Intravenous ketamine compared with diclofenac suppository in suppressing acute postoperative pain in women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy

A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Ketamine Bolus and Intradermal Lidocaine in Reducing Acute Postoperative Pain

Background and objective

In light of the scarcity of data and research about the management of pain in a low-resource setting, we conducted this study with a view to assessing the effectiveness of intravenous ketamine in comparison to that of intradermal lidocaine in reducing postoperative pain. Postoperative pain can lead to significant morbidity, longer hospital stay, and the development of chronic pain. Our study was formulated to assess the effectiveness of a ketamine bolus in comparison to intradermal lidocaine at the wound site in terms of decreasing pain scores postoperatively.

Methods

In our study, 99 patients were randomly selected to undergo inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia. After obtaining informed consent from the participants and approval from the hospital ethical committee, the patients were randomly classified into the following three groups: the lidocaine group (group A), the ketamine group (group B), and the control group (group C). The patients in the lidocaine group received 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) infiltration at the wound site. The ketamine group was given a 50-mg ketamine bolus at the end of the operation, and the control group did not receive either ketamine or intradermal lidocaine at the wound site. Postoperative pain was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring and the results were compared. The time of the first request for analgesia was also recorded.

Results

The pain scores measured via VAS scores were higher in patients who received intradermal lidocaine (group A) at the wound site as compared to group B that received a bolus of 50-mg ketamine (p<0.0001); the control group (group C) had pain scores higher than both groups A and B (p=0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, administering ketamine bolus can significantly decrease VAS scores and reduce the incidence of chronic post-surgical pain as compared to lidocaine infiltration. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, provides excellent pain relief and analgesia, which decreases overall pain scores.

Comparison of the efficacy of intranasal ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac on acute non-traumatic headaches: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Non - traumatic headaches are one of the most common causes of referral to hospital emergency. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intranasal ketamine and intravenous ketorolac on acute non-traumatic headaches.

METHODS

This randomized and double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 2019. One hundred and forty samples were randomly divided into intranasal ketamine (A) and intravenous ketorolac (B). Group (A) received ketamine intranasal (0.75 mg/kg, max 75 mg), and group B received intravenous ketorolac (30 mg). Headache severity was measured on arrival, 30, 60, and 120 min after intervention with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The side effects were recorded an hour after the intervention.

RESULT

The mean difference of pain intensity 30, 60, and 120 min after the intervention between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the first 30 min, significant changes were observed in the VAS levels of the two groups. These changes were significantly greater in the intranasal ketamine group (p < 0.001). Side effects such as fatigue, dizziness, general discomfort, nausea, increased heart rate, and hypertension were significantly higher in the ketamine group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intranasal ketamine and intravenous ketorolac both effectively reduced headaches. However, more analgesic effects of intranasal ketamine in a short time can be considered as a selective approach to reducing headaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20180108038276N3 , Registered 29 September 2019.

ETHICS COMMITTEE REFERENCE NUMBER

IR.KUMS.REC.1398.068.

Low-dose intravenous ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic in an emergency setting: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of low-dose ketamine versus ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The initial pain severity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Then, ketamine or ketorolac was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg and 30 mg respectively. The pain severity and adverse drug reactions were recorded 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min thereafter.

RESULTS

The data of 62 subjects in the ketamine group and 64 patients in the ketorolac group were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34.2 ± 9.9 and 37.9 ± 10.6 years in the ketamine and ketorolac group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean NRS scores at each time point, except for the 5 min, between the two groups. Despite a marked decrease in pain severity in the ketamine group from drug administration at the 5 min, a slight increase in pain was observed from the 5 min to the 15 min. The rate of adverse drug reactions, including dizziness (P = 0.001), agitation (P = 0.002), increased systolic blood pressure (> 140 mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (> 90 mmHg) was higher in the ketamine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose ketamine is as effective as ketorolac in pain management in patients with renal colic presenting to the ED. However, it is associated with a higher rate of adverse drug reactions.

Efficacy of Low-dose Ketamine as Sole Analgesic Agent in Maintaining Analgesia and Intraoperative Hemodynamics During Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries

BACKGROUND

Ketamine, in low doses, is known to possess intense analgesic properties. The available literature shows wide variation regarding the time and dose of administration of ketamine during surgery.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative administration of ketamine when used as sole analgesic in low doses, on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery and compared on the basis of duration of surgery.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This prospective, observational study was conducted from July to December 2015, over a period of 6 months in a tertiary care medical college and hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients between 23 and 55 years planned for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were recruited. Ketamine was given in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg preoperatively and then repeated every ½ hourly in a dose of 0.25 mg/kg throughout the surgery. Hemodynamic parameters, time to the first rescue analgesia and complications were recorded for the first 8 h. Statistical evaluation was done and result expressed as percentage. Paired t-test was employed for the comparison of numerical variables within the group.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of the patients did not require any postoperative rescue analgesia during the first 8 h after surgery. None of the patients complained of pain immediately after extubation, and 16% of the patients had minor postoperative complications. The intraoperative hemodynamic profile was significantly altered. Duration of surgery and dose of ketamine required did not affect the duration of analgesia.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine in low dose proved to be an efficacious analgesic even in the long duration laparoscopic gynecological surgeries. It stabilizes intraoperative hemodynamics thereby reducing the requirement of other anesthetic and antihypertensive agents.

Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management

Laparoscopic surgery is widespread, and an increasing number of surgeries are performed laparoscopically. Early pain after laparoscopy can be similar or even more severe than that after open surgery. Thus, proactive pain management should be provided. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is derived from multiple origins; therefore, a single agent is seldom sufficient. Pain is most effectively controlled by a multimodal, preventive analgesia approach, such as combining opioids with non-opioid analgesics and local anaesthetics. Wound and port site local anaesthetic injections decrease abdominal wall pain by 1-1.5 units on a 0-10 pain scale. Inflammatory pain and shoulder pain can be controlled by NSAIDs or corticosteroids. In some patient groups, adjuvant drugs, ketamine and α2-adrenergic agonists can be helpful, but evidence on gabapentinoids is conflicting. In the present review, the types of pain that need to be taken into account while planning pain management protocols and the wide range of analgesic options that have been assessed in laparoscopic surgery are critically assessed. Recommendations to the clinician will be made regarding how to manage acute pain and how to prevent persistent postoperative pain. It is important to identify patients at the highest risk for severe and prolonged post-operative pain, and to have a proactive strategy in place for these individuals.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2013

This paper is the thirty-sixth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2013 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.

Comparing the effects of morphine sulfate and diclofenac suppositories on postoperative pain in coronary artery bypass graft patients

Background:

Simple and efficient way of pain management after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery is an important aspect of patients' care.

Objectives:

This study aimed to compare the effects of morphine and diclofenac suppositories on postoperative pain management.

Patients and Methods:

In this double-blinded clinical trial study, 120 patients aged 30-65 years old, undergone CABG, were equally divided into two groups of A (morphine) and B (diclofenac). All patients were anesthetized with intravenous fentanyl 10 μg/kg, etomidate 0.2 mg/kg and cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with oxygen 50% and air 50%, propofol 50 μg/kg/min, fentanyl 1-2 μg/kg/h and atracurium 0.6 mg/kg/h. Analgesics were administered after the operation at intensive care unit (ICU) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was evaluated in both groups in 4-hour intervals after extubation for 24 hours. After extubation in case of VAS > 3, morphine suppository 10 mg (group A) or diclofenac suppository 50 mg (group B) was administered for patients.

Results:

No significant statistical relationship was found between the two groups regarding gender, age, BMI, paracetamol consumption, length of operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass pump (CPB) time, and stay time at ICU (P Value ≥ 0.05). Total dosage of used morphine was 22 ± 8.3 mg in each patient and total dosage of used diclofenac was 94 ± 32.01 mg. Average variation of VAS at measured intervals was significant (P Value ≤ 0.0001), but these variations were not significantly different when comparing the two groups (P Value = 0.023).

Conclusions:

Both morphine and diclofenac suppositories reduced pain significantly and similarly after CABG surgery.

Effect of intravenous patient controlled ketamine analgesiaon postoperative pain in opium abusers

Background:

Acutepostoperative pain is among the worst experience that patient scan undergo, and many analgesics have been used to suppress it; especially in chronic opium abusers. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist analgesic, having both anesthetic and analgesic properties, which are not affected to the same extent in chronic opium abusers.

Objectives:

In this study, we assessed the analgesic effects of ketamine added to morphine as a patient-controlled analgesia method for acute pain management, compared with a placebo, inchronic maleopium abusers.

Patients and Methods:

After institutional review board approval for ethical considerations, a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 140 male patients aged 18-65 years, undergoing orthopedic surgery, were entered into the study after matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients received the same anesthesia method; while the first group received ketamine (1mg/mL) and morphine (0.5 mg/mL) as a patient-controlled analgesia (70 patients), the second group received morphine (0.5 mg/mL) plus normal saline (70 patients). P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The ketamine and morphine group of patients experienced less postoperative pain and required less postoperative rescue analgesia. However, the unwanted postoperative side effects were nearly the same; although increased levels of postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed in the ketamine and morphine group

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated improved analgesic effects after using intravenous patient controlled analgesia with ketamine on postoperative pain in opium abusers.

Effects of the addition of low-dose ketamine to propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia during diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy (DGL) is a brief procedure, generally performed on an outpatient basis. Propofol-fentanyl is often used for anaesthesia in minor outpatient procedures because of its rapid onset, short duration of action and smooth patient awakening. However, propofol has various cardiovascular effects such as reduced arterial pressure, cardiac output and cardiac index. Ketamine is an intravenous anaesthetic and short-acting analgesic that could alleviate the haemodynamic effects of propofol due to its sympathomimetic activity. The aim of this placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of the addition of low-dose ketamine to propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia in DGL.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind randomized trial, 60 healthy women undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy to investigate infertility were studied. Following injection of midazolam and fentanyl in all patients, the study group (n=30) received ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and propofol 1-2.5 mg/kg, and the placebo group (n=30) received saline 0.9% and propofol 1-2.5 mg/kg. Propofol was subsequently infused for the maintenance of anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Patients in the study group had a significantly lower incidence of pain than patients in the placebo group during propofol injection (13% vs 87%, respectively; p<0.0001). After induction of anaesthesia, 16 (53%) patients in the placebo group and three (10%) patients in the study group had a decreased heart rate (p<0.001). The decrease in mean arterial pressure was greater in the placebo group compared with the study group (37% vs 7%, respectively; p<0.001). During the procedure, the total mean±standard deviation dose of propofol was 420±65 mg in the placebo group and 330±35 mg in the study group (p<0.001). Pain scores for the first 3h after the operation were significantly lower in the study group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of low-dose ketamine with propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia in patients undergoing DGL was associated with less pain during propofol injection, lower incidence of haemodynamic changes, lower total dose of propofol and improved postoperative analgesia.