Radiographic and clinical assessment on the accuracy and complications of C1 anterior lateral mass and C2 anterior pedicle screw placement in the TARP-III procedure: a study of 106 patients

Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate (TARP) Technique for the Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation (IAAD) Caused by Old Odontoid Fracture

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of TARP technique for treating IAAD caused by old odontoid fracture and assess the outcomes of patients who underwent TARP technique over 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and September 2017, 56 patients with IAAD caused by old odontoid fractures were treated with TARP technique. Patients' clinical, radiological, and surgical data were retrospectively analyzed. Radiological parameters included the atlantodental interval (ADI) and the space available for the spinal cord (SAC) were measured. Occipitocervical pain levels and neurologic status were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score respectively. Degree of cervical dysfunction was assessed by Neck Disability Index (NDI). Fusion status was evaluated by images during the follow-ups.

RESULTS

Surgeries for 56 cases were performed successfully with no injury to the spinal cord, nerve, or blood vessels. All patients achieved satisfactory reduction and fixation. Clinical symptomatic relief was obtained in all cases (100%). Patients were followed up for an average of 33.9 ± 9.6 months (ranged 24-60 months). Improvements in the postoperative ADI, SAC, VAS, JOA score and NDI were significant (P < .05). Besides, Bone fusion was observed in all patients. No hardware failure or re-dislocation occurred during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

TARP technique is an effective procedure for the treatment of IAAD caused by old odontoid fracture, which can achieve complete release, satisfactory decompression, reduction and fixation, and reliable bone fusion through a single transoral approach.

Preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine

Purpose

This review aimed to describe the preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression of the upper cervical spine, and to clarify the risk factors, related issues and complication management.

Methods

Studies on transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine were reviewed systematically. The preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for upper cervical deformities were analyzed.

Results

Evidence suggests that preoperative management in patients undergoing transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine is closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. Hence, preoperative surgical planning, preoperative preparation, and oral nursing care should be seriously considered in these patients. Moreover, while being established as an effective and safe method, transoral decompression is associated with several postoperative complications, which could be prevented by elaborate preoperative management, improved surgical skills, and appropriate precautionary measures.

Conclusions

The effectiveness and safety of transoral decompression has been improved by the constant development of operative techniques and advanced auxiliary diagnostic and therapeutic methods, with the understanding of the anatomical structure of the craniocervical joint. Therefore, the incidence rates of postoperative complications have decreased. The application of individualized anterior implants and less-invasive endoscopic endonasal approach has improved the effectiveness of transoral decompression and reduced the associated complications.

An Intraoperative Trajectory-Determined Strategy of Patient-Specific Drill Template for C2 Transoral Pedicle Insertion in Incomplete Reduction of Atlantoaxial Dislocation: An In Vitro Study

Objectives

This study aims to explore a novel intraoperative trajectory‐determined strategy of grouped patient‐specific drill templates (PDTs) for transoral C₂ pedicle screw insertion (C₂TOPI) for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) with incomplete reduction and to evaluate its efficiency and accuracy.

Methods

Ten cadaveric C₂ specimens were scanned by computed tomography (CT) and randomly divided into two groups (the PDT and freehand groups). A novel intraoperative trajectory‐determined strategy of grouped PDTs was created for AAD with incomplete reduction. C₂TOPI was performed by use of the PDT technique and the fluoroscopy‐guided freehand technique. After surgery, the screw deviations from the centroid of the cross‐section at the midpoint of the pedicle and screw position grades were assessed in both groups.

Results

Compared to the freehand group, the PDT group had a significantly shorter surgery time than the freehand group (47.7 vs 61.9 min, P < 0.001). The absolute deviations from the centroids between the preoperative designs and postoperative measurements on the axial plane of the pedicle were 1.19 ± 0.25 mm in the PDT group and 1.82 ± 0.51 mm in the freehand group. On the sagittal plane of the pedicle, the corresponding values were 1.10 ± 0.33 mm in the PDT group and 1.70 ± 0.49 mm in the freehand group. The absolute deviations of the free‐hand group on both the axial and sagittal planes were higher than that of the freehand group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively). For the grade of screw insertion position, nine (90%) were observed in type I and one (10%) in type II in the PDT group, whereas five (50%) were in type I, three (30%) were in type II, and two (20%) in type III in the freehand group. Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the screw positions (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The novel intraoperative trajectory‐determined strategy of grouped PDTs can be used as an accurate and feasible method for C₂TOPI for AAD with incomplete reduction.

Patient-specific drill template for C2 transoral pedicle insertion in complete reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation: cadaveric efficacy and accuracy assessments

Background

The transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) is an effective advance in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and can enable the performance of anterior atlantoaxial release, reduction, decompression, and internal fixation in a one-stage operation. However, accurate transoral C2 pedicle insertion (C2TOPI) remains a challenge. The aim of this study is to develop a grouped patient-specific drill template (PDT) specifically for AAD with complete reduction and, furthermore, to compare its efficacy and accuracy in facilitating C2TOPI.

Methods

After CT scanning, ten cadaveric C2 specimens were randomly assigned to two groups (the PDT and freehand group). A grouped PDT specifically for AAD with complete reduction was designed and manufactured. C2TOPI was performed using the PDT or the fluoroscopy-guided freehand technique. Postoperative CT scans were subsequently performed to analyze the deviations at the centroid of the cross section at the midpoint of the pedicle. Screw position grades were also assessed in both groups.

Results

Compared to the freehand group, the PDT group had a significantly shorter surgery time (p < 0.001). Significant differences between the two groups were observed in the absolute value of the deviations at the centroid of the pedicle on either the axial or sagittal planes (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the screw positions between the two groups (p > 0.05); however, two unacceptable breaches (20%) occurred in the freehand group.

Conclusion

A specifically designed PDT could provide an accurate and easy-to-apply method for C2TOPI in AAD with complete reduction.

Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the causes of partial remission in patients with basilar invagination (BI) and irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) treated with transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) without odontoidectomy and quantify the distance of odontoid descent.

METHODS

Between August 2010 and July 2012, 22 consecutive patients with BI with IAAD who underwent TARP surgery were reviewed. The preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were evaluated. Follow-up data and the symptom treatment interval (STI), defined as the interval between the onset of symptoms and surgical treatment, were assessed. Neurological function was evaluated as neurologic improvement, defined as ([Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score] - [Preoperative JOA score])/(17 - [Preoperative JOA score]). The patients were assigned to group A (<50%) or group B (≥50%) based on their level of neurologic improvement.

RESULTS

All 22 patients improved clinically to varying degrees. The mean preoperative STI was 105.6 ± 67.6 months for group A and 45.3 ± 46.7 months for group B (P < 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in follow-up (P > 0.05) or with respect to radiographic parameters (P > 0.05). Persistent brainstem compression was observed in 1 patient, whose symptoms were not adequately relieved after revision surgery (transoral odontoidectomy and posterior decompression and fusion). No fixation failure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Descent of the odontoid process is useful for treating basilar invagination. TARP surgery without odontoidectomy may pull the dens caudally and ventrally to achieve sufficient decompression of the spinal cord. Neurologic improvement may be associated with STI.

An 11-Year Review of the TARP Procedure in the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to introduce the surgical techniques and evaluate the clinical outcomes of transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Researchers have reported on transoral plate internal fixation for the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) without long-term follow-up and detailed clinical experience.

METHODS

The clinical records of 388 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD, 340 cases; fixed atlantoaxial dislocation [FAAD], 48 cases) who received the TARP procedure from April 2003 to September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. They were treated separately with TARP-I or TARP-II (82 cases), TARP-III (248 cases), or TARP-IV (58 cases). X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate the efficacy of reduction and the degree of decompression, respectively. The long-term clinical outcome was evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring and the Symon and Lavender standard.

RESULTS

Immediate reduction was achieved for all the patients with IAAD (340/340), whereas anatomical reduction was achieved for 98.2% of patients (334/340). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 87.5% of patients with FAAD (42/48). The average degree of spinal cord decompression ranged from 75% to 100% with an average of 88.4%. The clinical data of 106 patients were evaluated in the latest follow-up (12-108 mo, average 60.5 mo). The average spinal cord improvement rate by Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring was 62.1%. According to the Symon and Lavender standard, there were 85 cases rated as markedly effective, 104 cases as effective, and 2 cases as noneffective. The overall markedly effective rate was 80% and the effective rate was 98%.

CONCLUSION

The TARP procedure showed good anterior atlantoaxial release, reduction, decompression, and internal fixation for patients with IAAD and FAAD through a single anterior approach. It has the advantages of three-dimensional immediate atlantoaxial reduction and sufficient decompression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Biomechanical Comparison of Modified TARP Technique Versus Modified Goel Technique for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanical differences between atlantoaxial fusion cage combined with transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation (TARP + Cage, modified TARP technique) and that combined with C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw fixation (C1LS + C2PS + Cage, modified Goel technique) in the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) by finite element analysis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Clinical studies have shown that transoral anterior atlantoaxial release followed by TARP fixation can achieve reduction, decompression, fixation, and fusion of C1-C2 through a transoral-only approach. Although cage has been used to reduce the BI through posterior approach, there are no studies referred to the cage combined with TARP for C1-C2 fusion.

METHODS

A finite element model was used to investigate and compare the stability between TARP + Cage fixation and C1LS + C2PS + Cage fixation in the treatment of BI. Vertical load of 40  N was applied on the C0, to simulate head weight, and 1.5  Nm torque was applied to the C0 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation.

RESULTS

In comparison with the C1LS + C2PS + Cage model, the TARP + Cage model reduced the ROM by 44.7%, 30.0%, and 10.5% in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, while the TARP + Cage model increased the ROM by 30.0% in flexion, and the TARP + Cage model also led to lower screw stress in all motions with one exception (anterior C2PS stress in extension).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the TARP + Cage fixation may offer higher stability to C1LS + C2PS + Cage in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation but lower stability in flexion. Compared with modified Goel technique, the modified TARP technique not only has the capability of transferring the load and distributing the stress but also can provide neural decompression, stabilization and fusion, and restore C1-C2 normal fusion angle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Biomechanical comparison of a novel transoral atlantoaxial anchored cage with established fixation technique - a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) fixation has been introduced to achieve reduction, decompression, fixation and fusion of C1-C2 through a transoral-only approach. However, it may also be associated with potential disadvantages, including dysphagia and load shielding of the bone graft. To prevent potential disadvantages related to TARP fixation, a novel transoral atlantoaxial fusion cage with integrated plate (Cage + Plate) device for stabilization of the C1-C2 segment is designed. The aims of the present study were to compare the biomechanical differences between Cage + Plate device and Cage + TARP device for the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

METHODS

A detailed, nonlinear finite element model (FEM) of the intact upper cervical spine had been developed and validated. Then a FEM of an unstable BI model treated with Cage + Plate fixation, was compared to that with Cage + TARP fixation. All models were subjected to vertical load with pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) of C1-C2 segment and maximum von Mises Stress of the C2 endplate and bone graft were quantified for the two devices.

RESULTS

Both devices significantly reduced ROM compared with the intact state. In comparison with the Cage + Plate model, the Cage + TARP model reduced the ROM by 82.5 %, 46.2 %, 10.0 % and 74.3 % in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The Cage + Plate model showed a higher increase stresses on C2 endplate and bone graft than the Cage + TARP model in all motions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the novel Cage + Plate device may provide lower biomechanical stability than the Cage + TARP device in flexion, extension, and axial rotation, however, it may reduce stress shielding of the bone graft for successful fusion and minimize the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Clinical trials are now required to validate the reproducibility and advantages of our findings using this anchored cage for the treatment of BI with IAAD.