A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities

Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Review and analysis of modern lumbar spinal fusion techniques

PURPOSE

A variety of different lumbar spinal fusion techniques have been developed. In this study, we review published medical literature highlighting the differences between lumbar interbody fusion techniques with regard to their surgical technique, clinical outcomes, and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar searches were performed for studies published between January 1990 to April 2018 reporting spinal fusion surgery clinical outcomes of at least one fusion technique. Clinical outcomes were extracted and pooled by surgical technique. Chi-squared analyses and Fisher Exact Tests were used to determine differences in rates between groups.

RESULTS

PLIF had the highest rate of successful fusion (97% [155/159]) and the lowest rate of complications (4% [6/131]). A chi square analysis revealed a significant difference in fusion success in PLIF compared to PLF (84% [278/330], p < .001). PLIF also had significantly fewer complications compared to PSF (14.7% [251/1709], p = .001), PLF (13.4% [47/351], p = .008), ALIF (14.2% [22/155], p = .008), and LIC (13.9% [47/339], p = .005). Additionally, there were significant differences in the rate of successful fusion when comparing lateral interbody cage (LIC) techniques (p = .041), which include OLIF (100% [63/63]), DLIF (92% [24/26]), and XLIF (87% [67/77]). LIC techniques overall had higher fusion success rates (93.0% [154/166] compared to PLF (p = .01), but a higher rate of complications (14% [47/339]) compared to PLIF (p = .005) and TLIF (6% [17/259], p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PLF and XLIF have the lowest fusion success rates, and OLIF demonstrated a trend of higher fusion rates among LIC. Techniques that utilized interbody fusion tended to increase the rate of fusion. While interbody fusion techniques offer higher rates of fusion, complication rates also tend to rise with the increase in complexity of the surgical technique, as with OLIF which notably has the highest fusion rate and complication rate.

Anterior column realignment via a minimally invasive hybrid approach in adult spinal deformity surgery: a short-term retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anterior column realignment (ACR) is a novel surgical method for correcting spinal sagittal balance. meanwhile, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) are considered minimally invasive surgical methods through natural anatomical space. This study aimed to explore the corrective effects and clinical outcomes of OLIF or ALIF combined with ACR technology in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with sagittal imbalance who received OLIF and/or ALIF and ACR treatment from 2018 to 2021. Surgical time and intraoperative bleeding volume are recorded, the corrective effect is determined by the intervertebral space angle (IVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), clinical outcome is evaluated by preoperative and final follow-up visual analog pain score (VAS), Japanese orthopedic association scores (JOA) and complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the study, average age of 65.1(range, 47-82) years. All patients completed 173 fusion segments, for 150 segments of ACR surgery. The operation time of ALIF-ACR was 50.4 ± 22.1 min; The intraoperative bleeding volume was 50.2 ± 23.6 ml. The operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume of single-segment OLIF-ACR was 66.2 ± 19.4 min and 70.2 ± 31.6 ml. At the follow-up of 6 months after surgery, the intervertebral space angle correction for OLIF-ACR and ALIF-ACR is 9.2° and 12.2°, the preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis were 16.7° ± 6.4°and 47.1° ± 3.6° (p < 0.001), VAS and JOA scores were improved from 6.8 to 1.8 and 7.8 to 22.1 respectively, statistically significant differences were observed in these parameters. The incidence of surgical related complications is 29.69%, but without serious complications.

CONCLUSION

ACR via a minimally invasive hybrid approach for ASD has significant advantages in restoring local intervertebral space angulation and correcting the overall sagittal balance. Simultaneously, it can achieve good clinical outcomes and fewer surgical complications.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS AND PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREWS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

ABSTRACT A systematic review of the literature was performed in order to organize, evaluate, and select evidences available about the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis with percutaneous pedicle screws in the treatment of patients with degenerative disc disease (and other spinal pathologies) as compared to conventional arthrodesis. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were consulted to locate clinical trials and case reports/case series published in English between 2014 and 2019. After selection according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 21 of the 197 articles identified were chosen for a complete reading and used for the present review. Although the level of evidence of most of the studies included made the demonstration of efficacy and superiority among the surgical techniques reviewed difficult, the findings related to the minimally invasive procedure indicate a safe and reliable approach for the treatment of lumbar diseases. Level of evidence II; Systematic review of literature.

Chitosan-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Experimental Lumbar Laminectomy and Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Wistar Rats

Study Design

Experimental study with an animal model.

Purpose

To evaluate the role of a chitosan and hydroxyapatite composite for spinal fusion in a lumbar experimental model based on regenerative tissue engineering principles.

Overview of Literature

Chitosan and hydroxyapatite represent an alternative biodegradable implant material for tissue engineering and regeneration. The combination of chitosan and hydroxyapatite in a 20:80 ratio could potentiate their individual properties as an implantable composite for experimental laminectomy.

Methods

Phase I: design and synthesis of a porous composite scaffold composed of chitosan-hydroxyapatite using a freeze drying technique. Phase II: experimental microsurgical lumbar laminectomy at L5. A total of 35 Wistar rats were categorized into three experimental groups: control (laminectomy alone), experimental (laminectomy with implant), and reference (intact spine) (n=5 per group). Postoperative structural and functional evaluations were performed using computed tomography scans. In addition, radiologic, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical microstructures were evaluated.

Results

At the laminectomy site, the composite implant induced bone regeneration, which was observed in the axial reconstruction of the rat lumbar spine in all cases. Biomechanical changes in the lumbar spine were observed by radiology in both groups after the surgery. The posterolateral space was covered by a bone structure in the treated spine, a condition not seen in the control group. The range of motion was 7.662°±0.81° in the scaffold group versus 20.72°±3.47° in the control group. Histological findings revealed qualitatively more bone tissue formation in the implant group.

Conclusions

A composite of chitosan-hydroxyapatite at a 20:80 ratio induced bone formation after experimental laminectomy in rats and led to spinal fusion, which was assessed by radiology and biomechanical tests. No functional complications in posture or walking were observed at 90 days post-surgery, despite biomechanical changes in the spine.

Accuracy in Percutaneous Transpedicular Screws Placement Using Biplane Radioscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and descriptive data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to appropriately establish the accuracy in the percutaneous transpedicular screws (PTS) placement using biplane radioscopy (Rx-2D).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Rx-2D is a widely-used technique for PTS as it is practical, ubiquitous, and cost-effective. However, the reported "acceptable" accuracy attained by this method is widely variable ranging between 76% and 100%.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to screen publications about PTS placement using Rx-2D guidance. PubMed/MEDLINE database was consulted using the search term "percutaneous pedicle screw" from 1977 to 2017. Previous meta-analysis and reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed. Accuracy values were assessed fulfilling the proposed criteria. Observational data meta-analysis was performed. Cochran's Q test was used to determine heterogeneity among data extracted from the series, which was quantified by I test. P-values≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. The results were depicted by Forest plots. Funnel plots were outlined to visualize a possible bias of publication among the selected articles.

RESULTS

In total, 27 articles were included in the analysis. Results of the accuracy were as follow, 91.5% (n=7993; 95% CI, 89.3%-93.6%) of the screws were placed purely intrapedicular, and 96.1% (n=8579; 95% CI, 94.0%-98.2%) when deviation from the pedicle was up to 2 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis is the largest review of PTS placed with Rx-2D guidance reported up to date. We concluded that the procedure is a safe and reproducible technique. The key values obtained in this work set reliable references for both clinical and training outcome assessing.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modMOTLIF) and open TLIF (OTLIF).

Overview of Literature

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF) is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less pain. However, it has concerns like increased radiation exposure, steep learning curve, and instrumentation cost. We modified the MTLIF technique by direct freehand insertion of pedicle screws using stab incisions without tubular retractors.

Methods

The study included 24 patients in the modMOTLIF group and 27 patients in the OTLIF group. The average follow-up period was 25.6 months. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Serial X-rays were acquired at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess the union and presence of instability. We also compared blood loss and length of hospital stay in both groups.

Results

All patients showed progressive improvement in VAS and ODI scores. No differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS leg scores between the groups. The immediate postoperative VAS back score was significantly higher in the OTLIF group than in the modMOTLIF group; however, no difference was observed at 1 and 2 years. Radiological analysis showed nonunion in one and two patients in the OTLIF and modMOTLIF groups, respectively. The average blood loss was 63 mL in the mod-MOTLIF group and 254 mL in the OTLIF group. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for the modMOTLIF group and 5 days for the OTLIF group.

Conclusions

modMOTLIF was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with OTLIF. No significant differences were observed in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups after 2 years despite reduced back pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients who underwent modMOTLIF.

Minimally invasive surgery procedure in isthmic spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the direct lateral approach to the lumbar spine in the treatment of painful isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients affected by isthmic spondylolisthesis and treated with extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation were enrolled. All included patients were clinically evaluated with Oswestry Disability Index, SF36 and Visual Scale Anatomy (VAS) for back pain at 1, 3 months and at 1 year.

RESULTS

The mean correction of vertebral slippage measured on lateral lumbar X-ray was 56.3% (p = 0.002). The average preoperative VAS score was 7.1, at 1 year decreasing to 2.2 (p = 0.001). The patients had an average preoperative "Oswestry Disability Index" of 36.8 and 24.1% after 1 year (p = 0.02). The preoperative Short-Form 36 Physical Health was equal to 33.8, 72.1% after 1 month, to 76.3% after 3 months and to 83.2% (p = 0.001) after 1 year of follow-up. There were no signs of implant loosening at 1-year CT scan examination in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that the extreme lateral approach to the lumbar spine in case of isthmic spondylolisthesis is a reliable and safe option to the most common open procedures. In the authors' opinion, XLIF procedures allow a good correction of the listhesis associated with good clinical and radiographic results. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic supplementary material.

POSTEROLATERAL, POSTERIOR AND MI-TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: A STUDY OF 212 CASES

ABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative disc disease is a common problem that could require surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, complications and benefits associated with intersomatic fusions by the MI-TLIF, PLIF and PLF techniques. Methods: A total of 212 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent the same pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and SF-36. Follow-ups were performed for at least one year. Inpatient days, complications, blood loss and operative times were equally quantified. Results: Estimated blood loss for MI-TLIF was statistically lower compared to the amount of blood recovered by Cell Saver device on PLIF and PLF groups. Mean surgical time for MI-TLIF were not significantly different compared to PLIF and PLF groups. Inpatient days were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group, with an average decrease of one day. Four complications were recorded in the PLIF group, 2 in the PLF group, and one in the MI-TLIF group. Analysis of the clinical parameters revealed post-operative improvements at all time points, with the most statistically significant differences occurring at the first six months. Better results were achieved with the MI-TLIF technique. Conclusions: Compared to more invasive techniques, MI-TLIF showed fewer complications, less blood loss and shorter hospitalization times. Longer operative times in this group can be explained by the greater technical complexity and incipient learning curves. Interbody fusion by PLIF, PLF and MI-TLIF provided good clinical outcomes, but faster recovery was obtained with less invasive techniques. Level of evidence: III; Type of study: Retrospective comparative case study.

Adult spinal deformity: effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages to restore disc angle and spino-pelvic parameters through completely mini-invasive trans-psoas and hybrid approach

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to assess and quantify the effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages applied by trans-psoas approach to improve radiographic parameters, showing the differences between completely mini-invasive and hybrid approach.

METHODS

We collected data of 65 patients affected by degenerative lumbar deformity/diseases and underwent mini-invasive lateral interbody fusion followed by percutaneous (group A, completely mini-invasive) or open (group B, hybrid) posterior instrumentation. A subgroup underwent anterior column realignment (ACR). We assessed statistical differences in preoperative and postoperative (at least 6-month) coronal and sagittal parameters, and disc angle (DA) at each level of cage application.

RESULTS

107 lordotic cages were implanted. Group B had the most significant mean changes, especially in coronal Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-LL mismatch and DA. Concerning DA, at each level of lordotic cage application, in group A changed from -2.9° preop to -6.5° postop (p = 0.01); in group B, DA changed from -2.6° to -9.5° (p = 0.002) and from +1° to -13.2° in patients underwent ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion is an effective technique in improving sagittal parameters. When combined with posterior open approach and/or application of ACR procedure greater corrections are possible.

The unfeasible made feasible: lumbar minimally invasive hybrid stabilization with dynamic rod and mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine is spreading as a viable alternative to spinal fusion, aiming to achieve an equally satisfactory clinical outcome without making the spine completely rigid. We describe the feasibility of a minimally invasive surgical technique used to implant a hybrid system and perform a mini-open (m-open) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients suffering from degenerative spondylolistesis and adjacent level's degenerative disc disease (DDD). Three patients (2 females), suffering from degenerative spondylolistesis and adjacent level's DDD, underwent two-level hybrid stabilization combining a rigid, circumferential fusion (with m-open TLIF) at the level involved by spondylolistesis and a dynamic stabilization at the adjacent one. Screws, hybrid rods as well as interbody cages were introduced using a simple minimally invasive technique. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed pre- and postoperatively, and at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, using the Visual Analogue Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire. Mean VAS and ODI score reduced from 8.3, preoperatively, to 5 and from 72.66 to 43.98, respectively. No surgery-related complications were observed and the mean postoperative hospitalization was 2.5 days. Postoperative and follow-up flexion-extension X-rays showed persisting motion at dynamically stabilized levels. Follow-up CT imaging confirmed interbody fusion at TLIF levels in all patients. Dynamic and hybrid stabilizations of the lumbar spine are typically performed using open surgery. This study reports the feasibility of a hybrid stabilization with m-open TLIF performed using a minimally invasive technique.

Posterior Decompression and Fusion: Whole-Spine Functional and Clinical Outcomes

The mobility of the spine and the change in the angle of the curvatures are directly related to spinal pain and spinal stenosis. The aim of the study was the evaluation of morphology and mobility of the spine in patients who were subjected to decompression and posterior fusion with pedicle screws. The treatment group consisted of 20 patients who underwent posterior fixation of lumbar spine (one and two level fusion). The control group consisted of 39 healthy subjects. Mobility and curvatures of the spine were measured with a non-invasive device, the Spinal Mouse. Pain was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36 were used to evaluate the degree of the functional disability and the quality of life, respectively. The measurements were recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The mobility of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane increased (p = 0.009) at 12 months compared to the measurements at 3 months. The mobility of the thoracic spine in the frontal plane increased (p = 0.009) at 12 months compared to the preoperative evaluation. The results of VAS, ODI and SF-36 PCS improved significantly (p<0.001). The levels of fusion exhibited a strong linear correlation (r = 0.651, p = 0.002) with the total trunk inclination in the upright position. Although pain, quality of life and spinal mobility in the sagittal and frontal planes significantly improved in the treatment group, these patients still had limited mobility and decreased curves/angles values compared to control group.

[Facet Fixation Combined with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Experience and A New Method of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases]

Background

For the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine the technique of pedicle fixation is widespread, when after open decompression channel structure locking screws are introduced into the vertebral body through the back vertebra legs. We first used a fundamentally new way of fixing the rear using the facet-boards Cage «Facet Wedge», when posterior fixation is done by closing the facet joints with minimally invasive, percutaneous method. We have not found data on the clinical efficacy of facet fixation in scientific literature.

Aims

To compare the clinical efficacy of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Materials and Methods

The study included 145 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The study group with long-term observation included patients (n=100) who underwent a new method for lumbar fixation; the method comprises unilateral or bilateral implantation of titanium Cage «facet Wedge» in the joint space facet joint in combination with the anterior, lateral, and transforaminal interbody fusion. Clinical comparison group (n=45) included retrospectively recruited patients who were performed titanium pedicle screw installation after open decompression and interbody fusion posterior lumbar fixation. Dynamic observation and comprehensive evaluation of the treatment clinical results was carried out for 18 months after surgery.

Results

Cage facet installation technology is quite simple, universal for the stabilization of the rear of the complex after interbody fusion from the front, side, and rear access; and does not require the intraoperative application of expensive high-tech equipment. Comparative analysis of the main group showed significantly better results in terms of the duration of the operation [CG 125 (90; 140) min, the CCG 205 (160; 220) min; p=0.01], the volume of blood loss [CG 80 (70; 120) ml, CCG 350 (300; 550) ml; p=0.008], activation time [CG 2 (1; 2) days, 4 CCG (3; 5) days; p=0.02], length of hospitalization [CG 9 (10; 11) days, the CCG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0.03], the level of pain on a visual analog scale [CG 3 (2; 4) mm, CCG 15 (12; 18) mm; p=0.001], quality of life (by index Oswestry) [CG 8 (6; 8) points, the CCG 23 (20; 28) points, p=0.003], and labor rehabilitation [CG 3 (2; 6) months, CCG 9 (6; 12) months; p=0.0001]. The number of postoperative complications in group 1 was 13%, in the 2nd ― 31,1% (p=0,0012). The new method involves fixing the back with considerably less surgical trauma of paravertebral soft tissue that results in early activation of patients, reduction of stay in hospital period, and better functional recovery of patients.

Conclusions

The application of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine allows achieving the best clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications during the short and long-term follow-up if compared with the traditional method of transpedicular stabilization. The combination of low-impact and reliability facet fixation techniques for posterior stabilization of the operated segment creates favorable conditions for the restoration of a functional condition of patients, full social and physical rehabilitation.

Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis

Study Design

A single-center, retrospective patient review of clinical and radiological outcomes of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression, without posterior instrumentation, for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis.

Purpose

This study documented the clinical and radiological results of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression of the lateral recess using interbody cages without posterior instrumentation for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis.

Overview of Literature

Although microsurgery has some advantages, various complications have been reported following microsurgical decompression, including cage migration, pseudoarthrosis, neurologic deficits, and persistent pain.

Methods

A total of 34 patients (13 men, 21 women), with a mean age of 56.65±9.1 years (range, 40-77 years) confirmed spinal stability, and preoperative radiological findings of lateral recess stenosis, were included in the study. Interbody polyetheretherketone cages and auto grafts were used in all patients. Posterior instrumentation was not used because of limited resection of the posterior lumbar structures. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging were assessed and compared to images taken at the final follow-up. Functional recovery was also evaluated according to the Macnab criteria at the final follow-up.

Results

The average follow-up time was 35.05±8.65 months (range, 24-46 months). The clinical results, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were similar to previously published results; the fusion rate (85.2%) was decreased and the migration rate (5.8%) was increased, compared with prior reports.

Conclusions

Although microsurgery has some advantages, migration and pseudoarthrosis remain challenges to achieving adequate lumbar interbody fusion.

Optimization of segmental lumbar spine instability treatment using minimally invasive spinal fusion technique

Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using transpedicular rods and interbody cage, which is used to treat segmental instability, is associated with a significant paravertebral muscle and ligament injury. A new rigid fusion method was introduced to improve the outcome of patients' treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of minimally invasive fusion technique and TLIF to improve the treatment results in patients with symptomatic lumbar spine degeneration concomitant with moderate segmental instability of the lumbar spine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 90 patients, which were divided into 2 groups. Transforaminal interbody fusion with Pezo-T PEEK cage was performed after spinal canal reconstruction in both groups. In the first group (n=45), interbody fusion was augmented by 4-point transpedicular rod fixation (Konmet, Russia); in the second group (n=45), by Coflex-F rigid interspinous spacer. Patients were followed up and the results were assessed within 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The intergroup comparison of pain level using the visual analogue scale, the need for analgesics, and quality of life according to Oswestry Disability Index score during the early postoperative period demonstrated significantly better outcomes in the second group of patients due to lesser operative trauma of the paravertebral soft tissue. Interbody fusion was observed within 20-36 months in 95% of group I patients and 94% of group II patients (p>0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 17.8% of patients in group I and in 2.2% of cases in group II (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stabilization by rigid interspinous spacer and transforaminal interbody cage provides better clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications as compared to the conventional TLIF technique with similar X-ray rate of bone block formation in patients with moderate segmental instability of the lumbar spine, thus optimizing the treatment of such patients.

Posterior percutaneous reduction and fixation of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures

BACKGROUND

Treatment of A3 thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spinal fractures nowadays remains a controversial issue. Percutaneous techniques are becoming very popular in the last few years to reduce the approach-related morbidity associated with conventional techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Purpose of the study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcome of patients who underwent percutaneous posterior fixation without fusion for the treatment of thoraco-lumbar and lumbar A3 fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients, having sustained a single-level thoraco-lumbar fracture, underwent short segment percutaneous instrumentation and were retrospectively analyzed. sagittal index (SI) was calculated in all patients. Clinical and functional outcome were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form General Health Status (SF-36).

RESULTS

Average operative blood loss was 82 mL (50-320). Mean pre-operative SI in the thoraco-lumbar segment was 13.3° decreased to 5.8° in the immediate postoperative with a mean deformity correction of 7.5. Mean pre-operative SI in the lumbar segment was 16.5° decreased to 11.3° in the immediate postoperative with a mean deformity correction of 5.2. Not statistically significant correction loss was registered at 1-year minimum follow-up. Constant clinical conditions improvement in the examined patients was observed.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for A3 thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spinal fractures is a reliable and safe procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Retrospective study.

Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion

PURPOSE

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is an increasing problematic complication following lumbar fusion surgeries. ASD requires appropriate treatment, although there are only few reports on surgery for ASD. This study aimed to clarify surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for ASD.

METHODS

Medical charts of 18 patients who underwent the second (repeat) PLIF for ASD were retrospectively investigated (average follow-up, 40 [27-66] months). Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Whitecloud classification were used as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Mean modified JOA score improved from 7.7 just before repeat PLIF to 11.4 at maximum recovery and declined to 10.2 at final follow-up. Mean recovery rate of modified JOA score was 52.9 % at maximum recovery and 31.6 % at final follow-up. According to Whitecloud classification, 17 patients (94 %) were excellent or good and only 1 was fair at maximum recovery, whereas 10 (56 %) were excellent or good, 6 were fair, and 2 were poor at final follow-up. Eight patients (44 %) deteriorated again because of recurrent ASD. Two poor patients underwent a third PLIF.

CONCLUSION

PLIF is effective for ASD after PLIF in the short term, although it tends to lead to a high incidence of recurrent ASD.

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Supporters of minimally invasive approaches for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) have reported short-term advantages associated with a reduced soft tissue trauma. Nevertheless, mid- and long-term outcomes and specifically those involving physical activities have not been adequately studied. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of mini-open versus classic open surgery for one-level TLIF, with an individualized evaluation of the variables used for the clinical assessment.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted of 41 individuals with degenerative disc disease who underwent a one-level TLIF from January 2007 to June 2008. Patients were randomized into two groups depending on the type of surgery performed: classic open (CL-TLIF) group and mini-open approach (MO-TLIF) group. The visual analog scale (VAS), North American Spine Society (NASS) Low Back Pain Outcome instrument, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used for clinical assessment in a minimum 3-year follow-up (36-54 months).

RESULTS

Patients of the MO-TLIF group presented lower rates of lumbar (p = 0.194) and sciatic pain (p = 0.427) and performed better in daily life activities, especially in those requiring mild efforts: lifting slight weights (p = 0.081), standing (p = 0.097), carrying groceries (p = 0.033), walking (p = 0.069) and dressing (p = 0.074). Nevertheless, the global scores of the clinical questionnaires showed no statistical differences between the CL-TLIF and the MO-TLIF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an improved functional status of MO-TLIF patients in the short term, the clinical outcomes of mini-open TLIF at the 3- to 4-year follow-up showed no clinically relevant differences to those obtained with open TLIF.

Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The object of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery in a severely affected subgroup of degenerative spondylolisthetic patients with severe stenosis (SDS) and high-grade facet osteoarthritis (FJO).

METHODS

From January 2009 to February 2010, 49 patients with severe SDS and high-grade FJO were treated using either MIS or open TLIF. Intraoperative and diagnostic data, including perioperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS), were collected, using retrospective chart review. Surgical short- and long-term outcomes were assessed according to the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain.

RESULTS

Comparing MIS and open surgery, the MIS group had lesser blood loss, significantly lesser need for transfusion (p = 0.02), more rapid improvement of postoperative back pain in the first 6 weeks of follow-up and a shorter LOS. On the other hand, we experienced in the MIS group a longer operative time. The distribution on the postoperative ODI (p = 0.841), VAS leg (p = 0.943) and back pain (p = 0.735) scores after a mean follow-up of 2 years were similar. The overall proportion of complications showed no significant difference between the groups (29% in the MIS group vs. 28% in the open group, p = 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery for severe SDS leads to adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis and results in a faster recovery of symptoms and disability in the early postoperative period.

Selection of appropriate outcomes instruments

Patient based outcomes research continues to grow and expand, as evidenced by recent missions by the federal government and private organizations to fund this area of study. As orthopaedic surgeons, we can improve our ability to provide the highest level of care for our patients beyond the skills and tools available to us in the operating room. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of using various patient based outcome measures can be a daunting task and could deter many orthopaedic surgeons from applying these useful tools to their practice. This article aims to summarize the importance and proper usage of the many outcomes instruments available to orthopedic surgeons.

Spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgery

INTRODUCTION

The conventional open pedicle screw fusion (PSF) requires an extensive detachment of the paraspinal muscle from the posterior aspect of the lumbar spine, which can cause muscle injury and subsequently lead to "approach-related morbidity". The spinous process-splitting (SPS) approach for decompression, unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, and the Wiltse approach for pedicle screw insertion are considered to be less invasive to the paraspinal musculature. We investigated whether SPS open PSF combined with the abovementioned techniques attenuates the paraspinal muscle damage and yields favorable clinical results, including alleviation in the low back discomfort, in comparison to the conventional open PSF.

METHODS

We studied 53 patients who underwent single-level PSF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis (27 patients underwent SPS open PSF and the other 26 underwent the conventional open PSF). The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain and low back discomfort (heavy feeling or stiffness). Postoperative multifidus (MF) atrophy was evaluated using MRI. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 and 3 years after the surgery.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in the JOA and RDQ score between the two groups, the VAS score for low back pain and discomfort after the surgery were significantly lower in the SPS open PSF group than in the conventional open PSF group. The extent of MF atrophy after SPS open PSF was reduced more significantly than after the conventional open PSF during the follow-up. The MF atrophy ratio was found to correlate with low back discomfort at the 1-year follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, SPS open PSF was less damaging to the paraspinal muscle than the conventional open PSF and had a significant clinical effect, reducing low back discomfort over 1 year after the surgery.