Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam During Anesthesia Induction in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective and Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery may experience hemodynamic instability during the induction of general anesthesia, and anesthetic agents with minimal hemodynamic effects should be administered. Midazolam, a classic benzodiazepine anesthetic, is known to have relatively weak circulatory depression during anesthesia induction compared to other sedatives. On the other hand, remimazolam, a newly approved short-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic, is expected to have fewer circulatory depressant effects. However, comparisons between remimazolam and midazolam regarding circulatory depression during anesthesia induction have not been adequately studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and midazolam during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

METHOD

In this single-center retrospective and exploratory study, adults undergoing cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia were divided into the remimazolam group (R group) and midazolam group (M group). Remimazolam 0.06 mg/kg (R group) or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (M group) was administered during induction of general anesthesia. Both groups received remifentanil 1 μg/kg/min as analgesia. During anesthesia induction, additional sedatives (remimazolam or midazolam, respectively) were administered as needed to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) below 60. The primary endpoints were the following hemodynamic parameters: mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and stroke volume variation (SVV). Measurements were taken before the induction of anesthesia, one and three minutes after rocuronium administration, and one, three, five, and 10 minutes after tracheal intubation. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients requiring vasopressors and vasopressor dosage, time to fall asleep, and BIS values. All values are expressed as the median (interquartile range). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistically significant differences were set at p-values <0.05.

RESULTS

Forty patients (20 in each group) were included in the final analysis. The doses of remimazolam and midazolam until sleep onset were 0.058 (0.053, 0.066) mg/kg in the R group and 0.035 (0.03, 0.045) mg/kg in the M group. The MAP at five minutes and 10 minutes after tracheal intubation was significantly higher in the R group than in the M group (p=0.031 and p=0.004, respectively). The HR, CI, SVI, SVRI, and SVV were not significantly different between the two groups at any of the measurement points. The number of patients requiring vasopressors and vasopressor dosage were not statistically significant between the two groups. The time to fall asleep was 124 seconds (90, 142) in the R group and 146 seconds (130, 167) in the M group, with a significant difference (p=0.01). The BIS values during anesthesia induction were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam had fewer hemodynamic effects than midazolam, even with relatively high doses and an earlier sleep onset. In terms of hemodynamic stability, remimazolam may be beneficial during anesthetic induction; however, further research is needed to confirm its efficacy.

Accuracy of Cardiac Output Measured by Fourth-Generation Flotrac and Lidcorapid, and Their Characteristics Regarding Systemic Vascular Resistance in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The clinical use of less-invasive devices that calculate the cardiac output from arterial pressure waveform is increasing. The authors aimed to evaluate the accuracy and characteristics of the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) of the cardiac index measured by 2 less-invasive devices, fourth-generation FloTrac (CI_FT) and LiDCOrapid (CI_LR), compared with the intermittent thermodilution technique, using a pulmonary artery catheter (CI_TD).

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-nine adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective cardiac surgery was used as an intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hemodynamic parameters, CI_FT, CI_LR, and CI_TD, were measured after the induction of general anesthesia, at the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, after completion of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, 30 minutes after weaning, and at sternal closure (135 measurements in total). The CI_FT and CI_LR had moderate correlations with CI_TD (r = 0.62 and 0.58, respectively). Compared with CI_TD, CI_FT, and CI_LR had a bias of -0.73 and -0.61 L/min/m², limit of agreement of -2.14-to-0.68 L/min/m² and -2.42-to-1.20 L/min/m², and percentage error of 39.9% and 51.2%, respectively. Subgroup analysis for evaluating SVRI characteristics showed that the percentage errors of CI_FT and CI_LR were 33.9% and 54.5% in low SVRI (<1,200 dyne×s/cm⁵/m), 37.6% and 47.9% in moderate SVRI (1,200-1,800 dyne×s/cm⁵/m), 49.3% and 50.6% in high SVRI (>1,800 dyne·s/cm⁵/m²), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of CI_FT or CI_LR was not clinically acceptable for cardiac surgery. Fourth-generation FloTrac was unreliable in high SVRI. LiDCOrapid was inaccurate across a broad range of SVRI, and minimally affected by SVRI.

Intraoperative Hypotension Prediction—A Proactive Perioperative Hemodynamic Management—A Literature Review

Intraoperative hypotension (IH) is a frequent phenomenon affecting a substantial number of patients undergoing general anesthesia. The occurrence of IH is related to significant perioperative complications, including kidney failure, myocardial injury, and even increased mortality. Despite advanced hemodynamic monitoring and protocols utilizing goal directed therapy, our management is still reactive; we intervene when the episode of hypotension has already occurred. This literature review evaluated the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), which is designed to predict and reduce the incidence of IH. The HPI algorithm is based on a machine learning algorithm that analyzes the arterial pressure waveform as an input and the occurrence of hypotension with MAP <65 mmHg for at least 1 min as an output. There are several studies, both retrospective and prospective, showing a significant reduction in IH episodes with the use of the HPI algorithm. However, the level of evidence on the use of HPI remains very low, and further studies are needed to show the benefits of this algorithm on perioperative outcomes.

The Cardiac Power Index during Abdominal Open Aortic Surgery: Intraoperative Insights into the Cardiac Performance-A Retrospective Observational Analysis

Background: The Cardiac Power Index (CPI) measures the rate of energy output generated by the heart and correlates this with in-hospital mortality due to cardiogenic shock. In open aortic surgery, both aortic clamping and unclamping expose the heart to abrupt variations of the left ventricle afterload, preload, and contractility, with possible hemodynamic impairment. We investigated how aortic-cross clamping (Ao-XC) and unclamping (Ao-UC) procedures affect the CPI during open aortic surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our surgical database of 67 patients submitted to open surgical aortic repair at Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan. Patients were monitored by an EV1000-FloTrac SystemTM (Edwards Lifescience, Irvine, CA, USA) beyond the standard intra-operative hemodynamic monitoring. The primary outcome was the variation of basal CPI after aortic clamping and unclamping. Secondary outcomes were variations of the cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and lactate during aortic clamping and after unclamping. The CPI was computed as: (CI × MAP)/451. Results: The CPI changed significantly after aortic unclamping. CPI: basal = 0.39 ± 0.1 W/m2, after Ao-XC = 0.39 ± 0.1 W/m2, and after Ao-UC = 0.44 ± 0.2 W/m2, p < 0.05. The CI changed during both cross-clamping and unclamping (p < 0.0001), whilst the MAP and heart rate did not during any phase of the surgery. Five subjects (8.3%) needed inotropic support after cross-clamping. Their basal CPI was lower than the general population: 0.31 ± 0.11 W/m2 vs. 0.39 ± 0.1 W/m2. Conclusions: The CPI describes the adaptation of the cardiac function to the changes in preload, contractility, and afterload occurring during aortic cross-clamping and unclamping. It may be used to explore the cardiac performance in real-time and predict cardiac impairment in the intraoperative period in a minimally invasive way, similar to ventriculo-arterial coupling parameters.

Accuracy and Trending Ability of Cardiac Index Measured by the CNAP System in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The CNAP system is a noninvasive monitor that provides a continuous arterial pressure waveform using an inflatable finger cuff. The authors hypothesized that dramatic changes in systemic vascular resistance index during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery might affect the accuracy of noninvasive pulse contour monitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index derived by the CNAP system (CI_CN) in patients undergoing AAA surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Cardiac surgery operating room in a single cardiovascular center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients who underwent elective AAA surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

CI_CN and cardiac index measured using 3-dimensional images (CI_3D) were determined simultaneously at 8 points during the surgery. At aortic clamping and unclamping, the authors tested the trending ability of CI_CN using 4-quadrant plot analysis and polar plot analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors found a wide limit of agreement between CI_CN and CI_3D (percentage error: 85.0%). The cubic splines, which show the relationship between systemic vascular resistance index and percentage CI discrepancy [(CI_CN-CI_3D)/CI_3D], were sloped positively. Four-quadrant plot analysis showed poor trending ability for CI_CN at both aortic clamping and unclamping (concordance rate: 29.4% and 57.9%, respectively). In the polar plot analysis, the concordance rates at aortic clamping and unclamping were 15.0% and 35.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CI_CN is not interchangeable with CI_3D in patients undergoing AAA surgery. The trending ability for CI_CN at aortic clamping and unclamping was below the acceptable limit. These inaccuracies might be secondary to the high systemic vascular resistance index during AAA surgery.

Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

One of the most important variables in assessing hemodynamic status in the intensive care unit (ICU) is the cardiac function and blood pressure. Invasive methods such as pulmonary artery catheter and arterial line allow monitoring of blood pressure and cardiac function accurately and reliably. However, their use is not without drawbacks, especially when the invasive nature of these procedures and complications associated with them are considered. There are several newer methods of noninvasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring available. In this manuscript, we will review these different methods of minimally invasive and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and will discuss their advantages, drawbacks and limitations.

The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study

Superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have been shown to predict fluid responsiveness. SVC-CI has been validated only with conventional transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the SVC long axis, on the basis of SVC diameter variations, but not in the SVC short axis or by SVC area variations. SVV was not previously tested in vascular surgery patients. Forty consecutive adult patients undergoing open major vascular surgical procedures received 266 intraoperative volume loading tests (VLTs), with 500 ml of gelatine over 10 min. The hSVC-CI was measured using a miniaturized transoesophageal echocardiography probe (hTEE). The SVV and cardiac index (CI) were measured using Vigileo-FloTrac technology. VLTs were considered 'positive' (≥ 11% increase in CI) or 'negative' (< 11% increase in CI). We compared SVV and hSVC-CI measurements in the SVC short axis to predict fluid responsiveness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for hSVC-CI and SVV were not significantly different (P = 0.56), and both showed good predictivity at values of 0.92 (P < 0.001) and 0.89 (P < 0.001), respectively. The cutoff values for hSVC-CI and SVV were 37% (sensitivity 90%, specificity of 83%) and 15% (sensitivity 78%, specificity of 100%), respectively. Our study validated the value of the SVC-CI measured as area variations in the SVC short axis to predict fluid responsiveness in anesthetized patients. An hTEE probe was used to monitor and measure the hSVC-CI but conventional TEE may also offer this new dynamic parameter. In our cohort of significant preoperative hypovolemic patients undergoing major open vascular surgery, hSVC-CI and SVV cutoff values of 37% and 15%, respectively, predicted fluid responsiveness with good accuracy.

Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiac output monitoring is used in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution and transpulmonary thermodilution, considered the gold standard, are invasive and linked to complications. Therefore, many non-invasive cardiac output devices have been developed and studied. One of those is electrical cardiometry. The results of validation studies are conflicting, which emphasize the need for definitive validation of accuracy and precision. We performed a database search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials to identify studies comparing cardiac output measurement by electrical cardiometry and a reference method. Pooled bias, limits of agreement (LoA) and mean percentage error (MPE) were calculated using a random-effects model. A pooled MPE of less than 30% was considered clinically acceptable. A total of 13 studies in adults (620 patients) and 11 studies in pediatrics (603 patients) were included. For adults, pooled bias was 0.03 L min^-1 [95% CI - 0.23; 0.29], LoA - 2.78 to 2.84 L min^-1 and MPE 48.0%. For pediatrics, pooled bias was - 0.02 L min^-1 [95% CI - 0.09; 0.05], LoA - 1.22 to 1.18 L min^-1 and MPE 42.0%. Inter-study heterogeneity was high for both adults (I² = 93%, p < 0.0001) and pediatrics (I² = 86%, p < 0.0001). Despite the low bias for both adults and pediatrics, the MPE was not clinically acceptable. Electrical cardiometry cannot replace thermodilution and transthoracic echocardiography for the measurement of absolute cardiac output values. Future research should explore it's clinical use and indications.

Disagreement in cardiac output measurements between fourth-generation FloTrac and critical care ultrasonography in patients with circulatory shock: a prospective observational study

Background

Cardiac output measurements may inform diagnosis and provide guidance of therapeutic interventions in patients with hemodynamic instability. The FloTrac™ algorithm uses uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to estimate cardiac output. Recently, a new version of the algorithm has been developed. The aim was to assess the agreement between FloTrac™ and routinely performed cardiac output measurements obtained by critical care ultrasonography in patients with circulatory shock.

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary hospital from June 2016 to January 2017. Adult critically ill patients with circulatory shock were eligible for inclusion. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously using FloTrac™ with a fourth-generation algorithm (CO_AP) and critical care ultrasonography (CO_CCUS). The strength of linear correlation of both methods was determined by the Pearson coefficient. Bland-Altman plot and four-quadrant plot were used to track agreement and trending ability.

Result

Eighty-nine paired cardiac output measurements were performed in 17 patients during their first 24 h of admittance. CO_AP and CO_CCUS had strong positive linear correlation (r² = 0.60, p < 0.001). Bias of CO_AP and CO_CCUS was 0.2 L min⁻¹ (95% CI − 0.2 to 0.6) with limits of agreement of − 3.6 L min⁻¹ (95% CI − 4.3 to − 2.9) to 4.0 L min⁻¹ (95% CI 3.3 to 4.7). The percentage error was 65.6% (95% CI 53.2 to 77.3). Concordance rate was 64.4%.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients with circulatory shock, there was disagreement and clinically unacceptable trending ability between values of cardiac output obtained by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis and critical care ultrasonography.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02912624, registered on September 23, 2016

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-019-0373-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.