Incidence and outcome of atlanto-occipital dissociation at a level 1 trauma centre: a prospective study of five cases within 5 years

Atlanto-occipital dislocation with concomitant severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study at a level 1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a life-threatening injury. Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with increased mortality in AOD patients, a detailed individual analysis of these patients is lacking in the literature.

METHODS

Patients ≥16 years old who were diagnosed of AOD with concomitant severe TBI from 2010 to 2020 were included in this retrospective study. We examined the epidemiology, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, and outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included. Six patients died before any intervention could be performed, and two patients underwent an occipito-cervical fixation, showing a notorious neurologic improvement on follow-up. Cardiorespiratory arrest (CRA) was a strong predictor of subsequent death. CT signs of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) were present in most patients and were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in survivors. Although TBI was not the main cause of death, it was responsible for the delayed neurological improvement and deferred stabilization. The average sensitivity of the different used methodologies for AOD diagnosis ranged from 0.50 to 1.00, being the Basion Dens Interval (BDI) and the Condyle-C1 interval (CCI) sum the most reliable criteria. Non-survivors tended to show greater distraction measurements. The high incidence of condylar avulsion fractures suggests that their visualization on the initial CT study should heighten the suspicion for AOD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that patients with AOD and concomitant severe TBI might be salvageable patients. In those who survive beyond the first hospital days and show neurological improvement, surgical treatment should be performed as they can achieve an important neurologic recovery.

Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a child: a challenging diagnosis. Illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a highly unstable injury of the osseoligamentous complex at the craniocervical junction that is more common in children. Its diagnosis remains a challenging process that must integrate clinical presentation and radiological criteria.

OBSERVATIONS

A 9-year-old child presented with severe craniocervical trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale score 6) and cardiorespiratory arrest on-site. Prompt resuscitation on-site and transfer to the university hospital were performed, and a computed tomography (CT) scan showed a subarachnoid hemorrhage around the brainstem and a retroclival hematoma. Most of the radiological criteria on CT scans for AOD were negative, except for the occipital condyle–C1 interval, and further imaging with magnetic resonance imaging permitted the diagnosis of AOD with rupture of both the tectorial membrane and the transverse ligament. Occipital-cervical Oc-C1–2 fixation was performed. The neurological outcome was excellent, with full recovery 6 months after the trauma.

LESSONS

AOD should be suspected in all high-intensity trauma in children, especially if the clinical presentation includes cardiorespiratory arrest and other brainstem and/or upper cervical cord symptoms along with premedullary subarachnoid hemorrhage. Understanding the ligamentous nature of the injury resulting in “normal” radiographs or CT scans is important to avoid underdiagnosing AOD, which can have detrimental consequences.

Analysis of diagnostics, therapy and outcome of patients with traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients' outcome following traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) has been poor. In recent years, an increasing number of patients surviving the initial trauma are admitted to hospital. In order to further improve the management of these patients, the knowledge of diagnostics and therapy as well as possible complications should be increased.

PURRPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic parameters, therapy, early complications and outcome of patients with traumatic AOD.

STUDY DESIGN

Monocentric retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 12 patients were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was functional patient outcome. Furthermore, radiographic and treatment data were analyzed.

METHODS

All patients suffering from traumatic AOD within an 8-year time period were included. Demographic data, radiological diagnostic parameters (condylar sum, basion dens interval, basion axis interval, power´s ratio, x-line method), as well as treatment data and complications of every patient were analyzed. Radiological parameters were compared with each other. Outcome was analyzed by a follow up examination.

RESULTS

The accident mechanisms were motor vehicle accidents (MVA), fall from high and low height. Basion dens interval, basion axis interval, power's ratio and x-line method were not reliable in identifying traumatic AOD (only up to 33% of the patients were identified). Twelve patients could be reviewed. Three patients were treated with surgery, five patients were treated nonsurgically. Four patients died before surgical therapy. All seven surviving patients (survival rate: 58.3%) were re-examined (mean follow-up time: 6.7 months). All patients had a GCS of 15. Three surviving patients suffered from persisting neurological deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

The most reliable way to diagnose AOD in Computer Topography is using the condylar sum. Surgical and nonsurgical measures can be employed with reasonable outcomes. Patient specific injury burden and clinical presentation should be taken into account when making treatment decisions for AOD.

Traumatic Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation-A Comprehensive Analysis of All Case Series Found in the Spinal Trauma Literature

BACKGROUND

Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (TAOD) is one of the most devastating traumatic injuries, generally associated with immediate death after high-energy trauma. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature review of all cases series of TAOD and present the current state of this entity.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only case series with at least 5 cases were included in the analysis. We focused on survival rates, diagnostic methods, delays in diagnosis, outcomes, and cases successfully treated nonoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles were included (16 retrospective and 1 prospective study) with 341 patients. Six studies included pediatric patients only. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale at admission was ≤8 in all studies. Many different diagnostic criteria were used, but none of them had high accuracy. The overall mortality rate was 34.8%, but the studies' designs were heterogeneous (some included only survivors). A high rate of concomitant traumatic brain injury was documented in some studies. We found it interesting that some patients were treated with cervical immobilization (37/341; 10.8%), which was generally used in less unstable injuries; however, the majority of patients were managed with an occipito-cervical fusion (193/341; 56.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

TAOD is a devastating traumatic injury, with a high mortality rate. An MRI may be recommended when there are subtle findings of TAOD and a normal computed tomography scan, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage in the posterior fossa, upper cervical injuries, or consistent neurological findings. Further studies are necessary to identify patients with mild MRI findings and TAOD that may be managed nonoperatively.

Occipitocervical fusion of traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation in a patient with autofused cervical facet joints: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Patients who survive traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation (AOD) may present with normal neurological examinations and near-normal-appearing diagnostic images, such as cervical radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors described a neurologically intact 64-year-old female patient with a degenerative autofusion of her right C4–5 facet joints who presented to their center after a motor vehicle collision. Prevertebral soft tissue swelling and craniocervical subarachnoid hemorrhage prompted awareness and consideration for traumatic AOD. An abnormal occipital condyle–C1 interval (4.67 mm) on CT and craniocervical junction ligamentous injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis of AOD. Her autofused right C4–5 facet joints were incorporated into the occipitocervical fusion construct.

LESSONS

Traumatic AOD can be easily overlooked in patients with a normal neurological examination and no associated upper cervical spine fractures. A high index of suspicion is needed when evaluating CT scans because normal values for craniocervical parameters are significantly different from the accepted ranges of normal on radiographs in the adult population. MRI of the cervical spine is helpful to evaluate for atlanto-occipital ligamentous injury and confirm the diagnosis. Occipitocervical fusion construct may need to be extended to incorporate spinal levels with degenerative autofusion to prevent adjacent level degeneration.

Successful non-operative management for atlanto-occipital dislocation resulting in spinal cord contusion in a patient with atlanto-occipital assimilation and severe Chiari I malformation

Background:

Atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a rare, highly morbid, and highly lethal injury that results from high-energy trauma and almost universally requires operative management for satisfactory outcomes. It can be difficult to identify the severity of injury at the time of presentation, and when diagnosis is delayed outcomes worsen significantly. Anatomic anomalies of the craniovertebral junction may further complicate its detection. When such anomalies are present either singly or in combination, they are known to cause space constraints which may increase the likelihood of spinal cord injury. Given that such anomalies and AOD are rare, few examples of patients with both are reported in the literature. Furthermore, it is not clear in what way patient management may be impacted in this context.

Case Description:

We will present a unique case of an 18-year-old patient with traumatic AOD and an intact neurologic examination who was found to have atlanto-occipital assimilation (AOA), platybasia, basilar invagination, and severe Chiari I malformation, who was treated effectively with non-operative management.

Conclusion:

Our case demonstrates the successful application of a non-operative treatment strategy in a carefully selected patient with AOD in the context of AOA.

Independent predictors of survival after traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation

BACKGROUND

Atlanto-occipital dissociation (AOD) occurs when the skull base is forcibly separated from the vertebral column. Existing literature on AOD is sparse and risk factors for mortality are unknown. This study determined independent predictors of survival after AOD.

METHODS

Patients who sustained AOD were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2014). Those arriving without signs of life or with missing mortality data were excluded. Study groups were defined as patients who survived to hospital discharge versus patients who died in hospital. Demographics, injury data, interventions, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of survival.

RESULTS

After applying exclusion criteria, 1,489 patients (<1% of National Trauma Data Bank) were identified. Median age was 37 years (interquartile range [IQR), 20-59 years], and 59% of patients were male. Atlanto-occipital dissociation occurred almost exclusively after blunt mechanisms (97%), most commonly motor vehicle collisions (66%). Median injury severity score (ISS) was 25 (IQR, 10-36), with 22% mortality. Median time to death was 1,358 minutes (IQR, 281-4,451 minutes), approximately 23 hours. Independent predictors of survival were higher Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission (p < 0.001), lower ISS (p = 0.011), lower Abbreviated Injury Scale score for the head (p = 0.001), and the lack of need for exploratory laparotomy (p < 0.001). Time to neurosurgical intervention of the spine was not predictive of survival (p > 0.05). Patients who survived had a median hospital length of stay of 5 days (IQR, 1-14 days) and intensive care unit length of stay of 1 day (IQR, 0-7 days). The most common discharge destination was home (n = 393 [34%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Traumatic AOD is not uniformly fatal, with 78% of patients who arrive alive to hospital surviving to discharge. When death occurs, it is typically within the first 23 hours. Lower ISS and higher Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission independently predict survival, while time to neurosurgical intervention does not. Survivors have a short hospital stay and are commonly discharged home. This study suggests that AOD among patients who arrive alive to hospital may not be as devastating as previously considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Progonostic/Epidemiological, level III; Therapeutic, level IV.

Atlantoaxial Instability Resulting in Intractable Nausea in a Person with C5 Complete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have altered neurophysiology and present with symptoms that must be interpreted in the context of their specific neurologic injury. This is a case of a 16-year-old female adolescent with C5 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A SCI who presented with intractable nausea. Multiple etiologies for her nausea, including medication effect, metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders, autonomic dysreflexia, and mood disorder, were systematically ruled out. Due to the persistence of the patient's symptoms and suboptimal progression in her rehabilitation, a central nervous system etiology was investigated. Ultimately, atlantoaxial instability with odontoid compression on the medulla was identified and her refractory nausea resolved following an occiput to C2 fusion. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of atlantoaxial instability causing intractable nausea due to brain stem compression in a patient with SCI. Level of Evidence: V.

Occipitocervical Dislocation in Low-Energy Trauma

Traumatic occipitocervical dislocation (OCD) is described in the literature as a potentially fatal injury secondary to high-energy trauma. We describe a case of OCD occurring in a patient who sustained a ground-level fall whose only clinical symptom was posterior neck pain without neurologic compromise. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to diagnose severe injury to the structurally important ligamentous complex that stabilizes the base of the skull to the spine, along with unstable fractures of the occipital condyle and C1. Emergent surgical instrumentation and fusion of occiput-C2 was performed. Postoperatively, neurologic integrity was maintained. This case illustrates that traumatic OCD is not exclusively secondary to high-energy mechanisms. It also demonstrates that severe neck pain as the only clinical manifestation in a patient with head or neck low-energy trauma is suggestive of a possible OCD. We highlight the importance of the use of head and neck CT as the first imaging-based diagnostic tool to aid in identifying this injury. Finally, surgical stabilization should be performed as soon as possible to minimize neurologic sequelae.

Failure of the Condyle-C1 Interval Method to Diagnose Atlanto-occipital Dislocation in the Presence of an Associated Atlanto-axial Dislocation: A Case Report

Atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a craniocervical injury that has serious neurological consequences and is often fatal. High-speed blunt trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents, that extend and put traction on the head can cause this injury. The current recommendation for diagnosis is to measure the condyle-C1 interval (CCI) using a computed tomography (CT) scan in the coronal plane and more recently in the sagittal plane. We report the case of a patient who suffered a motor vehicle accident and had concomitant AOD and atlanto-axial dislocation. In this particular case, the CCI method failed to diagnose AOD and the diagnosis was made using the basion-dens interval (BDI) and other methodologies, as well as the presence of ligamentous disruption at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

A 19-year-old female suffered a motor vehicle accident in which she was ejected from the car. Her neck was immobilized on the scene and she was brought to the emergency department complaining of neck pain. CT of the cervical spine showed concomitant atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial dissociation. MRI of the cervical spine confirmed the diagnosis with total ligamentous disruption at the CVJ and distraction of the atlanto-axial joints bilaterally. While the CCI was normal, the BDI was diagnostic of AOD.

The current recommendations for using the CCI interval method may not diagnose AOD in the presence of associated atlanto-axial dislocation. Other methodologies should be employed including BDI and basion-axial interval (BAI) as well as MR imaging showing ligamentous disruption.

A Case of Asymptomatic Occipital Condyle Fracture with Incomplete Occipitocervical Dislocation: How Did It Happen?

BACKGROUND

Atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a lesion rarely observed in a trauma center, because of high mortality in the preclinical phase. The number of AOD survivors is increasing thanks to the improvement in prehospital resuscitation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Our goal is to describe a case of incomplete atlanto-occipital dislocation presented without any neurologic, cardiorespiratory, or metabolic problems, which remained constant even after surgical treatment. Our purpose is also to discuss treatment approaches to minimize subsequent neurologic deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a rapid immobilization with spine table and cervical collar, the consensual stabilization of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, and a successive prompt occipitocervical stabilization. C2 should be included in the stabilization because of the ligamentous conformation of craniocervical joint.

Traumatic occipito-cervical dissociation in adults: a Middle Eastern cohort study

The objective of this study is to describe a series of cranio-cervical dissociation victims and evaluate their outcomes as well as discuss the clinical dilemmas we faced in the context of current literature evidence. This is a retrospective cohort study of traumatic occipito-cervical dissociation in five patients (three males and two females) encountered between 2010 and 2016 at a tertiary care facility in the Middle East region. All patients underwent occipito-cervical fusion using screws and rods system with mean postoperative follow-up period of 2.5 years. All patients survived, and four were independently mobile and one wheel chair bound. Most had some degree of neurological sequelae, often due to associated injuries and all complained of limited neck range of motion. Contemporary literature review shows that CT scan with MRI is often the best diagnostic modality. Surgery is usually indicated though rare cases treated conservatively have been reported. The commonest predictor of mortality is missed injury, associated head injury and wide separation between the skull base and C1 on imaging studies.

[Injuries of the upper cervical spine : Update on diagnostics and management]

Injuries to the upper cervical spine represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the treating surgeon due to the complex anatomical relationships and biomechanical features. In this further education article the diagnostic principles, established classifications and therapeutic recommendations as well as injury-specific characteristics of bony and ligamentous injuries to the upper cervical spine (C0-C2) are presented.

Imaging of Atlanto-Occipital and Atlantoaxial Traumatic Injuries: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

Approximately one-third of all cervical spine injuries involve the craniocervical junction (CCJ). Composed of the occiput and the first two cervical vertebrae, this important anatomic landmark, in conjunction with an intricate ligamentous complex, is essential to maintaining the stability of the cervical spine. The atlantoaxial joint is the most mobile portion of the spine, predominantly relying on the ligamentous framework for stability at that level. As acute onsite management of trauma patients continues to improve, CCJ injuries, which often lead to death onsite where the injury occurred, are increasingly being encountered in the emergency department. Understanding the anatomy of the CCJ is crucial in properly evaluating the cervical spine, allowing the radiologist to assess its stability in the trauma setting. The imaging findings of important CCJ injuries, such as atlanto-occipital dissociation, occipital condyle fractures, atlas fractures with transverse ligament rupture, atlantoaxial distraction, and traumatic rotatory subluxation, are important to recognize in the acute setting, often dictating patient management. Thin-section multidetector computed tomography with sagittal and coronal reformats is the study of choice in evaluating the extent of injury, allowing the radiologist to thoroughly evaluate the stability of the cervical spine. Furthermore, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly being used to evaluate the spinal soft tissues and ligaments, and to identify associated spinal cord injury, if present. MR imaging is also indicated in patients whose neurologic status cannot be evaluated within 48 hours of injury. .

Prognostic factors in traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation

Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is an ominous injury with high mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Improved survival has been observed with advancements in pre-hospital and hospital care. Furthermore, high quality imaging studies are accessible at most trauma centers; these are crucial for prompt diagnosis of AOD. The objective of this study is to perform a comprehensive literature review of traumatic AOD, with specific emphasis on identifying prognostic factors for survival. A review of the literature was performed using the Medline database for all traumatic atlanto-occipital articles published between March 1959 and June 2015; 141 patients from 60 total studies met eligibility criteria for study inclusion. A binary logistic regression model was utilized to identify prognostic factors. The analysis assessed age, sex, spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), polytrauma injury (PI), and Traynelis AOD Classification. Only TBI was statistically significantly associated with death (OR 8.05 p<0.05); SCI did not reach statistical significance for predicting mortality in AOD patients (OR 1.25 p>0.05). Age, sex, PI, and Traynelis AOD Classification did not meet significance to predict mortality in AOD patients. We found that patients with TBI are eight times more likely to die than patients without TBI. A high degree of suspicion for AOD during pre-hospital care, as well as, prompt diagnosis and management in the trauma center play a key role in the treatment of this devastating injury. The relationship between survival and factors such as TBI and SCI should be further explored.

Pediatric Cervical Spine Injuries: A Rare But Challenging Entity

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the cervical spine in pediatric patients are uncommon. A missed injury can have devastating consequences in this age group. Because of the lack of routine in diagnosis and management of pediatric cervical spine injuries (PCSI), each of these cases represents a logistic and personal challenge.

METHODS

By means of clinical cases, we demonstrate key points in diagnostics and treatment of pediatric spine injuries. We highlight typical pediatric injury patterns and more adult-like injuries.

RESULTS

The most common cause of injury is blunt trauma. There is an age-related pattern of injuries in pediatric patients. Children under the age of 8 frequently sustain ligamentous injuries in the upper cervical spine. After the age of 8, the biomechanics of the cervical spine are similar to adults, and therefore, bony injuries of the subaxial cervical spine are most likely to occur. Clinical presentation of PCSI is heterogeneous. Younger children can neither interpret nor communicate neurological abnormalities, which make timely and accurate diagnosis difficult. Plain radiographs are often misinterpreted. We find different types of injuries at different locations, because of different biomechanical properties of the immature spine. We outline that initial management is crucial for long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of biomechanical properties and radiographic presentation of the immature spine can improve the awareness for PCSI. Diagnosis and management of pediatric patients after neck trauma can be demanding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Traumatic atlantooccipital dislocation: comprehensive assessment of mortality, neurologic improvement, and patient-reported outcomes at a Level 1 trauma center over 15 years

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Only Level 3 evidence exists for the diagnosis and treatment of atlantooccipital dislocation (AOD) with few studies examining mortality, neurologic improvement, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

PURPOSE

First, the aim was to determine: the incidence of AOD, 90-day surgical morbidity and mortality after AOD, patient factors that may be associated with delayed or missed diagnosis, and factors that were associated with mortality and neurologic improvement after AOD. Secondly, the aim was to quantify the pain, disability, and quality of life experienced by patients surviving AOD.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 5,337 consecutive spine computed tomography traumagrams from 1997 to 2012 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, neurologic improvement, complications, EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-neck, NRS-arm, and return-to-work were the outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients were considered to have AOD if they met one of the following radiographic criteria: basion-dens interval greater than 10 mm; basion-axial interval: anterior displacement greater than 12 mm or posterior displacement greater than 4 mm between the basion and posterior C2 line; and condyle to C1 interval greater than 1.4 mm. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality, neurologic improvement, and missed diagnosis. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed via phone interview.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients met radiographic criteria for AOD; an incidence of 0.6% over 15 years. Twenty-one (68%) patients were treated with occipital cervical fusion. At 90 days postoperatively, there were no new neurologic deficits or reoperations. Eight (26%) patients died within 90 days. All patients who died had no documented AOD diagnosis and were not treated surgically. Missed AOD diagnosis was the strongest predictor of mortality. Younger age, lower Glasgow Coma Score, lower Injury Severity Score (ISS) score, and worse initial American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score were significantly associated with greater neurologic improvement. Higher ISS score and better ASIA score were significantly associated with missed AOD diagnosis. The average PROs metrics at time of telephone follow-up were as follows: EQ-5D=0.73±0.19, NDI=30.89±18.57, NRS-neck=2.33±2.21, NRS-arm=2.00±2.54. Of the patients with follow-up data, four were employed full-time, and five were receiving disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work suggests that failure to diagnose AOD is a powerful predictor of mortality. Higher ISS scores and better neurologic presentation were significantly associated with missed diagnosis. Craniocervical arthrodesis preserved neurologic function with low complication rate and unexpectedly high PROs and return-to-work. These results must be carefully interpreted because it is unclear whether missed AOD diagnosis accompanies another death-causing injury (eg, traumatic brain injury) or if failure to treat AOD contributes to mortality in a multifactorial manner.

Cervical spine clearance when unable to be cleared clinically: a pooled analysis of combined computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The role of cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of clinically unevaluable blunt trauma patients has been called into question by several recent studies.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for all studies comparing computed tomography and MRI in the assessment of the cervical spine in patients who cannot be evaluated clinically. The radiologic findings and clinical outcomes from each study were collated for analysis.

RESULTS

Data for 1,714 patients were available. All patients had a negative computed tomography scan and then underwent an MRI. There were 271 (15.8%) patients who had a previously undocumented finding on MRI with the majority (98.2%) being a ligamentous injury. Only 5 injuries (1.8%) resulted in surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI identifies additional injuries; however, the vast majority are of minor clinical significance. Routine MRI after a negative computed tomography of the cervical spine is not supported by the current literature.