In vitro changes in the proportion of protein-unbound-free propofol induced by valproate

Body mass index and pharmacodynamics of target-controlled infusion of propofol: A prospective non-randomized controlled study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

In our preliminary study, there were large individual variations at sedation levels during propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI). The present study aimed to assess the effects of body mass index (BMI) on the pharmacodynamic index of propofol TCI.

METHODS

This prospective, non-randomized controlled trial evaluated 175 female patients undergoing breast lumpectomy. Anesthesia was induced with propofol using the TCI system embedded Schnider model. The effect compartment concentration was set to 3 μg/ml, and the start time of infusion was recorded. When the target concentration reached 3 μg/ml, the patient could not be awakened (Ramsay sedation score ≥4), and when the Bispectral Index (BIS) was <60, the infusion was discontinued, and the time point was recorded. The observation end-point was set at the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of <4. The correlation between the BMI and the pharmacodynamic index of propofol was evaluated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Propofol induction time was significantly correlated with the BMI (p < 0.001). The induction time of the underweight subjects was 10.14 ± 2.19 min, which was remarkably higher than that of normal weight (6.48 ± 3.44 min) and overweight (4.75 ± 2.53 min) individuals (p < 0.001). There were still significant differences after multivariable-adjusted regressions (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in recovery time and sedative effect indicators, such as Ramsay score, BIS value, and effect compartment concentration, between the three groups (p > 0.05 for all).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the BMI is one of the critical factors affecting the pharmacodynamic index of propofol TCI, and the induction time decreased progressively with increasing BMI. The Schnider model might underpredict doses of propofol for underweight individuals.

Anesthetic Considerations for Patients on Psychotropic Drug Therapies

Psychotropic drugs are used in the treatment of psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Many patients who are on psychotropic medications may present for procedures requiring anesthesia. Psychotropic medications can have dangerous interactions with drugs commonly used in anesthesia, some of which can be life-threatening. In this review, we describe the current anesthetic considerations for patients on psychotropic drug therapies, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, and stimulants. The pharmacology, side effects, and potential drug interactions of the commonly prescribed psychotropic drug therapies with anesthetic agents are described. Further, we highlight the current recommendations regarding the cessation and continuation of these medications during the perioperative period.

Multi-drug therapy for epilepsy influenced bispectral index after a bolus propofol administration without affecting propofol's pharmacokinetics: a prospective cohort study

Some previous studies have indicated that valproate (VPA) might change the pharmacokinetics and enhance the effects of propofol. We evaluated whether clinical VPA therapy affected the propofol blood level, the protein-unbound free propofol level, and/or the anesthetic effects of propofol in the clinical setting. The subjects were divided into the control group (not medicated with antiepileptics), the mono-VPA group (medicated with VPA alone), and the poly-VPA group (medicated with VPA, other antiepileptics, and/or psychoactive drugs). General anesthesia was induced via the administration of a single bolus of propofol and a remifentanil infusion, and when the bispectral index (BIS) exceeded 60 sevoflurane was started. There were no significant differences in the total blood propofol level at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min or the protein-unbound free propofol level at 5 min after the intravenous administration of propofol between the 3 groups. However, the minimum BIS was significantly lower and the time until the BIS exceeded 60 was significantly longer in the poly-VPA group. In the multivariate regression analysis, belonging to the poly-VPA group was found to be independently associated with the minimum BIS value and the time until the BIS exceeded 60. Clinical VPA therapy did not influence the pharmacokinetics of propofol. However, multi-drug therapy involving VPA might enhance the anesthetic effects of propofol.