1
|
Savaie M, Sheikhi Y, Baghbanian R, Soltani F, Amiri F, Hesam S. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Cardiac Dysrhythmias in a
Noncardiac Intensive Care Unit. SAGE Open Nurs 2023; 9:23779608231160932. [PMID: 36969363 PMCID: PMC10034271 DOI: 10.1177/23779608231160932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Several extrinsic factors contribute to the development of cardiac
dysrhythmias. In intensive care unit (ICU) settings and among critically ill
patients who are exposed to a large number of risk factors, cardiac
disturbances are more common. Objectives This study aimed to examine the epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of
cardiac dysrhythmias in a non-cardiac ICU. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study conducted in a
tertiary noncardiac ICU at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz, Iran. Out of the
360 adult patients aged 18 years and older who were admitted to ICU for
longer than 24 h, 340 cases who met the study inclusion criteria were
recruited between March 2018 until October 2018. Results The most common nonsinus dysrhythmias were new-onset atrial fibrillation
(NOAF) (12.9%) and ventricular tachycardia (21 patients—6.2%). According to
our results, previous percutaneous coronary instrumentation, acute kidney
injury, sepsis, and hyperkalemia act as risk factors in the development of
cardiac dysrhythmias. Additionally, we found out that thyroid dysfunction
and pneumonia can predict the development of NOAF in critically ill
patients. The estimated mortality rate among patients with NOAF in this
study was 15.7% (p < .05). Conclusion Cardiac dysrhythmias are common in ICU patients and treating the risk factors
can help to prevent their development and improve patient management and
outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Savaie
- Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Mohsen Savaie, Post code 6155689768, No.
15, East Motahhari Street, Kianpars, Ahvaz, Iran.
| | - Yasaman Sheikhi
- School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Reza Baghbanian
- Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Farhad Soltani
- Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Fereshteh Amiri
- Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Saeed Hesam
- Ahvaz
Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences,
Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bedford J, Drikite L, Corbett M, Doidge J, Ferrando-Vivas P, Johnson A, Rajappan K, Mouncey P, Harrison D, Young D, Rowan K, Watkinson P. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and outcomes for new-onset atrial fibrillation in ICU patients: the CAFE scoping review and database analyses. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-174. [PMID: 34847987 DOI: 10.3310/hta25710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New-onset atrial fibrillation occurs in around 10% of adults treated in an intensive care unit. New-onset atrial fibrillation may lead to cardiovascular instability and thromboembolism, and has been independently associated with increased length of hospital stay and mortality. The long-term consequences are unclear. Current practice guidance is based on patients outside the intensive care unit; however, new-onset atrial fibrillation that develops while in an intensive care unit differs in its causes and the risks and clinical effectiveness of treatments. The lack of evidence on new-onset atrial fibrillation treatment or long-term outcomes in intensive care units means that practice varies. Identifying optimal treatment strategies and defining long-term outcomes are critical to improving care. OBJECTIVES In patients treated in an intensive care unit, the objectives were to (1) evaluate existing evidence for the clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological new-onset atrial fibrillation treatments, (2) compare the use and clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological new-onset atrial fibrillation treatments, and (3) determine outcomes associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation. METHODS We undertook a scoping review that included studies of interventions for treatment or prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation involving adults in general intensive care units. To investigate the long-term outcomes associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation, we carried out a retrospective cohort study using English national intensive care audit data linked to national hospital episode and outcome data. To analyse the clinical effectiveness of different new-onset atrial fibrillation treatments, we undertook a retrospective cohort study of two large intensive care unit databases in the USA and the UK. RESULTS Existing evidence was generally of low quality, with limited data suggesting that beta-blockers might be more effective than amiodarone for converting new-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and for reducing mortality. Using linked audit data, we showed that patients developing new-onset atrial fibrillation have more comorbidities than those who do not. After controlling for these differences, patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation had substantially higher mortality in hospital and during the first 90 days after discharge (adjusted odds ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval 2.16 to 2.48; adjusted hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.70, respectively), and higher rates of subsequent hospitalisation with atrial fibrillation, stroke and heart failure (adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio 5.86, 95% confidence interval 5.33 to 6.44; adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.93; and adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.44, respectively), than patients who did not have new-onset atrial fibrillation. From intensive care unit data, we found that new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 952 out of 8367 (11.4%) UK and 1065 out of 18,559 (5.7%) US intensive care unit patients in our study. The median time to onset of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients who received treatment was 40 hours, with a median duration of 14.4 hours. The clinical characteristics of patients developing new-onset atrial fibrillation were similar in both databases. New-onset atrial fibrillation was associated with significant average reductions in systolic blood pressure of 5 mmHg, despite significant increases in vasoactive medication (vasoactive-inotropic score increase of 2.3; p < 0.001). After adjustment, intravenous beta-blockers were not more effective than amiodarone in achieving rate control (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.44) or rhythm control (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.11). Digoxin therapy was associated with a lower probability of achieving rate control (adjusted hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.86) and calcium channel blocker therapy was associated with a lower probability of achieving rhythm control (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.79) than amiodarone. Findings were consistent across both the combined and the individual database analyses. CONCLUSIONS Existing evidence for new-onset atrial fibrillation management in intensive care unit patients is limited. New-onset atrial fibrillation in these patients is common and is associated with significant short- and long-term complications. Beta-blockers and amiodarone appear to be similarly effective in achieving cardiovascular control, but digoxin and calcium channel blockers appear to be inferior. FUTURE WORK Our findings suggest that a randomised controlled trial of amiodarone and beta-blockers for management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients should be undertaken. Studies should also be undertaken to provide evidence for or against anticoagulation for patients who develop new-onset atrial fibrillation in intensive care units. Finally, given that readmission with heart failure and thromboembolism increases following an episode of new-onset atrial fibrillation while in an intensive care unit, a prospective cohort study to demonstrate the incidence of atrial fibrillation and/or left ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge and at 3 months following the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation should be undertaken. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13252515. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 71. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bedford
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laura Drikite
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Mark Corbett
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - James Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Alistair Johnson
- Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kim Rajappan
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Mouncey
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - David Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathryn Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Peter Watkinson
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drikite L, Bedford JP, O'Bryan L, Petrinic T, Rajappan K, Doidge J, Harrison DA, Rowan KM, Mouncey PR, Young D, Watkinson PJ, Corbett M. Treatment strategies for new onset atrial fibrillation in patients treated on an intensive care unit: a systematic scoping review. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2021; 25:257. [PMID: 34289899 PMCID: PMC8296751 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03684-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients treated on an intensive care unit (ICU) is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We undertook a systematic scoping review to summarise comparative evidence to inform NOAF management for patients admitted to ICU. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, OpenGrey, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials register, additional WHO ICTRP trial databases, and NIHR Clinical Trials Gateway in March 2019. We included studies evaluating treatment or prevention strategies for NOAF or acute anticoagulation in general medical, surgical or mixed adult ICUs. We extracted study details, population characteristics, intervention and comparator(s), methods addressing confounding, results, and recommendations for future research onto study-specific forms. RESULTS Of 3,651 citations, 42 articles were eligible: 25 primary studies, 12 review articles and 5 surveys/opinion papers. Definitions of NOAF varied between NOAF lasting 30 s to NOAF lasting > 24 h. Only one comparative study investigated effects of anticoagulation. Evidence from small RCTs suggests calcium channel blockers (CCBs) result in slower rhythm control than beta blockers (1 study), and more cardiovascular instability than amiodarone (1 study). Evidence from 4 non-randomised studies suggests beta blocker and amiodarone therapy may be equivalent in respect to rhythm control. Beta blockers may be associated with improved survival compared to amiodarone, CCBs, and digoxin, though supporting evidence is subject to confounding. Currently, the limited evidence does not support therapeutic anticoagulation during ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS From the limited evidence available beta blockers or amiodarone may be superior to CCBs as first line therapy in undifferentiated patients in ICU. The little evidence available does not support therapeutic anticoagulation for NOAF whilst patients are critically ill. Consensus definitions for NOAF, rate and rhythm control are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Drikite
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), 24 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6AZ, UK.
| | - Jonathan P Bedford
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Liam O'Bryan
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tatjana Petrinic
- Cairns Library, University of Oxford Health Care Libraries, Oxford, UK
| | - Kim Rajappan
- Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - James Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), 24 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6AZ, UK
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), 24 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6AZ, UK
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), 24 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6AZ, UK
| | - Paul R Mouncey
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), 24 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6AZ, UK
| | - Duncan Young
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Corbett
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shawwa K, Kompotiatis P, Bobart SA, Mara KC, Wiley BM, Jentzer JC, Kashani KB. New-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute kidney injury on continuous renal replacement therapy. J Crit Care 2020; 62:157-163. [PMID: 33383309 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The mortality of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) who require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains high. We assessed the incidence and predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in this population and its impact on outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of adult intensive care units (ICU) patients who had AKI and received CRRT from December 2006 through November 2015 in a tertiary academic medical center. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the impact of NOAF on overall mortality. RESULTS Out of 1398 screened patients, NOAF occurred in 193 (14%) cases. NOAF occurring on CRRT was independently associated with an increased hazard of death at follow-up (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), compared to the group who did not have NOAF. In the multivariable analysis using time-dependent covariates, higher potassium (HR 1.24, 95%CI: 1.01-1.54) and bicarbonate (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.92-0.98) levels were associated with increased and decreased risk of NOAF on CRRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS NOAF in critically ill patients with AKI receiving CRRT is common and carries an unfavorable prognosis. Prospective studies are required to elucidate modifiable risk factors for NOAF occurring on CRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Shawwa
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Panagiotis Kompotiatis
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shane A Bobart
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kristin C Mara
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brandon M Wiley
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kianoush B Kashani
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
New-onset atrial fibrillation in adult critically ill patients: a scoping review. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:928-938. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05633-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|