Surgical management of the fractures of axis body: indications and surgical strategy

Addressing the challenges of complex type III odontoid fractures: Clinical and radiological outcomes of various treatment modalities

Background

Unlike simple fractures, complex Type III odontoid fractures-characterized by intricate morphology and pathomechanics-pose significant management challenges. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment modalities for these complex fractures, with a focus on assessing factors influencing fracture union.

Methods

Following approval of our institutional review board, this retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. All Patients with complex Type III odontoid fractures who were managed at our center from June 2016 to December 2022 were assessed for eligibility. The primary outcome was union status. Secondary outcomes included the ASIA impairment scale, neck disability index (NDI), and complications. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse union outcomes.

Results

A total of 39 patients were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 36.10 years. Nine patients were managed conservatively, 12 patients underwent anterior odontoid screw (AOS) fixation, and 18 patients received posterior fusion (PF). The rate of bony union varied significantly across the treatment groups, 100 % in the PF group, 58 % in the AOS group and 22 % in the conservative group (p = 0.0012). The NDI revealed superior functional outcomes in the PF group compared to the other groups (p = 0.0436). Failure of primary treatment was observed in seven patients (three from the conservative group and four from the AOS), necessitating secondary treatment with PF. Lateral mass gap >2 mm, coronal tilt >5°, and atlantoaxial instability >50 % were identified as significant risk factors for adverse union outcomes.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment, particularly PF, offers superior outcomes in terms of union rates and functional recovery for complex Type III odontoid fractures. The identification of specific radiological measurements as significant risk factors for non-union underscores the need for detailed imaging and careful patient selection for conservative versus surgical management.

C2 Odontoid Fracture Associated with C1-C2 Rotatory Dislocation: A Retrospective Analysis of 2 Surgical Techniques

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures in association with a C1-C2 rotatory luxation reports are seldom found in the literature. The fusion between the lateral mass of C1 and C2 could be of interest to ensure adequate treatment in these particular cases. We report 23 cases where there was coexistence of an odontoid fracture and rotatory subluxation, which were treated surgically using cages between C1 and C2 or just traditional Goel-Harms technique. We evaluated the radiologic fusion rate, reoperation rate, and complications.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients with C2 fractures (mixed type and C1-C2 rotatory luxation according to the Fielding classification) who were treated surgically. Radiologic computed tomography scans were used to assess fusion (presence of bridging trabecular bone end plate or pseudoarthrosis) between 6 months and 1.5 years after the surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with C2 fractures and C1-C2 rotatory luxation that were treated surgically and were suitable for the analysis; 11 patients underwent C1-C2 fusion with intra-articular cages, and 12 underwent a classical Goel-Harms technique. The fusion rate at the C1-C2 joint was higher in the cages group. Only 12 patients exhibited fusion at the level of the odontoid fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 fractures associated with C1-C2 rotatory dislocation are rare. The fusion rate at the level of the odontoid in these patients appears to be lower than that reported in patients without rotatory dislocation. It may be of special interest to obtain a clear fusion at the C1-C2 joint, where this type of implant seems to offer an advantage.

Direct Screw Osteosynthesis for an Elderly Osteoporotic Patient With C2 Complex Fracture

There are various types of C2 fractures, including odontoid fractures, hangman fractures, and complex fractures, which involve the vertebral body or multiple fracture types. The published literature on C2 complex fractures is limited, and treatment strategies have not yet been established. An 80-year-old woman with a history of osteoporosis, brain stroke, and cervical spondylosis fell and sustained a C2 complex fracture. Initial treatment with a cervical collar was unsuccessful and a C2 direct screw osteosynthesis surgery was performed under an image-guided three-dimensional navigation system. The surgical procedure was successfully performed with a surgical time of 83 minutes and a blood loss of 31 ml. Her neck pain improved after surgery. Follow-up CT scans revealed acceptable healing of the fracture four months later. C2 direct screw osteosynthesis is a viable treatment option for C2 complex fractures, particularly in elderly patients who may benefit from early stabilization of the fracture to prevent complications associated with long-term conservative treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Goel-Harms Technique in Upper Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of implant-associated complications and fusion rates for the Goel-Harms technique (GHT) and to show potential factors affecting the complications and nonunion development.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed database according to PRISMA guidance was performed. The main inclusion criteria comprised description of fusion rate and/or implant-associated complications rate.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 86 articles focused on the results of surgery in 4208 patients. The rate of screw-related complications was as follows: 1) vertebral artery (VA) injury, 2.8%; 2) screw malposition in the direction of the VA, 5.8%; and 3) C2 nerve root irritation, 6.1%. The nonunion rate was 4.2%. Transpedicular screw insertion to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were the safest regarding VA injury and correlated with lower blood loss. For C1-C2 fusion, there was no statistical difference for the different bone graft localization. C2 nerve root irritation rate did not depend on screw insertion technique. The use of a freehand technique did not correlate with a high rate of screw-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Goel-Harms technique is a promising method of C1-C2 fusion, with a relatively low nonunion and VA injury rate. It can be performed safely without C-arm or navigation system assistance. Transpedicular screw insertion trajectories to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were safest regarding VA injury and blood loss volume. Further comparative studies of various C1-C2 stabilization methods with a high level of significance should be carried out to identify the optimal approach.

Proposal of New Radiological Classification and Treatment Strategy for Transverse Fractures of the C2 Axis Body

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of transverse fractures of the C2 axis body diagnosed on sagittal computed tomography (CT) and to propose new classification and appropriate treatment strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed by enrolling 49 patients (26 men and 23 women) with transverse fractures of the C2 axis body who were treated at four national trauma centers of tertiary university hospitals from January 2000 to December 2017. The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years (ranging from 21 to 90 years). We classified 49 transverse fractures of the C2 body into three types based on fracture trajectories involving superior articular facet (SAF) and lateral cortex (LC) of the C2 body on coronal CT as follows: Type 1, involvement of C2 SAF on both sides; Type 2, unilateral involvement of C2 SAF on one side and LC on the other side; Type 3, involvement of LC on both sides. The characteristics, treatment methods, and results of 49 transverse fractures of the C2 body were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 12.6 months (ranging from 12 to 26 months).

RESULTS

Twenty-six (53.1%) patients were Type 1, 21 (42.9%) were Type 2, and 2 (4.0%) were Type 3. Correlation coefficients for intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of classification were 0.723 and 0.598 (both, P < 0.001), respectively. About 40.8% (7 Type 1 and 13 Type 2) of the patients had fracture displacement >3 mm; Incidence of fracture displacement >3 mm was higher in Type 2 than Type 1 (61.9% vs 26.9%, P < 0.05). About 79.6% (20 Type 1, 17 Type 2 and 2 Type 3) of the patients were treated conservatively, and 20.4% (6 Type 1 and 4 Type 2) underwent surgery. At last follow-up, 47 out of 49 patients achieved fusion; overall fusion rate was 95.9%. All conservatively treated Type 1 and Type 3 patients achieved fusion. Out of 17 conservatively treated Type 2 patients, 15 achieved fusion but two developed nonunion; however, two nonunion patients opted not to undergo surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that Philadelphia brace caused nonunion significantly in fracture displacement >3 mm compared to Minerva brace/Halovest (100% vs 0%, P < 0.05). All surgically treated Type 1 and 2 patients achieved fusion. In terms of clinical outcomes, neck pain visual analog scale and neck disability index were significantly improved (both, P < 0.01). According to Odom's criteria, 93.9% (46/49) of the patients achieved satisfactory outcomes. No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of transverse fractures of C2 body can be treated conservatively. However, surgery or rigid Minerva brace/Halovest should be considered for Type 2 transverse fractures of the C2 body with fracture displacement >3 mm.

Temporary Bridge Occipitocervical Fixation for Comminuted Atlantoaxial Fracture

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the feasibility of temporary bridge occipitocervical fixation temporary bridge occipitocervical fixation (T-BOCF) for comminuted atlantoaxial fractures.

METHODS

A 57-year-old man presented with multiple trauma including a comminuted, undisplaced atlantoaxial fracture; subdural hemorrhage; skull base fracture; scalp laceration; right second finger tendon injury; and right distal femur open fracture. T-BOCF was performed to preserve neck motion while providing rigid stability to atlantoaxial fracture. Occipital plate and bilateral lateral mass screws were inserted at C3, C4, and C5, avoiding the fracture site; this was followed by rod connection without fusion. The screw-rod construct was removed after confirmation of bone union in the fracture site 12 months after the initial operation.

RESULTS

Computed tomography performed at 12 months after the operation demonstrated solid bone union. Dynamic radiographs taken 12 months after implant removal demonstrated a flexion-extension range of motion of 16 degrees at C0‒C2 and 19.8 degrees at C2‒C7. The total flexion-extension range of motion was 35.8 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

T-BOCF is a viable option for treatment of comminuted, undisplaced atlantoaxial fractures. The technique is easier than direct C1‒C2 fusion and can avoid complications associated with occipitocervical fusion or C1‒C2 screw fixation. The blood supply to the fracture site is preserved by avoiding subperiosteal stripping, and semispinalis cervicis insertion at the C2 spinous process is also circumvented. Furthermore, neck motion is preserved after implant removal.

Transpedicular lag screw placement in traumatic cervical spondylolisthesis: Case report and systematic review of the literature

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2-C3 is an unstable fracture. Posterior fixation techniques can be employed with intraoperative navigation, however this tool is not available to all spine surgeons. Furthermore, the evidence for posterior surgical stabilization of C2, while adhering to motion preservation principles is currently unknown. The authors describe a patient who had fractures of the pedicle and vertebral body of C2 and C3, which was successfully stabilized with freehand placement of C2 pedicle lag screws and subsequent C2-C5 fixation. Subsequently, a systematic review was performed to evaluate studies that utilized C2 lag screw placement in patients with traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (TSA). Eight retrospective case series were identified (N = 63 patients). Five studies evaluated an open posterior cervical approach and 3 investigated a percutaneous approach. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 48 months and fusion was successful in most cases. No intra-operative complications were reported. On final follow-up, 2 patients had unintentional C2-C3 fusion, and 3 had C2-C3 instability. Three minor complications (urinary tract infection, surgical site hematoma, respiratory infection) were also reported, that resolved with medical management. Freehand placement of C2 pedicle lag screws may be a viable option in select cases. While posterior C2 lag-screw fixation demonstrated successful fusion in most patients with TSA, the supporting evidence is limited to level IV studies.

Treatment of Axis Ring Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative literature review and expert recommendation.

OBJECTIVE

To establish treatment recommendations for axis ring fractures based on the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma.

METHODS

This recommendation summarizes the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma with regard to the treatment of axis ring fractures based on a narrative literature review.

RESULTS

Typical "hangman's fractures" with bilateral separation of the neural arch from C2 and atypical "hangman's fractures" with irregular fracture morphology are described. Computed tomography is the "gold" standard used to detect and analyse these fractures adequately. Furthermore, the detection of vertebral artery integrity is necessary. To classify axis ring fractures, the Levine-Edwards or Josten classification is recommended. In particular, the integrity of the C2/3 disc and the integrity of the anterior longitudinal ligament are used to determine the treatment strategy. While Levine-Edwards type I and type IIA (Josten type 1 and 2) fractures should be treated conservatively, Levine type II and type III (Josten type 3 and 4) fractures should be treated operatively. Levine-Edwards type II fractures will be predominately treated by anterior C2/3 fusion. Levine-Edwards type III fractures have to be primary reduced, if an anterior fusion is planned (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF] C2/3). If a closed reduction of a type III fracture is impossible, an open reduction and posterior fixation/fusion is the treatment of choice.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is predominantly reserved for Levine-Edwards I and IIA fractures. Operative treatment should be performed in case of Levine-Edwards II and III fractures.

Combined Fractures Involving the Odontoid and Unilateral Superior Articular Processes of the Axis: A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review

Introduction

A treatment strategy has not yet been established for combined fractures involving the odontoid and unilateral superior articular processes of the axis. Such injuries are rare, with only 17 reported cases in the literature. A lateral flexion force with a rotated position of the atlas on the axis is considered to be the mechanism of injury.

Case Report

Herein, we present three cases (two female; 1 male; and age range 65-years) of combined fractures involving the odontoid and unilateral superior articular processes of the axis, with a mean follow-up period of 17 months. Two patients were treated surgically, while one patient was treated non-surgically. In the present cases, two new findings were obtained regarding the mechanism of injury. First, both clockwise and counterclockwise rotated positions result in such fractures. Second, a comminuted-type fracture of the superior articular process of the axis was observed. Neck pain, limitations in the range of motion of the neck, and torticollis remained after treatment in non-surgical cases, while there were no such symptoms in surgical cases.

Conclusion

Of importance, the combined fractures shown in the current study may be considered as Type III odontoid fractures when diagnosed only by X-rays. Therefore, when observing a great dislocation, the presence of comminuted fractures or torticollis of the odontoid should be ascertained on X-ray and computed tomography images (especially coronal images). To avoid lingering symptoms in the neck, surgery is recommended for the treatment of these fractures.

Unilateral lag screw fixation of isolated non-union atlas lateral mass fracture: a new technical note

We describe a novel and new technique of posterior unilateral lag screw fixation of non-union atlas lateral mass fracture. A 46-year-old man presented with cervical pain and tenderness after a vehicle turn over accident and he was diagnosed to have left atlas lateral mass fracture. He was initially treated by immobilization using Minerva orthosis. About 2 months later, he developed severe neck pain and limitation of motion and thus he was scheduled for operation due to non-union atlas lateral mass fracture. A 28 mm lag screw was inserted under anterior-posterior and lateral fluoroscopic views. The entrance point was at the dorsal aspect of left atlas posterior arc at its junction to the lateral mass, and by using the trajectory of 10 degrees medial and 22 degrees cephalad fracture reduction was achieved. Unilateral lag screw fixation of atlas fractures is an appropriate, safe and effective surgical technique for the management of unilateral atlas fractures.

C2 Body Fracture: Report of Cases Managed Conservatively by Philadelphia Collar

Study Design

Case series.

Purpose

To present results of conservative management in patients with pure C2 body fractures.

Overview of Literature

Axis body fractures, a less common subgroup of C2 fractures, are commonly classified as vertical coronal, vertical sagittal, and transverse subtypes. While the treatment paradigm for other C2 fractures is clear, there is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines for C2 body fractures.

Methods

Eleven patients with pure C2 body fractures were managed with external immobilization and followed thereafter.

Results

All neurologic examinations were normal. In computed tomography (CT) scans, four, two, three, and two patients had a coronal, sagittal, horizontal, and burst fracture, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hematoma and partial rupture in the anterior longitudinal ligament in four patients, posterior ligamentous complex injury in one, and normal ligamentous structure in six. All fractures were managed conservatively using the Philadelphia collar, which was continued until complete disappearance of symptoms (within 1–3 months in all patients). The decision to discontinue the neck collar was made by a dynamic neck X-ray and CT scan that showed complete bony fusion. All patients were then followed for an additional 1.5 years (mean follow-up of 21 months for all patients). No patient showed any neurologic symptoms or deficits during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

In patients with pure C2 body fracture, non-operative management with Philadelphia neck collar is a safe and efficacious option, even in the presence of some sort of ligamentous injury.

Oblique Axis Body Fracture: An Unstable Subtype of Anderson Type III Odontoid Fractures-Apropos of Two Cases

Purpose. Anderson type III odontoid fractures have traditionally been considered stable and treated conservatively. However, unstable cases with unfavorable results following conservative treatment have been reported. Methods. We present the cases of two patients who sustained minimally displaced Anderson type III fractures with a characteristic fracture pattern that we refer to as "oblique type axis body fracture." Results. The female patients aged 90 and 72 years, respectively, were both diagnosed with minimally displaced Anderson type III fractures. Both fractures had a characteristic "oblique type" fracture pattern. The first patient was treated conservatively with cervical spine immobilization in a semirigid collar. However, gross displacement was noted at the 6-week follow-up visit. The second patient was therefore treated operatively by C1-C3/4 posterior fusion and the course was uneventful. Conclusions. Oblique type axis body fractures resemble a highly unstable subtype of Anderson type III fractures with the potential of severe secondary deformity following conservative treatment, irrespective of initial grade of displacement. The authors therefore warrant a high index of suspicion for this injury and suggest early operative stabilization.