Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy to treat basilar invagination with congenital osseous malformations

Basilar Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Features, Operative Strategies, and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Basilar impression (BI) is a rare yet debilitating abnormality of the craniovertebral junction, known to cause life-threatening medullary brainstem compression. Our study analyzes surgical approaches for BI and related outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to critically assess primary articles examining BI.

RESULTS

We analyzed 87 patients from 65 articles, mostly female (55.17%) with a mean age of 46.31 ± 17.94 years, commonly presenting with motor (59.77%) and sensory deficits (55.17%). Commonly employed procedures included posterior occipitocervical fusion (24.14%), anterior decompression (20.69%), and combined anterior decompression with posterior fusion (21.84%). Patients who underwent anterior approaches were found to be older (55.38 ± 17.67 vs. 45.49 ± 18.78 years, P < 0.05) and had a longer duration from symptom onset to surgery (57.39 ± 64.33 vs. 26.02 ± 29.60 months, P < 0.05) compared to posterior approaches. Our analysis revealed a significant association between a longer duration from symptom onset to surgery and an increased likelihood of undergoing odontoidectomy and decompression (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03, P < 0.05). Furthermore, after adjusting for all other covariates, a history of rheumatoid arthritis and the use of a posterior approach were significantly associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment approach to complex craniovertebral junction disease should be tailored to the surgeon's experience and the nature of the compressive pathology.

Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Background: The aging of the population in developing and developed countries has led to a significant increase in the health burden of spinal diseases. These elderly patients often have a number of medical comorbidities due to aging. The need for minimally invasive techniques to address spinal disorders in this elderly population group cannot be stressed enough. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has several proven benefits, such as minimal muscle trauma, minimal bony resection, lesser postoperative pain, decreased infection rate, and shorter hospital stay. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using PubMed. Results: Over the past 40 years, constant efforts have been made to develop newer techniques of spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery is one such subset of MISS, which has all the benefits of modern MISS. Endoscopic spine surgery was initially limited only to the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. With improvements in optics, endoscopes, endoscopic drills and shavers, and irrigation pumps, there has been a paradigm shift. Endoscopic spine surgery can now be performed with high magnification, thus allowing its application not only to lumbar spinal stenosis but also to spinal fusion surgeries and cervical and thoracic pathology as well. There has been increasing evidence in support of these newer techniques of spine surgery. Conclusions: For this report, we studied the currently available literature and outlined the historical evolution of endoscopic spine surgery, the various endoscopic systems and techniques available, and the current applications of endoscopic techniques as an alternative to traditional spinal surgery.

Release, reduction, and fixation of one-stage posterior approach for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

PURPOSE

We evaluate the efficacy, safety and indications of single stage posterior release, reduction, and fixation of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with BI and IAAD consecutively underwent one-stage release, reduction, and fixation by a posterior approach from July 2000 to June 2015 were followed up for at least 12 months. There were 8 males. Mean age was 56 35.2 ± 13.8 years (range 12-56). The clinical symptoms and signs of the patients were recorded. Pre- and postoperative imaging examinations were performed. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Ranawat scores.

RESULTS

Average follow-up time was 47.4 months (12-97 months). The JOA score increased from preoperative 4-10 (8.06 ± 2.52) to postoperative 13-16 (15.20 ± 0.62). The preoperative Chamberlain line, McRae line, Wackenheim line, atlantodens interval, and cervico medullary angle were 12.52 ± 5.17 mm, 6.59 ± 3.04 mm, 6.96 ± 4.32 mm, 9.88 ± 1.93 mm, and 115.35 ± 12.40°, respectively. The postoperative values were 2.0 ± 3.67 mm, -3.06 ± 1.85 mm, -1.76 ± 2.88 mm, 1.17 ± 1.18 mm, and 136.76 ± 11.44°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

One-stage release, reduction, and fixation for patients with BI and IAAD through a posterior approach is safe and efficient.

Case report of bilateral middle ear effusion requiring myringotomy and tube placement following inferior U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap elevation for endonasal odontoidectomy: investigation of causality

We describe a patient with symptomatic os odontoideum and a previous history of C1-2 wiring who underwent successful treatment with a staged endonasal odontoidectomy and C1-2 revision of instrumentation. Access to the odontoid process was gained through the endonasal corridor using an inverted U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap (IUNF). Post-operatively, the patient experienced resolution of her presenting neurologic symptoms but developed conductive hearing loss secondary to bilateral middle ear effusion, requiring bilateral myringotomy and tube placement 3 months post-operatively. We hypothesize this dysfunction may have resulted from surgical edema, packing buttressing the IUNF, or some combination thereof. In this manuscript, we review the evolution of the nasopharyngeal exposure for odontoidectomy and whether an IUNF may predispose to this complication.

Basilar Invagination With Chiari Type I Malformation and Atlanto-Axial Instability: A Rare Case Report

Basilar invagination (BI) and Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) are important anomalies involving the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) involving the skull base and occipitocervical region. The incidence of BI is rare involving < 1% of the general population worldwide. They present with varied and complex clinical-radiological features. We present a 36-year-old male who displayed complaints of persistent reeling sensation at our center. Clinical examination revealed bilateral cerebellar signs along with nystagmus and restricted neck movements. Imaging revealed evidence of BI with cerebellar tonsil herniation of ~14.7 mm. Atlantodens interval of 6 mm was noted. The unexpected findings of C1-C2 fusion and instability were also noted. We describe a rare case of BI with C1 prolapse into the foramen magnum along with CM-1 malformation and congenital fusion of C1-C2. We conclude that the treatment algorithm for these rare cases is not very well established and is individually dependent.

[Minimally invasive surgery for invaginated CII odontoid process]

Odontoidectomy is indicated for anterior compression of the brainstem by invaginated odontoid process. This procedure can currently be performed via transoral microsurgical and transnasal endoscopic access.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We assessed treatment outcomes in 10 patients with anterior compression of the brainstem by invaginated odontoid process. All patients underwent endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy.

RESULTS

Brainstem decompression was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Currently, endoscopic transnasal approach is gradually replacing the transoral one in some patients requiring anterior odontoidectomy. Analysis of literature data reflects the development of this technique taking into account various features of surgical treatment including optimization of dimensions of surgical field, attempts to perform C1-sparing surgeries and analysis of sufficient size of trepanation. Nasopalatine and nasoclival lines are used to select optimal access. Nevertheless, the choice of access depends on equipment of the hospital and surgical experience in most cases.

The endoscopic transnasal approach to the lesions of the craniocervical junction: two case reports

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has recently been considered a safer alternative and less invasive approach than the traditional transoral approach because the complications associated with the latter are avoided or minimized. Here, we present two challenging cases of CVJ pathologies. The first case involved os odontoideum associated with anterior displacement of the occipitocervical junction where the EEA was used, followed by C0-C1-C2 fusion using a posterior approach to decompress the CVJ, and was complicated by rhinorrhea and Candida albicans meningitis. The second case involved basilar invagination with syringomyelia previously treated using a posterior approach, where aggravation of neuropathic symptoms required combined treatment with EEA and occipitocervical fusion of C0-C2-C3-C4, with the postoperative course challenged by operative site infection requiring drainage with debridement and antibiotic therapy. The EEA is an alternative approach for accessing the CVJ in well-selected patients. Knowledge of EEA complications is crucial for the optimal care of patients.

Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after odontoidectomy with anterior C1 arch preservation: A finite element study

OBJECTIVE

Odontoidectomy with preservation of the anterior C1 arch can be increasingly achieved by an endoscopic endonasal approach. It is controversial whether preservation of the anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy can prevent instability of the craniovertebral junction （CVJ） and avoid posterior fixation. The aim of this research was to investigate the biomechanical effect of the preserved anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy.

METHODS

A validated finite element model of a whole cervical spine (occipital bone to T1) was constructed to study the biomechanical changes due to traditional odontoidectomy (TO) and odontoidectomy with preservation of the anterior C1 arch (OPC1).

RESULTS

The greatest biomechanical changes in the cervical spine model after TO and OPC1 occurred at C0-C1 and C1-C2. At C0-C1 and C1-C2, the motion changes of the TO and OPC1 models had no significant difference in flexion, extension and lateral bending. Compared with the intact model, motion increases of the two surgical models were both extremely significant at C1-C2 in extension (128.2% vs. 128.1%) and lateral bending (178% vs. 156%). In axial rotation, the TO approach produced more motions than the OPC1 approach, especially at C1-C2(90.3° under TO approach, and 74.6° under OPC1 approach).

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy can preserve the axial rotational motion at C0-C1 and C1-C2, whereas the motions in extension and lateral bending continue to have an extremely abnormal increase at C1-C2. Thus, instability of the CVJ still exists, and posterior internal fixation may also be required after OPC1.

The rhinopharyngeal flap for reconstruction of lower clival and craniovertebral junction defects

OBJECTIVE

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the lower clivus and craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has been traditionally performed via resection of the nasopharyngeal soft tissues. Alternatively, an inferiorly based rhinopharyngeal (RP) flap (RPF) can be dissected to help reconstruct the postoperative defect and separate it from the oropharynx. To date, there is no evidence regarding the viability and potential clinical impact of the RPF. The aim of this study was to assess RPF viability and its impact on clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 60 patients who underwent EEA to the lower clivus and CVJ was studied. The RPF was used in 30 patients (RPF group), and the nasopharyngeal soft tissues were resected in 30 patients (control group).

RESULTS

Chordoma was the most common surgical indication in both groups (47% in the RPF group vs 63% in the control group, p = 0.313), followed by odontoid pannus (20% in the RPF group vs 10%, p = 0.313). The two groups did not significantly differ in terms of extent of tumor (p = 0.271), intraoperative CSF leak (p = 0.438), and skull base reconstruction techniques other than the RPF (nasoseptal flap, p = 0.301; fascia lata, p = 0.791; inlay graft, p = 0.793; and prophylactic lumbar drain, p = 0.781). Postoperative soft-tissue enhancement covering the lower clivus and CVJ observed on MRI was significantly higher in the RPF group (100% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The RPF group had a significantly lower rate of nasoseptal flap necrosis (3% vs 20%, p = 0.044) and surgical site infection (3% vs 27%, p = 0.026) while having similar rates of postoperative CSF leakage (17% in the RPF group vs 20%, p = 0.739) and meningitis (7% in the RPF group vs 17%, p = 0.424). Oropharyngeal bacterial flora dominated the infections in the control group but not those in the RPF group, suggesting that the RPF acted as a barrier between the nasopharynx and oropharynx.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPF provides viable vascularized tissue coverage to the lower clivus and CVJ. Its use was associated with decreased rates of nasoseptal flap necrosis and local infection, likely due to separation from the oropharynx.

A 360° Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction in a Cadaveric Laboratory Setting: Historical Insights, Current, and Future Perspectives in a Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

We herein outline the experience matured in our equipped Cranio-Vertebral Junction Laboratory for anatomic dissection.

METHODS

An extreme lateral approach (ELA) was performed on 4 fresh cadavers and submandibular approach was performed on 5. An endoscope and navigation-assisted far lateral approach (FLA) was performed in 5 injected specimens. In these specimens, a transoral approach was also performed, as well as a neuronavigation-assisted comparison between transoral and transnasal explorable distances.

RESULTS

As calculated with neuronavigation, statistically significant differences both in the explored craniocaudal (P = 0.003) and lateral (P = 0.008) distances were observed between the transoral approach and endoscopic endonasal approach. In FLA, neuronavigation facilitated identification and partial removal of the occipital condyle; in one case, during endoscopic intradural exploration, tearing of the emerging roots of the 11th cranial nerve occurred. In ELA, the site where the accessory nerve pierces into the sternocleidomastoid muscle was found at a distance from the tip of the mastoid between 3 and 4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

During dissections, as in the clinical setting, endoscope and image guidance give the surgeon a constant orientation, increasing the accuracy and the safety of the approach. Nonetheless, the encumbrance of the endoscope could represent a limit in deep and narrow corridors as those running across the craniovertebral junction, especially in "oblique" FLA and ELA, in which the surgical target is often hidden by a delicate tangle of nerves and vessels. Its use appears more suitable and safer in "straight" approaches as transoral and transnasal in which there are no neurovascular structures interposed.

Endoscopic Transnasal Odontoidectomy for Ventral Decompression of the Craniovertebral Junction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome in a Case Series of 19 Patients

BACKGROUND

Abnormalities and pathologies of the craniovertebral junction as well as space-occupying lesions of the odontoid process can result in myelopathy symptoms. A staged procedure with posterior stabilization and anterior transnasal endoscopic decompression is recently considered a less invasive alternative to the transoral approach. We present a considerably large case series focused on the operative technique and the long-term neurological clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of odontoidectomy performed via an endoscopic transnasal approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated in our neurosurgical department from January 2009 to January 2020. Demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical status, and operative technique and complications were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 22 transnasal operations were performed in 19 patients from January 2009 to January 2020. All but one patient underwent posterior C1-C2 instrumentation prior to the anterior transnasal computed tomography (CT)-navigated full-endoscopic decompression. The median duration of symptoms before surgery was 3 mo. Complications occurred in 1 patient who died from septic organ failure because of his initial diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Postoperative CT imaging showed sufficient decompression in 16 patients, and 3 patients underwent a transnasal endoscopic re-decompression (16%).

CONCLUSION

Transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy presents a safe procedure with a satisfying clinical and radiological postoperative outcome.

Surgical outcomes of posterior occipito-cervical decompression and fusion for basilar invagination: A prospective study

STUDY DESIGN

A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess results of posterior occipito-cervical decompression and fusion operated with intra-operative traction/manipulation and instrumented reduction in cases of Basilar Invagination(BI).

METHODS

Total 22 patients of 8-65 years with diagnosed BI were operated for posterior occipito-cervical fusion by intra-operative traction/manipulation and instrumented reduction. Fusion was done using autologous bone graft taken from iliac crest. Immediate post-operative, first month and then every 3 months' follow-up examination were done for minimum period of 2 years.

RESULTS

22 patients (10 males,12 females) with mean age of 23.9 years having BI were included. 11 patients had C1 occipitalization, 4 had platybasia and 9 had atlanto-axial dislocation (AAD). 1 patient with os odontoideum with kyphotic deformity expired on 4th postoperative day due to respiratory insufficiency (mortality rate 4.54%). Neurological improvement by at least by one grade according to RANAWAT's and/or NURICK'S scale was observed in 17/21 patients (80.95%). 3 patients remained static and 1 had neuro-worsening. Mean mJOA score of 13.14 improved to 16.24. All had reduction of dens below foramen magnum according to McRae, chamberlain line and Ranawat index. Bone graft fused in all patients as confirmed with CT scan and dynamic X-rays. 1 wound dehiscence and 1 asymptomatic implant loosening were seen on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of BI with intra-operative traction/manipulation, instrumented reduction and posterior occipito-cervical fusion can achieve good correction of radiology, functional performance and clinical neurology as well as excellent fusion rates without adverse effects of trans-oral surgery.

[Anatomy of anterior craniovertebral junction in endoscopic transnasal approach]

Modern achievements in endoscopic technologies ensure extending the indications for endoscopic transnasal approach in skull base surgery. Knowledge on topographic anatomy of craniovertebral junction is a prerequisite for surgical interventions in this area. Transnasal endoscopic surgery of craniovertebral junction is a relatively new field. Therefore, this manuscript and similar anatomical studies are extremely important for neurosurgeons.

Anterior release without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral or endoscopic transnasal?

PURPOSE

To compare transoral and endoscopic transnasal anterior release without odontoidectomy and posterior reduction and fixation to treat irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

METHODS

From June 2006 to January 2017, 35 consecutive patients with IAAD underwent transoral (Tr-Oral group) or endoscopic transnasal (Tr-Nasal group) release and posterior fixation and fusion in our department. Clinical neurological recovery (Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score) and radiological reduction parameters including atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC) and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. The operation duration, blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All 35 patients (18 and 17 patients in the Tr-Oral and Tr-Nasal groups, respectively) were followed up for a mean of 36.4 months (range, 21-60 months). All patients achieved excellent anatomical reduction and clinical neurological recovery, with no significant differences between the two groups. The JOA score, ADI, SAC and CMA were not significantly different between the two groups at various postoperative points. Although the Tr-Oral group had shorter operation time and less blood loss than the Tr-Nasal group, the Tr-Nasal group tended to have a significantly shorter hospital/ICU stay, earlier extubation and earlier oral intake than the Tr-Oral group.

CONCLUSION

The transoral and endoscopic transnasal approaches can achieve equivalent release and reduction effects when treating IAAD. Compared to the transoral approach, the endoscopic transnasal route is less invasive with earlier extubation and oral intake, shorter hospital/ICU stays and lower medical costs, which is conducive to enhanced recovery after surgery.

Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability: a literature review and critical analysis

Introduction

Recently, a novel hypothesis has been proposed concerning the origin of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) abnormalities. Commonly found in patients with these entities, atlantoaxial instability has been suspected to cause both Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination, which renders the tried and tested surgical decompression strategy ineffective. In turn, C1-2 fusion is proposed as a single solution for all CVJ abnormalities, and a revised definition of atlantoaxial instability sees patients both with and without radiographic evidence of instability undergo fusion, instead relying on the intraoperative assessment of the atlantoaxial joints to confirm instability.

Methods

The authors conducted a comprehensive narrative review of literature and evidence covering this recently emerged hypothesis. The proposed pathomechanisms are discussed and contextualized with published literature.

Conclusion

The existing evidence is evaluated for supporting or opposing sole posterior C1-2 fusion in patients with CVJ abnormalities and compared with reported outcomes for conventional surgical strategies such as posterior fossa decompression, occipitocervical fusion, and anterior decompression. At present, there is insufficient evidence supporting the hypothesis of atlantoaxial instability being the common progenitor for CVJ abnormalities. Abolishing tried and tested surgical procedures in favor of a single universal approach would thus be unwarranted.

Can Posterior Reduction Replace Odontoidectomy as Treatment for Patients With Congenital Posterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination?

BACKGROUND

For patients with odontoid process protrusion and basilar invagination, posterior screw–rod fixation can usually achieve satisfactory horizontal reduction, but in some cases satisfactory reduction in the vertical direction cannot be achieved at the same time.

OBJECTIVE

To propose a method for calculation of the theoretical maximum vertical reduction possible in individual patients.

METHODS

The computed tomography imaging data of patients with occipitalization and basilar invagination who were treated at our institute between January 2013 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The direction of odontoid reduction was decided by the inclination of the lateral joint. The atlanto-dental distance was assumed to be the maximum possible reduction in the horizontal direction. The maximum vertical reduction possible was calculated based on these values.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients (34 males and 48 females) were included. The theoretical vertical reduction value was 4.2 ± 3.0 mm, which was significantly smaller than that of the dental protrusion (14.5 ± 3.8 mm, P = .000). Analysis of follow-up data (29 cases) showed that, the difference between the theoretical vertical reduction value H (4.7 ± 3.5 mm) and the actual vertical reduction value Ha (5.6 ± 3.5 mm) was not significant (P = .139).

CONCLUSION

The theoretical calculation method we proposed can well predict the actual degree of vertical reduction. The theoretical vertical reduction value is significantly lower than the odontoid protrusion value, indicating that satisfactory reduction in the vertical direction is difficult with a posterior approach alone.

Anatomical Aspects of the Transnasal Endoscopic Access to the Craniovertebral Junction

OBJECTIVE

Interest in endoscopic transnasal access has increased with continued technological advances in endoscopic technology. The goals of this study were to review the normal anatomy in transnasal endoscopic neurosurgery and outline the anatomical basis for an expanded surgical approach. Defining anatomical aspects of surgical endoscopy helps guide the surgeon by defining normal anatomy of the access vector.

METHODS

This anatomic study was conducted on 15 adult male cadaver specimens using various microsurgical tools and endoscopic instruments and 1 intraoperative case. The vasculature was injected with colored silicone to aid visualization. Different transnasal approach techniques were used, with angles of endoscope access at 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° accordingly for extensive anatomical mapping.

RESULTS

The proximity of critical structures is different in each approach degree. A full understanding of the possible structures to be met during transnasal access is described. As a result of the study, anatomical aspects and important structures were outlined, and a surgical protocol was defined for minimal risk access in respect to normal anatomy of the area.

CONCLUSIONS

Thorough knowledge of topographic anatomy of the craniovertebral junction is required for performing minimal-risk surgical intervention in this region. It is important to know all anatomical aspects of the transnasal approach in order to reduce the risk of damage to vital structures. Transnasal endoscopic surgery of the craniovertebral junction is a relatively new direction in neurosurgery; therefore, anatomical studies such as the one described in this article are extremely important for the development of this access method.

Transoral Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: A Neuronavigated Cadaver Study

More than 100 years after the first description by Kanavel of a transoral-transpharyngeal approach to remove a bullet impacted between the atlas and the clivus [1], the transoral approach (TOA) still represents the 'gold standard' for surgical treatment of a variety of conditions resulting in anterior craniocervical compression and myelopathy [2, 3]. Nevertheless, some concerns-such as the need for a temporary tracheostomy and a postoperative nasogastric tube, and the increased risk of infection resulting from possible bacterial contamination and nasopharyngeal incompetence [4-6]-led to the introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) by Kassam et al. [7] in 2005. Although this approach, which was conceived to overcome those surgical complications, soon gained wide attention, its clear predominance over the TOA in the treatment of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) pathologies is still a matter of debate [3]. In recent years, several papers have reported anatomical studies and surgical experience with the EEA, targeting different areas of the midline skull base, from the olfactory groove to the CVJ [8-19]. Starting from these preliminary experiences, further anatomical studies have defined the theoretical (radiological) and practical (surgical) craniocaudal limits of the endonasal route [20-25]. Our group has done the same for the TOA [26, 27] and compared the reliability of the radiological and surgical lines of the two different approaches. Very recently, a cadaver study, with the aid of neuronavigation, tried to define the upper and lower limits of the endoscopic TOA [28].

The Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Pathologies: A Minimally Invasive but not Minimal-Risk Approach

This paper has been edited for clarity, correctness and consistency with our house style. Please check it carefully to make sure the intended meaning has been preserved. If the intended meaning has been inadvertently altered by the editing changes, please make any corrections needed.

Basilar invagination associated with chiari malformation type I: A literature review

Basilar invagination (BI) and Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) are very important anomalies that introduce instability and compression in the occipitocervical transition region and have complex clinical characteristics. These anomalies vary according to the affected structures. The present study revises current knowledge regarding the anatomy, anatomo-physiology, clinical manifestations, and radiological findings of these entities and the associated surgical treatment approaches. A bibliographic survey was performed through a search in the Medline, PubMed, SciELO, Science and LILACS databases. When associated, these craniovertebral malformations result in neurological deficits due to neural parenchyma compression; however, the presence of microtraumas due to repetitive lesions caused by the bulb and cervical marrow instability has been highlighted as a determinant dysfunction. Surgical treatment is controversial and has many technical variations. Surgery is also challenging due to the complex anatomical characteristics and biomechanics of this region. Nevertheless, advances have been achieved in our understanding of related mechanisms, and compression and atlantoaxial instability are considered key elements when selecting the surgical approach.

A Dual Approach for the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities: Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy and Posterior Decompression with Fusion

BACKGROUND

Ventral brainstem compression secondary to complex craniovertebral junction abnormality is an infrequent cause of neurologic deterioration in pediatric patients. However, in cases of symptomatic, irreducible ventral compression, 360° decompression of the brainstem supported by posterior stabilization may provide the best opportunity for improvement in symptoms. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal corridor has been proposed as an alternative method of odontoidectomy associated with less morbidity. We report the largest single case series of pediatric patients using this dual-intervention surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent posterior occipitocervical decompression and instrumentation followed by endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy performed to relieve neurologic impingement involving the ventral brainstem and craniocervical junction.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and February 2017, 7 patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion followed by endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy at our unit. Standardized clinical and radiological parameters were assessed before and after surgery. A univariate analysis was performed to assess clinical and radiologic improvement after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 14 operations were performed on 7 pediatric patients. One patient had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 1 patient had a Chiari 1 malformation, and the remaining 5 patients had Chiari 1.5 malformations. Average extubation day was postoperative day 0.9. Average day of initiation of postoperative feeds was postoperative day 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy and posterior decompression and fusion for complex craniovertebral compression is a safe and effective procedure that appears to be well tolerated in the pediatric population.

The full-endoscopic uniportal technique for decompression of the anterior craniocervical junction using the retropharyngeal approach: an anatomical feasibility study in human cadavers and review of the literature

Objective

Acute or progressive myelopathy may necessitate direct anterior decompression of the craniocervical junction and odontoidectomy. Different techniques with individual advantages and disadvantages can be used. In addition to the gold standard-the transoral approach-there is also increasing experience with the endoscopic transnasal technique. Other alternative methods are also being developed to reduce technical and perioperative problems. The aim of this anatomical study was to investigate the feasibility of the full-endoscopic uniportal technique with a retropharyngeal approach for decompression of the craniocervical junction, taking into consideration the specific advantages and disadvantages compared with conventional methods and the currently available data in the literature.

Methods

Five fresh adult cadavers were operated on. The endoscope used has a shaft cross-section of 6.9 × 5.9 mm and a 25° viewing angle. It contains an eccentric intraendoscopic working channel with a diameter of 4.1 mm. An anterior retropharyngeal approach was used. The anatomical structures of the anterior craniocervical junction were dissected and the bulbomedullary junction was decompressed.

Results

The planned steps of the operation were performed in all cadavers. The retropharyngeal approach allowed the target region to be accessed easily. The anatomical structures of the anterior craniocervical junction could be identified and dissected. The bulbomedullary junction could be adequately decompressed. No resections of the anterior arch of the atlas were necessary in the odontoidectomy.

Conclusions

Using the full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an anterior retropharyngeal approach, the craniocervical region can be adequately reached, dissected, and decompressed. This is a minimally invasive technique with the known advantages of an endoscopic procedure under continuous irrigation. The retropharyngeal approach allows direct, sterile access. The instruments are available for clinical use and have been established for years in other operations of the entire spine.

Full-endoscopic uniportal retropharyngeal odontoidectomy for anterior craniocervical infection

BACKGROUND

Infections of the anterior craniocervical junction may require surgery. There are various techniques with individual advantages and disadvantages. This study evaluates the full-endoscopic uniportal technique via the anterior retropharyngeal approach for odontoidectomy, decompression, and debridement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three patients with an infection of the anterior craniocervical junction with retrodental involvement were operated on between 2014 and 2016 using the full-endoscopic uniportal technique. Posterior stabilization was also performed with the same procedure for all patients.

RESULTS

The operation was technically satisfactory in all cases. No problems due to swelling of the pharyngeal soft tissue occurred. No other complications were observed. All patients had a satisfactory outcome with stable regression of the myelopathy symptoms and/or complete healing of the infection. The follow-up images showed sufficient decompression of bone and soft tissues in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an anterior retropharyngeal approach can be an adequate and minimally invasive surgical technique for odontoidectomy, decompression, and debridement in infections of the craniocervical junction and can reduce access-related problems. The transoral, transnasal, and retropharyngeal approaches have different surgical fields due to the access trajectories, which must be taken into consideration depending on the anatomy and pathology when selecting a suitable technique.

Full-endoscopic Uniportal Odontoidectomy and Decompression of the Anterior Cervicomedullary Junction Using the Retropharyngeal Approach

STUDY DESIGN

A study of a series of consecutive full-endoscopic uniportal decompressions of the anterior craniocervical junction with retropharyngeal approach.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct anterior decompression of the craniocervical junction in patients with bulbomedullary compression using a full-endoscopic uniportal technique via an anterolateral retropharyngeal approach.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Acute or progressive myelopathy may necessitate direct anterior decompression of the craniocervical junction and odontoidectomy. Different techniques with individual advantages and disadvantages can be used. In addition to the gold standard - the transoral approach - there is increasing experience with the endoscopic transnasal technique. Other alternative procedures are also being developed.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, eight patients with basilar impression, retrodental pannus, or retrodental infection were operated in the full-endoscopic uniportal technique with a retropharyngeal approach. Anterior decompression of the bulbomedullary junction with odontoidectomy was performed. All patients additionally underwent posterior stabilization. Imaging and clinical data were collected in follow-up examinations for 1 year.

RESULTS

The bulbomedullary junction was adequately decompressed. No problems due to swelling of pharyngeal soft tissue occurred. One patient required revision due to secondary bleeding. No other complications were observed. All patients had a good clinical outcome with stable regression of the myelopathy symptoms and/or healing of the infection. The imaging follow-up showed sufficient decompression of bone and soft tissue in all cases. No evidence was found of increasing instability or failure of posterior fusion.

CONCLUSION

In the operated patients, the full-endoscopic uniportal surgical technique with anterior retropharyngeal approach was found to be a sufficient and minimally invasive method with the known advantages of an endoscopic procedure under continuous irrigation. It should not be viewed only as competition for other surgical techniques - due to its individual technical parameters, it can also be considered to be an alternative or complementary procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Walk the Line. The Surgical Highways to the Craniovertebral Junction in Endoscopic Approaches: A Historical Perspective

BACKGROUND

We compiled a comprehensive literature review on the anatomic and clinical results of endoscopic approaches to the craniocervical junction (CVJ) to better contribute to identify the best strategy.

METHODS

An updated literature review was performed in the PubMed, OVID, and Google Scholar medical databases, using the terms "Craniovertebral junction," "Transoral approach," "Transnasal approach," "Transcervical approach," "Endoscopic endonasal approach," "Endoscopic transoral approach," "Endoscopic transcervical approach." Clinical series, anatomic studies, and comparative studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Pure endonasal and cervical endoscopic approaches still have some disadvantages, including the learning curve and the deeper surgical field. Endoscopically assisted transoral surgery with 30° endoscopes represents an emerging option to standard microsurgical techniques for transoral approaches to the anterior CVJ. This approach should be considered as complementary rather than an alternative to the traditional microsurgical transoral-transpharyngeal approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The transoral approach with sparing of the soft palate still remains the gold standard compared with the pure transnasal and transcervical approaches because of the wider working channel provided by the former technique. The transnasal endoscopic approach alone appears to be superior when the CVJ lesion exceeds the upper limit of the inferior third of the clivus.

The endoscopic endonasal approach to cranio-cervical junction: the complete panel

We aim to establish a complete summary on the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) to Cranio Cervical Junction (CCJ): evolution since first description, criteria to predict the feasibility and limitations, anatomical landmarks, indications and biomechanical evaluation after performing the approach. A comprehensive literature search to identify all available literature published between March 2002 and June 2015, the articles were divided into four categories according to their main purpose: 1- surgical technique, 2- anatomical landmarks and limitations, 3- literature reviews to identify main indications, 4- biomechanical studies. Thereafter, we demonstrate the approach step-by-step, using 1 fresh and 3 silicon injected embalmed cadaveric specimen heads. 61 articles and one poster were identified. The approach was first described on cadaveric study in 2002, and firstly used to perform odontoidectomy in 2005. The main indication is odontoid rheumatoid pannus and basilar invagination. The nasopalatine line (NPL), the superior nostril-hard palate Line (SN-HP), the naso-axial line (NAxL), the rhinopalatine Line (RPL) and other methods were described to predict the anatomical feasibility of the approach. The craniocervical fusion is potentially unnecessary after removal of < 75% of one occipital condyle. A recent cadaveric study stated the possibility of C1-C2 fusion via EEA. This paper reviews all available clinical and anatomical studies on the EEA to CCJ. The approach marked a significant evolution since its first description in 2002. Because of its lesser complications compared to the transoral approach, the EEA became when feasible, the approach of choice to the ventral CCJ.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniovertebral Junction Pathologic Conditions: Myth and Truth in Clinical Series and Personal Experience

OBJECTIVE

For many years, the microsurgical transoral approach has been accepted as the gold standard for anterior decompressions of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). The introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has gained wide recognition and overwhelming support in recent years, including for diseases of the CVJ. The aim of this study was to critically analyze and discuss all cases of CVJ diseases approached by means of an EEA so far reported in the literature, including our institutional experience consisting of 6 consecutive patients.

METHODS

Six consecutive patients affected by CVJ disease underwent an EEA. Three patients had a tumor (2 chordomas and 1 myeloma) and 3 had impressio basilaris.

RESULTS

Five patients had an uncomplicated postoperative course and 1 developed an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and subsequent meningitis and died 5 weeks after surgery. A total of 107 patients (including our 6) affected by CVJ disease and treated with EEA have been reported so far. Among these patients, cerebrospinal fluid leak was reported in 13 (12.4%), transient velopharyngeal incompetence in 6 (5.6%), postoperative epistaxis in 2 (1.86%), and respiratory dysfunction requiring a tracheostomy in 2 (1.86%). In our extended institutional series of more than 20 consecutive anterior decompressions for CVJ diseases (including transoral and transnasal microsurgical approaches), the only fatal complication was associated with EEA.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the reviewed literature and our personal experience, the reported increased safety of the EEA needs to be reassessed and discussed.

Image-guided transoral approach in severe craniovertebral junction malformations at the golden age of endoscopy: Regarding 2 cases

INTRODUCTION

The image-guided transoral approach (IGTOA) provides a safe exposure to skull base midline lesions and the ventral aspect of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). The IGTOA has several advantages: the head being placed in the extended position, it decreases the brainstem angulation during surgery; the approach being done through the avascular median pharyngeal raphe, not only lowers the bleeding risk but also provides a direct access to the bony pathology and granulation tissue accessible only via the ventral route. Wide field exposure and maneuverability are necessary to deal with the entire ventral brainstem compression in case of severe CVJ malformation to safely perform partial clivectomy and odontoidectomy.

PRESENTATION OF TWO CASES

We illustrate the cases of two patients, 52-year-old and 42-year-old males, who presented with an impressive craniovertebral junction malformation, confirmed on CT and MRI images. They first underwent surgery by IGTOA, later completed by occipitocervical fixation. For the two patients, outcomes were assessed respectively at 4 and 5 years and showed satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically.

CONCLUSION

In patients with marked ventral compression, the IGTOA provides direct and guided access to the anterior aspect of the CVJ and effective means for odontoidectomy and clivectomy. This approach is more easily maneuverable compared to the endonasal endoscopic approach. The IGTOA approach is quite a complex technique, requiring multidisciplinary skills, but it should primarily be used in difficult situations. We suggest that endonasal endoscopy is over-utilized. We consider that endoscopy should not be routinely performed and kept only for well-selected cases.

Endoscopic Transnasal Odontoidectomy

Transoral microscopic odontoidectomy followed by posterior fixation has been accepted as a standard procedure to treat nonreducible basilar invagination during the half past century. In recent years, the development of endoscopic techniques has raised challenges regarding the traditional treatment algorithm. The endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy is a feasible and effective method in the treatment of irreducible ventral cervicomedullary junction compression, which has several advantages over the transoral approach. The endoscopic odontoidectomy includes transnasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. The 3 different approaches for endoscopic odontoidectomy present complementary advantages and limitations. The necessity of posterior fixation after odontoidectomy should be considered in every single case on the basis of the peculiar anatomic and clinical conditions.

Selection of surgical procedures for basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Basilar invagination (BI) is a malformation of craniovertebral junction. However, surgical procedures on BI with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) remain controversial.

PURPOSE

This research aimed to investigate the selection of surgical procedures and its significance in the surgical treatment of patients with BI and AAD.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study enrolled 33 patients who were diagnosed with BI and AAD and were followed up for at least 6 months.

OUTCOME MEASURE

All of the patients were assessed for neurologic recovery observation in terms of Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and Odom criteria. X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography scanning was used to determine reduction, compression, bone graft, and internal fixation before and after operation.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients who suffered from BI with AAD were treated in our department from July 2000 to October 2014. Preoperatively, the patients were divided into two types on the basis of whether dislocation was reduced after anesthesia and traction were performed: reducible dislocation (Type A) and irreducible dislocation (Type B). Reducible dislocation was further divided into two subtypes: full reducible dislocation (Type A1) and partial reducible dislocation (Type A2). Type A1 patients were treated with direct posterior fixation and fusion after traction and reduction. Type A2 patients received posterior atlantoaxial release, fixation, and fusion under traction. Type B patients underwent transoral atlantoaxial release, posterior fixation, and fusion.

RESULTS

There were 5 Type A1 patients, 10 Type A2 patients, and 18 Type B patients treated in accordance with the proposed scheme. Postoperatively, sufficient reduction and decompression were achieved for all cases. Two Type B patients died. Other patients were followed up from 6 months to 42 months (average=16.6 months); follow-up results showed sufficient decompression, effective fixation and fusion, and no reduction loss. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score increased from preoperative 4-12 (average, 7.8) to postoperative 10-17 (average, 14.3), and neurologic recovery was satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

Under traction, simple posterior fixation and fusion were effective for Type A patients suffering from BI with AAD; anterior atlantoaxial release and posterior fixation and fusion were effective for Type B patients with BI and AAD.

Endoscopic Approaches to the Craniovertebral Junction

The endoscopic endonasal approach provides a direct surgical trajectory to anteriorly located lesions at the craniovertebral junction. The inferior limit of surgical exposure is predicted by the nasopalatine line, and the lateral limit is demarcated by the lower cranial nerves. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy allows preservation of the soft palate, and patients can restart an oral diet on the first postoperative day. Treating the condition at the craniovertebral junction using this approach requires careful preoperative planning and endoscopic endonasal surgical experience with a 2-surgeon 4-handed approach combining expertise in otolaryngology and neurosurgery.

The endoscopic transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomical study with a clinical example

OBJECTIVE

The microscopic transoral, endoscopic transnasal, and endoscopic transoral approaches are used alone and in combination for a variety of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) pathologies. The endoscopic transoral approach provides a more direct exposure that is not restricted by the nasal cavity, pterygoid plates, and palate while sparing the potential morbidities associated with extensive soft-tissue dissection, palatal splitting, or mandibulotomy. Concerns regarding the extent of visualization afforded by the endoscopic transoral approach may be limiting its widespread adoption.

METHODS

A dissection of 10 cadaver heads was undertaken. CT-based imaging guidance was used to measure the working corridor of the endoscopic transoral approach. Measurements were made relative to the palatal line. The built-in linear measurement tool was used to measure the superior and inferior extents of view. The superolateral extent was measured relative to the midline, as defined by the nasal process of the maxilla. The height of the clivus, odontoid tip, and superior aspect of the C-1 arch were also measured relative to the palatal line. A correlated clinical case is presented with video.

RESULTS

The CVJ was accessible in all cases. The superior extent of the approach was a mean 19.08 mm above the palatal line (range 11.1–27.7 mm). The superolateral extent relative to the midline was 15.45 mm on the right side (range 9.6–23.7 mm) and 16.70 mm on the left side (range 8.1–26.7 mm). The inferior extent was a mean 34.58 mm below the palatal line (range 22.2–41.6 mm). The mean distances were as follows: palatal line relative to the odontoid tip, 0.97 mm (range −4.9 to 3.7 mm); palatal line relative to the height of the clivus, 4.88 mm (range −1.5 to 7.3 mm); and palatal line relative to the C-1 arch, −2.75 mm (range −5.8 to 0 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic transoral approach can reliably access the CVJ. This approach avoids the dissections and morbidities associated with a palate-splitting technique (velopharyngeal insufficiency) and the expanded endonasal approach (mucus crusting, sinusitis, and potential lacerum or cavernous-paraclival internal carotid artery injury). For appropriately selected lesions near the palatal line, the endoscopic transoral approach appears to be the preferred approach.

Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniovertebral junction pathology: a review of the literature

OBJECT

The transoral approach is the gold standard for ventral decompression of the brainstem caused by craniovertebral junction (CVJ) pathology. This approach is often associated with significant morbidity, related to swallowing and respiratory complications. The endoscopic endonasal approach was introduced to reduce the rate of these complications. However, the exact role of this approach in the treatment of CVJ pathology is not well defined.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify series of patients with pathology of the CVJ treated via the endoscopie endonasal approach. Data on patient characteristics, indications for treatment, complications, and outcome were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 72 patients were included. The most common indications for treatment were rheumatoid pannus (38.9%) and basilar invagination (29.2%). Cerebrospinal fluid leak was found in 18% of cases intraoperatively and 4.2% of cases postoperatively. One case of meningitis complicated by sepsis and death represents the procedure-related mortality of 1.4%. Of the patients without preoperative swallowing impairment, 95% returned to oral feeding on the 3rd postoperative day. Ninety-three percent of patients experienced improvement in neurological symptoms after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The endonasal endoscopie approach is effective for the treatment of neural compression caused by CVJ pathology. It offers advantages such as lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and respiratory complications when compared with the more traditional transoral approach. However, these 2 approaches should be seen as complementary rather than alternatives. Patient-related factors as well as the surgeon's expertise must be considered when making treatment decisions.

Endoscopic endonasal transclival transodontoid approach for ventral decompression of the craniovertebral junction: operative technique and nuances

The transoral approach is considered the gold-standard surgical route for performing anterior odontoidectomy and ventral decompression of the craniovertebral junction for pathological conditions that result in symptomatic cervicomedullary compression, including basilar invagination, rheumatoid pannus, platybasia with retroflexed odontoid processes, and neoplasms. Extended modifications to increase the operative corridor and exposure include the transmaxillary, extended "open-door" maxillotomy, transpalatal, and transmandibular approaches. With the advent of extended endoscopic endonasal skull base techniques, there has been increased interest in the last decade in the endoscopic endonasal transclival transodontoid approach to the craniovertebral junction. The endonasal route represents an attractive minimally invasive surgical alternative, especially in cases of irreducible basilar invagination in which the pathology is situated well above the palatine line. Angled endoscopes and instrumentation can also be used for lower-lying pathology. By avoiding the oral cavity and subsequently using a transoral retractor, the endonasal route has the advantages of avoiding complications related to tongue swelling, tracheal swelling, prolonged intubation, velopharyngeal insufficiency, dysphagia, and dysphonia. Postoperative recovery is quicker, and hospital stays are shorter. In this report, the authors describe and illustrate their method of purely endoscopic endonasal transclival odonotoidectomy for anterior decompression of the craniovertebral junction and describe various operative pearls and nuances of the technique for avoiding complications.

Combined endoscopic transnasal and transoral approach for extensive upper cervical osteoradionecrosis

PURPOSE

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a rare yet well-recognized complication following radiotherapy to the head and neck. We illustrate the only case of a spontaneous extrusion of the sequestered C1 arch through the oral cavity and discuss our experience with a combined endoscopic transnasal and transoral approach for cervical ORN.

METHODS

A 56-year-old female presented with a 3-month history of blood-stained nasal discharge. She had been treated with radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma 25 years earlier. Flexible nasal endoscopy demonstrated an exposed bone with an edematous posterior nasopharyngeal mass. Computed tomography showed a pre-vertebral mass with destruction of C1 and C2. She underwent occipito-cervical fusion followed by a combined transnasal and transoral endoscopic debridement of non-viable bone in the same perioperative setting. Healing of the raw mucosa was by secondary intention and reconstruction was not performed.

RESULTS

Histopathological examination reported ulcerated inflamed granulation tissue with no evidence of malignancy. During follow-up, she remained neurologically intact with no recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Using both nasal and oral spaces allows placement of the endoscope in the nasal cavity and surgical instruments in the oral cavity without splitting the palate. Hence, the endoscopic transnasal and transoral approach has vast potential to be effective in carefully selected cases of cervical ORN.

The odontoid process invagination in normal subjects, Chiari malformation and Basilar invagination patients: Pathophysiologic correlations with angular craniometry

Background:

Craniometric studies have shown that both Chiari malformation (CM) and basilar invagination (BI) belong to a spectrum of malformations. A more precise method to differentiate between these types of CVJM is desirable. The Chamberlain's line violation (CLV) is the most common method to identify BI. The authors sought to clarify the real importance of CLV in the spectrum of craniovertebral junction malformations (CVJM) and to identify possible pathophysiological relationships.

Methods:

We evaluated the CLV in a sample of CVJM, BI, CM patients and a control group of normal subjects and correlated their data with craniocervical angular craniometry.

Results:

A total of 97 subjects were studied: 32 normal subjects, 41 CM patients, 9 basilar invagination type 1 (BI1) patients, and 15 basilar invagination type 2 (BI2) patients. The mean CLV violation in the groups were: The control group, 0.16 ± 0.45 cm; the CM group, 0.32 ± 0.48 cm; the BI1 group, 1.35 ± 0.5 cm; and the BI2 group, 1.98 ± 0.18 cm. There was strong correlation between CLV and Boogard's angle (R = 0.82, P = 0.000) and the clivus canal angle (R = 0.7, P = 0.000).

Conclusions:

CM's CLV is discrete and similar to the normal subjects. BI1 and BI2 presented with at least of 0.95 cm CLV and these violations were strongly correlated with a primary cranial angulation (clivus horizontalization) and an acute clivus canal angle (a secondary craniocervical angle).

Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Craniovertebral Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background We reviewed the current literature pertaining to extended endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Methods A systematic literature review was utilized to identify published surgical cases of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Full-text manuscripts were examined for various measures of surgical indications, patient characteristics, operative technique, and surgical outcomes. Results We identified 71 cases involving endoscopic endonasal approaches for surgical management of a variety of pathologies located within the craniovertebral junction. Patient ages ranged from 3 to 87 years, with 40 females and 31 males. Five patients required tracheostomy, two were reintubated, and all others experienced an average intubation duration of 0.54 days following surgery. Fifty-eight patients (81.7%) underwent an additional posterior decompression or fusion either before or after the endonasal procedure. A complete resection of the pathologic lesion was reported in 57 cases (83.8%), another five were successful biopsies, and four resulted in partial resection. The follow-up time ranged from 0.5 to 57 months. Conclusion Although the transoral approach has been the standard for anterior surgical management for the past several decades, our systematic review illustrates that the extended endoscopic endonasal approach is a safe and effective alternative for most pathologies affecting the craniovertebral junction.

Transnasal odontoid resection: is there an anatomic explanation for differing swallowing outcomes?

OBJECT

Swallowing dysfunction is common following transoral (TO) odontoidectomy. Preliminary experience with newer endoscopic transnasal (TN) approaches suggests that dysphagia may be reduced with this alternative. However, the reasons for this are unclear. The authors hypothesized that the TN approach results in less disruption of the pharyngeal plexus and anatomical structures associated with swallowing. The authors investigate the histological and gross surgical anatomical relationship between pharyngeal plexus innervation of the upper aerodigestive tract and the surgical approaches used (TN and TO). They also review the TN literature to evaluate swallowing outcomes following this approach.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric specimens were used for histological (n = 3) and gross anatomical (n = 4) examination of the pharyngeal plexus with the TO and TN surgical approaches. Particular attention was given to identifying the location of cranial nerves (CNs) IX and X and the sympathetic chain and their contributions to the pharyngeal plexus. S100 staining was performed to assess for the presence of neural tissue in proximity to the midline, and fiber density counts were performed within 1 cm of midline. The relationship between the pharyngeal plexus, clivus, and upper cervical spine (C1-3) was defined.

RESULTS

Histological analysis revealed the presence of pharyngeal plexus fibers in the midline and a significant reduction in paramedian fiber density from C-2 to the lower clivus (p < 0.001). None of these paramedian fibers, however, could be visualized with gross inspection or layer-by-layer dissection. Laterally based primary pharyngeal plexus nerves were identified by tracing their origins from CNs IX and X and the sympathetic chain at the skull base and following them to the pharyngeal musculature. In addition, the authors found 15 studies presenting 52 patients undergoing TN odontoidectomy. Of these patients, only 48 had been swallowing preoperatively. When looking only at this population, 83% (40 of 48) were swallowing by Day 3 and 92% (44 of 48) were swallowing by Day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the midline approach, both TO and TN approaches may injure a portion of the pharyngeal plexus. By limiting the TN incision to above the palatal plane, the surgeon avoids the high-density neural plexus found in the oropharyngeal wall and limits injury to oropharyngeal musculature involved in swallowing. This may explain the decreased incidence of postoperative dysphagia seen in TN approaches. However, further clinical investigation is warranted.

Purely endoscopic endonasal surgery of the craniovertebral junction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is a relatively novel approach to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). The purpose of this analysis is to determine the surgical outcomes of patients who undergo purely EES of the CVJ.

METHODS

A search for articles related to EES of the CVJ was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. A bibliographic search was done for additional articles. Demographics, presenting symptoms, imaging findings, complications, follow-up, and patient outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients from 30 articles were included. The mean patient age was 47.9 ± 24.8 years (range, 3 to 96 years), with 44.7% being male. The most common presenting symptom was myelopathy (n = 64, 75.3%). The most common indications for surgery were brainstem compression secondary to basilar invagination (n = 41, 48.2%) and odontoid pannus (n = 20, 23.5%). Odontoidectomy was performed in 97.6% of cases. Intraoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (18.8%) and postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (21.2%). Six patients developed postoperative respiratory failure necessitating a tracheostomy. Neurologic improvement was seen in 89.4% of patients at a mean follow-up of 22.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis found that EES of the CVJ results in a high rate of neurologic improvement with acceptable complication rates. Given its minimally invasive nature and high success rate, this approach appears to be a reasonable alternative to the traditional transoral approach in select cases. This study represents the largest pooled sample size of EES of the CVJ to date. Increasing use of the endoscopic endonasal approach will allow for further studies with greater statistical power.

Basilar Invagination: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Basilar invagination is a rare clinical condition characterized by upward protrusion of the odontoid process into the intracranial space, leading to bulbomedullary compression. It is often encountered in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Transoral microscopic or endonasal endoscopic decompression may be pursued, with or without posterior fixation. We present a case of basilar invagination with C1-C2 autofusion and discuss an algorithm for choice of anterior versus posterior approaches.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 47-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis presented with severe occipital and cervical pain, dysphagia, hoarseness, and arm paresthesias. Findings on magnetic resonance imaging revealed moderate cranial settling with the odontoid indenting the ventral medulla but no posterior compression. Computed tomography demonstrated bony fusion at C1-C2 without lateral sag. Given autofusion of C1-C2 in proper occipitocervical alignment and the absence of posterior compression, the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy without further posterior fusion, with satisfactory resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy offers a safe and effective method for anterior decompression of basilar invagination. Preoperative assessment for existing posterior fusion, absence of posterior compression, and preservation of the anterior C1 ring during operative decompression help stratify the need for lone anterior approach versus a combined anterior and posterior treatment.

Endoscopic endonasal atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique: an anatomical feasibility and biomechanical study

OBJECT The primary disadvantage of the posterior cervical approach for atlantoaxial stabilization after odontoidectomy is that it is conducted as a second-stage procedure. The goal of the current study is to assess the surgical feasibility and biomechanical performance of an endoscopic endonasal surgical technique for C1-2 fixation that may eliminate the need for posterior fixation after odontoidectomy. METHODS The first step of the study was to perform endoscopic endonasal anatomical dissections of the craniovertebral junction in 10 silicone-injected fixed cadaveric heads to identify relevant anatomical landmarks. The second step was to perform a quantitative analysis using customized software in 10 reconstructed adult cervical spine CT scans to identify the optimal screw entry point and trajectory. The third step was biomechanical flexibility testing of the construct and comparison with the posterior C1-2 transarticular fixation in 14 human cadaveric specimens. RESULTS Adequate surgical exposure and identification of the key anatomical landmarks, such as C1-2 lateral masses, the C-1 anterior arch, and the odontoid process, were provided by the endonasal endoscopic approach in all specimens. Radiological analysis of anatomical detail suggested that the optimal screw entry point was on the anterior aspect of the C-1 lateral mass near the midpoint, and the screw trajectory was inferiorly and slightly laterally directed. The custommade angled instrumentation was crucial for screw placement. Biomechanical analysis suggested that anterior C1-2 fixation compared favorably to posterior fixation by limiting flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending (p > 0.3). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of an endoscopic endonasal technique for C1-2 fusion. This novel technique may have clinical utility by eliminating the need for a second-stage posterior fixation operation in certain patients undergoing odontoidectomy.

Endoscopic Transnasal Approach for Urgent Decompression of the Craniocervical Junction in Acute Skull Base Osteomyelitis

Ventral epidural abscess with osteomyelitis at the craniocervical junction is a rare occurrence that typically mandates spinal cord decompression via a transoral approach. However, given the potential for morbidity with transoral surgery, especially in the setting of immunosuppression, together with the advent of extended endonasal techniques, the transnasal approach could be attractive for selected patients. We present two cases of ventral epidural abscess and osteomyelitis at the craniocervical junction involving C1/C2 that were successfully treated via the endoscopic transnasal approach. Both were treated in staged procedures involving posterior cervical fusion followed by endoscopic transnasal resection of the ventral C1 arch and odontoid process for decompression of the ventral spinal cord and medulla. Dural repairs were successfully performed using multilayered, onlay techniques where required. Both patients tolerated surgery exceedingly well, had brief postoperative hospital stays, and recovered uneventfully to their neurologic baselines. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirmed complete decompression of the foramen magnum and upper C-spine. These cases illustrate the advantages and low morbidity of the endonasal endoscopic approach to the craniocervical junction in the setting of frank skull base infection and immunosuppression, representing to our knowledge a unique application of this technique to osteomyelitis and epidural abscess at the craniocervical junction.

Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy without resection of nasal turbinates: clinical outcomes of 13 patients

Object The goal of the study was to report a series of consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy (ETO) without resection of nasal turbinates. The techniques for this minimally invasive approach are described in detail. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent ETO for basilar invagination. All the patients had myelopathy caused by compression at the cervicomedullary junction, which required surgical decompression. Preoperative and postoperative data, including those from radiographic and clinical evaluations, were compared. Morbidity and mortality rates for the procedure are also reported in detail. Results Thirteen patients (6 men and 7 women) with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 24-72 years) were enrolled. The basilar invagination etiologies were rheumatoid arthritis (n = 5), trauma (n = 4), os odontoideum (n = 2), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 1), and postinfectious deformity (n = 1). The average follow-up duration was 51.2 months (range 0.3-105 months). One patient died 10 days after the operation as a result of meningitis caused by CSF leakage. Among the other 12 patients, the average postoperative Nurick grade (3.2) was significantly improved over that before the operation (4.1, p = 0.004). The mean (± SD) duration of postoperative intubation was 1.5 ± 2.1 days, and there was no need for perioperative tracheostomy or nasogastric tube feeding. There also was no postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. There were 6 (46%) intraoperative and 2 (15%) postoperative CSF leaks in the 13 patients in this series. Conclusions ETO is a viable and effective option for decompression at the ventral cervicomedullary junction. This approach is minimally invasive and causes little velopharyngeal insufficiency. The pitfall of this approach is the difficulty in repairing dural defects and subsequent CSF leakage.

Experience with intraoperative navigation and imaging during endoscopic transnasal spinal approaches to the foramen magnum and odontoid

Object

In this study the authors share their experience using intraoperative spinal navigation and imaging for endoscopic transnasal approaches to the odontoid in 5 patients undergoing C1–2 surgery for basilar invagination at Stanford Hospital and Clinics from 2010 to 2013.

Methods

Of these 5 patients undergoing C1–2 surgery for basilar invagination, 4 underwent a 2-tiered anterior C1–2 resection with posterior occipitocervical fusion during a first stage surgery, followed by endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy in a separate setting. Intraoperative stereotactic navigation was performed using a surgical navigation system in all cases. Navigation accuracy, characterized as target registration error, ranged between 0.8 mm and 2 mm, with an average of 1.2 mm. Intraoperative imaging using a CT scanner was also performed in 2 patients.

Results

Endoscopic decompression of the brainstem was achieved in all patients, and no intraoperative complications were encountered. All patients were extubated within 24 hours after surgery and were able to swallow within 48 hours. After appropriate initial reconstruction of the defect at the craniocervical junction, no postoperative CSF leakage, arterial injury, or need for reoperation was encountered; 1 patient developed mild postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency that resolved by the 6-month follow-up evaluation. There were no deaths and no patients required tracheostomy placement. The average inpatient stay after surgery varied between 72 and 96 hours, without extended intensive care unit stays for any patient.

Conclusions

Technologies such as intraoperative CT scanning and merged MRI/CT can provide the surgeon with detailed, virtual real-time information about the extent of complex endoscopic vertebral segment resection and brainstem decompression and lessens the prospect of revision or secondary procedures in this challenging surgical corridor. Moreover, patients experience limited morbidity and can tolerate early oral intake after transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy. Essential to the successful undertaking of these endoscopic adventures is 1) an understanding of the endoscopic nasal, skull base, and neurovascular anatomy; 2) advanced and extended-length instrumentation including navigation; and 3) a team approach between experienced rhinologists and spine surgeons comfortable with endoscopic skull base techniques

Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy combined with posterior reduction to treat basilar invagination: technical note

OBJECT

Transoral microscopic odontoidectomy has been accepted as a standard procedure to treat basilar invagination over the past several decades. In recent years the emergence of new technologies, including endoscopic odontoidectomy and posterior reduction, has presented a challenge to the traditional treatment algorithm. In this article, the authors describe 1 patient with basilar invagination who was successfully treated with endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy combined with posterior reduction. The purpose of this report is to validate the effectiveness of this treatment algorithm in selected cases and describe several operative nuances and pearls based on the authors' experience.

METHODS

One patient with basilar invagination caused by a congenital osseous malformation underwent endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy combined with posterior reduction in a single operative setting. The purely endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy was first conducted with the patient supine. The favorable anatomical reduction was then achieved through a posterior approach after the patient was moved prone.

RESULTS

The patient was extubated after recovery from anesthesia and allowed oral food intake the next day. No complications were noted, and the patient was discharged 4 days after the operation. Postoperative imaging demonstrated excellent decompression of the anterior cervicomedullary junction pathology. The patient was followed up for 12 months and remarkable neurological recovery was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy is a better minimally invasive approach for anterior decompression and can make the posterior reduction easier because the anterior resistant force is eliminated. The subsequent posterior reduction can make decompression of the ventral side of the cervicomedullary junction more effective because the C-2 vertebral body is pushed forward. A combination of these 2 approaches has the advantages of minimally invasive access and a faster patient recovery, and thus is a valid alternative in selected cases.