed tomography (upper gastrointestinal abnormality on computed tomography [UACT]), and REI were significantly different between the two groups. Among the factors that were potentially associated with an intractable clinical course, logistic regression revealed that REI, EOS, and UACT were significant factors. Based on an analysis of the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, a combination of REI and EOS had the lowest Akaike's information criterion, indicating the best model to predict an intractable clinical course.

CONCLUSIONS

REI may predict an intractable course in patients with non-EoE EGIDs. In addition, the combination of REI and EOS was a better predictor than REI alone.

Eosinophilic enteritis requiring differentiation from chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 gene: A case report

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is a disorder characterized by infiltration of eosinophils causing mucosal damage and dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract. The endoscopic findings of eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), an EGID variant, are nonspecific and occasionally difficult to diagnose. In contrast, chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 (CEAS) is a chronic persistent small intestinal disorder characterized by endoscopic findings such as multiple oblique and circular ulcers.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 10-year-old boy who had suffered abdominal pain and fatigue for the preceding 6 mo. He was referred to our institute for investigation of suspected gastrointestinal bleeding because of severe anemia with hypoproteinemia and positive fecal human hemoglobin. The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic findings were normal; however, double-balloon small bowel endoscopy showed multiple oblique and circular ulcers with discrete margins and mild constriction of the intestinal lumen in the ileum. The findings were highly consistent with CEAS, but urine prostaglandin metabolites were within normal limits, and no previously reported mutations in the SLCO2A1 gene were identified. Histological evaluation demonstrated moderate to severe eosinophilic infiltration localized to the small intestine suggesting a diagnosis of EoN. Clinical remission was maintained with montelukast and a partial elemental diet, but emergent surgery for bowel obstruction due to small intestinal stenosis was performed two years after the initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

EoN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CEAS-like small intestinal ulcerative lesions and normal urinary prostaglandin metabolite levels.

Dupilumab Leads to Clinical Improvements including the Acquisition of Tolerance to Causative Foods in Non-Eosinophilic Esophagitis Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

A recent report showed that most pediatric cases of non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) (non-EoE EGIDs) are persistent and severe compared with those of EoE, thus requiring further effective therapeutic approaches. In this study, we present the first case based on a systematic search of non-EoE EGID for which tolerance to causative foods and histological and symptomatic improvements were achieved following dupilumab administration, after elimination diets and omalizumab and mepolizumab treatments. Driven by this case, we investigated the efficacies of biological treatments in non-EoE EGID cases based on the patient studied herein, and other patients identified in the conducted systematic review. Seven articles, including five different biologics, were reviewed. Both clinical efficacies and impact differences among the targeted molecules are demonstrated in this study. Our findings show that dupilumab may affect mechanisms that can suppress symptoms induced by offending foods that are different from those induced by other biologics as identified in the conducted systematic review. Additional studies are required to address the unmet needs of non-EoE EGID treatments.

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: The Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are delayed-type chronic allergic disorders that show gastrointestinal eosinophil dense infiltration, with an exaggerated Th2-type immune reaction considered to be an important mechanism. These diseases can be roughly divided into two types: eosinophilic esophagitis, mainly found in young and middle-aged men, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis, which is found in both genders equally. A diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is suspected when characteristic endoscopic findings, including longitudinal furrows and rings, are noted. However, characteristic endoscopic abnormalities are rarely found in cases with eosinophilic gastroenteritis, so multiple biopsy sampling from the apparently normal gastrointestinal mucosal surface is important for making an accurate diagnosis. The administration of systemic glucocorticoid is the standard treatment for eosinophilic gastroenteritis, while acid inhibitors and topical glucocorticoid swallowing therapy are effective for eosinophilic esophagitis. Anti-cytokine therapies for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are currently under development.

Small Bowel Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) is a rare digestive disorder characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach and intestines. In the diagnosis of EoE, it is extremely important to recognize distinctive endoscopic findings and accurately detect increased eosinophilia in gastrointestinal tissues. However, endoscopic findings of EoGE in the small intestine remain poorly understood. Therefore, we conducted a literature review of 16 eligible papers. Redness or erythema was the most common endoscopic finding in the small bowel, followed by villous atrophy, erosion, ulceration, and edema. In some cases, stenosis due to circumferential ulceration was observed, which led to retention of the capsule during small bowel capsule endoscopy. Although many aspects of small bowel endoscopic findings in EoGE remain elusive, the findings presented in this review are expected to contribute to the further development of EoGE practice.

Clinical presentation and endoscopic findings in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

Background/Aim: The frequency of eosinophilic esophagitis has been rising over the last decades. It is diagnosed primarily based on symptoms and endoscopic and histopathological examination findings. Although eosinophilic esophagitis is not associated with malignancy, it remains an important condition affecting both children and adults, as it is associated with morbidity such as dysphagia, food impaction, and esophageal strictures. This study aimed to define clinical and endoscopic characteristics of adult patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis based on recently recommended histopathological criteria. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study included 54 adult patients (mean age: 33.6 yr, range: 16–61 yr) who underwent upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy for dyspeptic complaints (epigastric pain, reflux, dysphagia, or food impaction) and diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis based on the latest histopathological criteria (≥15 eosinophils per high-power field). Patients with a history of malignancy were excluded. Patients’ clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological data were examined. Results: In patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis, the most common presenting complaint was dysphagia (61.1%), followed by dyspepsia (24.0%), regurgitation (16.6%), chest pain (16.6%), epigastric pain (12.9%), food impaction (11.1%), and halitosis (3.7%), without any age predilection for the complaints. White papules and linear furrow were the most frequent findings on endoscopic examination (35.1% each), followed by circular rings (24.0%), paleness (22.2%), normal endoscopic finding (20.3%), and small-caliber esophagus (11.1%). Conclusion: The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis remains challenging due to considerable variations in definitions and in the relative frequencies of endoscopic findings. Therefore, we recommend combining clinical, endoscopic, and histologic criteria to establish diagnosis. The identification of standards for diagnosis in future studies is warranted.

A rare case of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders with short bowel syndrome after strangulated bowel obstruction

Background

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a rare yet costly disease with an incidence rate of 3 per million people. Herein, we report a rare case of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) with SBS after strangulated bowel obstruction.

Case presentation

A 5-year-old male had a necrotic intestine of 340 cm resected due to strangulated bowel obstruction caused by an intestinal mesenteric hiatal hernia. The length of the residual intestine was 51 cm. Bloody stools appeared 19 days postoperatively. Colonoscopy showed diffuse redness of the colonic mucosa, and pathological findings showed moderate chronic inflammatory cellular infiltration. On blood examination, the eosinophil count was > 30%. EGIDs with short bowel syndrome (SBS) were suspected. Because his symptoms did not improve with initial nutrition therapy, he was transferred to our hospital 5 months after the operation. Prednisolone was administrated at an initial dose of 1.4 mg/kg/day, 6 days after his transfer. Bloody stools disappeared after prednisolone administration. Seven months after discharge, he had no bloody stool recurrence.

Conclusion

The risk of developing secondary EGIDs in children with SBS should be considered, and postoperative management should include attention to abdominal symptoms and elevated eosinophil counts on blood examination.

Preliminary evidence in treatment of eosinophilic gastroenteritis in children: A case series

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare inflammatory disorder in children. However, there is still no standard guideline in the treatment of pediatric eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

AIM

To report our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of children with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 22 children were diagnosed with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

RESULTS

Endoscopic examination showed eosinophil infiltration in the duodenum [mean number of eosinophils/high-power field (HPF) = 53.1 ± 81.5], stomach (mean number of eosinophils/HPF = 36.8 ± 50.5), and terminal ileum (mean number of eosinophils/HPF = 49.0 ± 24.0). All 18 children with low eosinophil infiltration (< 14%) responded well to the initial drug treatment without relapse, while two of four children with high eosinophil infiltration (> 14%) relapsed after initial methylprednisolone/montelukast treatment. In addition, children with high eosinophil infiltration (> 14%) showed symptomatic relief and histological remission without further relapse after receiving budesonide/methylprednisolone as initial or relapse treatment.

CONCLUSION

Methylprednisolone/montelukast is still the best treatment for children with low eosinophil infiltration (< 14%). Budesonide can be considered as the initial or relapse treatment for children with high eosinophil infiltration (> 14%).

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis]

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated esophageal disease characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The diagnostic criteria for EoE have changed with our growing knowledge over the past two decades. Esophageal eosinophilia, which responds histologically to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is not a distinct disease but a subset of EoE. An endoscopic scoring system that relies on the assessment of exudates, rings, edema, furrows, and strictures is a useful tool for assessing endoscopic severity. PPIs are regarded as safe and effective first-line treatments for EoE. Oral topical corticosteroids or dietary therapy are also options for first-line treatment. Endoscopic dilation is effective for relieving the dysphagia symptoms of a patient with an esophageal stricture.

Prospective Endoscopic Activity Assessment for Eosinophilic Gastritis in a Multisite Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastritis (EG) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the stomach characterized by eosinophil-predominant gastric mucosal inflammation and gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate endoscopic features in a large series of children and adults with EG to better understand the endoscopic manifestations and develop a standardized instrument for investigations.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected as part of the Consortium for Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers, a national collaborative network. Endoscopic features were prospectively recorded using a system specifically developed for EG, the EG Endoscopic Reference System (EG-REFS). Correlations were made between EG-REFS and clinical and histologic features.

RESULTS

Of 98 patients with EG, 65 underwent assessments using EG-REFS. The most common findings were erythema (72%), raised lesions (49%), erosions (46%), and granularity (35%); only 8% of patients with active histology (≥30 eosinophils/high-power field) exhibited no endoscopic findings. A strong correlation between EG-REFS scores and physician global assessment of endoscopy severity was demonstrated (Spearman r = 0.84, P < 0.0001). The overall score and specific components of EG-REFS were more common in the antrum than in the fundus or body. EG-REFS severity was significantly correlated with active histology, defined by a threshold of ≥30 eosinophils/high-power field (P = 0.0002).

DISCUSSION

Prospective application of EG-REFS identified gastric features with a strong correlation with physician global assessment of endoscopic activity in EG. Endoscopic features demonstrated greater severity in patients with active histology and a predilection for the gastric antrum. Further development of EG-REFS should improve its utility in clinical studies.

Case Report: Food Protein-Induced Protein Losing Enteropathy (FPIPLE) in Infancy

Food-protein induced protein-losing enteropathy (FPIPLE) is a mixed IgE and non-IgE food allergy in infants along with eosinophilic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases (EGID). It is characterized by poor weight gain, edema, due to hypoproteinemia/hypoalbuminemia by enteral loss of proteins, anemia, eosinophilia, raised fecal α1-antitrypsin (α1AT), and specific-IgE and allergy skin prick test (SPT) positive for offending foods. Here, we describe 4 cases with the same clinical pattern (edema due to hypoproteinemia/hypoalbuminemia from enteral loss of proteins, confirmed by high α1AT in the stools and no other pathological findings explaining the hypoproteinemia including normal kidney and liver function parameters), and propose the term “food-protein induced protein-losing enteropathy” (FPIPLE) to define this clinical entity. We also propose diagnostic criteria and an empirical algorithm of a practical approach to the diagnosis and management for children suspected to have FPIPLE. These infants can be managed successfully with dietary modification. In our 4 cases, initially, an empirical elimination diet was applied, comprising the foods that had benn introduced in the infant's diet during the last month and, an extensively hydrolyzed or elemental formula was given. In a second approach, after evaluation by a pediatric allergist, an allergy test-directed dietary elimination alimentation was implemented, for mother and/or infant. It has yet to be demonstrated whether patients with FPIPLE are a subset of patients with EGID, and whether early intervention modifies the natural course.

Clinical features of pediatric eosinophilic gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

No study has analyzed more than100 cases of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) in children in a single center. We aimed to describe the clinical features of pediatric EGE.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a single center. Between April 2007 and December 2017, 860 children between the ages of 1 year and 15 years underwent endoscopy for gastrointestinal symptoms of unknown cause. Among them, 109 (12.7%) were diagnosed with EGE according to the diagnostic criteria for EGE developed by the research group of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder in 2015. We investigated their symptoms, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, pathological findings, treatments, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-one boys (65.1%) and 38 girls (34.9%) were diagnosed with EGE. The median age at diagnosis was 11 years (range, 1-15 years). The chief complaints were abdominal pain in 83 (76.1%) and diarrhea in 26 (23.9%). Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies showed normal findings in 32 patients (29.4%). The most common treatment was a combination of elimination of foods suspected of causing EGE and anti-allergic agents in 50 cases (45.9%). The outcomes were symptom disappearance in 43 patients (39.4%) and symptom improvement in 53 patients (48.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

For gastrointestinal symptoms of unknown cause in children, EGE should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Although the symptoms and endoscopic findings are nonspecific, cracked mucosa may be a specific endoscopic finding for pediatric EGE. An elimination diet and/or anti-allergic drugs were effective in most patients with pediatric EGE.

Asymptomatic Eosinophilic Infiltration with Endoscopic and Histological Findings Consistent with Eosinophilic Gastritis

Eosinophilic gastritis often presents with gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of abnormal endoscopic findings. On the other hand, endoscopic changes due to eosinophilic infiltration in an asymptomatic patient are rare. A 29-year-old woman with a history of asthma on steroid inhalers presented for an annual medical checkup. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed diffuse white granular patches in the body of the stomach, suggestive of eosinophilic gastritis. Histology showed over 100 eosinophils per high-power field, also consistent with eosinophilic gastritis. As the absence of symptoms precluded the diagnosis of eosinophilic gastritis, the patient was diagnosed with asymptomatic eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach.

Small-bowel Capsule Endoscopic Features in Patients with Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis: Three Case Reports

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is an uncommon disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract in the absence of secondary causes and presents with a variety of gastrointestinal manifestations. Important diagnostic evidence for EGE can be provided by endoscopy; however, the specific small-bowel capsule endoscopic (SBCE) findings remain unknown. We herein report the SBCE findings of three cases of EGE as well as those of the previous cases. The most common findings in patients with EGE were multiple erythema and erosions with surrounding redness on SBCE; these findings should be considered for the diagnostic evaluation for EGE.

Peripheral eosinophilia and hypoalbuminemia are associated with a higher biopsy diagnostic yield for eosinophilic gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Gastric and duodenal mucosa may appear normal in eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). Adult gastroenterologists typically biopsy only in the setting of mucosal abnormalities or symptoms, while pediatric providers biopsy all patients. The biopsy yield of EGE has not been adequately evaluated.

AIMS

To evaluate the biopsy yield of EGE in a pediatric cohort and assess predictors of increased biopsy yield.

METHODS

We identified patients age 0-18 who underwent upper endoscopy. We recorded endoscopic findings, pathology, demographics, and clinical and laboratory characteristics. We identified EGE cases (>20 eosinophils per high-power field on stomach and/or duodenum biopsy). We compared characteristics between EGE and non-EGE cases, calculated biopsy diagnostic yield, and performed multivariate analysis for predictors of increased biopsy yield.

RESULTS

In 509 patients (55.6% female, mean age 10.3 years, 69.7% white, 58.7% atopic), biopsy diagnostic yield for EGE was 1.2% (6/509) among all subjects, 7.7% (3/39) for those with peripheral eosinophilia (≥500 eos/uL), 9.1% (3/33) for those with hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), and 25.0% (3/12) for those with peripheral eosinophilia and hypoalbuminemia. The odds of EGE were 27.8 (95% CI 3.3-231.8) times greater among those with peripheral eosinophilia. The mean total biopsy surface area and number of fragments was similar between patients with and without EGE. The area under the ROC curve for blood eosinophil counts and albumin level for predicting EGE was 0.926.

CONCLUSIONS

The biopsy diagnostic yield for EGE is low but increases with peripheral eosinophilia and hypoalbuminemia. Patients with these features should have biopsies obtained, regardless of endoscopic appearance.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), part of the spectrum of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID), share pathogenic similarities. We examined differences regarding clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes between EoE and EGE cases.

METHODS

Two-hundred fifteen EGID patients, including 181 with EoE and 34 with EGE, diagnosed at Shimane University Hospital between February 2011 and March 2019 were enrolled. Information regarding clinical parameters and treatment outcomes was reviewed.

RESULTS

EoE showed significant male predominance (82.3%) as compared with EGE (50.0%) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with EoE were significantly older and had a higher body mass index (24.8 ± 4.0 vs. 22.2 ± 4.3, p < 0.05). Over 90% of the EoE patients were initially given proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment, of whom 73.2% showed clinical and histological remission. Vonoprazan, a more potent acid inhibitor than PPI, was effective in two-thirds of the nonresponsive EoE patients initially treated with a PPI. In contrast, oral glucocorticoid administration was mainly given to patients with EGE (58.8%). Of 13 EGE patients treated with a food-elimination diet, responsible foods were successfully identified in 9, with 7 controlled in a state of remission without glucocorticoid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We found different clinical characteristics and treatment strategies in the present EoE and EGE cases. Most of the EoE patients responded to and were maintained by acid suppressive therapy, using PPI or vonoprazan. For EGE patients, glucocorticoid administration was mainly used though food-elimination diet therapy also showed beneficial effects.

Similarity and difference in the characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis between Western countries and Japan

Over the past two decades, the incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have risen rapidly, especially in Western countries, with cases in Japan also showing a gradual increase in recent years. However, similarities and differences regarding the characteristics of EoE between Western countries and Japan remain to be clearly elucidated. The current clinical guidelines for diagnosis include symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration in the esophageal epithelium. Most affected patients in Japan are diagnosed incidentally during a medical health check-up and asymptomatic cases with typical endoscopic findings suggestive of EoE are frequently encountered. Clinical characteristics of EoE in Japanese are similar to those seen in Western populations. The predominant symptom is dysphagia, with food impaction extremely rare in Japanese cases. Linear furrows are the most frequently reported characteristic endoscopic finding, while an esophageal stricture or narrow caliber is rarely observed. Treatment strategies for EoE include drugs, dietary restrictions, and endoscopic dilation when the disease is advanced with stricture formation. Although single therapy using a proton-pump inhibitor has been shown to achieve symptomatic and histological response in the majority of patients in Japan, no prospective randomized control studies that evaluated drug or elimination diet therapy have been presented. Overall, EoE has similar clinical characteristics between Japanese and Western populations, while disease severity seems to be milder in Japan. Additional studies are necessary to determine genetic factors, natural history of the disease, and treatment efficacy of drugs and elimination diet as compared to Western populations.

Comparison of Nonesophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Nationwide Survey

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has increased rapidly and has been well characterized. However, no nationwide survey has been conducted regarding non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (non-EoE EGIDs), and they remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical features and natural histories of non-EoE EGIDs and EoE by using the same questionnaire, for all ages.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide hospital-based survey of patients who visited hospitals from January 2013 through December 2017. We randomly selected 10,000 hospitals that perform endoscopy. We analyzed the demographics, symptoms, gastrointestinal histology, treatments, and natural histories of EoE and non-EoE EGIDs.

RESULTS

A total of 2906 hospitals responded to the questionnaire. We identified 1542 patients and obtained detailed data for 786 patients, consisting of 39% EoE and 61% non-EoE EGIDs. The clinical characteristics were analyzed for patients who met the "definite" criteria that excluded comorbidities. Non-EoE EGIDs showed no gender difference, whereas EoE was male-predominant. Tissue eosinophilia was often seen in the small intestine (62%) and stomach (49%). The frequency of hypoproteinemia was high (27%) in childhood. Children also had more serious symptoms and complications than adults: restriction of daily life activity (P = .009), failure to grow/weight loss (P = .008), and surgery (P = .01). For both diseases, the most common natural history was the continuous type: 66% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58-74) in EoE and 64% (95% CI: 55-72) in non-EoE EGIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of persistent patients with non-EoE EGIDs was almost the same as those with EoE. Complications were more frequent in children than in adults.

A case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis with high PET-CT accumulation treated by P-CAB

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) can present findings on computed tomography (CT) images that resemble malignant tumors. EGE is generally treated with systemic oral steroid administration, which is reportedly effective in relieving symptoms at least temporarily. Here, we report a case of EGE that mimicked malignant lymphoma in a gastroduodenal lesion, in which treatment with a potassium-competitive acid blocker without systemic oral steroid administration relieved the symptoms and reversed the initial image findings. A 56-year-old woman became aware of discomfort in her epigastric region, which gradually worsened. This case showed antroduodenal wall thickness, which mimicked a malignant lymphoma with increased F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed protruding erosions in the antrum and severe edematous changes in the duodenum. Extensibility of the normal gastric wall by insufflation also occurred. However, an abdominal ultrasound indicated wall thickening with a preserved wall structure. Histological examinations showed a large amount of eosinophil infiltration, mainly in the gastroduodenal mucosa, without malignant cells. Thus, we made a final diagnosis of EGE. The patient was then administered 20 mg vonoprazan fumarate per day because she refused steroid treatment and because the pathological lesion was also localized from the duodenum to the antrum. After 3 weeks of potassium-competitive acid blocker treatment, her symptoms were alleviated, and the degree and extent of thickening of the gastroduodenal wall in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ultrasonographic image findings had remarkably improved.

Classification of patients with esophageal eosinophilia by patterns of sensitization revealed by a diagnostic assay for multiple allergen-specific IgEs

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is considered to be an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic disorder. Our goal was to examine IgE-mediated allergic sensitization patterns in patients with esophageal eosinophilia (EE).

METHODS

We enrolled subjects with EE who underwent evaluation with a diagnostic panel to document multiple allergen-specific IgEs. Statistically significant groups were identified by cluster analysis. We also defined allergens based on their characteristics including outdoor, indoor, plant, and animal allergens.

RESULTS

We classified patients with EE into 3 distinct groups, including cluster 1 (n = 62) who were minimally sensitized to most allergens except pollen and house dust, cluster 2 (n = 30) who were hypersensitized to outdoor and plant allergens, and cluster 3 (n = 15) who were hypersensitized to most allergens, most notably to indoor and animal allergens. Dysphagia reported among those in clusters 1, 2, and 3 at 35.5%, 46.7%, and 73.3%, respectively, (p = 0.028) and EoE endoscopic reference scores (EREFS) at 3.0, 6.0, and 8.0, respectively, (p < 0.001) differed significantly between the 3 clusters. Those in cluster 3 had a significantly higher prevalence of dysphagia (35.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.030), and higher EREFS with respect to rings (0.3 vs. 0.9, p = 0.003) and strictures (0.0 vs. 0.13, p = 0.011) compared to those in cluster 1.

CONCLUSIONS

IgE-mediated allergic sensitization patterns are associated with clinical features of patients with EE. Use of a diagnostic panel that detects multiple allergen-specific IgEs can help to explain the heterogeneous phenotype of this patient cohort.

Inflammatory Cell Numbers in the Stomach of Japanese Subjects with Endoscopically Normal Mucosa without Helicobacter pylori Infection

INTRODUCTION

Since inflammatory cells, such as lymphocytes and plasma cells, normally inhabit the stomach, the border between normal and mild inflammation is difficult to visually determine using the updated Sydney system scale of gastritis. Additionally, eosinophils in the gastric mucosa must be counted to diagnose eosinophilic gastritis. We aimed to determine the normal number of inflammatory cells in patients with endoscopically normal mucosa and without Helicobacter pylori infections.

METHODS

We assessed patients aged 20-79 years, who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Kawasaki Medical School Hospital between January 2010 and December 2014. Inflammatory cells were counted in 1,000 μm2 fields of pyloric and fundic gland mucosal biopsy specimens. We finally included 325 (male, n = 141; female, n = 184; average age = 49.3 years) patients without inflammation who had H. pylori-negative endoscopic results and negative histological findings interpreted based on the updated Sydney System and the Kyoto classification of gastritis.

RESULTS

The average numbers of nucleated cells were 83.3 ± 14.2 and 65.4 ± 12.6/mm2 in the pyloric and fundic gland mucosae, respectively. Inflammatory cells were significantly more abundant in the pyloric mucosa than in the fundic gland mucosa (p < 0.05). Age and sex distribution did not significantly differ. Eosinophils were absent or scanty in the gastric mucosae of both glands in all patients.

CONCLUSION

We determined the absolute values of inflammatory cells, including eosinophils, in normal mucosae of pyloric and fundic glands. These findings could be important in defining gastric mucosal inflammation, including eosinophilic gastritis diagnosis.

Endoscopic findings of gastric lesions in patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders

Background and study aims  Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are classified into eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and eosinophilic colitis according to the site of eosinophilic infiltration. Although well established in eosinophilic esophagitis, endoscopic findings in eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis with regard to gastric lesions have not been clearly described. The aim of this study was to identify endoscopic findings of gastric lesions associated with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Patients and methods  Out of 278 patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, 18 had eosinophilic gastritis or eosinophilic gastroenteritis confirmed by biopsy; their endoscopic images were analyzed retrospectively. The association between endoscopic findings and number of eosinophils in the gastric mucosa was investigated. Results  Erythema was most frequently observed (72 %), followed by ulcers (39 %), discoloration (33 %), erosions (28 %), nodularity (28 %), and polyps (28 %). There were several unique endoscopic findings such as submucosal tumor-like deep large ulcers in three patients, antral Penthorum -like appearances (small nodules radially lined toward the pyloric ring) in three patients, "muskmelon-like appearances" (discolored mucosa-composed mesh pattern) in three patients, multiple white granular elevations in two patients, cracks (appearance of furrows similar to those in eosinophilic esophagitis) in five patients, and antral rings in one patient. No significant association was observed between endoscopic findings and number of gastric eosinophils. Conclusions  Several unique endoscopic findings of gastric lesions were observed in patients with eosinophilic gastritis or eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Submucosal tumor-like ulcers, antral Penthorum -like appearances, muskmelon-like appearances, and cracks might be associated with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis-associated Duodenal Ulcer Successfully Treated with Crushed Budesonide

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE)-associated duodenal ulcer is rare and its endoscopic and pathological features remain poorly described. A 15-year-old boy was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment of duodenal ulcer. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed two A2-stage duodenal ulcers on the duodenal bulb. A biopsy revealed marked infiltration of eosinophils, suggestive of EGE-associated duodenal ulcers. Thus, treatment with crushed budesonide (9 mg/day) was started. EGD revealed healing of the duodenal ulcers seven months after treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing EGE-associated duodenal ulcer successfully treated with crushed budesonide.

Symptom-based diagnostic approach for eosinophilic esophagitis

The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasing in Japan. Although the diagnosis of EoE is based on simple criteria that include the presence of esophageal symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia on biopsies, there are several important issues associated with the diagnostic approach. Following an extensive literature search, the symptoms of 886 EoE cases in Japanese adults were analyzed and divided into three categories as follows: (1) typical symptoms, such as dysphagia (53%); (2) other upper GI symptoms (40%); and (3) no symptoms found during screening or medical examination, i.e., "asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia" (19%). The diagnostic approach was reviewed according to these categories as well as according to the presence or absence of esophageal eosinophilia. The present manuscript describes the current therapeutic strategy of EoE and ultimately proposes a symptom-based diagnostic approach for EoE.

Single-Organ and Multisystem Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Patients with Gastrointestinal Manifestations Share Common Characteristics

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are defined by marked eosinophilia in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract resulting in a wide variety of GI symptoms. When accompanied by blood hypereosinophilia (HE; absolute eosinophil count ≥1500/mm3), EGID can occur as an isolated GI disorder (hypereosinophilic syndrome [HES]/EGID overlap) or as part of a multisystem hypereosinophilic syndrome (Multisystem HES).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the GI disease of patients categorized as those with HES/EGID overlap versus those with Multisystem HES.

METHODS

Consecutively enrolled patients on a natural history protocol to study eosinophilia with biopsy-proven EGID involving the esophagus, stomach, small-bowel, and/or colon were evaluated for clinical, histopathologic, and endoscopic features by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Among the 56 patients with EGID and HE, 34 were categorized as HES/EGID overlap and 22 as Multisystem HES. Demographics, GI symptoms, and associated comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. Multisegment GI eosinophilia was present in 20 of 30 (67%) patients who underwent tissue sampling of all 4 GI segments. Tissue eosinophilia in all 4 GI segments was found in 5 of 30 (17%) patients. Dietary therapy was more common in patients with HES/EGID overlap (65% vs 23%, P = .0028). Patients with Multisystem HES were more likely to receive glucocorticoids (100% vs 79%, P = .0349) and nonglucocorticoid systemic therapies (77% vs 38%, P = .0061). One-third (8 of 22) of patients with Multisystem HES presented with isolated GI symptoms before developing extraintestinal manifestations at a median of 1 year (range, 0.25-15 years).

CONCLUSION

There are striking clinical similarities between patients with Multisystem HES and those with HES/EGID overlap, despite differing treatment approaches. Moreover, Multisystem HES can present with isolated GI involvement. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Japanese guidelines for food allergy 2020

Five years have passed since the Japanese Pediatric Guideline for Food Allergy (JPGFA) was first revised in 2011 from its original version. As many scientific papers related to food allergy have been published during the last 5 years, the second major revision of the JPGFA was carried out in 2016. In this guideline, food allergies are generally classified into four clinical types: (1) neonatal and infantile gastrointestinal allergy, (2) infantile atopic dermatitis associated with food allergy, (3) immediate-type of food allergy (urticaria, anaphylaxis, etc.), and (4) special forms of immediate-type of food allergy such as food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and oral allergy syndrome (OAS). Much of this guideline covers the immediate-type of food allergy that is seen during childhood to adolescence. Infantile atopic dermatitis associated with food allergy type is especially important as the onset of most food allergies occurs during infancy. We have discussed the neonatal and infantile gastrointestinal allergy and special forms of immediate type food allergy types separately. Diagnostic procedures are highlighted, such as probability curves and component-resolved diagnosis, including the recent advancement utilizing antigen-specific IgE. The oral food challenge using a stepwise approach is recommended to avoid complete elimination of causative foods. Although oral immunotherapy (OIT) has not been approved as a routine treatment by nationwide insurance, we included a chapter for OIT, focusing on efficacy and problems. Prevention of food allergy is currently the focus of interest, and many changes were made based on recent evidence. Finally, the contraindication between adrenaline and antipsychotic drugs in Japan was discussed among related medical societies, and we reached an agreement that the use of adrenaline can be allowed based on the physician's discretion. In conclusion, this guideline encourages physicians to follow the principle to let patients consume causative foods in any way and as early as possible.

Epidemiology of Nonesophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases in Symptomatic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are increasingly described disorders that include eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis, and colitis. The exact epidemiology of nonesophageal EGIDs (non-EoE EGIDs) is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the epidemiology of non-EoE EGIDs in adults and children referred to outpatient clinics for gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a protocol registered and published with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42018111437). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL for cohort or cross-sectional studies published since 1990, evaluating the incidence and prevalence of non-EoE EGIDs. We assessed study quality and risk of bias using items derived from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement.

RESULTS

A total of 576 articles were identified. Ten studies with 13,377 participants were included in the analysis, with the results showing high heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found. The overall prevalence of non-EoE EGIDs in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms was 1.9% (95% confidence interval: 0.575-3.894; I2 = 92.72%; P < .001). Because none of the examined studies were prospectively designed, incidence rates could not be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

More prospective, large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to evaluate reported data and to further investigate the epidemiology of non-EoE EGIDs and their possible risk factors and comorbidities.

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan: a case-control study

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergy-associated clinicopathologic condition gaining an increasing amount of recognition in various areas of the world. While the clinical definition and characteristics may differ depending on country and region, sufficient studies have not yet been performed in Japan.

Objective

To assess the prevalence of EoE among the Japanese population and the clinical features associated with the disease.

Methods

Endoscopic data from January 2012 to October 2018 was gathered from 9 Japanese clinical institutes. EoE, defined as esophageal mucosal eosinophilia of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field, was determined based on esophageal biopsies. Clinical and endoscopic patterns in the cases with EoE were investigated and compared with 186 age- and sex-matched controls.

Results

From 130,013 upper endoscopic examinations, 66 cases of EoE were identified (0.051%; mean age, 45.2 years [range, 7-79 years]; 45 males). Twenty-five patients (37.9%) with EoE were diagnosed by endoscopy during a medical check-up. Patients with EoE had more symptoms (69.7% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.01) such as dysphagia and food impaction, and more allergies (65.2% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.01) compared with the controls. The prevalence of atrophic gastritis was lower in EoE patients than in the controls (20.0% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prevalence of EoE in the Japanese population was 0.051% which was comparable with previous reports in Japan. History of allergies and the absence of atrophic gastritis were associated with EoE.

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Initially Diagnosed as Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

We herein report two cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) initially diagnosed as eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) based solely on endoscopic biopsy results. One year after the EGE diagnosis, one patient presented with multiple purpura, and skin biopsy findings resulted in a change of the diagnosis to EGPA. In another patient, multiple skin and colonic ulcerations emerged eight years after the diagnosis of EGE, at which time histological examinations of endoscopic biopsy specimens revealed vasculitis, and the diagnosis was changed to EGPA. Physicians should be aware of the possible existence of EGPA in cases diagnosed as EGE.

The Evaluation of Esophageal Motility Using Infusion Manometry with a Trans-nasal Endoscope: A Preliminary Study

Objective The Chicago classification using high-resolution manometry (HRM) has been proposed for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. However, HRM is expensive, and few patients are likely to benefit from this method. We established a method using a raised infusion catheter called "esophageal manometry using a trans-nasal endoscope". In this study, we examined the clinical utility of this new method for the assessment of patients with dysphagia. Methods We enrolled 124 consecutive patients who complained of dysphagia and were suspected of having esophageal motility disorders. Patients underwent manometry using a trans-nasal endoscope at Hiroshima University Hospital from September 2008 to December 2018. An esophageal biopsy was performed during the procedure from the thoracic esophagus to detect eosinophilic esophagitis. In addition, we examined the clinical courses of patients diagnosed with achalasia. Results The diagnostic ability of manometry using a trans-nasal endoscope was 98%, and no major complications associated with the procedure were recorded. About 30% of patients were diagnosed with achalasia, and most (77%) were well controlled by medications or balloon dilation. One patient was diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis. Conclusion Manometry using a trans-nasal endoscope is beneficial and can be used for the clinical management of patients with dysphagia.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis in an Ulcerative Colitis Patient During Treatment with Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Antagonist

A 45-year-old man with steroid-dependent ulcerative pancolitis was hospitalized with frequent diarrhea, abdominal pain and distension 3 months after induction of golimumab, a tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist. Computed tomography showed wall thickening from the stomach to the colon and massive ascites. Peripheral blood test revealed eosinophilia. A large number of eosinophils were observed in the ascites fluid. Although esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no abnormal findings and colonoscopy showed ulcerative colitis with a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 1, eosinophil infiltration was histologically observed. Based on these findings, we diagnosed him with eosinophilic gastroenteritis and started prednisolone. Consequently, his eosinophil counts and abdominal symptoms dramatically improved.

Risk of progression to eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia: A retrospective pilot study

Background and Aim

As the number of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has increased worldwide, the likelihood of diagnosing esophageal eosinophilia (EE) in screening endoscopy has also increased. Many of these EE patients do not display any symptoms (i.e. they display asymptomatic EE: aEE), and the risk of aEE patients developing EoE has yet to be demonstrated.

Methods

A total of 62 250 cases were found in the endoscopic registries of two digestive disease centers in the context of gastric cancer screening from April 2016 to August 2018, and these were reviewed.

Results

Thirty‐seven aEE patients (0.059%) were found in the registries, and the histories of endoscopic findings and symptoms were successfully traced for 29 of them. While 11 aEE (37.9%) patients did not show any change in endoscopic findings, 18 (62.1%) exhibited exacerbation. A comparison of the two groups showed both relative youth and diffuse disease distribution to be independent risk factors for progression (P = 0.0034 and 0.0078, respectively). Of the 18 aEE patients whose findings showed progression, 6 developed EoE (5 (17.2%) developed proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI)‐responsive EoE, and only 1 (3.4%) developed PPI‐resistant EoE). A comparison of the non‐EoE and EoE groups showed relative youth to be an independent risk factor for progression to EoE (P = 0.0146).

Conclusions

While some aEE patients developed symptomatic EE, the existence among them of PPI‐resistant EoE was extremely rare. Younger age and diffuse disease distribution at first detection in endoscopic findings are risk factors for progression to symptomatic EE in aEE patients.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases - Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), depending on the involved gastrointestinal tract, though both are considered to be chronic Th2-type allergic diseases caused by food or environmental allergens. In development of EoE, refluxed gastric acid may also have an important role. For diagnosis of EGIDs, the presence of symptoms possibly originating from the involved gastrointestinal tract and dense eosinophil infiltration are important factors. Imaging studies, including endoscopy and computed tomography, along with histopathological examinations of biopsy specimens are useful for diagnosis, whereas laboratory testing of blood, urine, and stool samples has limited value. Three useful options for treating EoE patients are acid inhibitors, swallowed topical corticosteroids, and an elimination diet, while systemic administration of glucocorticoids is the standard treatment of EGE, though information is limited. Since the prevalence of EGIDs is increasing in Western countries as well as Japan, development of effective treatments based on sufficient evidence is becoming an urgent need.

Endoscopic Features and Diagnostic Procedures of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

No specific endoscopic features for eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) have been reported previously. This study therefore evaluated the endoscopic findings of six patients with EGE. The diagnosis was confirmed based on gastrointestinal symptoms, pathological findings on biopsy, and the absence of other diseases. The site of the lesion was identified based on eosinophilic infiltration with ≥20 cells per high-power field during a pathological specimen analysis. Flattening of the small intestinal villi was observed in four patients; we speculate that this may be a specific feature in the diagnosis of EGE.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis: Clinical Manifestation, Natural Course, and Evaluation of Treatment with Corticosteroids and Vedolizumab

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare, chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about its natural history and treatment outcomes. The aims of our analysis were to describe clinical presentation, response to current medical treatments, and to evaluate the response of refractory EGE to anti-integrin therapy.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed diagnosis of EGE fulfilling the diagnostic criteria: (1) the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, (2) dense eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and (3) exclusion of other conditions leading to gastrointestinal eosinophilia were included in this analysis. In patients non-responding to corticosteroids and/or anti-TNF treatment the integrin blocker vedolizumab was used.

RESULTS

EGE patients (n = 22) were predominantly female (63%) with a median age at diagnosis of 41.5 years. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (100%), diarrhea (59%), nausea/vomiting (36%), and bloating (27%). No pathognomonic endoscopic alterations were found. Eosinophilic infiltration was observed in the majority of patients in more than one segment. Patients were treated with systemic steroids, topical, and enteral release steroids in 21/22 (95%) patients, proton pump inhibitors in 7/22 (32%), TNFα inhibitors in 3/22 (14%), and vedolizumab in 4/22 (18%) patients. In 3/4 of steroid-refractory patients vedolizumab induced a clinical and histological improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of highly variable clinical presentation, subtle endoscopic abnormalities, and involvement of several GI segments undermines the difficulty to diagnose EGE and the need for structured biopsy sampling. Corticosteroids were efficient in the majority of patients to induce remission. Response to the integrin blocker vedolizumab suggests further assessment in refractory cases.

Increasing Rates of Diagnosis, Substantial Co-Occurrence, and Variable Treatment Patterns of Eosinophilic Gastritis, Gastroenteritis, and Colitis Based on 10-Year Data Across a Multicenter Consortium

OBJECTIVES

The literature related to eosinophilic gastritis (EG), gastroenteritis (EGE), and colitis (EC) is limited. We aimed to characterize rates of diagnosis, clinical features, and initial treatments for patients with EG, EGE, and EC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data were collected from 6 centers in the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Researchers from 2005 to 2016. We analyzed demographics, time trends in diagnosis, medical history, presenting symptoms, disease overlap, and initial treatment patterns/responses.

RESULTS

Of 373 subjects (317 children and 56 adults), 38% had EG, 33% EGE, and 29% EC. Rates of diagnosis of all diseases increased over time. There was no male predominance, and the majority of subjects had atopy. Presenting symptoms were similar between diseases with nausea/vomiting and abdominal pain, the most common. One hundred fifty-four subjects (41%) had eosinophilic inflammation outside of their primary disease location with the esophagus the second most common gastrointestinal (GI) segment involved. Multisite inflammation was more common in children than in adults (68% vs 37%; P < 0.001). Initial treatment patterns varied highly between centers. One hundred-nine subjects (29%) had follow-up within 6 months, and the majority had clinical, endoscopic, and histologic improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, EG, EGE, and EC were diagnosed more frequently over time, and inflammation of GI segments outside the primary disease site co-occurrence of atopy was common with a lack of male predominance. Symptoms were similar between diseases, and initial treatment strategies were highly variable. Future investigation should assess the cause of the increased prevalence of eosinophilic GI disorders and prospectively assess outcomes to establish treatment algorithms.

Trend, clinical presentations and diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in Saudi children

Objectives:

To observe the frequency of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), pattern of clinical presentation and diagnosis among Saudi children at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

The database of children admitted or seen, and aged less than 18 years over 5 years period and diagnosed with EoE was collected and reviewed. Patients with esophagitis other than EoE were excluded. Patients who had eosinophils count more than 15/high power field (HPF) on esophageal biopsies were given the diagnosis of EoE. Demographic database, clinical parameters, and diagnostic modalities were analyzed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.

Results:

A total of 37 children with the diagnosis of EoE were gathered from 398 upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with the frequency of 9.3%. There were 22 (59.4%) males with a mean±SD age of 9.6±2.3 years and all were Saudi nationals. Dysphagia was the leading presentation in 21 (56.7%) children followed by vomiting in 18 (48.6%), impaction of food bolus in 8 (21.6%) and foreign body in 3 (8.1%). Allergic symptoms were present in 13 (35.1%) children in the form of asthma, 11 (29.7%) multiple food allergies and 5 (13.5%) eczema. Peripheral eosinophil count and immunoglobulin E were raised more than normal in 6 and 5 children respectively. The pH measurements were carried out in 16 (43.2%) and ruled out the reflux. Contrast studies with barium (n=6; 16.2%) and endoscopic findings were significant (n=27; 72.9%).

Conclusion:

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an emerging disease and have a rising trend in Saudi children. Dysphagia, vomiting, and food impaction are the more common presenting features in older children and recurrent vomiting in younger children in addition to associated allergic conditions.

Eosinophil Counts in Mucosal Biopsies of the Ileum and Colon: Interobserver Variance Affects Diagnostic Accuracy

Primary eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis (EGE) is a rare entity with unspecific clinical and endoscopic findings. Validated histopathologic criteria for confirming the diagnosis are lacking, because numeric values for normal or elevated concentrations of eosinophils in mucosal biopsies are varying between observers. To quantify this interobserver variance, we had the same set of 30 slides of eosinophilic-rich mucosal biopsies from the ileum and colon systematically reviewed by a panel of six independent pathologists, each with more than a ten-year experience in the field. Using a highly standardized biopsy and slide preparation protocol, we ruled out any influence by the preparation, the patient, the endoscopist, the endoscopes and calipers used, the sampling site, the fixation and staining method, and the microscopic field sizes. Still, all numeric results differed between pathologists up to a factor greater than 30. Calculated positive or negative diagnosis of EGE differed up to a factor greater than 8. A theoretical incidence for EGE calculated from these numbers differed by a factor greater than 1500. We conclude that eosinophil counts in mucosal biopsies from the lower gastrointestinal tract are subject to a very high interobserver variance. Until further research provides objective and validated methods for standardization, all epidemiologic numbers derived from histopathologic findings may have to be questioned. When diagnosing individual patients with EGE, overall morphologic picture together with clinical and endoscopic findings is more important than numeric eosinophil count.