Subsidence of SB Charité total disc replacement and the role of undersizing

Development and validation of a clinical tool to semi-automatic measure three-dimensional TAR alignment on two-dimensional radiographs

BACKGROUND

Malalignment is often postulated as an important reason for the high failure rate of total ankle replacements (TARs). The correlation between TAR malalignment and clinical outcome, however, is not fully understood. Improving and expanding radiographic TAR alignment measurements in the clinic might lead to a better insight into the correlation between malalignment and the clinical outcome. This study aims to develop and validate a tool to semi-automatic measure TAR alignment, and to improve alignment measurements on radiographs in the clinic.

METHODS

A tool to semi-automatically measure TAR alignment on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs was developed in MATLAB. Using the principle of edge contouring and the perpendicular relationship between the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, the exact configuration of the TAR components can be found. Two observers validated the tool by measuring TAR alignment of ten patients using the tool. The Intraclass Coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of the developed method. The results obtained by the tool were compared to clinical results during radiographic follow-up in the past, and the accuracy of both methods was calculated using three-dimensional CT data.

RESULTS

The tool showed an accuracy of 76% compared to 71% for the method used during follow-up. ICC values were 0.94 (p < 0.01) and higher for both inter-and intra-observer reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The tool presents a reproducible method to measure TAR alignment parameters. Three-dimensional alignment parameters are obtained from two-dimensional radiographs, and as the tool can be applied to most TAR designs, it offers a valuable addition in the clinic and for research purposes.

A cross-sectional analysis of 284 complications for lumbar disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar disc replacement (LDR) is a motion sparing procedure for degenerative disc disease. When compared to lumbar fusion, this procedure may reduce complications, reoperations, operative time, and length of stay. However, the extent of overall complications related to LDR has not been well defined in the literature.

PURPOSE

Demonstrate the complication profile of popular LDR implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Nationwide database of reported complications related to LDR products from patients throughout the country.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Complications related to LDR.

METHODS

Data files from January 1, 2004 to April 1, 2021 were queried using the publicly accessible Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database and Alternative Summary Reporting program. Three LDR ("Charité," "Prodisc-L," and "Activ L") products were analyzed for complications. Data collected included the date the reports were received by the FDA, the type of complication, complication event description, and the source of the report. The complication event description was utilized to determine the completion of the investigation. Entries with insufficient information were excluded. Complications were further divided into two categories, device and non-device related.

RESULTS

A total of 431 complication entries were found between January 1, 2004, and April 1, 2021. After screening for duplicates and events with insufficient information there were 284 total complications. The total complications were then further divided into implant and non-implant related. The five most common overall complications were lumbar pain (49 entries, 17.25%), migration of implant (42 entries, 14.78%), polyethylene dislodged (37 entries, 13.0%), insertion of device problem (37 entries, 13.0%), device handling problem (12 entries, 4.22%). The most common implant related complication, along with the number of MAUDE entries for each implant was migration of implant for Charité (n=6); Migration of implant for ActivL (n=24); Polyethylene dislodged for ProdiscL (n=32). Of the 284 total complications analyzed, 86 (30.28%) of the entries were deemed "investigation completed." The majority of reports were submitted from the manufacturer and company representative (66.2%, 14.8 % respectively). There were no entries related to LDR within the Alternative Summary Reporting search.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlined the complications of LDR implants from the MAUDE database which have not always been highlighted in previously published studies. The findings of this study provide insight into the potential targets for improvement in future LDR design and surgical techniques to reduce complications and ensure the safe utilization of these implants.

The Role of Vertebral Porosity and Implant Loading Mode on Bone-Tissue Stress in the Human Vertebral Body Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Micro-computed tomography- (micro-CT-) based finite element analysis of cadaveric human lumbar vertebrae virtually implanted with total disc arthroplasty (TDA) implants.

OBJECTIVE

(1) Assess the relationship between vertebral porosity and maximum levels of bone-tissue stress following TDA; (2) determine whether the implant's loading mode (axial compression vs. sagittal bending) alters the relationship between vertebral porosity and bone-tissue stress.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Implant subsidence may be related to the bone biomechanics in the underlying vertebral body, which are poorly understood. For example, it remains unclear how the stresses that develop in the supporting bone tissue depend on the implant's loading mode or on typical inter-individual variations in vertebral morphology.

METHODS

Data from micro-CT scans from 12 human lumbar vertebrae (8 males, 4 females; 51-89 years of age; bone volume fraction [BV/TV] = 0.060-0.145) were used to construct high-resolution finite element models (37 μm element edge length) comprising disc-vertebra-implant motion segments. Implants were loaded to 800 N of force in axial compression, flexion-, and extension-induced impingement. For comparison, the same net loads were applied via an intact disc without an implant. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between BV/TV, loading mode, and the specimen-specific change in stress caused by implantation.

RESULTS

The increase in maximum bone-tissue stress caused by implantation depended on loading mode (P < 0.001), increasing more in bending-induced impingement than axial compression (for the same applied force). The change in maximum stress was significantly associated with BV/TV (P = 0.002): higher porosity vertebrae experienced a disproportionate increase in stress compared with lower porosity vertebrae. There was a significant interaction between loading mode and BV/TV (P = 0.002), indicating that loading mode altered the relationship between BV/TV and the change in maximum bone-tissue stress.

CONCLUSION

Typically-sized TDA implants disproportionately increase the bone-tissue stress in more porous vertebrae; this affect is accentuated when the implant impinges in sagittal bending.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Long-Term Residual-Mobility and Adjacent Segment Disease After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Total disc replacement (TDR) has been introduced in order to preserve segmental motion and thus reduce adjacent segment disease (ASD) as seen after spinal fusion. However, it is uncertain whether these presumed beneficial effects remain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence of ASD and residual-mobility in relation to clinical outcome.

METHODS

A total of 210 patients treated with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease were invited for follow-up. ASD was reported in case of severe degeneration in an adjacent disc at latest follow-up, or if an increase in disc degeneration was observed in these adjacent segments as compared to direct postoperative radiographs. Residual-mobility of the TDR was defined as a minimal rotation of 4.6° on flexion-extension radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (27.1%) were lost to follow-up. In 32 patients (15.3%) a revision by spinal fusion had been performed. In 20 patients this revision had occurred ≥5 years after TDR and were included. Consequently, 141 patients were available for analysis (mean follow-up of 16.7 years). Residual-mobility was noted in 38.0%. No significant associations were observed between residual-mobility and the occurrence of ASD, or with clinical outcome. In addition, ASD and clinical outcome were not related either.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that long-term preservation of motion after TDR is met for only a third of patients. However, residual-mobility is not associated with the occurrence of ASD, and both residual-mobility and ASD do not appear to be related to long-term clinical outcome.

Morphologic analysis of Chinese lumbar endplate by three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions for helping design lumbar disc prosthesis

Lumbar disc prostheses have been used increasingly in recent years. The successful design of lumbar disc prostheses depends on accurate morphometric parameters. However, the morphologic dimensions of lumbar endplate area have not been investigated in Chinese population.A total of 1800 lumbar endplates were retrospectively accessed in 150 Chinese adults. Eighteen parameters of each lumbar segment were measured by three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions from T12/L1 to L5/S1. These obtained parameters were compared between genders, bilateral sides, vertebral segments, and different populations.Endplate length and width increased in general, and there was a significant decrease for length/width ratio from T12 to S1 (P = .03). The average concavity depth of the lower lumbar endplate (2.09 ± 0.93 mm) was usually larger than that of the upper lumbar endplate (1.61 ± 0.74 mm) (P = .02). The percentage of the most concave point of the upper and lower lumbar endplate was 50.01 ± 10.76% and 56.41 ± 9.93%, respectively. Anterior, medium, or posterior intervertebral endplate height was severally 10.01 ± 1.98 mm, 10.46 ± 2.03 mm, and 6.41 ± 1.74 mm, and increased among vertebral segments (P = .01).The intervertebral endplate angle significantly increased from T12-L1 to L5-S1 (P = .01). Parameters displayed significant difference between genders. The morphometric parameters of different populations also showed differences.In conclusion, there is a morphologic discrepancy in dimensions of lumbar endplate regarding genders, vertebral segments, and different populations. It is essential to design the lumbar disc prosthesis suited for Chinese patients specially, for which the morphometric parameters in our study can be utilized.

ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study in cadaveric specimens.

BACKGROUND

The commercially available lumbar disc prostheses do not reproduce the intact disc's Instantaneous centre of Rotation (ICR), thus inducing an overload on adjacent anatomical structures, promoting secondary degeneration.

AIM

To examine biomechanical testing of cadaveric lumbar spine specimens in order to evaluate and define the ICR of intact lumbar discs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve cold preserved fresh human cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were subjected to computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomechanical testing. Kinematic studies were performed to analyse range of movements in order to determine ICR.

RESULTS

Flexoextension and lateral bending tests showed a positive linear correlation between the angle rotated and the displacement of the ICR in different axes.

DISCUSSION

ICR has not been taken into account in any of the available literature regarding lumbar disc prosthesis. Considering our results, neither the actual ball-and-socket nor the withdrawn elastomeric nucleus models fit the biomechanics of the lumbar spine, which could at least in part explain the failure rates of the implants in terms of postoperative failed back syndrome (low back pain). It is reasonable to consider then that an implant should also adapt the equations of the movement of the intact ICR of the joint to the post-surgical ICR.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first cadaveric study on the ICR of the human lumbar spine. We have shown that it is feasible to calculate and consider this parameter in order to design future prosthesis with improved clinical and biomechanical characteristics.

Subsidence after total lumbar disc replacement is predictable and related to clinical outcome

Purpose

As yet, there are no studies describing a relationship between radiographic subsidence after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) and patient symptoms. To investigate if subsidence, in terms of penetrated bone volume or angular rotation over time (ΔPBV and ΔAR), is related to clinical outcome. To assess if subsidence can be predicted by position implant asymmetry (IA) or relative size of the TDR, areal undersizing index (AUI) on direct post-operative radiographs.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study consists of 209 consecutive patients with lumbar TDR for degenerative disc disease. A three-dimensional graphical representation of the implant in relation to the bony endplates was created on conventional radiographs. Consequently, the PBV, AR, IA and AUI were calculated, direct post-operative (DPO) and at last follow-up (LFU). For clinical evaluation, patients with substantial pain (VAS ≥ 50) and malfunction (ODI ≥ 40) were considered failures.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 16.7 years, 152 patients (73%) were available for analysis. In 32 patients, revision by spinal fusion had been performed. Both ΔAR (4.33° vs. 1.83°, p = 0.019) and ΔPBV (1448.4 mm3 vs. 747.3 mm3, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the failure-compared to the success-group. Using ROC curves, thresholds for symptomatic subsidence were defined as ΔPBV ≥ 829 mm3 or PBV-LFU ≥ 1223 mm3 [area under the curve (AUC) 0.723, p = 0.003 and 0.724, p = 0.005, respectively]. Associations between symptomatic subsidence and AUI-DPO ≥ 0.50 (AUC 0.750, p = 0.002) and AR-DPO ≥ 3.95° (AUC 0.690, p = 0.022) were found.

Conclusion

Subsidence of a TDR is associated with a worse clinical outcome. The occurrence of subsidence is higher in case of incorrect placement or shape mismatch.

Load-transfer in the human vertebral body following lumbar total disc arthroplasty: Effects of implant size and stiffness in axial compression and forward flexion

Adverse clinical outcomes for total disc arthroplasty (TDA), including subsidence, heterotopic ossification, and adjacent-level vertebral fracture, suggest problems with the underlying biomechanics. To gain insight, we investigated the role of size and stiffness of TDA implants on load-transfer within a vertebral body. Uniquely, we accounted for the realistic multi-scale geometric features of the trabecular micro-architecture and cortical shell. Using voxel-based finite element analysis derived from a micro-computed tomography scan of one human L1 vertebral body (74-μm-sized elements), a series of generic elliptically shaped implants were analyzed. We parametrically modeled three implant sizes (small, medium [a typical clinical size], and large) and three implant materials (metallic, E = 100 GPa; polymeric, E = 1 GPa; and tissue-engineered, E = 0.01 GPa). Analyses were run for two load cases: 800 N in uniform compression and flexion-induced anterior impingement. Results were compared to those of an intact model without an implant and loaded instead via a disc-like material. We found that TDA implantation increased stress in the bone tissue by over 50% in large portions of the vertebra. These changes depended more on implant size than material, and there was an interaction between implant size and loading condition. For the small implant, flexion increased the 98th-percentile of stress by 32 ± 24% relative to compression, but the overall stress distribution and trabecular-cortical load-sharing were relatively insensitive to loading mode. In contrast, for the medium and large implants, flexion increased the 98th-percentile of stress by 42 ± 9% and 87 ± 29%, respectively, and substantially re-distributed stress within the vertebra; in particular overloading the anterior trabecular centrum and cortex. We conclude that TDA implants can substantially alter stress deep within the lumbar vertebra, depending primarily on implant size. For implants of typical clinical size, bending-induced impingement can substantially increase stress in local regions and may therefore be one factor driving subsidence in vivo.

We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

BACKGROUND

Replacement of a diseased lumbar intervertebral disc with an artificial device, a procedure known as lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR), has been practiced since the 1980s.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of published literature germane to LTDR, but comment is restricted to high-quality evidence reporting implantation of lumbar artificial discs that have been commercially available for at least 15 years at the time of writing and which continue to be commercially available.

RESULTS

LTDR is shown to be a noninferior (and sometimes superior) alternative to lumbar fusion in patients with discogenic low back pain and/or radicular pain attributable to lumbar disc degenerative disease (LDDD). Further, LTDR is a motion-preserving procedure, and evidence is emerging that it may also result in risk reduction for subsequent development and/or progression of adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the substantial logistical challenges to the safe introduction of LTDR to a health care facility, the procedure continues to gain acceptance, albeit slowly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with LDDD who are considering an offer of spinal surgery can only provide valid and informed consent if they have been made aware of all reasonable surgical and nonsurgical options that may benefit them. Accordingly, and in those cases in which LTDR may have a role to play, patients under consideration for other forms of spinal surgery should be informed that this valid procedure exists.

ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this Policy Statement is to educate patients, physicians, medical providers, reviewers, adjustors, case managers, insurers, and all others involved or affected by insurance coverage decisions regarding lumbar disc replacement surgery.

PROCEDURES

This Policy Statement was developed by a panel of physicians selected by the Board of Directors of ISASS for their expertise and experience with lumbar TDR. The panel's recommendation was entirely based on the best evidence-based scientific research available regarding the safety and effectiveness of lumbar TDR.