The correlation between cervical range of motion and misplacement of cervical pedicle screws during cervical posterior spinal fixation surgery using a CT-based navigation system

Impact of osteosclerosis on cervical pedicle screw insertion using preoperative CT-based navigation

PURPOSE

Preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based navigation is used for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion to mitigate the risk of spinal cord and vertebral artery injury. In vertebrae with osteosclerosis due to degeneration or other factors, however, probing may not proceed easily, with difficulty creating the CPS insertion hole. This study investigated the impact of osteosclerosis on the accuracy of CPS insertion.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients with CPS inserted at the C3-C7 level using preoperative CT navigation were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative CT was employed to investigate screw position and Hounsfield unit (HU) values at the lateral mass to evaluate the degree of osteosclerosis in the CPS insertion pathway.

RESULTS

Among 561 CPS insertions, the Grade 3 perforation rate was 1.8%, and the Grade 2 or higher perforation rate was 8.0%. When comparing insertions with and without CPS perforation, HU values were significantly higher in the perforation group (578 ± 191 vs. 318 ± 191, p < 0.01). The frequency of CPS insertion into the mid-cervical spine was also significantly greater in the perforation group (68.9% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a high HU value at the lateral mass (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.11, p < 0.01) was a significant independent factor associated with CPS deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

The screw perforation rate of Grade 2 or higher in CPS insertion using preoperative CT-based navigation was 8.0%. Since osteosclerosis was an independent factor related to CPS deviation, additional care may be required during insertion into affected vertebrae.

Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of placement for cervical pedicle screws with and without the use of spinal navigation.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted in electronic databases without any language or date restrictions. Eligible studies reported the proportion of accurately placed cervical pedicle screws measured on intraoperative or postoperative 3D imaging, and reported whether intraoperative navigation was used during screw placement. Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of how accuracy was assessed for cervical pedicle screws.

RESULTS

After screening and critical appraisal, 4697 cervical pedicle screws from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws with a breach up to 2 mm was 94% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (96%). The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws placed completely in the pedicle was 76% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (82%). Intraoperative screw reposition rates and screw revision rates as a result of postoperative imaging also did not differ between navigated and non-navigated screw placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of spinal navigation systems does not significantly improve the accuracy of placement of cervical pedicle screws compared to screws placed without navigation. Future studies evaluating intraoperative navigation for cervical pedicle screw placement should focus on the learning curve, postoperative complications, and the complexity of surgical cases.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Accuracy of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Direct Visualization Versus Computed Tomography-Based Navigation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of operative data from cadaveric cervical spines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation compared with laminotomy with direct visualization (DV) of the pedicle for placement of subaxial pedicle screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Subaxial pedicle screws provide superior fixation compared with other posterior cervical fixation strategies. However, high accuracy is required for safe placement, given the proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation has increased in popularity for placement of spinal implants, including subaxial pedicle screws. However, the accuracy of the technique for this application has not been extensively evaluated.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaveric spines (occiput to T2) were prepared. Pedicle screws were placed from C3 to C7 on either side using either the DV or neuronavigation technique (alternating sides between specimens). Pedicles with diameters <4 mm were excluded. For the DV technique, a hemilaminotomy was performed for DV of pedicle borders and to determine appropriate screw medialization and trajectory. Neuronavigation screws were placed using CT-based navigation with a reference frame mounted on the C2 spinous process. Screw position was evaluated using postoperative CT, and breaches were classified using the Neo classification.

RESULTS

Fifty pedicle screws were placed at 25 levels in 6 cadaveric spines; 25 screws each were placed using neuronavigation or DV. No significant difference in accuracy was found between the 2 techniques. Three (12%) breaches occurred in the DV group, and 9 (36%) breaches occurred in the neuronavigation group (P=0.10). The breaches were evenly distributed across all levels. There were no high-grade breaches with DV and only 1 (4.0%) with neuronavigation (P>0.99). Average pedicle cortical and medullary bone widths were higher for levels with no breach (P=0.009 and P=0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High accuracy can be achieved with both neuronavigation and DV for placement of subaxial cervical pedicle screws in cadavers.

Free-Hand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement by Using Para-articular Minilaminotomy: Its Feasibility and Novice Neurosurgeons' Experience

STUDY DESIGN.

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is technically demanding because of the great variation in pedicle size, dimension, and angulations between cervical levels and patients and the lack of anatomical landmarks. This retrospective study was conducted to analyze novice neurosurgeons' experience of CPS placement by using the technique with direct exposure of pedicle via para-articular minilaminotomy.

METHODS.

We retrospectively reviewed 78 CPSs in 22 consecutive patients performed by 2 surgeons. All pedicle screws were inserted under the direct visualization of the pedicle by using para-articular minilaminotomy without any fluoroscopic guidance. We analyzed the direction and grade of pedicle perforation on the postoperative computed tomography scan. The degree of perforation was classified as grade 0 to 3. Grades 0 and 1 were classified as the correct position and the others, as the incorrect position.

RESULTS.

In total, the correct position (grade 0 and 1) was found in 72 (92.3%) screws and the incorrect position (grade 2 and 3) in 6 (7.7%). Among the 16 pedicle perforations (grade 1, 2, and 3 perforations), the directions were lateral in 15 (93.8%) and superior in 1 (6.2%). There were no neurovascular complications related to CPS insertion.

CONCLUSION.

Free-hand CPS placement by using para-articular minilaminotomy seems to be feasible and reproducible.

Spinal Navigation for Cervical Pedicle Screws: Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We intend to evaluate the accuracy and safety of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion under O-arm-based 3-dimensional (3D) navigation guidance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent CPS insertion under intraoperative O-arm-based 3D navigation during the years 2009 to 2018. The radiological accuracy of CPS placement was evaluated using their intraoperative scans.

RESULTS

A total of 297 CPSs were inserted under navigation. According to Gertzbein classification, 229 screws (77.1%) were placed without any pedicle breach (grade 0). Of the screws that did breach the pedicle, 51 screws (17.2%) had a minor breach of less than 2 mm (grade 1), 13 screws (4.4%) had a breach of between 2 and 4 mm (grade 2), and 4 screws (1.3%) had a complete breach of 4 mm or more (grade 3). Six screws were revised intraoperatively. There was no incidence of neurovascular injury in this series of patients. 59 of the 68 breaches (86.8%) were found to perforate laterally, and the remaining 9 (13.2%) medially. It was noted that the C5 cervical level had the highest breach rate of 33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm-based 3D navigation can improve the accuracy and safety of CPS insertion. The overall breach rate in this study was 22.9%. Despite these breaches, there was no incidence of neurovascular injury or need for revision surgery for screw malposition.

Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and accuracy of the C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws placement and free-hand technique versus navigation for upper cervical fusion patients.

Methods

Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify all papers published up to April 2020 that have evaluated C2 pedicle/pars screws placement accuracy. Two authors individually screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The accuracy rates associated with C2 pedicle/pars were extracted. The pooled accuracy rate estimated was performed by the CMA software. A funnel plot based on accuracy rate estimate was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results

From 1123 potentially relevant studies, 142 full-text publications were screened. We analyzed data from 79 studies involving 4431 patients with 6026 C2 pedicle or pars screw placement. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Overall, funnel plot and Begg’s test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the accuracy rates were 93.8% for C2 pedicle screw free-hand, 93.7% for pars screw free-hand, 92.2% for navigated C2 pedicle screw, and 86.2% for navigated C2 pars screw (all, P value < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the accuracy of placement C2 pedicle versus C2 pars screws with the free-hand technique and the free-hand C2 pedicle group versus the navigated C2 pedicle group (all, P value > 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, there was no difference in the safety and accuracy between the free-hand and navigated techniques. Further well-conducted studies with detailed stratification are needed to complement our findings.

[Assessment of the safety and accuracy of implantation of screws into the C2 vertebra using individual 3D-navigation matrices]

Introduction

Individual 3D-navigation matrices are valuable to increase the safety of screw implantation into the axis.

Objective

To analyze safety and accuracy of screw deployment into the axis using individual 3D-navigation matrices compared to free hand technique.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis included 23 patients (group 1) who underwent implantation of 44 screws into the axis using the «free hand» technique. The screws were installed along the transpedicular or pars trajectory. A prospective analysis enrolled 17 patients (group 2) who underwent installation of 34 screws using individual navigation matrices. 3D-printing technology was applied for manufacturing these matrices. Implantation results were evaluated considering postoperative CT data and SGT (Screw Guide Template) system.

Results

In the 1st group («free hand»), grade 0 and 1 (no malposition or less than 50% of screw diameter) were recorded for 29 (65.91%) screws, grade 2 - for 13 (29.55%) screws, grade 3 - for 2 (4.45%) screws. Intraoperative injury of the vertebral artery without postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 4 (8.89%) patients. In the 2nd group, 97% of screws were implanted in accordance with grades 1 and 2. Deviation grade 2 was registered in 11 cases (32.35%). Mean deviation was 1.8 ± 1.0 mm. In the 2nd group, 28 (82.35%) out of 34 screws were completely within the bone structures (grade 0), 4 (11.76%) screws perforated pedicles for less than 50% of their diameter (grade 1). There were 2 cases of malposition grade 2 and 3 without vertebral artery injury.

Conclusion

Individual 3D navigation matrix is an effective method for screw installation into the axis. This approach exceeds fluoroscopy-assisted "free hand" technique in terms of safety of implantation.

Intraoperative Use of O-arm in Pediatric Cervical Spine Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans are used to evaluate screw position after pediatric cervical spine fusion. However, noncontained screws detected postoperatively can require revision surgery. Intraoperative O-arm is a 3-dimensional CT imaging technique, which allows intraoperative evaluation of screw position and potentially avoids reoperations because of implant malposition. This study's objective was to evaluate the use of intraoperative O-arm in determining the accuracy of cervical implants placed by a free-hand technique using anatomic landmarks or fluoroscopic guidance in pediatric cervical spine instrumentation.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of consecutive examinations of children treated with cervical spine instrumentation and intraoperative O-arm from 2014 to 2018 was performed. In total, 44 cases (41 children, 44% men) with a mean age of 11.9 years (range, 2.1 to 23.5 y) were identified. Instability (n=16, 36%) and deformity (n=10, 23%) were the most frequent indications. Primary outcomes were screw revision rate, neurovascular complications caused by noncontained screws, and radiation exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 272 screws were inserted (60 occipital and 212 cervical screws). All screws were evaluated on fluoroscopy as appropriately placed. Four screws (1.5%) in 4 cases (9%) were noncontained on O-arm imaging and required intraoperative revision. A mean of 7.7 levels (range, 5 to 13) were scanned. The mean CT dose index and dose-length product were 15.2±6.87 mGy and 212.3±120.48 mGy×cm. Mean effective dose was 1.57±0.818 mSv. There was no association between screw location and noncontainment (P=0.129). No vertebral artery injuries, dural injuries, or neurologic deficits were related to the 4 revised screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative non-navigated O-arm is a safe and efficient method to evaluate screw position in pediatric patients undergoing cervical spine instrumentation. Noncontained screws were detected in 9% of cases (n=4). O-arm delivers low radiation doses, allows for intraoperative screw revision, and negates the need for postoperative CT scans after confirmation of optimal implant position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Optical Topographic Imaging for Spinal Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Navigation in the Cervical Spine: Initial Preclinical and Clinical Feasibility

OF BACKGROUND DATA

Computer-assisted 3-dimensional navigation may guide spinal instrumentation. Optical topographic imaging (OTI) is a novel navigation technique offering comparable accuracy and significantly faster registration workflow relative to current navigation systems. It has previously been validated in open posterior thoracolumbar exposures.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the utility and accuracy of OTI in the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective preclinical cadaveric and clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Standard midline open posterior cervical exposures were performed, with segmental OTI registration at each vertebral level. In cadaveric testing, OTI navigation guidance was used to track a drill guide for cannulating screw tracts in the lateral mass at C1, pars at C2, lateral mass at C3-6, and pedicle at C7. In clinical testing, translaminar screws at C2 were also analyzed in addition. Planned navigation trajectories were compared with screw positions on postoperative computed tomographic imaging, and quantitative navigation accuracies, in the form of absolute translational and angular deviations, were computed.

RESULTS

In cadaveric testing (mean±SD) axial and sagittal translational navigation errors were (1.66±1.18 mm) and (2.08±2.21 mm), whereas axial and sagittal angular errors were (4.11±3.79 degrees) and (6.96±5.40 degrees), respectively.In clinical validation (mean±SD) axial and sagittal translational errors were (1.92±1.37 mm) and (1.27±0.97 mm), whereas axial and sagittal angular errors were (3.68±2.59 degrees) and (3.47±2.93 degrees), respectively. These results are comparable to those achieved with OTI in open thoracolumbar approaches, as well as using current spinal neuronavigation systems in similar applications. There was no radiographic facet, canal or foraminal violations, nor any neurovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

OTI is a novel navigation technique allowing efficient initial and repeat registration. Accuracy even in the more mobile cervical spine is comparable to current spinal neuronavigation systems.

Intraoperative Error Propagation in 3-Dimensional Spinal Navigation From Nonsegmental Registration: A Prospective Cadaveric and Clinical Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective pre-clinical and clinical cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Current spinal navigation systems rely on a dynamic reference frame (DRF) for image-to-patient registration and tool tracking. Working distant to a DRF may generate inaccuracy. Here we quantitate predictors of navigation error as a function of distance from the registered vertebral level, and from intersegmental mobility due to surgical manipulation and patient respiration.

METHODS

Navigation errors from working distant to the registered level, and from surgical manipulation, were quantified in 4 human cadavers. The 3-dimensional (3D) position of a tracked tool tip at 0 to 5 levels from the DRF, and during targeting of pedicle screw tracts, was captured in real-time by an optical navigation system. Respiration-induced vertebral motion was quantified from 10 clinical cases of open posterior instrumentation. The 3D position of a custom spinous-process clamp was tracked over 12 respiratory cycles.

RESULTS

An increase in mean 3D navigation error of ≥2 mm was observed at ≥2 levels from the DRF in the cervical and lumbar spine. Mean ± SD displacement due to surgical manipulation was 1.55 ± 1.13 mm in 3D across all levels, ≥2 mm in 17.4%, 19.2%, and 38.5% of levels in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, respectively. Mean ± SD respiration-induced 3D motion was 1.96 ± 1.32 mm, greatest in the lower thoracic spine (P < .001). Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure correlated positively with increased vertebral displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral motion is unaccounted for during image-guided surgery when performed at levels distant from the DRF. Navigating instrumentation within 2 levels of the DRF likely minimizes the risk of navigation error.

Accuracy and Safety of Lateral Vertebral Notch-Referred Technique Used in Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies revealed that pedicle screw instrumentation has a superior stabilizing effect compared with other internal fixations in reconstructing the subaxial cervical spine. However, severe neurovascular risks preclude surgeons from routinely conducting pedicle screw manipulation in cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and safety of the lateral vertebral notch (LVN)-referred technique used in subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-five consecutive retrospective patients with cervical disorders underwent the LVN-referred technique for CPS placements in 3 spine centers. Postoperative pedicle perforations were confirmed by CT scans to assess the technical accuracy. Neurovascular complications derived from CPS misplacements were recorded to evaluate the technical safety.

RESULTS

A total of 718 CPSs were inserted into subaxial cervical spine. Postoperative CT scans revealed that the accuracy of CPS placement was superior. Neither vertebral artery injury nor spinal cord injury occurred. One radiculopathy was from a unilateral C6 nerve root compression. A screw-related neurovascular injury rate of 0.7% occurred in this cohort. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of CPS placement among 3 surgeons (H = 1.460, P = .482). The relative standard deviation values revealed that technical reproducibility was acceptable. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the patients' pedicle transverse angles and inserted CPS transverse angles from C3 to C7 (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The LVN is a reliable and consistent anatomic landmark for CPS placement. The accuracy and safety of subaxial CPS placement by using LVN-referred technique are highly acceptable, which may endow this technique to be practicably performed in selected patients.

Use of 3D Navigation in Subaxial Cervical Spine Lateral Mass Screw Insertion

Objective  Cervical spine can be stabilized by different techniques. One of the common techniques used is the lateral mass screws (LMSs), which can be inserted either by freehand techniques or three-dimensional (3D) navigation system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between the 3D navigation system and the freehand technique for cervical spine LMS placement in terms of complications. Including intraoperative complications (vertebral artery injury [VAI], nerve root injury [NRI], spinal cord injury [SCI], lateral mass fracture [LMF]) and postoperative complications (screw malposition, screw complications).

Methods  Patients who had LMS fixation for their subaxial cervical spine from January 2014 to April 2015 at the Ottawa Hospital were included. A total of 284 subaxial cervical LMS were inserted in 40 consecutive patients. Surgical indications were cervical myelopathy and fractures. The screws' size was 3.5 mm in diameter and 8 to 16 mm in length. During the insertion of the subaxial cervical LMS, the 3D navigation system was used for 20 patients, and the freehand technique was used for the remaining 20 patients. We reviewed the charts, X-rays, computed tomography (CT) scans, and follow-up notes for all the patients pre- and postoperatively.

Results  Postoperative assessment showed that the incidence of VAI, SCI, and NRI were the same between the two groups. The CT scan analysis showed that the screw breakage, screw pull-outs, and screw loosening were the same between the two groups. LMF was less in the 3D navigation group but statistically insignificant. Screw malposition was less in the 3D navigation group compared with the freehand group and was statistically significant. The hospital stay, operative time, and blood loss were statistically insignificant between the two groups.

Conclusions  The use of CT-based navigation in LMS insertion decreased the rate of screw malpositions as compared with the freehand technique. Further investigations and trials will determine the effect of malpositions on the c-spine biomechanics. The use of navigation in LMS insertion did not show a significant difference in VAI, LMF, SCI, or NRI as compared with the freehand technique.

Spinal navigation for posterior instrumentation of C1-2 instability using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner

OBJECTIVE Spinal navigation techniques for surgical fixation of unstable C1-2 pathologies are challenged by complex osseous and neurovascular anatomy, instability of the pathology, and unreliable preoperative registration techniques. An intraoperative CT scanner with autoregistration of C-1 and C-2 promises sufficient accuracy of spinal navigation without the need for further registration procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior C1-2 fixation using intraoperative mobile CT scanner-guided navigation. METHODS In the period from July 2014 to February 2016, 10 consecutive patients with instability of C1-2 underwent posterior fixation using C-2 pedicle screws and C-1 lateral mass screws, and 2 patients underwent posterior fixation from C-1 to C-3. Spinal navigation was performed using intraoperative mobile CT. Following navigated screw insertion in C-1 and C-2, intraoperative CT was repeated to check for the accuracy of screw placement. In this study, the accuracy of screw positioning was retrospectively analyzed and graded by an independent observer. RESULTS The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 10 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 80.7 ± 4.95 years (range 42-90 years). Unstable pathologies, which were verified by fracture dislocation or by flexion/extension radiographs, included 8 Anderson Type II fractures, 1 unstable Anderson Type III fracture, 1 hangman fracture Levine Effendi Ia, 1 complex hangman-Anderson Type III fracture, and 1 destructive rheumatoid arthritis of C1-2. In 4 patients, critical anatomy was observed: high-riding vertebral artery (3 patients) and arthritis-induced partial osseous destruction of the C-1 lateral mass (1 patient). A total of 48 navigated screws were placed. Correct screw positioning was observed in 47 screws (97.9%). Minor pedicle breach was observed in 1 screw (2.1%). No screw displacement occurred (accuracy rate 97.9%). CONCLUSION Spinal navigation using intraoperative mobile CT scanning was reliable and safe for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies with high accuracy in this patient series.

Differences between Manufacturers of Computed Tomography-Based Computer-Assisted Surgery Systems Do Exist: A Systematic Literature Review

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement significantly improves with use of computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems. Yet, there has been no systematic review directly comparing accuracy of pedicle screw placement between different CT-based navigation systems. The objective of this study is to review the results presented in the literature and compare CT-based navigation systems relative only to screw placement accuracy.

METHODS

Data sources included CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies included were randomized clinical trials, case series, and case-control trials reporting the accuracy of pedicle screws placement using CT-based navigation. Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the selected studies that met our inclusion criteria. Publications were grouped based on the CT-based navigation system used for pedicle screw placement.

RESULTS

Of the 997 articles we screened, only 26 met all of our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis, which showed a significant statistical difference (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.23) in accuracy of pedicle screw placement between three different CT-based navigation systems. The mean (weighted) accuracy of pedicle screws placement based on the CT-based navigation system was found to be 97.20 ± 2.1% in StealthStation (Medtronic, United States) and 96.1 ± 3.9% in VectorVision (BrainLab, Germany).

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes results presented in the literature and compares screw placement accuracy using different CT-based navigation systems. Although certain factors such as the extent of the procedure and the experience and skills of the surgeon were not accounted for, the differences in accuracy demonstrated should be considered by spine surgeons and should be validated for effects on patients' outcome.

Surgical safety of cervical pedicle screw placement with computer navigation system

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) may be the biomechanically best system for posterior cervical segmental fixation, but may carry a surgery-related risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of CPS placement using computer navigation system for posterior cervical instrumented fixation and discuss its complication avoidance and management. Posterior cervical instrumented fixation using CPS was performed in a total of 128 patients during the period between 2007 and 2015. Intraoperative image guidance was achieved using a preoperative 3D CT-based or an intraoperative 3D CT-based navigation system. A total of 762 CPSs were placed in the spine level of C2 to Th3. The radiological accuracy of CPS placement was evaluated using postoperative CT. Accuracy of CPS placement using a preoperative 3D CT-based navigation system was 93.6 % (423 of 452 screws) in grade 0; the screw was completely contained in the pedicle, and accuracy of CPS placement using an intraoperative 3D CT-based navigation system was a little bit improved to 97.1 % (301 of 310 screws) in grade 0. CPS misplacement (more than half of screw) was 3.3 % (15 of 452 screws) using a preoperative 3D CT-based navigation system, and CPS misplacement (more than half of screw) was 0.6 % (2 of 310 screws) using an intraoperative 3D CT-based navigation system. In total, 38 screws (5.0 %) were found to perforate the cortex of pedicle, although any neural or vascular complications closely associated with CPS placement were not encountered. Twenty nine of 38 screws (76.3 %) were found to perforate laterally, and seven screws (18.4 %) were found to perforate medially. Image-guided CPS placement has been an important advancement to secure the safe surgery, although the use of CPS placement needs to be carefully determined based on the individual pathology.

Comparing Accuracy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement between a Guidance System and Manual Manipulation: A Cadaver Study

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement between a three-dimensional guidance system and manual manipulation.

Material/Methods

Eighteen adult cadavers were randomized into group A (n=9) and group B (n=9). Ninety pedicle screws were placed into the C3-C7 under the guidance of a three-dimensional locator in group A, and 90 screws were inserted by manual manipulation in group B. The cervical spines were scanned using computed tomography (CT). Parallel and angular offsets of the screws were compared between the two placement methods.

Results

In group A, 90% of the screws were within the pedicles and 10% breached the pedicle cortex. In group B, 55.6% were within the pedicle and 44.4% breached the pedicle cortex. Locator guidance showed significantly lower parallel and angular offsets in axial CT images (P<0.01), and significantly lower angular offset in sagittal CT images (P<0.01) than manual manipulation.

Conclusions

Locator guidance is superior to manual manipulation in accuracy of cervical screw placement. Locator guidance might provide better safety than manual manipulation in placing cervical screws.

Hybrid Technique for Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: Combination of Miniopen Surgery and Use of a Percutaneous Cannula System-Pilot Study

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaver study and clinical application; a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE

To minimize muscle dissection and enhance accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement by using a percutaneous cannula system.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have reported that the most frequent misplacement of CPSs is breach of the lateral wall; thus, an easy technique for securing medial convergence is required. We developed a percutaneous cannula system for this purpose and report the results of a cadaver study and its clinical application.

METHODS

A cadaver study was conducted to confirm the possibility of this percutaneous technique in 5 specimens (50 CPSs, C3-C7). Then, the technique was applied in 8 patients (40 CPSs, C3-C7). The surgical technique was a hybrid of miniopen surgery and the use of percutaneous cannula system under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Entry holes were made in the open field and a cannula was used for tapping and insertion of CPSs. A stiff pedicle probe through the cannula was used to locate the pedicle in the lateral mass.

RESULTS

In the cadaver study, there were 12 (24%) misplacements among 50 CPSs used. The hybrid technique was applied clinically in 4 traumatic, 2 degenerative, and 2 failed back surgery lesions. Thirty CPSs were inserted using the percutaneous cannula system and 10 were inserted using a cannula as a retractor. Misplacement occurred in 6.7% (n = 2) and 20% (n = 2) pedicles, respectively, and there were no symptomatic complications (total incidence, 10%). An additional incision for the cannula system can be made for 2-level CPS insertions.

CONCLUSION

Use of the percutaneous cannula system facilitated a secure convergence angle for CPS insertion without extending muscle dissection or shifting cervical alignment because of muscle retraction. Moreover, this system can be used for CPS insertion in bull-necked patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Mid-term results of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation

Study Design

A retrospective study.

Purpose

The present study aimed to evaluate mid-term results of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation for cervical instability.

Overview of Literature

CPS fixation has widely used in the treatment of cervical spinal instability from various causes; however, there are few reports on mid-term surgical results of CPS fixation.

Methods

Record of 19 patients who underwent cervical and/or upper thoracic (C2-T1) pedicle screw fixation for cervical instability was reviewed. The mean observation period was 90.2 months. Evaluated items included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and C2-7 lordotic angle before surgery and at 5 years after surgery. Postoperative computerized tomography was used to determine the accuracy of screw placement. Visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain and radiological evidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) at the 5-year follow-up were also evaluated.

Results

Mean JOA score was significantly improved from 9.0 points before surgery to 12.8 at 5 years after surgery (p=0.001). The C2-7 lordotic angle of the neutral position improved from 6.4° to 7.8° at 5 years after surgery, but this was not significant. The major perforation rate was 5.0%. There were no clinically significant complications such as vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, or nerve root injury caused by any screw perforation. Mean VAS for neck pain was 49.4 at 5 years after surgery. The rate of ASD was 21.1%.

Conclusions

Our mid-term results showed that CPS fixation was useful for treating cervical instability. Severe complications were prevented with the assistance of a computed tomography-based navigation system.