Spinal tumors in coexisting degenerative spine disease--a differential diagnostic problem

A delayed diagnostic case with complaints of severe lower back pain and sciatic nerve symptoms caused by osteoid osteoma of the sacrum: A case report

BACKGROUND

Osteoid sacral osteomas are rare. Patients present with severe lower back pain and, rarely, sciatic nerve symptoms.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we report a patient with delayed diagnosis with complaints of severe lower back pain and sciatic nerve symptoms compressed by a sacral osteoid osteoma. En bloc tumor resection was performed using computed tomography (CT)-based navigation. Complete resolution of symptoms was achieved immediately after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Even if a patient with an osteoid osteoma has sciatic symptoms, spinal surgeons should recognize a subgroup of patients with unexpected spinal or pelvic tumors compressing the nerve root.

Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Metastases to Various Levels of Vertebra: A Case Report and Literature Review

The consequences of lung cancer over the past century have been quite deadly and cost millions of lives. Besides the statistics that show its brutal mortality rate, the comorbidities secondary to lung cancer have had their toll and burden on patients too. Lung cancer is broadly and histologically divided into small and non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with the latter associated with a heavy smoking history. Initial presentation of NSCLC varies, and many patients present with an advanced disease that has spread to different parts of the body. Metastasis to the bone can lead to severe pain requiring extreme analgesia regimens. Here, we present a case of a 68-year-old male with advanced NSCLC who initially presented with bony pain due to metastasis.

Lung Cancer With Vertebral Metastases Presenting as Low Back Pain in the Chiropractic Office: A Case Report

Lung cancer commonly metastasizes to the skeletal system, and when affecting the spine, it may initially be mistaken for a typical musculoskeletal source of back pain. We report a previously healthy 52-year-old male non-smoker with an eight-week history of low back pain that radiated into his left thigh and recent weight loss, yet no respiratory symptoms. Initially, the patient visited his primary care physician, who suspected a musculoskeletal condition and prescribed a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and muscle relaxant, then referred the patient to the chiropractor. Based on the patient's pain pattern, limited mobility, and other features, the chiropractor suspected a lumbar disc herniation. However, the patient's condition worsened during a one-week trial of care, so the chiropractor ordered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, as the findings suggested vertebral metastasis, promptly referred the patient to an oncologist, who confirmed a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma via positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and biopsy. Chiropractors should be aware of warning signs of malignancy, such as unexplained weight loss or progressive worsening despite treatment. If providers suspect spinal metastasis, they should order advanced imaging such as an MRI and refer patients to an oncologist for timely care.

Thoracic Schwannoma as an Unusual Cause of Sciatic Pain in the Chiropractic Office: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Sciatica, which is pain radiating along the sciatic nerve distribution, is most often caused by degenerative conditions of the lower back and rarely results from lesions of the spinal cord. This case report illustrates a patient with suspected lumbar radiculopathy, ultimately diagnosed with a thoracic schwannoma after visiting a chiropractor. CASE REPORT A 61-year-old woman presented to a chiropractor with progressively worsening lower back pain radiating to the right lower extremity and unsteady gait. Her symptoms began 10 years previously and she had been diagnosed by an orthopedist with lumbar disc herniation causing radiculopathy via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and was treated with physical therapy and diclofenac. Upon examination by the chiropractor, the patient had bilateral lower-extremity neurologic deficits, hyperreflexia, and upgoing Babinski responses. The chiropractor ordered thoracic MRI, but the patient preferred to initiate a trial of care, which was unsuccessful. After a delay imposed by cardiac bypass surgery, the patient returned to the chiropractor with worsened symptoms and underwent thoracic MRI, revealing an intraspinal mass at T9. The patient underwent laminectomy and tumor removal, with histopathology confirming a diagnosis of schwannoma. The patient gradually improved after surgery with the help of rehabilitative exercises. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians should suspect a spinal cord lesion as a cause of sciatic pain when patients fail to improve with treatment, have a broad sensorimotor distribution unexplained by lumbar imaging findings, hyperreflexia/pathological reflexes, or other atypical findings (eg, negative neural tension tests). In such cases, MRI of the cervical and thoracic spine may be indicated.

Lumbar Schwannoma as a Rare Cause of Radiculopathy in the Chiropractic Office: A Case Report

Cauda equina tumors are rare, slow-growing, and typically benign. These tumors present with low back pain resembling disc displacement with radiculopathy and thus may go undiagnosed for months. A 52-year-old, otherwise healthy man presented to a chiropractor with a one-year history of worsening low back pain radiating to the right lower extremity, rated an 8/10 in severity and aggravated by recumbency. Previously, his primary care physician had ordered radiographs revealing mild lumbar degenerative changes, prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and referred him to an orthopedist and physical therapist. There had been no change in symptoms. Upon examination by the chiropractor, the patient had neurologic deficits, and due to progressive worsening, the chiropractor recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which the patient deferred due to cost. The chiropractor initiated a trial of care, with initial success; however, the patient's symptoms recurred, and he consented to an MRI. MRI revealed an intradural extramedullary lumbar tumor, and the chiropractor referred the patient to an oncologist, who referred the patient to a neurosurgeon. The neurosurgeon surgically removed the mass, with a biopsy confirming a schwannoma. The patient had significantly improved six weeks after surgery. This case highlights a patient with chronic low back pain for whom a chiropractor identified a cauda equina tumor and referred him for further evaluation and surgery. Clinicians should consider night pain and persistent symptoms, despite conservative care, as red flags warranting further investigation in those with low back pain. Providers should refer for neurosurgical evaluation when clinical and radiological findings suggest a cauda equina tumor.

A rare case of concomitant cervical disc herniation and intradural meningioma treated with one-stage posterior surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

PURPOSE

To present a rare case of cervical disc herniation concomitant with intradural meningioma which was successfully treated using a single one-stage posterior surgery of tumor resection and transdural discectomy. Coexistence of symptomatic disc herniation and intra-spinal tumor in the same cervical segment is extremely rare. Usually, two-stage anterior and posterior surgeries are needed to treat two conditions, respectively. One-stage posterior surgery to treat two pathologies simultaneously has not been reported in the literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 76-year-old man presented with leg weakness and numbness for 6 months and left arm pain for 2 months. Contrast MR imaging revealed C3/4 intervertebral disc herniation and a hyperintense intradural lesion at the right portion of C3 canal. A one-stage posterior surgery, including C3/4 laminectomy, intradural tumor resection, transdural C3/4 discectomy, and C3/4 lateral mass instrumentation and fusion, was performed to treat two distinct pathologies together. The patient's arm pain and numbness disappeared right after the surgery and symptoms of myelopathy fully recovered at 6-month follow-up. Histological studies confirmed a herniated disc and a meningioma.

CONCLUSION

In rare case, intradural tumor coexists with cervical disc herniation. When suspicious findings were noticed, or clinical symptoms cannot be fully explained, contrast MR imaging is helpful in differential diagnosis. Microscopic transdural discectomy is safe, and could be used as an optional procedure for cervical disc herniation in some cases.

Positioning and spinal bracing for pain relief in metastatic spinal cord compression in adults

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 3 (Lee 2012) on patient positioning (mobilisation) and bracing for pain relief and spinal stability in adults with metastatic spinal cord compression.Many patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) have spinal instability, but their clinician has determined that due to their advanced disease they are unsuitable for surgical internal fixation. Mobilising may be hazardous in the presence of spinal instability as further vertebral collapse can occur. Current guidance on positioning (whether a patient should be managed with bed rest or allowed to mobilise) and whether spinal bracing is helpful, is contradictory.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correct positioning and examine the effects of spinal bracing to relieve pain or to prevent further vertebral collapse in patients with MSCC.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched for relevant studies from February 2012 to 31 March 2015. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE In Process, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, TRIP, SIGN, NICE, UK Clinical Research Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse and PEDro database. We also searched the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), ClinicalTrials.gov, UK Clinical Trials Gateway (UKCTG), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR).For the original version, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, NICE, SIGN, AMED, TRIP, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and PEDro database, in February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with MSCC of interventions on positioning (mobilisation) and bracing.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed each possible study for inclusion and quality.

MAIN RESULTS

For the original version of the review, we screened 1611 potentially relevant studies. No studies met the inclusion criteria. Many papers identified the importance of mobilisation, but no RCTs of bed rest versus mobilisation have been undertaken. We identified no RCTs of bracing in MSCC.For this update, we identified 347 potential titles. We screened 300 titles and abstracts after removal of duplicates. We did not identify any additional studies for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Since publication of the original version of this review, no new studies were found and our conclusions remain unchanged.There is a lack of evidence-based guidance around how to correctly position and when to mobilise patients with MSCC or if spinal bracing is an effective technique for reducing pain or improving quality of life. RCTs are required in this important area.

Back pain in patients with degenerative spine disease and intradural spinal tumor: what to treat? when to treat?

BACKGROUND

Back pain is common in industrialized countries and one of the most frequent causes of work incapacity. Successful treatment is, therefore, not only important for improving the symptoms and the quality of life of these patients but also for socioeconomic reasons. Back pain is frequently caused by degenerative spine disease. Intradural spinal tumors are rare with an annual incidence of 2-4/1,00,000 and are mostly associated with neurological deficits and radicular and nocturnal pain. Back pain is not commonly described as a concomitant symptom, such that in patients with both a tumor and degenerative spine disease, any back pain is typically attributed to the degeneration rather than the tumor.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present retrospective investigation was to study and analyze the impact of microsurgery on back/neck pain in patients with intradural spinal tumor in the presence of degenerative spinal disease in adjacent spinal segments.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent microsurgical, intradural tumor surgery using a standardized protocol assisted by multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring. Clinical symptoms, complications and surgery characteristics were documented. Standardized questionnaires were used to measure outcome from the surgeon's and the patient's perspectives (Spine Tango Registry and Core Outcome Measures Index). Follow-up included clinical and neuroradiological examinations 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Back/neck pain as a leading symptom and coexisting degenerative spine disease was present in 27/58 (47 %) of the tumor patients, and these comprised to group under study. Patients underwent tumor surgery only, without addressing the degenerative spinal disease. Remission rate after tumor removal was 85 %. There were no major surgical complications. Back/neck pain as the leading symptom was eradicated in 67 % of patients. There were 7 % of patients who required further invasive therapy for their degenerative spinal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradural spinal tumor surgery improves back/neck pain in patients with coexisting severe degenerative spinal disease. Intradural spinal tumors seem to be the only cause of back/neck pain more often than appreciated. In these patients suffering from both pathologies, there is a higher risk of surgical overtreatment than undertreatment. Therefore, elaborate clinical and radiological examinations should be performed preoperatively and the indication for stabilization/fusion should be discussed carefully in patients foreseen for first time intradural tumor surgery.

Red flags to screen for malignancy in patients with low-back pain

BACKGROUND

The identification of serious pathologies, such as spinal malignancy, is one of the primary purposes of the clinical assessment of patients with low-back pain (LBP). Clinical guidelines recommend awareness of "red flag" features from the patient's clinical history and physical examination to achieve this. However, there are limited empirical data on the diagnostic accuracy of these features and there remains very little information on how best to use them in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic performance of clinical characteristics identified by taking a clinical history and conducting a physical examination ("red flags") to screen for spinal malignancy in patients presenting with LBP.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases for primary studies (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) and systematic reviews (PubMed and Medion) from the earliest date until 1 April 2012. Forward and backward citation searching of eligible articles was also performed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered studies if they compared the results of history taking and physical examination on patients with LBP with those of diagnostic imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, myelography).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the quality of each included study with the QUality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and extracted details on patient characteristics, study design, index tests, and reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy data were presented as sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals for all index tests.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight cohort studies of which six were performed in primary care (total number of patients; n = 6622), one study was from an accident and emergency setting (n = 482), and one study was from a secondary care setting (n = 257). In the six primary care studies, the prevalence of spinal malignancy ranged from 0% to 0.66%. Overall, data from 20 index tests were extracted and presented, however only seven of these were evaluated by more than one study. Because of the limited number of studies and clinical heterogeneity, statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy data was not performed.There was some evidence from individual studies that having a previous history of cancer meaningfully increases the probability of malignancy. Most "red flags" such as insidious onset, age > 50, and failure to improve after one month have high false positive rates.All of the tests were evaluated in isolation and no study presented data on a combination of positive tests to identify spinal malignancy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For most "red flags," there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations regarding their diagnostic accuracy or usefulness for detecting spinal malignancy. The available evidence indicates that in patients with LBP, an indication of spinal malignancy should not be based on the results of one single "red flag" question. Further research to evaluate the performance of different combinations of tests is recommended.

Delay in diagnosis of primary intradural spinal cord tumors

Background:

It has been our impression in recent years that there is a significant delay in diagnosis (DID) of patients in Israel harboring intradural spinal cord tumors (IDSCTs). DID can lead to irreversible deficits and unnecessary suffering. Our goal was to identify the incidence and the specific reasons for DID of IDSCTs in patients operated upon at our institution.

Methods:

A retrospective record review, with additional telephone survey, of 101 patients operated upon at our institute between the years 1996 and 2009 was conducted. The patients who were not diagnosed locally and those who were diagnosed during routine spinal imaging studies as part of their basic disease check-up were excluded. Accordingly, neurofibromatosis and medical tourist patients were excluded.

Results:

The clinical presentation of IDSCTs in our study was similar to the descriptions given in previous reports. The average age was 41.9 ± 23.3 years. Most tumors were ependymomas, astrocytomas, and schwannomas. The most common symptoms were motor or sensory disturbance, back pain, walking disturbance, and sphincter control deficit. The median time to diagnosis was 12.0 ± 37.0 months (range 3 days to 20 years). We found DID in 82.2% of the cases. 62.4% of the cases were defined as “unreasonable delay.” The most common reasons for DID were “classical symptoms with a wrong diagnosis” and “delayed imaging.”

Conclusions:

Based on the results of this study, the incidence of unreasonable delays in diagnosis of primary IDSCTs in Israel is very high. In order to shorten the time to diagnosis, primary and secondary care physicians need to increase their awareness of symptoms that may be associated with these lesions. We hereby offer feedback for care providers, relevant to the diagnostic workup of these patients. Such a feedback must be delivered by neurosurgeons to the community they are serving.

Patient positioning (mobilisation) and bracing for pain relief and spinal stability in metastatic spinal cord compression in adults

BACKGROUND

Many patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) have spinal instability but are determined, by their clinician, to be unsuitable for surgical internal fixation due to their advanced disease. Mobilisation may be hazardous in the presence of spinal instability as further vertebral collapse can occur. Current guidance on positioning (or mobilisation) and spinal bracing is contradictory.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correct positioning (or mobilisation) and examine the effects of spinal bracing to relieve pain or to prevent further vertebral collapse in patients with MSCC.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, NICE, SIGN, AMED, TRIP, National Guideline Clearinghouse and PEDro database were searched; the last search was run in February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with MSCC of interventions on positioning or mobilisation and bracing.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed each possible study for inclusion and quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One thousand, six hundred and eleven potentially relevant studies were screened. No studies met the inclusion criteria. Many papers identified the importance of mobilisation but no RCTs have been undertaken. No RCTs of bracing in MSCC were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is lack of evidence based guidance around how to correctly position and when to mobilise patients with MSCC or if spinal bracing is an effective technique for reducing pain or improving quality of life. RCTs are required in this important area.

Enlargement of the spinal cord: inflammation or neoplasm?

Intramedullary spinal tumours are uncommon lesions that can cause significant difficulties in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and vascular malformations or neoplasms. We report five cases in which the history and the clinical symptoms suggested an inflammatory process of the spinal cord but the MRI characteristics were those of neoplastic lesions. Both non-neoplastic and neoplastic intramedullary lesion may have very similar symptoms, and even CSF abnormalities, but in every one of our cases, a more detailed history and longer observation of the clinical course would have led to the correct diagnosis; in such problem cases, empirical treatment and a follow-up MRI after a month's observation would be a more prudent approach providing that the patient is not rapidly deteriorating.

The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004

The Deputy Editor has explained in his editorial the reason for this review. I found it a challenging but very rewarding project. The overall quality of papers was so good that it was very difficult to select the necessarily few which space would allow me to review. Inevitably I am influenced by my particular interests, and hence very many excellent papers will not be discussed; failure to discuss a paper is not a reflection on its quality or importance. Criticisms of papers again reflect my own prejudices.