Anterior retropharyngeal fixation C1-2 for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities: study of feasibility, technical description and preliminary results

Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) and compare it with anterior transarticular screw (ATS) which may provide basic evidence for clinical application.

METHODS

Eight human fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput-C4) were tested with 5 conditions including the intact status, the injury status (type II odontoid fracture), the injury+ATS fixation status (traditional bilateral ATS fixation); the injury+unilateral ATCS fixation status; and the injury+bilateral ATCS fixation status. Specimens were applied to a pure moment of 1.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The range of motions (ROMs) and the neutral zones (NZs) of C1 to C2 segment were calculated and compared between 5 status.

RESULTS

ATS and ATCS fixations significantly reduced the motions in all directions when compared with the intact and injury statues (p < 0.05). In flexion-extension, the ROMs of ATS, unilateral ATCS, and bilateral ATCS were 4.7° ± 2.5°, 4.1° ± 1.9°, and 3.2° ± 1.2°, respectively. Bilateral ATCS resulted in a significant decrease in ROM in flexion-extension when compared with ATS and unilateral ATCS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.023). In lateral bending and axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM between the 3 fixations (p > 0.05). Three fixations resulted in similar NZs in all directions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ATCS is a biomechanically effective alternative or supplemental method for atlantoaxial instability.

Atlantoaxial Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation: Indications and Surgical Technique

Posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation is a widely adopted therapeutic option for C1-C2 instability secondary to fractures or dislocation, degenerative diseases, or tumors at this level. Anterior transarticular screw fixation (ATSF) is an effective alternative to the posterior approaches, presenting several advantages despite being scarcely known and rarely chosen.In this chapter, we describe the ATSF step by step, illustrating its variations reported in literature, and we critically analyze the several advantages and contraindications of this technique. Moreover, we provide a list of tips and tricks on the surgical procedure, including critical operating room settings-the result of more than 10 years of experience in the field by a senior author.ATSF is a valid strategy for the treatment of different diseases occurring at the level of the atlantoaxial complex that needs consideration. Given the significant learning curve of this strategy, some hints may be essential to begin introducing this technique in the personal armamentarium of a spine surgeon so that they can perform ATSF safely and effectively.

Referencing for anterior atlantoaxial trans-articular osteosynthesis: a radiological study and proposal of a decisional algorithm

PURPOSE

Anterior trans-articular C1-C2 screw placement can be considered as a surgical alternative in different conditions affecting the atlantoaxial region. While its rigidity is similar to posterior Magerl and Harms techniques, it also provides some surgical advantages. However, the literature lacks papers exhaustively describing indication criteria, surgical steps, and pitfalls.

METHODS

This is a radiological study on 100 healthy subjects. Thin-layer CT scans of the craniovertebral junction were retrieved from the institutional database. The coronal inclination of the C1-C2 joint rim and the depth of the entry point of the screw with respect to the anterior profile of C2 were measured. The antero-posterior and the medio-lateral surgical corridors for the screw placement, and the wideness of the target area on the upper surface of C1 were also measured.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that the coronal inclination of the C1-C2 articular joint rim strongly influences the surface extension of the C1 target area; the depth of the entry point and the C1-C2 articular rim inclination seem to be independent factors in influencing both the medio-lateral and the antero-posterior surgical corridors wideness. A decisional algorithm on whether to perform an anterior or posterior approach to the atlantoaxial region was also proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that, as much as the C1-C2 articular rim is tending to the horizontal line, and as deeper is the entry point of the screw on the anterior profile of C2, as easier the anterior C1-C2 trans-articular screw placement will result.

Pathoanatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of upper cervical ligamentous instability: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine instability broadly refers to compromise of the articular congruity. It can be stratified according to spinal level, functional compromise, and mechanism of instability. Conventional wisdom advocates for use of bracing and physical therapy with only a subset of patients proceeding to obtain surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review article is to summarize the current state of knowledge on upper cervical ligamentous instability.

METHODS

The literature search was performed in Mendeley. Search fields were varied until redundant. All articles were screened by title and abstract and a preliminary decision to include an article was made. The full-text screening was performed on the selected articles. Any question regarding the inclusion of an article was discussed by 3 authors until an agreement was reached.

RESULTS

Many articles report on the etiological factors including ligamentous laxity, traumatic injury, syndrome instability, iatrogenic instability, congenital, and inflammatory causes. A few recent studies elucidate new findings regarding pathoanatomy through the use of finite element analysis. A few articles demonstrate the diagnosis and show that radiographs alone have a low diagnostic rate and that functional MRI may be able to better quantify instability. Conservative treatment has been described, but there are no outcome studies in the literature. Surgical treatment has been described in many different populations with good radiologic and clinical outcomes. Recently the use of preoperative 3D CT reconstruction has been described with radiographic and immediate postoperative patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The presentation of upper cervical spinal instability can be asymptomatic, symptoms of isolated instability, symptoms of nerve irritation, vertebrobasilar insufficiency, or severe neurologic compromise. 3D fine element analysis models and motion-capture systems have the potential to increase our understanding of the pathoanatomic cascade in both traumatic and non-traumatic cases of upper cervical spinal instability. A few modalities on the horizon could increase diagnostic potential. More efforts are needed regarding the use of fine element analysis in understanding the pathoanatomic cascade, the long-term outcomes of children over a spectrum of syndromic causes, and the potential of preoperative virtual simulation to improve surgical outcomes.

Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability in Children: Computed Tomography-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility of anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) fixation for atlantoaxial instability was confirmed in adults. However, atlantoaxial instability is more common in children. Therefore this study was aimed to ascertain the pediatric morphometric characteristics of ATCS in C1-2.

METHODS

Morphometric analysis was conducted on computed tomography scan in 87 pediatric patients who were divided into groups based on ages (1-6 years, 7-10 years, and 11-16 years). Measurements were taken in sagittal and axial planes of computed tomography imaging to determine the range of screw lateral angles, incline angles, and screw lengths.

RESULTS

The overall screw lengths were relatively longer in males than females. For those aged 1-6 years, the screw lengths were 25.5-32.8 mm in males and 24.2-31.3 mm in females, respectively. The screw lengths showed no difference in the 7- to 10-year group between sexes, while the incline angle was larger in females than males. And the screw lengths were 33.5-43.2 mm in males and 31.2-40.4 mm in females in the 11- to 16-year group. The screw lengths were increased with age, yet the lateral angles were decreased. We also found that the epiphyseal closure of odontoid reached 93.6% when the age was older than 7 years old. Therefore ATCS was recommended for children older than 7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall screw lengths and lateral angles of ATCS were larger in male children than those in females, but the incline angles were larger in females. ATCS is feasible in children, particularly those aged 7 years or older.

Unstable odontoid fractures: technical appraisal of anterior extrapharyangeal open reduction internal fixation for irreducible unstable odontoid fractures. Patient series

BACKGROUND

Displaced odontoid fractures that are irreducible with traction and have cervicomedullary compression by the displaced distal fracture fragment or deformity caused by facetal malalignment require early realignment and stabilization. Realignment with ultimate solid fracture fusion and atlantoaxial joint fusion, in some situations, are the aims of surgery. Fifteen such patients were treated with direct anterior extrapharyngeal open reduction and realignment of displaced fracture fragments with realignment of the atlantoaxial facets, followed by a variable screw placement (VSP) plate in compression mode across the fracture or anterior atlantoaxial fixation (transarticular screws or atlantoaxial plate screw construct) or both.

OBSERVATIONS

Anatomical realignment with rigid fixation was achieved in all patients. Fracture fusion without implant failure was observed in 100% of the patients at 6 months, with 1 unrelated mortality. Minimum follow-up has been 6 months in 14 patients and a maximum of 3 years in 4 patients, with 1 unrelated mortality.

LESSONS

Most irreducible unstable odontoid fractures can be anatomically realigned by anterior extrapharyngeal approach by facet joint manipulation. Plate (VSP) and screws permit rigid fixation in compression mode with 100% fusion. Any associated atlantoaxial instability can be treated from the same exposure.

Basilar Invagination: Surgical Treatment by Novel Anterior Implant

Introduction

Anterior retropharyngeal realignment, distraction, and atlantoaxial fixation are an option for the treatment of symptomatic basilar invagination (BI). The anterior implants for distraction and fixation for atlantoaxial joints are still evolving. We share our experience using a novel implant which can easily, safely, and rigidly fix both lateral masses to the body of the axis.

Methods

After exposing both the atlantoaxial joints anteriorly, the joints were prepared, distracted with wedge shaped autologous tricorticate bone grafts and realigned to correct the cervicomedullary strain. The atlantoaxial joints were fixed using a novel titanium plate by passing screws upwards and laterally into the lateral masses of the atlas and centrally into the body of the axis. Post-operative imaging showed effective correction of BI and atlantoaxial dislocation. Post-operative dynamic X-ray images confirmed maintenance of rigid fixation at 6 months.

Conclusion

This new plate screw construct is safe, easy, cost-efficient, and biomechanically appealing option for the treatment of symptomatic BI.

The Anterior Transarticular Fixation of C1/C2 in the Elderly With Dens Fractures

Background

Anterior transarticular screw fixation (ATSF) of C1/C2 can be used for the treatment of unstable dens fractures. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of an anterior C1/C2 fixation in elderly patients with unstable dens fractures. Furthermore, we tried to analyze safe entry zones for ATSF surgery.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of 13 patients with unstable dens fractures were treated with ATSF of C1/C2 between January 2015 and October 2016. If necessary, an additional screw was placed into the odontoid process. The placement was radiographically analyzed using the 3D Arcadis Orbic (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Additionally, computed tomography scans of the cervical spine from 50 trauma patients were analyzed to evaluate safe entry zones for anterior odontoid screw fixation and for ATSF.

Results

ATSF was performed in 13 cases (7 female, 6 male; mean age 81.80 years). One screw had to be corrected intraoperatively due to initial malplacement. Neurological deficits or an injury of the vertebral artery were not observed. All patients suffered from swallowing difficulties during the postoperative course, without lesions of the esophagus or the trachea. In 4 patients (30.8%), an additional posterior fixation was offered to the patients due to progressive loosening of the screws.The anatomical-radiographic analyzes revealed a significantly shallower angle of trajectory for anterior odontoid screw fixation (24.9° ± 5.85°) than for ATSF (39.1° ± 6.44° (left); 40.5° ± 6.79° (right) P = 0.02).

Conclusions

The ATSF of C1/C2 might be a valuable option in the treatment of instable C1/C2 fractures, especially in the elderly or in patients with short necks and/or high body mass index due to the steeper trajectory compared with odontoid screw placement. Yet available screws seem to be of inferior resistance compared with the biomechanical properties of a dorsal fixation. Further studies should focus on screws with better mechanical properties and probably additional cement augmentation.

Level of Evidence

4.

Radiologic Characteristics of Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility of anterior transarticular crossing screws (ATCS) was confirmed in cadaveric specimens and it has been used in clinic. However, no study has documented the morphometric characteristics of ATCS. This study seeks to determine the morphometric characteristics of ATCS in C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients without abnormality of C1-2 were enrolled. The range of screw lateral angles (LAs) and the screw lengths of ATCS on coronal images were measured on multiplanar computed tomography images, as well as the screw incline angles (IAs) in the sagittal plane. The ideal trajectory was designed as toward to the posterosuperior points of the opposite C1 lateral mass, which had the longest screw.

RESULTS

The LAs were relatively small in men (31.4°-45.3°) compared with women (32.6°-46.0°). In the sagittal plane, the IAs were ranged from 41.0° to 68.4° in men and from 44.4° to 68.1° in women. The overall screw lengths were longer in men (34.7-44.8 mm) than in women (32.2-39.6 mm). In the ideal path, the LA and IA were 38.4° and 41.0° in men and 39.6° and 44.4° in women, and the screw lengths were 44.8 mm in men and 39.6 mm in women.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the range of screw angles and lengths of ATCS, which will help surgeons to perform ATCS safely and accurately.

Anatomic Considerations of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

Study Design

Cadaveric, observational study.

Purpose

Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is characterized by excessive movement at the C1–C2 junction between the atlas and axis. An anterior surgical approach to expose the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone grafting has been developed to fix AAI. Currently, no anatomic information exists on the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 in the Indian population. The objective of this study is to assess the anatomic landmarks of C1–C2 vertebrae: entry point, trajectory, screw length, and safety of the procedure.

Overview of Literature

Methods outlined by Magerl and Harms are the optimal approaches among the dorsal techniques. Contraindications for these techniques include aberrant location of vertebral arteries, fractures of C1–C2 posterior structures. In these cases, anterior transarticular fixation is an alternative. Several available screw insertion trajectories have been reported. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that adequate rigidity of this fixation is comparable with posterior fusion techniques.

Methods

Direct measurements using Vernier calipers and a goniometer were recorded from 30 embalmed human cadavers. The primary parameters measured were the minimum and maximum lateral and posterior angulations of the screw in the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively, and optimum screw length, if it was placed accurately.

Results

The posterior and lateral angles of screw placement in the coronal and sagittal planes ranged from 16° to 30° (mean±standard deviation [SD], 23.93°±3.93°) and 8° to 17° (mean±SD, 13.3°±2.26°), respectively. The optimum screw length was 25–38 mm (mean±SD, 28.76±3.69 mm).

Conclusions

If the screw was inserted without lateral angulation, the spinal canal or cord could be violated. If a longer screw was inserted with greater posterior angulation, the vertebral artery at the posterior or posterolateral aspect of the C1 superior facet could be violated. Thus, 26° and 30° of lateral and posterior angulations, respectively, are the maximum angles permissible to avoid injury of the vertebral artery and violations of the spinal canal or atlanto-occipital joint.

Anterior Retropharyngeal Cage Distraction and Fixation for Basilar Invagination: "The Wedge Technique"

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is indicated for basilar invagination (BI) in symptomatic patients. In many patients, symptoms and signs occur due to an upward-migrated and malaligned odontoid with fixed or mobile atlantoaxial instability. Posterior distraction and fixation of the atlantoaxial joints has evolved to become the standard of care, but has some inherent morbidity. In this study, we propose that the unilateral anterior submandibular retropharyngeal approach with customized wedge-shaped titanium cages inserted into both atlantoaxial joints and anterior atlantoaxial fixation with a plate screw construct is a safer and easier option in many cases of BI.

METHODS

From February 2014 to February 2019, 52 patients (age range, 15-78 years; 40 males and 12 females) with symptomatic BI with atlantoaxial dislocation and minimal sagittal facetal inclination and only mild Chiari malformation without syringomyelia were offered anterior submandibular retropharyngeal atlantoaxial distraction and fixation surgery.

RESULTS

Neurological improvement occurred in 80% of patients, while the neurological status of 20% remained unchanged. No patients worsened, and no major complications or mortality was observed.

CONCLUSION

In properly selected cases of symptomatic BI, anterior wedge cage distraction with anterior atlantoaxial fixation is a safe and simple option.

Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It

The C1-2 joint is unique and is responsible for more than 50% of the neck rotation. The joints have an ergonomic design that allows maximum motion without getting dislocated. It provides six degrees of freedom, the maximum being axial rotation, and is a marvel of nature's engineering. The morphometry of lateral masses of C1 and C2 joints was analyzed to explain the possible movements despite minor variations. The normal morphometry was compared with the joints of individuals with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation. The structural flaws were assessed to understand the forces leading to dislocation in various planes. The surgical correction of such flaws and engineering involved has been discussed. The joints of patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation are deformed and the lateral masses are trapezoidal as compared to the cuboidal lateral masses of normal individuals. The orientation of joints decides the direction and rate of slip of C1 over C2. Surgical correction of the joints is possible by drilling them, aiding in reduction, and preventing redislocation. The construct needs to be as close to the C1-2 joints as possible. Studying the engineering in naturally occurring joints gives us a chance to understand the dynamics of the abnormal ones. Correcting the deformed joints to near-normal ones makes realignment possible in all planes and helps in understanding the best construct to fuse them. Mimicking the naturally occurring joints can help us in developing prosthesis for C1-2 arthroplasty.

Anterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation with contralateral screw insertion: a report of two cases and technical note

PURPOSE

Anterior transarticular fixation of the C1-C2 vertebrae is a well-known technique that involves screw insertion through the body of the C2 vertebra into the lateral masses of the atlas through an anterior transcervical approach. Meanwhile, contralateral screw insertion has been previously described only in anatomical studies.

METHODS

We describe two case reports of the clinical application of this new technique.

RESULTS

In Case 1, the patient was diagnosed with an unstable C1 fracture. The clinical features of the case did not allow for any type of posterior atlantoaxial fusion, Halo immobilization, or routine anterior fixation using the Reindl and Koller techniques. The possible manner of screw insertion into the anterior third of the right lateral mass was via a contralateral trajectory, which was performed in this case. Case 2 involved a patient with neglected posteriorly dislocated dens fracture who could not lie in the prone position due to concomitant cardiac pathology. Reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation was insufficient, even after scar tissue resection at the fracture, while transdental fusion was not possible. Considering the success of the previous case, atlantoaxial fixation was performed through the small approach, using the Reindl technique and contralateral screw insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

These two cases demonstrate the potential of anterior transarticular fixation of C1-C2 vertebrae in cases where posterior atlantoaxial fusion is not achievable. This type of fixation can be performed through a single approach if one screw is inserted using the Reindl technique and another is inserted via a contralateral trajectory.

An Experimental Biomechanical Study on Artificial Atlantoodontoid Joint Replacement in Dogs

STUDY DESIGN

This study tested the biomechanics of artificial atlantoodontoid joint replacement (AAOJR) in a dog model. Dogs were divided into the artificial AAOJR group (n=10), the decompression group (n=10), and the healthy control group (n=10) using a random number table.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the use of AAOJR for repair of atlantoaxial instability retains rotation and restores stability.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Atlantoaxial instability is characterized by excessive movement or laxity at the junction between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). Pure decompression can lead to considerable loss of head and neck rotation and postoperative impairment. A series of biomechanical tests on cadavers found that the artificial AAOJR might rebuild the stability and retain the rotation function.

METHODS

We designed the AAOJ based on the radiologic and anatomic data of the dog atlas and axis, and established an animal model by resecting the odontoid and implanting the AAOJ into dogs. The biomechanical experiments measured the range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and stiffness of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in the intact state, the decompressed state, after AAOJR, and after a fatigue test.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact state, after decompression operation, ROM and NZ in all directions, and stiffness during flexion were increased, and stiffness in all other directions was decreased. Compared with the after decompression state, AAOJR before and after the fatigue test resulted in decreased ROM in all directions (all P<0.05), decreased NZ during flexion/extension and lateral bending (all P<0.05), an increased NZ during axial rotation (both P<0.05), and increased stiffness in all directions (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that AAOJR could reconstruct the vertebral stability of the C1-C2 segment and retain some axial rotation function.

A Method to Prevent Occipitocervical Joint Violation Using Plain Radiography During Percutaneous Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method to determine screw tip position through plain radiography after percutaneous ATS fixation to prevent occipitocervical joint (OCJ) violation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No studies using plain radiography to prevent OCJ violation during percutaneous ATS fixation have been performed.

METHODS

In total, 34 subjects (with 68 screws) who had undergone percutaneous ATS fixation were enrolled. To evaluate the screw tip location in relation to the C1 lateral mass (LM), the screw tip positions were graded 1, 2, or 3 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, and I, II, or III on lateral radiographs. OCJ violation was analyzed by postoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Screws with tips located lower (tip I) in the LM did not result in OCJ violation. Only one tip in the tip 3 position showed OCJ perforation, and this screw was also located in tip III. Screw perforation rates of tip 1-tip II, tip 1-tip III, and tip 2-tip III were the highest (100%), followed by tip 2-tip II (10.5%) and tip3-tip III (10%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into OCJ violation during percutaneous ATS fixation. According to AP radiography, a percutaneous ATS with the screw tip located in the lateral part of the LM resulted in a lower rate of OCJ perforation, whereas screws located in the medial LM resulted in the highest rate of perforation. Percutaneous ATS with the screw tip located in the neutral part of the LM should ensure that the screw tip is below the upper part of the LM, preventing OCJ violation. These findings may help surgeons assess screw positioning both during and after the operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Feasibility and trajectory study of anterior transarticular crossing screw placement for atlantoaxial joint instability: a cadaveric study and description of a novel technique

PURPOSE

In unique clinical situations where C1-C2 anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation is not available or has failed, an anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) with transcorporal pathway of the screws inside the contralateral promontory of C2 may enhance the stabilization and achieve atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The present study was to describe a novel technique of ATCS fixation for atlantoaxial joint instability and its applied anatomy, and compared it with ATS fixation method.

METHODS

Direct measurements using digital calipers and a goniometer were conducted on 30 pairs of dried human C1 and C2 vertebrae. The ATS and ATCS with screws (Φ 4.0 mm) were performed on 11 fresh cervical spine specimens. The screw lengths in the C1 and C2, and screw entry angles of the ATS and ATCS were measured, respectively. Cadaver specimens were dissected to observe the incidence of violation to the important structures surrounding the ATS and ATCS fixation technique.

RESULTS

There was enough osseous space for ATCS placement. The lateral and incline angle of the ATCS was 36.2° and 28.7°, respectively. Screw purchase in C2 of the ATCS (25.6 mm) was greater than that of the ATS (11.4 mm). The ATCS C1 purchase (14.8 mm) was similar to the ATS C1 purchase (14.9 mm). No violation to the vertebral artery groove, the spinal canal or the atlanto-occipital joint was observed after the ATCS placement.

CONCLUSION

Anterior transarticular crossing screw is a feasible and viable option for atlantoaxial fixation in selected cases. This technique achieved remarkable longer screw purchase and could enhance the atlantoaxial stability.

Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT

The unique and complex biomechanics of the atlantoaxial junction make the treatment of C1–2 instability a challenge. Several screw-based constructs have been developed for atlantoaxial fixation. The biomechanical properties of these constructs have been assessed in numerous cadaver studies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the biomechanical stability achieved using various C1–2 screw constructs and to perform a meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed through July 1, 2013, was conducted using the following key words and Boolean operators: “atlanto [all fields]” AND “axial [all fields]” OR “C1–C2” AND “biomechanic.” Cadaveric studies on atlantoaxial fixation using screw constructs were included. Data were collected on instability models, fixation techniques, and range of motion (ROM). Forest plots were constructed to summarize the data and compare the biomechanical stability achieved.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. An average (± SD) of 7.4 ± 1.8 cadaveric specimens were used in each study (range 5–12). The most common injury models were odontoidectomy (53.3%) and cervical ligament transection (26.7%). The most common spinal motion segments potted for motion analysis were occiput–C4 (46.7%) and occiput–C3 (33.3%). Four screw constructs (C1 lateral mass–C2 pedicle screw [C1LM–C2PS], C1–2 transarticular screw [C1–C2TA], C1 lateral mass–C2 translaminar screw [C1LM-C2TL], and C1 lateral mass–C2 pars screw [C1LM–C2 pars]) were assessed for biomechanical stability in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending, for a total of 12 analyses. The C1LM–C2TL construct did not achieve significant lateral bending stabilization (p = 0.70). All the other analyses showed significant stabilization (p < 0.001 for each analysis). Significant heterogeneity was found among the reported stabilities achieved in the analyses (p < 0.001; I2 > 80% for all significant analyses). The C1LM–C2 pars construct achieved significantly less axial rotation stability (average ROM 36.27° [95% CI 34.22°–38.33°]) than the 3 other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 49.26° [95% CI 47.66°–50.87°], C1–C2TA average ROM 47.63° [95% CI 45.22°–50.04°], and C1LM–C2TL average ROM 53.26° [95% CI 49.91°–56.61°]) and significantly more flexion/extension stability (average ROM 13.45° [95% CI 10.53°–16.37°]) than the 3 other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 9.02° [95% CI 8.25°–9.80°], C1–C2TA average ROM 7.39° [95% CI 5.60°–9.17°], and C1LM–C2TL average ROM 7.81° [95% CI 6.93°–8.69°]). The C1–C2TA (average ROM 5.49° [95% CI 3.89°–7.09°]) and C1LM–C2 pars (average ROM 4.21° [95% CI 2.19°–6.24°]) constructs achieved significantly more lateral bending stability than the other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 1.51° [95% CI 1.23°–1.78°]; C1LM–C2TL average ROM −0.07° [95% CI −0.44° to 0.29°]).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of the existing literature showed that all constructs provided significant stabilization in all axes of rotation, except for the C1LM–C2TL construct in lateral bending. There were significant differences in stabilization achieved in each axis of motion by the various screw constructs. These results underline the various strengths and weaknesses in biomechanical stabilization of different screw constructs. There was significant heterogeneity in the data reported across the studies. Standardized spinal motion segment configuration and injury models may provide more consistent and reliable results.

Anterior transarticular screw fixation as a conventional operation for rigid stabilization

Background:

Anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation is a useful surgical option for atlantoaxial (AA) stabilization. This report presents a revised ATS method for AA fusion.

Methods:

A 79-year-old male presented with AA instability attributed both to an old odontoid fracture and severe degeneration of the lateral atlantoaxial joints (LAAJs). ATS fixation was performed through the conventional anterior cervical approach. The longest screw trajectories were planned preoperatively using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography (CT) scans, with entry points of the screws situated at the midpoint on the inferior border of the axial body. The surgical exposure was limited to opening at the entry points alone. Our retractor of choice was the Cusco speculum; it sufficiently secured space for utilizing the required instruments for screw placement while offering sufficient protection of soft tissues. Cannulated full-threaded bicortical screws stabilized the LAAJs. Screw insertion required a significant amount of coronal angulation up to the superior articular process of the atlas under open-mouth and lateral fluoroscopy image guidance. After ATS fixation, bone grafting was performed between the posterior laminae of the axis and the atlas through a conventional posterior approach.

Results:

Bony fusion between the atlas and the axis was confirmed radiographically. Arthrodesis of the LAAJs occurred despite no bone grafting.

Conclusions:

Rigid fixation of the LAAJs was obtained by our ATS technique, indicating that it is an alternative method for AA fixation when posterior rigid internal fixation is not applicable.

Atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a case series and reappraisal of the technique

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Atlantoaxial instability is commonly treated with C1-C2 fixation performed via posterior approaches. Although anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation, performed with a classic retropharyngeal approach, was described more than 10 years ago, the published literature still lacks a comprehensive analysis of the procedure and a real case series.

PURPOSE

We report a series of patients treated with atlantoaxial ATS, describing the surgical procedure in detail and discussing advantages and disadvantages of the technique.

STUDY DESIGN

The study design includes case series and technical report.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 15 patients affected by atlantoaxial instability secondary to trauma, degenerative diseases, or inflammatory diseases. Anterior transarticular screw fixation was performed with anteroposterior open-mouth and lateral intraoperative radiographs. All patients were evaluated radiologically at follow-up to identify bone fusion.

RESULTS

Anterior transarticular screw was performed successfully in 14 patients without complications. The procedure was aborted in a case of vertebral invagination, and one case required revision surgery owing to C2 articular bone fracture. Solid C1-C2 fusion was achieved in all cases (at 10- to 21-week follow-up) except in an elderly patient affected by severe osteoporosis. No complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the procedure is still not widely known, ATS allows the effective and safe treatment of C1-C2 instability even in patients with systemic comorbidities. It offers several advantages over posterior approaches.

Fluoroscopically guided anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screws: a feasibility and trajectory study using CT-based simulation software

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior transarticular screw (ATAS) fixation has been suggested as a viable alternative to posterior stabilization. However, we are not aware of previous reports attempting to establish the usefulness of specific fluoroscopic landmark-guided trajectories in the use of ATAS, and we could find no reference to it in a computerized search using MEDLINE.

PURPOSE

To determine the anatomic feasibility of ATAS placement using defined fluoroscopic landmarks to guide screw trajectory.

STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation using three-dimensional screw insertion simulation software and 1.0-mm-interval computed tomographic scans.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Computed tomographic scans of 100 patients including 50 men and 50 women.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of violation of the vertebral artery groove of C1 and C2, the spinal canal, and the atlanto-occipital joint and screw lengths and lengths of C1 and C2 purchase.

METHODS

Four screw trajectories were determined: promontory screw (PS), single central facet (CF) screw, and medial (MF) and lateral (LF) double facet screws. Placement of a 4.0-mm screw was simulated using defined fluoroscopic landmarks for each trajectory. The previously mentioned outcome measures were evaluated and compared for the four trajectories. This study was not supported by any financial sources, and there is no topic-specific potential conflict of interest with this study.

RESULTS

No violation of the C1 or C2 vertebral artery groove or of the spinal canal was observed for any of the screw types. Screw lengths and the length of C2 purchase were by far the longest for PS (40.4±2.8 and 25.7±2.1 mm, respectively; p<.001 in all post hoc comparisons). The length of C1 purchase was longer for CF (16.4±2.3 mm) and LF (15.8±1.6 mm) than PS (14.7±2.0 mm) and MF (14.6±2.4 mm) (p≤.001, respectively). There was no atlanto-occipital joint violation if the length of C1 purchase was set at 12 mm for CF and LF and at 10 mm for PS and MF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that it may be possible to place ATASs without violating the vertebral artery groove, spinal canal, or the atlanto-occipital joint by using the described entry points, trajectories, and fluoroscopic landmarks.

Evaluation of biomechanical properties of anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using three-dimensional finite element analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using finite element analysis.

METHODS

Thin-section spiral computed tomography was performed from occiput to C2 region. A finite element model of an unstable atlantoaxial joint, treated with an anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system, was compared with the simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw system. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were imposed on the model. Displacement of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw and stress at the screw-bone interface were observed for the two internal fixation systems.

RESULTS

Screw displacement was less using the anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system compared to simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation under various conditions, and stability increased especially during flexion and extension.

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system not only provided stronger fixation, but also decreased screw-bearing stress and screw-bone interface stress compared to simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation.

Total atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty system: a novel motion preservation device for atlantoaxial instability after odontoidectomy

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the initial stability and function of a novel total atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty system (TAAS) in human cadaveric cervical spine models by comparing it with a conventional method.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Resection of the odontoid and anterior arch of the atlas results in atlantoaxial instability, which if left uncorrected may lead to severe neurological complications. Currently, such atlantoaxial instability is corrected by anterior and/or posterior atlantoaxial fusion. However, this results in considerable motion loss of the atlantoaxial complex.

METHODS

Flexibility tests were conducted on 24 human cadaveric craniocervical specimens in the following sequence: (1) intact, (2) after dissection of the atlantoaxial ligaments and odontoidectomy, (3) after the TAAS implantation, and (4) after Harms rigid fixation. Rotational angles of the C1-C2 segment were measured to study the immediate stability and function of the TAAS implantation compared with the intact and Harms rigid fixation.

RESULTS

Comparing the TAAS implantation to the intact state, the range of motion and neutral zone changed little in flexion, extension, and lateral bending but increased significantly in axial rotation (P < 0.001). Compared with Harms rigid fixation, the TAAS implantation significantly increased range of motion and neutral zone in all directions (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We have designed the TAAS for correcting atlantoaxial instability arising from C1-C2 anterior decompression procedures. The unique aspect of the TAAS is that it restores, to a great extent, the C1-C2 motion that is lost during current stabilization procedures.

Minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and microendoscopic bone graft for atlantoaxial instability

PURPOSE

Even though transarticular screw (TAS) fixation has been commonly used for posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis in both traumatic and non-traumatic lesions, anterior TAS fixation C1-2 is a less invasive technique as compared with posterior TAS which produces significant soft tissue injury, and there were few reports on percutaneous anterior TAS fixation and microendoscopic bone graft for atlantoaxial instability. The goals of our study were to describe and evaluate a new technique for anterior TAS fixation of the atlantoaxial joints for traumatic atlantoaxial instability by analyzing radiographic and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of seven consecutive patients with C1-C2 instability due to upper cervical injury treated by a minimally invasive procedure from May 2007 to August 2009. Bilateral anterior TAS were inserted by the percutaneous approach under Iso-C3D fluoroscopic control. The atlantoaxial joint space was prepared for morselized autogenous bone graft under microendoscopy. The data for analysis included time after the injuries, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, X-ray exposure time, clinical results, and complications. Radiographic evaluation included the assessment of atlantoaxial fusion rate and placement of TAS. Bone fusion of the atlantoaxial joints was assessed by flexion extension lateral radiographs and 1-mm thin-slice computed tomography images as radiographic results. Clinical assessment was done by analyzing the recovery state of clinical presentation from the preoperative period to the last follow-up and by evaluating complications.

RESULTS

A total of 14 screws were placed correctly. The atlantoaxial solid fusion without screw failure was confirmed by CT scan in seven cases after a mean follow-up of 27.5 months (range 18-45 months). All patients with associated clinical presentation made a recovery without neurologic sequelae. Postoperative dysphagia occurred and disappeared in two cases within 5 days after surgery. There were no other complications during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous anterior TAS fixation and microendoscopic bone graft could be an option for achieving C1-C2 stabilization with several potential advantages such as less tissue trauma and better accuracy. Bilateral TAS fixation and morselized autograft affords effective fixation and solid fusion by a minimally invasive approach.

Traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation with odontoid fracture: A case report

We are reporting the one-year follow-up for a case of traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation associated with an odontoid fracture. This injury combination is rare and serious because of its resulting instability. After an unsuccessful attempt at closed reduction with traction, an open reduction with occipitocervical fixation was performed using a posterior approach. Based on our experience and a review of the published literature, the method for managing such an injury is discussed. If closed reduction with traction is successful, subsequent treatment is based on the algorithms for isolated odontoid fractures. If the closed reduction fails, surgical treatment consists of an open reduction using a posterior or lateral retropharyngeal approach, and then fixation of C1-C2, which is the key procedure.

Comparison of the anatomic risk for vertebral artery injury associated with percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior and posterior transarticular screws

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As a minimally invasive spine surgery, percutaneous atlantoaxial fixation techniques using anterior transarticular screw (ATS) and posterior transarticular screw (PTS) have promising clinical results. However, transarticular screw fixation is technically demanding and carries a potential risk of iatrogenic vertebral artery (VA) injury. There were no available data comparing the anatomic risk of VA injury associated with these screws.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the trajectories of percutaneous atlantoaxial ATS and PTS through three-dimensional (3D) computerized tomography.

STUDY DESIGN

To compare the anatomic risk of VA injury between percutaneous ATS and PTS.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Sixty patients ranged in age from 19 to 75 years (mean, 45.08 years) and included 35 men and 25 women.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Image measurement of C2 isthmus height and C2 isthmus width and the distance between the medial-most superior articular facet to the medial-most edge of the VA groove of the C2 (D).

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients (in total) with lower cervical lesions were evaluated through 3D images reconstructed by a rapid 3D system. The maximum possible diameters of the percutaneous atlantoaxial ATS and PTS trajectories were compared and examined. Mean, range, and standard deviations for each type of screw, for left and right trajectories, and for men and women were calculated from 120 percutaneous atlantoaxial ATS and PTS measurements through SPSS.

RESULTS

The maximum mean diameter differed significantly between the trajectories of 120 percutaneous atlantoaxial ATS and PTS. For screw trajectories ≤3.5 mm in diameter, 19.2% of the PTS trajectories were judged as risky, whereas all the anterior ones were judged as safe.

CONCLUSIONS

From an anatomic perspective, percutaneous ATS fixation poses less anatomic risk of VA injury than percutaneous PTS fixation. As an alternative surgical therapy for atlantoaxial subluxation, percutaneous ATS fixation may play a more important role in the future.

Sequentially staged resection and 2-column reconstruction for C2 tumors through a combined anterior retropharyngeal-posterior approach: surgical technique and results in 11 patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of C2 tumors remains challenging. Because of the deep location and unique anatomical complexity, anterior exposure in this region is considered difficult and dangerous, and few reports concerning anterior tumor resection and reconstruction exist.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique of sequentially staged resection and 2-column reconstruction for C2 tumors through a combined anterior retropharyngeal-posterior approach.

METHODS

Eleven patients with C2 tumors underwent sequentially staged tumor resection and 2-column reconstruction in our institute. Eight primary lesions and 3 metastases were involved. Tumor resections and anterior reconstructions with conventional constructs were accomplished by an anterior retropharyngeal approach, and occipitocervical fusions through posterior access were performed in the same anesthesia.

RESULTS

No operative mortality occurred in this series. All patients experienced pain relief and neurological improvement after surgery. Except for 1 incidence of screw pullout, which was corrected by revision surgery, solid fusion was achieved in all patients. A follow-up period of 12 to 37 months was available for this study. Two patients with chordoma relapsed; 1 died of disease, and the other was alive with disease. Two patients with metastasis died of multiple remote metastases. No evidence of local recurrence was found in the other patients.

CONCLUSION

The anterior retropharyngeal approach is a favorable route to treat tumor lesions of the C2 vertebral body that allows tumor resection and placement of anterior constructs between C1 and the subaxial vertebral body. Tumor resection and 2-column reconstruction could safely be accomplished simultaneously through the combined anterior retropharyngeal-posterior approach.

Posterior rotating rod reduction strategy for irreducible atlantoaxial subluxations with congenital odontoid aplasia

STUDY DESIGN

Applying rotating rod techniques to reduce irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

OBJECTIVE

To spare the occipital-C1 motion by the strategy in reduction of before surgery irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with obvious neurologic symptoms and congenital odontoid aplasia.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a challenging problem for most surgeons. Posterior surgical stabilization of C1 and C2 include C1-C2 transarticular screws, or C1 lateral with C2 pars screws. These constructs, however, are based on preoperative reductions. When preoperative skull reduction fails and myelopathic symptoms coexist, long-segment cervico-occipital fusion and decompression are usually the only practical choice.

METHODS

The authors explored a different surgical technique to spare the axial occipital joints by rotating rods in polyaxial C1, C3 lateral mass, and C2 pars screws, functioning as a lever analogue. Three before surgery irreducible AAD cases with obvious neurologic symptoms and congenital odontoid aplasia were successfully reduced and fused with this procedure. The authors used intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Preoperative skull traction was employed to distract and help extend the atlantoaxial complexes.

RESULTS

Three C1-C2 dislocations were reduced completely without any deterioration of neurologic signs. Cervical myelopathic symptoms recovered soon after the operation. No atlantoaxial subluxation recurred. They returned to their normal work and/or activities.

CONCLUSION

The rotating rod strategy is a viable option to reduce and fuse C1-C3 for AAD with odontoid aplasia. It spares the occipital-C1 motion.

A biomechanical rationale for C1-ring osteosynthesis as treatment for displaced Jefferson burst fractures with incompetency of the transverse atlantal ligament

Nonsurgical treatment of Jefferson burst fractures (JBF) confers increased rates of C1-2 malunion with potential for cranial settling and neurologic sequels. Hence, fusion C1-2 was recognized as the superior treatment for displaced JBF, but sacrifies C1-2 motion. Ruf et al. introduced the C1-ring osteosynthesis (C1-RO). First results were favorable, but C1-RO was not without criticism due to the lack of clinical and biomechanical data serving evidence that C1-RO is safe in displaced JBF with proven rupture of the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL). Therefore, our objectives were to perform a biomechanical analysis of C1-RO for the treatment of displaced Jefferson burst fractures (JBF) with incompetency of the TAL. Five specimens C0-2 were subjected to loading with posteroanterior force transmission in an electromechanical testing machine (ETM). With the TAL left intact, loads were applied posteriorly via the C1-RO ramping from 10 to 100 N. Atlantoaxial subluxation was measured radiographically in terms of the anterior antlantodental interval (AADI) with an image intensifier placed surrounding the ETM. Load-displacement data were also recorded by the ETM. After testing the TAL-intact state, the atlas was osteotomized yielding for a JBF, the TAL and left lateral joint capsule were cut and the C1-RO was accomplished. The C1-RO was subjected to cyclic loading, ramping from 20 to 100 N to simulate post-surgery in vivo loading. Afterwards incremental loading (10-100 N) was repeated with subsequent increase in loads until failure occurred. Small differences (1-1.5 mm) existed between the radiographic AADI under incremental loading (10-100 N) with the TAL-intact as compared to the TAL-disrupted state. Significant differences existed for the beginning of loading (10 N, P = 0.02). Under physiological loads, the increase in the AADI within the incremental steps (10-100 N) was not significantly different between TAL-disrupted and TAL-intact state. Analysis of failure load (FL) testing showed no significant differences among the radiologically assessed displacement data (AADI) and that of the ETM (P = 0.5). FL was Ø297.5 +/- 108.5 N (range 158.8-449.0 N). The related displacement assessed by the ETM was Ø5.8 +/- 2.8 mm (range 2.3-7.9). All specimens succeeded a FL >150 N, four of them >250 N and three of them >300 N. In the TAL-disrupted state loads up to 100 N were transferred to C1, but the radiographic AADI did not exceed 5 mm in any specimen. In conclusion, reconstruction after displaced JBF with TAL and one capsule disrupted using a C1-RO involves imparting an axial tensile force to lift C0 into proper alignment to the C1-2 complex. Simultaneous compressive forces on the C1-lateral masses and occipital condyles allow for the recreation of the functional C0-2 ligamentous tension band and height. We demonstrated that under physiological loads, the C1-RO restores sufficient stability at C1-2 preventing significant translation. C1-RO might be a valid alternative for the treatment of displaced JBF in comparison to fusion of C1-2.

Percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

We reviewed the outcome of a retrospective case series of eight patients with atlantoaxial instability who had been treated by percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation and grafting under image-intensifier guidance between December 2005 and June 2008.

The mean follow-up was 19 months (8 to 27). All eight patients had a solid C1–2 fusion. There were no breakages or displacement of screws. All the patients with pre-operative neck pain had immediate relief from their symptoms or considerable improvement. There were no major complications. Our preliminary clinical results suggest that percutaneous anterior transarticulation screw fixation is technically feasible, safe, useful and minimally invasive when using the appropriate instruments allied to intra-operative image intensification, and by selecting the correct puncture point, angle and depth of insertion.

Fixation of the Axis

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the techniques of fixation of the axis vertebral segment. Also, to review the anatomy of the axis vertebrae, ligamentous attachments, and unique biomechanics of this segment.

METHODS

The use of wire, cable, screw, and plate fixation techniques are reviewed and discussed in the treatment of fractures of C1 and C2 along with utilization of the halo vest and cervical collar during the postoperative period.

RESULTS

All fixation methods were useful. However, the appropriate fixation technique is best determined by the local anatomy (eg, anomalous vertebral artery), posterior element fractures, or the necessity to remove the posterior elements for treatment of the underlying condition.

CONCLUSION

New techniques for fixation and instrumentation for fixation of the axis are available. Advanced imaging allows for advanced aggressive instrumentation while avoiding injury to adjacent structures. Biomechanical studies have influenced the utility and popularity of each technique.

Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture and neurologic deficit: a case report and the review of literature

Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without related fracture of the odontoid process is very rare, and only ten cases have been previously reported. The objective of this paper was to describe a case of traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without related fracture of the odontoid process, and its management with atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation and bony fusion through an anterior retropharyngeal approach, and to review the relevant literature. The patient's medical and radiographic history is reviewed as well as the relevant medical literature. Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation was confirmed in a 48-year-old male struck by an automobile through conventional radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. No related fracture of the odontoid process or neurological deficit was found in this patient. Transarticular screw fixation of the atlantoaxial articulation through anterior retropharyngeal approach was performed after several unsuccessful attempts of closed reduction. At the latest follow-up, the lateral cervical spine radiography in flexion and extension demonstrated no instability of the atlantoaxial complex 21 months after the operation. In conclusion, patients with posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture may survive with few or no-long term neurological deficit. Routine CT and MRI of the cervical spine should be carried out in patients with head or neck trauma to prevent missing of this rare clinical entity. Transarticular screw fixation of the atlantoaxial articulation through anterior retropharyngeal approach is safe and useful in case the management of dislocation is unsuccessful under closed reduction.

C2-fractures: part II. A morphometrical analysis of computerized atlantoaxial motion, anatomical alignment and related clinical outcomes

Knowledge on the outcome of C2-fractures is founded on heterogenous samples with cross-sectional outcome assessment focusing on union rates, complications and technical concerns related to surgical treatment. Reproducible clinical and functional outcome assessments are scant. Validated generic and disease specific outcome measures were rarely applied. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the radiographic, functional and clinical outcome of a patient sample with C2-fractures. Out of a consecutive series of 121 patients with C2 fractures, 44 met strict inclusion criteria and 35 patients with C2-fractures treated either nonsurgically or surgically with motion-preserving techniques were surveyed. Outcome analysis included validated measures (SF-36, NPDI, CSOQ), and a functional CT-scanning protocol for the evaluation of C1-2 rotation and alignment. Mean follow-up was 64 months and mean age of patients was 52 years. Classification of C2-fractures at injury was performed using a detailed morphological description: 24 patients had odontoid fractures type II or III, 18 patients had fracture patterns involving the vertebral body and 11 included a dislocated or a burst lateral mass fracture. Thirty-one percent of patients were treated with a halo, 34% with a Philadelphia collar and 34% had anterior odontoid screw fixation. At follow-up mean atlantoaxial rotation in left and right head position was 20.2 degrees and 20.6 degrees, respectively. According to the classification system of posttreatment C2-alignment established by our group in part I of the C2-fracture study project, mean malunion score was 2.8 points. In 49% of patients the fractures healed in anatomical shape or with mild malalignment. In 51% fractures healed with moderate or severe malalignment. Self-rated outcome was excellent or good in 65% of patients and moderate or poor in 35%. The raw data of varying nuances allow for comparison in future benchmark studies and metaanalysis. Detailed investigation of C2-fracture morphology, posttreatment C2-alignment and atlantoaxial rotation allowed a unique outcome analysis that focused on the identification of risk factors for poor outcome and the interdependencies of outcome variables that should be addressed in studies on C2-fractures. We recognized that reduced rotation of C1-2 per se was not a concern for the patients. However, patients with worse clinical outcomes had reduced total neck rotation and rotation C1-2. In turn, C2-fractures, especially fractures affecting the lateral mass that healed with atlantoaxial deformity and malunion, had higher incidence of atlantoaxial degeneration and osteoarthritis. Patients with increased severity of C2-malunion and new onset atlantoaxial arthritis had worse clinical outcomes and significantly reduced rotation C1-2. The current study offers detailed insight into the radiographical, functional and clinical outcome of C2-fractures. It significantly adds to the understanding of C2-fractures.

C2-fractures: part I. Quantitative morphology of the C2 vertebra is a prerequisite for the radiographic assessment of posttraumatic C2-alignment and the investigation of clinical outcomes

Pertinent literature exists concerning indications, techniques, complications of treatment, and risk factors for nonunion in axis and odontoid fractures; however, there are scarce data regarding the incidence and definition of malunion in these fractures. As a prerequisite for the study of anatomical alignment following surgical and nonsurgical treatment of C2-fractures, an understanding of normal C2 anatomy is essential. Therefore, the authors intended to evaluate morphometrical dimensions of the C2 vertebra. The purpose was to provide normalized quantitative data to enable assessment of malalignment following the treatment of C2-fractures within a classification system. Using digitized cervical spine lateral and transoral odontoid radiographs of 100 consecutive patients without any evidence of traumatic or neoplastic disorders, the authors performed measurements on distinct anatomical structures and investigated morphometrical dimensions of the normal axis vertebra. The incidence of atlantoaxial arthritis was also evaluated. In addition, with the assessment of twenty arbitrarily chosen sets of radiographs by three different observers we calculated the interobserver reliability in terms of intraclass correlation coefficients for each parameter. With calculation of SD and 95% confidence limits, pathological cut-offs were reconstructed from measurements performed resembling non-physiological and pathological limits. Distinct parameters were selected to form a new classification system for radiographical follow-up that focuses on the quantitative C1-2 vertebral alignment. The measurement process resulted in 2,400 data points. Distinct morphometrical parameters, such as a quantitative characterization of the sagittal atlantoaxial congruency, the lateral mass inclination and the type of degenerative changes at the atlantoaxial joint could be demonstrated to be valuable and reliably used within a proposed classification for C2-malunions following C2-fractures. The current study offers a template including recommended radiological measurements for further research on the study of clinical outcome and posttraumatic alignment following C2-fractures.

Artificial atlanto-odontoid joint replacement through a transoral approach

Resection of the odontoid process and anterior arch of the atlas results in atlantoaxial instability, which if left uncorrected may lead to severe neurological complications. Currently, such atlantoaxial instability is corrected by anterior and/or posterior C1-C2 fusion. However, this results in considerable loss of rotation function of the atlantoaxial complex. From the viewpoint of retaining the rotation function and providing stability, we designed an artificial atlanto-odontoid joint based on anatomical measurements of 50 pairs of dry atlantoaxial specimens by digital calipers and 10 fresh cadaveric specimens by microsurgical techniques. The metal-on-metal titanium alloy joint has an arc-shaped atlas component, and a hollow cylindrical bushing into which fits a rotation axle of an inverted v-shaped axis component and is implanted through a transoral approach. After the joint was implanted onto specimens with anterior decompression, biomechanical tests were performed to compare the stability parameters in the intact state, after decompression, after artificial joint replacement, and after fatigue test. Compared to the intact state, artificial joint replacement resulted in a significant decrease in the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) during flexion, extension, and lateral bending (P < 0.001); however, with regard to axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM (P = 0.405), a significant increase in NZ (P = 0.008), and a significant decrease in stiffness (P = 0.003). Compared to the decompressed state, artificial joint replacement resulted in a significantly decreased ROM (P B 0.021) and NZ (P B 0.002) and a significantly increased stiffness (P \ 0.001) in all directions. Following artificial joint replacement, there was no significant difference in ROM (P C 0.719), NZ (P C 0.580), and stiffness (P C 0.602) in all directions before and after the fatigue test. The artificial joint showed no signs of wear and tear after the fatigue test. This artificial atlanto-odontoid joint may be useful in cases of odontoid resection due to malunion or nonunion of odontoid fracture, atraumatic odontoid fracture, irreducible atlas dislocation, posterior atlantoaxial subluxation, or congenital skull base abnormalities.

Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites

Multilevel cervical spine procedures can challenge the stability of current anterior cervical screw-and-plate systems, particularly in cases of severe three-column subaxial cervical spine injuries and multilevel plated reconstructions in osteoporotic bone. Supplemental posterior instrumentation is therefore recommended to increase primary construct rigidity and diminish early failure rates. The increasing number of successfully performed posterior cervical pedicle screw fixations have enabled more stable fixations, however most cervical pathologies are located anteriorly and preferably addressed by an anterior approach. To combine the advantages of the anterior approach with the superior biomechanical characteristics of cervical pedicle screw fixation, the authors developed a new concept of a cervical anterior transpedicular screw-and-plate system. An in vivo anatomical study was performed to explore the feasibility of anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS) in the cervical spine. The morphological study was conducted based on 29 cervical spine CT scans from healthy patients and measurements were performed on the pedicle sizes, angulations, vertebral body depth, height and width at C2 to T1. Significant morphologic parameters for the new technique are discussed. These parameters include the sagittal and transverse intersection points of the pedicle axis with the anterior vertebral body wall, as well as the distances between sagittal intersection points from C2 to T1. On the basis of these results, standard spine models were reconstructed and used for the conceptual development of a preclinical release prototype of an anterior transpedicular screw-and-plate system. The morphological feasibility of the new technique is demonstrated, and its indications, biomechanical considerations, as well as surgical prerequisites are thoroughly discussed. In the future, the technique of cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation might diminish the number of failures in the reconstruction of multilevel and three-column cervical spine instabilities, and avoid the need for supplemental posterior instrumentation.

Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS

Reconstruction after multilevel decompression of the cervical spine, especially in the weakened osteoporotic, neoplastic or infectious spine often requires circumferential stabilization and fusion. To avoid the additional posterior surgery in these cases while increasing rigidity of anterior-only screw-plate constructs, the authors introduce the concept of anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation. We demonstrated its morphological feasibility as well as its indications in a previous study in Part I of our project. Consequently, the objectives of the current study were to assess the ex vivo accuracy of placing ATPS into the cervical vertebra as well as the biomechanical performance of ATPS in comparison to traditional vertebral body screws (VBS) in terms of pull-out strength (POS). Twenty-three ATPS were inserted alternately to two screws into the pedicles and vertebral bodies, respectively, of six cadaveric specimens from C3-T1. For insertion of ATPS, a manual fluoroscopically assisted technique was used. Pre- and post insertional CT-scans were used to assess accuracy of ATPS insertion in the axial and sagittal planes. A newly designed grading system and accuracy score were used to delineate accuracy of ATPS insertion. Following insertion of screws, 23 ATPS and 22 VBS were subjected to pull-out testing (POT). The bone mineral density (BMD) of each specimen was assessed prior to POT. Statistical analysis showed that the incidence of correctly placed screws and non-critical pedicles breaches in axial plane was 78.3%, and 95.7% in sagittal plane. Hence, according to our definition of "critical" pedicle breach that exposes neurovascular structures at risk, 21.7% (n = 5) of all ATPS inserted showed a critical pedicle breach in axial plane. Notably, no critical pedicle perforation occurred at the C6 to T1 levels. Pull-out testing of ATPS and VBS revealed that pull-out resistance of ATPS was 2.5-fold that of VBS. Mean POS of 23 ATPS with a mean BMD of 0.566 g/cm(2) and a mean osseus screw purchase of 27.2 mm was 467.8 N. In comparison, POS of 22 VBS screws with a mean BMD of 0.533 g/cm(2) and a mean osseus screw purchase of 16.0 mm was 181.6 N. The difference in ultimate pull-out strength between the ATPS and VBS group was significant (p < 0.000001). Also, accuracy of ATPS placement in axial plane was shown to be significantly correlated with POS. In contrast, there was no correlation between screw-length, BMD, or level of insertion and the POS of ATPS or VBS. The study demonstrated that the use of ATPS might be a new technique worthy of further investigation. The use of ATPS shows the potential to increase construct rigidity in terms of screw-plate pull-out resistance. It might diminish construct failures during anterior-only reconstructions of the highly unstable decompressed cervical spine.