1
|
Jain M, Sahu RN, Gaikwad MR, Panda S, Tirpude A, Bag ND. Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the "Burcev Technique": A Cadaveric Study. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2021; 12:555-559. [PMID: 34295111 PMCID: PMC8289562 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study attempted to validate the “Burcev freehand method” based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the “freehand technique,” described by Burcev et al, without the aid of fluoroscopy and the trajectory verified by computed tomography scans. The screws were designated as satisfactory, permissible, or unacceptable. Descriptive variables were represented in number and percentages, continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Of the 32 CPSs placed, 24 (75%) exhibited a satisfactory position, 1 (3%) exhibited a permissible position, and 7 (22%) exhibited an unacceptable position. Of the seven CPSs in the unacceptable group, four exhibited a lateral breach and three exhibited a medial breach, whereas the CPS in the permissible group exhibited a medial breach. The overall angle with contralateral lamina in the horizontal plane in terms of mean ± SD was 175.43 ± 2.82, 169.49, and 169.65 ± 6.46 degrees in the satisfactory, permissible, and unacceptable groups, respectively. In the sagittal plane, the screws exhibited an angle of 88.15 ± 3.56 degrees. No breach was observed superiorly or inferiorly. The “Burcev technique” is replicable with similar results in cadavers. Further studies must be conducted in a clinical setting to ensure its safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mantu Jain
- Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Rabi N Sahu
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Manisha R Gaikwad
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Sashikanta Panda
- Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Amit Tirpude
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Nerbadyswari D Bag
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balestrino A, Gondar R, Jannelli G, Zona G, Tessitore E. Surgical challenges in posterior cervicothoracic junction instrumentation. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:3447-3458. [PMID: 33754193 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is a region of the spine submitted to significant mechanical stress. The peculiar anatomical and biomechanical characteristics make posterior surgical stabilization of this area particularly challenging. We present and discuss our surgical series highlighting the specific surgical challenges provided by this region of the spine. We have analyzed and reported retrospective data from patients who underwent a posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation between 2011 and 2019 at the Neurosurgical Department of the Geneva University Hospitals. We have discussed C7 and Th1 instrumentation techniques, rods design, extension of constructs, and spinal navigation. Thirty-six patients were enrolled. We have preferentially used lateral mass (LM) screws in the subaxial spine and pedicle screws (PS) in C7, Th1, and upper thoracic spine. We have found no superiority of 3D navigation techniques over 2D fluoroscopy guidance in PS placement accuracy, probably due to the relatively small case series. Surgical site infection was the most frequent complication, significantly associated with tumor as diagnosis. When technically feasible, PS represent the technique of choice for C7 and Th1 instrumentation although other safe techniques are available. Different rod constructs are described although significant differences in biomechanical stability still need to be clarified. Spinal navigation should be used whenever available even though 2D fluoroscopy is still a safe option. Posterior instrumentation of the CTJ is a challenging procedure, but with correct surgical planning and technique, it is safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Balestrino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. .,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences (DINOGMI), IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Renato Gondar
- Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Gianluigi Zona
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal And Children (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Enrico Tessitore
- Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rasouli JJ, Kennamer BT, Moore FM, Steinberger A, Yao KC, Syed ON, Arginteanu MS, Gologorsky Y. Utility of intraoperative electromyography in placing C7 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 32:891-899. [PMID: 32005025 DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.spine191120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The C7 vertebral body is morphometrically unique; it represents the transition from the subaxial cervical spine to the upper thoracic spine. It has larger pedicles but relatively small lateral masses compared to other levels of the subaxial cervical spine. Although the biomechanical properties of C7 pedicle screws are superior to those of lateral mass screws, they are rarely placed due to increased risk of neurological injury. Although pedicle screw stimulation has been shown to be safe and effective in determining satisfactory screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine, there are few studies determining its utility in the cervical spine. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, clinical reliability, and threshold characteristics of intraoperative evoked electromyographic (EMG) stimulation in determining satisfactory pedicle screw placement at C7. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected data set. All adult patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion with placement of C7 pedicle screws at the authors' institution between January 2015 and March 2019 were identified. Demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, operative, and radiographic data were gathered. All patients underwent postoperative CT scanning, and the position of C7 pedicle screws was compared to intraoperative neurophysiological data. RESULTS Fifty-one consecutive C7 pedicle screws were stimulated and recorded intraoperatively in 25 consecutive patients. Based on EMG findings, 1 patient underwent intraoperative repositioning of a C7 pedicle screw, and 1 underwent removal of a C7 pedicle screw. CT scans demonstrated ideal placement of the C7 pedicle screw in 40 of 43 instances in which EMG stimulation thresholds were > 15 mA. In the remaining 3 cases the trajectories were suboptimal but safe. When the screw stimulation thresholds were between 11 and 15 mA, 5 of 6 screws were suboptimal but safe, and in 1 instance was potentially dangerous. In instances in which the screw stimulated at thresholds ≤ 10 mA, all trajectories were potentially dangerous with neural compression. CONCLUSIONS Ideal C7 pedicle screw position strongly correlated with EMG stimulation thresholds > 15 mA. In instances, in which the screw stimulates at values between 11 and 15 mA, screw trajectory exploration is recommended. Screws with thresholds ≤ 10 mA should always be explored, and possibly repositioned or removed. In conjunction with other techniques, EMG threshold testing is a useful and safe modality in determining appropriate C7 pedicle screw placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Rasouli
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Brooke T Kennamer
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Frank M Moore
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Alfred Steinberger
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Kevin C Yao
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Omar N Syed
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Marc S Arginteanu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| | - Yakov Gologorsky
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York; and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of computed tomographic images of 92 normal pediatric cervical vertebrae. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to ascertain the feasibility of the pedicle, intralaminar, and lateral mass screws fixation in children. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Fixation techniques of C7 vertebrae are technically challenging in the pediatric population. Although the techniques offer alternatives to screws placement at C7 spine in adult, there is no consensus to apply these screws in children. METHODS A total of 92 patients (59 males and 33 females) from 3- to 16-year old divided into three groups (group 1, 1-6 years; group2, 7-10 years; group 3, 11-16 years) were included. Measurements were taken through computed tomography (CT) imaging without evidence of spinal trauma. Length, width, and angle of lamina and pedicle were measured, and lateral mass length was also assessed. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the left and right sides, as well as the sexes. In 1 to 6 years' age group, 83.3% of the laminas and 87.5% of the pedicles measured have thicknesses of >3.5 mm. In 7 to 10 years' age group, 84.0% of the laminas and all the pedicles observed have thicknesses of >3.5 mm. In 11 to 16 years' age group, 88.4% of the laminas and 97.7% of the pedicles measured have thicknesses of >3.5 mm. Most of the spinolaminar angles were between 42.5° and 56°. There are three cases (3.3%) having lateral mass length >12 mm. CONCLUSION It is feasible to insert a screw (Ø 3.5 mm) in C7 lamina in children, and the intralaminar screw fixation is a safe and reliable technique. Around 49°, the spinolaminar angle with axial position, can be used as reference for placing screws in the C7 lamina. Preoperative CT scan will help surgeons to insert the laminar screw safely and accurately. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.
Collapse
|
5
|
Viswanathan VK, Subramanian S, Viswanathan S. Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis. Asian Spine J 2018; 12:726-733. [PMID: 30060383 PMCID: PMC6068419 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Radiological cohort study. Purpose The options of posteriorly stabilizing C7 vertebra include using lateral mass, pedicle or lamina, as bony anchors. The current study is a computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric analysis of C7 vertebra of 100 Indian patients and discusses the feasibility of these different techniques. Overview of Literature C7 is a peculiar vertebra with unique anatomy, which poses challenges for each of these fixation modalities. There are no reports available in the literature, which discuss and compare the feasibility of diverse posterior C7 fixation techniques in Indian population. Methods We included 100 consecutive cervical spine CT scans of Indian patients performed between July 2016 and September 2016. We excluded CT scans with any significant congenital anomaly or other pathological lesions of C7 and patients with non-Indian ethnicity. Regarding screw placement, we assessed and studied various dimensions of the C7 lateral mass, pedicles, and laminae in relevant sections. Results The mean age of our patients was 49.5±16.1 years. We included 56 male and 44 female patients. The mean anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of the lateral mass were 11.38±1.76 and 12.91±1.82 mm, respectively. The mean length of the lateral mass screw (Magerl technique) was 12.17±1.9 mm; 92% of patients could accommodate a lateral mass screw at least 10-mm long (unicortical), whereas 48% could accommodate a screw (unicortical) longer than 12 mm. Foramen transversarium was found in 30.5% of lateral masses. The mean outer and inner cortical widths of the pedicles were 6.5±0.71 mm and 3.72±0.61 mm, respectively. Approximately 58% of pedicles could accommodate 3.5-mm screws (based on the inner cortical pedicle width). The outer cortical and inner cortical widths of the laminae were 6.21±1.2 mm and 3.23±0.9 mm, respectively. Subsequently, 37% of the laminae could accommodate 3.5-mm screws. The mean angle of intralaminar screw trajectory was 50.7°±5.1°, and the mean length of the intralaminar screw was 32.6±3.05 mm. In addition, 96.4% and 60.7% of male patients could accommodate lateral mass screws longer than 10 mm and 12 mm, respectively. However, only 86.4% and 31.8% of female patients could accommodate 10- and 12-mm long lateral mass screws, respectively. Furthermore, 75% of male patients and 36% of female patients had pedicles that could accommodate 3.5-mm diameter screws, and 48.2% of male patients had laminae that could accommodate 3.5-mm screws; however, only 22.7% of female patients could accommodate 3.5-mm laminar screws. Conclusions Based on our CT-guided morphometric analysis, 92% and 48% of Indian patients could accommodate at least 10- and 12-mm long lateral mass screws, and 58% of pedicles and 37% of laminae could accommodate 3.5-mm screws. Thus, lateral mass screws (between 10- and 12-mm long) seem to be the safest feasible option for C7 fixation. In case of the need for an alternative mode of stabilization (pedicle or intralaminar screw), particularly in female patients, careful preoperative planning with a CT scan is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Surabhi Subramanian
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sushma Viswanathan
- Department of Mental Health, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang C, Zhou Q, Arnold PM. Safety and efficacy of lateral mass screws at C7 in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8:218. [PMID: 28966824 PMCID: PMC5609447 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_6_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lateral mass screws at C7 in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease. Methods: Patients with cervical degenerative disease who underwent posterior cervical fusion and fixation from 2009 to 2015 were included in the study. All complications were captured. Postoperative X-ray and computed tomography (CT) confirmed fusion at 6 and 12 months after surgery. X-ray and CT confirmed screw loosening, misplacement, pull-out, breakage, or rod breakage. Results: Seventy-two patients underwent cervical laminectomy and fixation with lateral mass screws at C7 and had at least 1 year follow-up. One patient had C3 screw pull-out; revision was not required. There were no complications related to the C7 screws, and all were in the lateral mass. Conclusions: Lateral mass screws are as safe and effective as pedicle screws at C7 in long-segment posterior cervical fixation, have a lower rate of perioperative complications than pedicle screws, and are technically easier to place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengmin Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.,Department of Orthopedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiang Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burcev AV, Pavlova OM, Diachkov KA, Diachkova GV, Ryabykh SO, Gubin AV. Easy method to simplify "freehand" subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2017; 8:390-395. [PMID: 29403258 PMCID: PMC5763603 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_92_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Study Design: Technical note. Objectives: The objective of this study is to check out safety and rationality of standardized and fast tricks to select trajectory of subaxial cervical pedicle screw (SCPS) insertion, based on simple angles to bony landmarks. Materials and Methods: Stage 1 – Computed tomography (CT)-morphometric analysis of C3–C7 vertebrae of ten patients with cervical degenerative diseases. Stage 2 – SCPS insertion in 6 cadavers, according to the developed technique (59 pedicle screws). Stage 3 – SCPS insertion in 6 patients, according to the developed technique (32 pedicle screws). Results: CT-morphometric analysis showed that the average length of C3–C7 pedicle channels was 32 mm, the average angle between a pedicle axis and an axis of contralateral lamina - 180°, the average angle between a pedicle axis and plane of a posterior surface of a lateral mass amounted to 90° and the coordinates of an optimal entry point – 2 mm from a lateral edge and 2 mm from an upper edge of the lateral mass posterior surface. During the cadaveric study, 39 screws had a satisfactory position (66.1%), 7 screws permissible (11.9%), and 13 screws unacceptable (22%). During the clinical study, 26 screws (81.25%) had satisfactory position, 4 (12.5%) had permissible position, and 2 (6.25%) unacceptable position. Conclusion: Developed and clinically approved a method for simplicity SCPS insertion is relatively safe and cheap. No doubt, it requires further investigation, but the results of primary analysis allow us to recommend it to wide practical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sergey O Ryabykh
- Division Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases, Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center, Kurgan, Russian
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vialle E, Herrera L, Vialle LR, Gomes L. FREE-HAND PLACEMENT OF C7 PEDICLE SCREWS: A CADAVERIC STUDY. COLUNA/COLUMNA 2015. [DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120151404152743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective : To evaluate the accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws placement at the seventh cervical vertebra. Methods : The authors have exposed the cervicothoracic junction of 9 adult cadavers (7 male and 2 female) preserved in formalin from the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez, city of Juliaca, Puno - Peru, locating the C7 vertebra based on anatomical parameters. According to previous publications, the entry point for the C7 pedicle was determined as 3-4mm lateral and 5-6mm superior to the center of the lateral mass, and the pedicle was drilled manually and instrumented with 3.5mm screws. After the screws placement, the C7 vertebrae were removed for radiographic analysis. Results : The authors were able to adequately locate the C7 entry point in 12 pedicles (66.6% accuracy), finding a great variability both laterally (2-5mm) and cranially (3-10mm). The angulation in the coronal plane was correct in 13 pedicles (72.3%), despite the incorrect location of the entry point. Angle values in the coronal plane ranged from 38 to 62 degrees. In the sagittal plane angulation, 2 screws were placed in the C6-C7 disc. The midtransversal diameter of the 18 pedicles ranged from 4 to 7mm. Conclusions : The location of the entry point for placement of C7 pedicle screws with pure free-hand technique is very variable due to anatomical differences and the authors recommend some type of guidance for increased safety and accuracy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variations in the pedicle morphology and presence of spinal deformities can make pedicle screw placement challenging. Recently, computerized tomography (CT) guided screw placement has reportedly improved the surgical accuracy of pedicle screw insertion. However, it is time consuming and expensive. We combined single-plane fluoroscopy in AP projection alone with tactile guidance for placing pedicle screws more efficiently and accurately. This report presents our results with this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective study was carried out on 308 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with 1806 pedicle screws placed using fluoroscopy only in the AP plane. There were 182 patients with two-level fusion, 79 with single-level fusion, 26 with three-level fusion, and 21 with more than three-level fusions. The indications of surgery included spondylolisthesis, adult scoliosis, revision surgery, lumbar canal stenosis, and discogenic pain. Pedicle screws were inserted under fluoroscopic guidance in the AP plane alone with a final lateral image after completion of implant placement. Radiographs were performed postoperatively in all patients and CT scans were obtained on 78 patients with 588 screws. RESULTS Twenty nine (5%) cortical wall perforations were noted amongst the 588 screws that were evaluated with a CT scan and did not result in postoperative vascular or neural complications. Anterior cortical vertebral violation was noted in 14 patients, while in 9 patients the screws penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle. The medial wall of the pedicle was encroached in six patients with no frank perforations. CONCLUSION Placement of pedicle screws under fluoroscopic guidance using AP plane imaging alone with tactile guidance is safe, fast, and reliable. However, a good understanding of the radiographic landmarks is a prerequisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Sethi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Investigation Performed at Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA,Address for correspondence: Dr. Anil Sethi, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, Suite 4D-4, 4201 St. Antoine Blvd, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. E-mail:
| | - Adrienne Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Investigation Performed at Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Rahul Vaidya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Investigation Performed at Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jang WY, Kim IS, Lee HJ, Sung JH, Lee SW, Hong JT. A computed tomography-based anatomic comparison of three different types of c7 posterior fixation techniques : pedicle, intralaminar, and lateral mass screws. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011; 50:166-72. [PMID: 22102943 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2010] [Revised: 07/04/2011] [Accepted: 09/05/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The intralaminar screw (ILS) fixation technique offers an alternative to pedicle screw (PS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation in the C7 spine. Although cadaveric studies have described the anatomy of the pedicles, laminae, and lateral masses at C7, 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging is the modality of choice for pre-surgical planning. In this study, the goal was to determine the anatomical parameter and optimal screw trajectory for ILS placement at C7, and to compare this information to PS and LMS placement in the C7 spine as determined by CT evaluation. METHODS A total of 120 patients (60 men and 60 women) with an average age of 51.7±13.6 years were selected by retrospective review of a trauma registry database over a 2-year period. Patients were included in the study if they were older than 15 years of age, had standardized axial bone-window CT imaging at C7, and had no evidence of spinal trauma. For each lamina and pedicle, width (outer cortical and inner cancellous), maximal screw length, and optimal screw trajectory were measured, and the maximal screw length of the lateral mass were measured using m-view 5.4 software. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. RESULTS At C7, the maximal PS length was significantly greater than the ILS and LMS length (PS, 33.9±3.1 mm; ILS, 30.8±3.1 mm; LMS, 10.6±1.3; p<0.01). When the outer cortical and inner cancellous width was compared between the pedicle and lamina, the mean pedicle outer cortical width at C7 was wider than the lamina by an average of 0.6 mm (pedicle, 6.8±1.2 mm; lamina, 6.2±1.2 mm; p<0.01). At C7, 95.8% of the laminae measured accepted a 4.0-mm screw with a 1.0 mm of clearance, compared with 99.2% of pedicle. Of the laminae measured, 99.2% accepted a 3.5-mm screw with a 1.0 mm clearance, compared with 100% of the pedicle. When the outer cortical and inner cancellous height was compared between pedicle and lamina, the mean lamina outer cortical height at C7 was wider than the pedicle by an average of 9.9 mm (lamina, 18.6±2.0 mm; pedicle, 8.7±1.3 mm; p<0.01). The ideal screw trajectory at C7 was also measured (47.8±4.8° for ILS and 35.1±8.1° for PS). CONCLUSION Although pedicle screw fixation is the most ideal instrumentation method for C7 fixation with respect to length and cortical diameter, anatomical aspect of C7 lamina is affordable to place screw. Therefore, the C7 intralaminar screw could be an alternative fixation technique with few anatomic limitations in the cases when C7 pedicle screw fixation is not favorable. However, anatomical variations in the length and width must be considered when placing an intralaminar or pedicle screw at C7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Young Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|