Evaluation of the efficacy of six supraglottic devices for airway management in dark conditions: a crossover randomized simulation trial

Challenges, Innovations, and Training in Airway Management During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review

Emergency airway management is a crucial procedure performed to secure the airway and ensure effective ventilation during respiratory distress or airway obstruction. In the context of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), this process is complicated by factors such as anatomical challenges, environmental conditions, and the urgency of the situation. Recent advancements in airway management devices, including videolaryngoscopes and supraglottic devices (SGDs), have proven beneficial in managing these challenges. SGDs, such as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and i-gel®, provide an effective alternative when tracheal intubation is difficult or when continuous chest compressions are required. Furthermore, simulation-based education plays a critical role in training healthcare providers to handle complex airway scenarios during CPR. This review discusses the challenges of tracheal intubation during CPR, the usefulness of various devices including videolaryngoscopes and gum-elastic bougies (GEB), and the role of simulation training in improving outcomes. Ensuring proficiency in airway management techniques through hands-on practice and advanced simulation is essential for improving both survival rates and neurological outcomes in emergency settings.

Supraglottic airway device to improve ventilation success and reduce pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation by basic life support rescuers: a randomised cross-over human cadaver study

Objectives: Early airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prevents aspiration of gastric contents. Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard to protect airways, but supraglottic airway devices (SGA) may provide some protection with less training. Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is the most common method used by rescuers. We hypothesized that SGA use by first rescuers during CPR could increase ventilation success rate and also decrease intragastric pressure and pulmonary aspiration.Methods: We performed a randomized cross-over experimental trial on human cadavers. Protocol A: we assessed the rate of successful ventilation (chest rise), intragastric pressure, and CPR key time metrics. Protocol B: cadaver stomachs were randomized to be filled with 300 mL of either blue or green serum saline solution through a Foley catheter. Each rescuer was randomly assigned to use SGA or BMV during a 5-minute standard CPR period. Then, in a crossover design, the stomach was filled with the second colour solution and another 5-minute CPR period was performed using the other airway method. Pulmonary aspiration, defined as the presence of coloured solution below the vocal cords, was assessed by a blinded operator using bronchoscopy. A generalized linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis.Results: Protocol A: Forty-eight rescuers performed CPR on 11 cadavers. Median ventilation success was higher with SGA than BMV: 75.0% (IQR: 59.8-87.3) vs. 34.7% (IQR: 25.0-50.0), (p = 0.003). Gastric pressure and differential (maximum minus minimum) gastric pressure were lower in the SGA group: 2.21 mmHg (IQR: 1.66; 2.68) vs. 3.02 mmHg (IQR: 2.02; 4.22) (p = 0.02) and 5.70 mmHg (IQR: 4.10; 7.60) vs. 8.05 mmHg (IQR: 5.40; 11.60) (p = 0.05). CPR key times were not different between groups. Protocol B: Ten cadavers were included with 20 CPR periods. Aspiration occurred in 2 (20%) SGA procedures and 5 (50%) BMV procedures (p = 0.44).Conclusion: Use of SGA by rescuers improved the ventilation success rate, decreased intragastric pressure, and did not affect key CPR metrics. SGA use by basic life support rescuers appears feasible and efficient.

A prospective observational study comparing two supraglottic airway devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Airway management in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important and several methods are used. The establishment of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is a common technique used during OHCA. Two types of SAD are routinely used in Norway; the Kings LTS-D™ and the I-gel®. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of these two devices in terms of difficulty, number of attempts before successful insertion and overall success rate of insertion.

Methods

All adult patients with OHCA, in whom ambulance personnel used a SAD over a one-year period in the ambulance services of Central Norway, were included. After the event, a questionnaire was completed and the personnel responsible for the airway management were interviewed. Primary outcomes were number of attempts until successful insertion, by either same or different ambulance personnel, and the difficulty of insertion graded by easy, medium or hard. Secondary outcomes were reported complications with inserting the SAD’s.

Results

Two hundred and fifty patients were included, of whom 191 received I-gel and 59 received LTS-D. Overall success rate was significantly higher in I-gel (86%) compared to LTS-D (75%, p = 0.043). The rates of successful placements were higher when using I-gel compared to LTS-D, and there was a significant increased risk that the insertion of the LTS-D was unsuccessful compared to the I-gel (risk ratio 1.8, p = 0.04). I-gel was assessed to be easy to insert in 80% of the patients, as opposed to LTS-D which was easy to insert in 51% of the patients.

Conclusions

Overall success rate was significantly higher and the difficulty in insertion was significantly lower in the I-gel group compared to the LTS-D in patients with OHCA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00444-0.

Performance of the laryngeal tube for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

INTRODUCTION

Sudden cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death in Europe and the whole world. Effective chest compressions and advanced airway management have been shown to improve survival rates. Supraglottic airway devices such as the laryngeal tube (LT) are a well-known strategy for patients with cardiac arrest during both basic (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). This systematic literature review aimed to summarize current data for using the LT when performing BLS and ALS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Recent data on the use of the LT during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was gathered by using the Medline database and a specific search strategy. Terms were used in various order and combinations without time restrictions. A total of N.=1005 studies were identified and screened by two experienced anesthesiologists/emergency physicians independently. Altogether, data of N.=19 relevant papers were identified and included in the analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Using the LT showed fast and easy placement with high success rates (76% to 94%) and was associated with higher short-term survival as compared to other strategies for initial airway management (2.2% vs. 1.4%). Quality of CPR such as chest compression fraction (CCF) before and after LT-insertion is improved (75% vs. 59%). For long-term survival, the LT showed lower survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially as initial device of airway management (for inexperienced staff), the use of a LT is easy and results in a fast insertion. The advantages of the LT as compared to bag mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation are inhomogeneous in recent literature.

Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Insertion Efficacy of Six Supraglottic Devices: A Crossover Randomized Simulation Trial

BACKGROUND

No study has ever compared the efficacy of various types of supraglottic devices (SGDs) for securing the airway under cricoid pressure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of six SGDs, LMA-ProSeal (ProSeal), LMA-Classic (Classic), Laryngeal Tube (LT), LMA-Supreme (Supreme), air-Q (air-Q), and i-gel (i-gel), in airway management under cricoid pressure using a manikin.

METHODS

Fifteen novice doctors and 16 experienced doctors used the six SGDs under cricoid or sham pressure on an adult manikin. Insertion time, successful ventilation rate, and subjective insertion difficulty on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured.

RESULTS

Both novice and experienced doctors had a significantly lower ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Novice doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all SGDs. Experienced doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than with sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Subjective insertion difficulty on VAS was significantly higher under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all six SGDs.

CONCLUSION

Ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure was significantly lower than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs in both novice and experienced doctors.

Evaluation of gum-elastic bougie combined with direct and indirect laryngoscopes in vomitus setting: A randomized simulation trial

PURPOSE

Videolaryngoscopes may not be useful in the presence of vomitus due to blurred images on the monitor. The objective of our study is to compare the utility of gum-elastic bougie (GEB) application for tracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope (McL), which is a direct laryngoscope, with that of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope® (AWS) and McGRATH® MAC (McGRATH) in simulated vomitus settings.

METHODS

Sixteen novice doctors performed tracheal intubation on an adult manikin using McL, AWS, and McGRATH with or without GEB under normal and vomitus simulations.

RESULTS

In the normal setting the tracheal intubation was successful with the three laryngoscopes regardless of GEB application. In the vomitus setting, the intubation success rate did not significantly improve using McL, while it did using McGRATH or AWS. In the normal settings, GEB application significantly lengthened the intubation time in all three laryngoscopes. By contrast, in the vomitus settings, GEB application significantly shortened the intubation time in all three laryngoscopes. For the comparison of three laryngoscopes, the intubation time did not differ significantly in normal setting, while it was significantly longer in McG and AWS trials than McL trial.

CONCLUSION

The GEB application facilitates the tracheal intubation in the vomitus setting using McGRATH and AWS in adult simulation.