Treatment of basilar invagination

A Staged Approach for Surgical Management of Basilar Invagination

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with basilar invagination (BI) can be treated with several surgical options, ranging from simple posterior decompression to circumferential decompression and fusion. Here, we aimed at examining the indications and outcomes associated with these surgical strategies to devise a staged algorithm for managing BI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 neurosurgical centers and included patients with a BI, as defined by a position of the dens tip at least 5 mm above the Chamberlain line. Other craniovertebral junction anomalies, such as atlas assimilation, platybasia, and Chiari malformations, were documented. C1-C2 stability was assessed with a dynamic computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

We included 30 patients with BI with a mean follow-up of 56 months (min = 12, max = 166). Posterior decompression and fusion (n = 8) was only performed in cases of obvious atlanto-axial instability (eg, increased atlanto-dental interval or hypermobility on flexion/extension), while anterior decompression (transoral or transnasal) was reserved to patients with lower cranial nerves deficits (eg, swallowing dysfunction) and irreducible anterior compression (n = 9). Patients with posterior signs (eg, Valsalva headaches) or myelopathy but without C1-C2 instability nor anterior signs were managed with an isolated foramen magnum decompression, with or without duraplasty (n = 13). Complications were more frequent for combined procedures, including neurological deterioriation (n = 4) and tracheostomy (n = 2), but reinterventions were more likely in patients undergoing posterior decompression alone (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Patient selection is key to determine the appropriate surgical strategy for BI: In our experience, combined approaches are only needed for patients with irreducible and symptomatic anterior compression, while fusion should be restricted to patient with obvious signs of atlanto-axial instability. Other BI patients can be managed by foramen magnum decompression alone to minimize surgical morbidity.

Basilar Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Features, Operative Strategies, and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Basilar impression (BI) is a rare yet debilitating abnormality of the craniovertebral junction, known to cause life-threatening medullary brainstem compression. Our study analyzes surgical approaches for BI and related outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to critically assess primary articles examining BI.

RESULTS

We analyzed 87 patients from 65 articles, mostly female (55.17%) with a mean age of 46.31 ± 17.94 years, commonly presenting with motor (59.77%) and sensory deficits (55.17%). Commonly employed procedures included posterior occipitocervical fusion (24.14%), anterior decompression (20.69%), and combined anterior decompression with posterior fusion (21.84%). Patients who underwent anterior approaches were found to be older (55.38 ± 17.67 vs. 45.49 ± 18.78 years, P < 0.05) and had a longer duration from symptom onset to surgery (57.39 ± 64.33 vs. 26.02 ± 29.60 months, P < 0.05) compared to posterior approaches. Our analysis revealed a significant association between a longer duration from symptom onset to surgery and an increased likelihood of undergoing odontoidectomy and decompression (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03, P < 0.05). Furthermore, after adjusting for all other covariates, a history of rheumatoid arthritis and the use of a posterior approach were significantly associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment approach to complex craniovertebral junction disease should be tailored to the surgeon's experience and the nature of the compressive pathology.

Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Skeletal and Non-skeletal Challenges in Adulthood

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a Mendelian connective tissue disorder associated with increased bone fragility and other clinical manifestations most commonly due to abnormalities in production, structure, or post-translational modification of type I collagen. Until recently, most research in OI has focused on the pediatric population and much less attention has been directed at the effects of OI in the adult population. This is a narrative review of the literature focusing on the skeletal as well as non-skeletal manifestations in adults with OI that may affect the aging individual. We found evidence to suggest that OI is a systemic disease which involves not only the skeleton, but also the cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal system, soft tissues, tendons, muscle, and joints, hearing, eyesight, dental health, and women's health in OI and potentially adds negative affect to health-related quality of life. We aim to guide clinicians as well as draw attention to obvious knowledge gaps and the need for further research in adult OI.

Congenital Cervical Spinal Deformities

Malformations of the cervical spine are a challenge in pediatric orthopedic surgery since the treatment options are limited. These congenital anomalies are often syndrome-related and have multiple repercussions on the function and statics of the cervical spine in all three planes. They are related to developmental abnormalities during the somite segmentation that occurs during the third week of embryonic development. Successful somitogenesis requires proper functioning of a clock regulated by complex signaling pathways that guide the steps needed to form the future spine. There is no specific classification for vertebral malformations at the cervical level. To characterize the progressive nature of a malformation, one must use general classifications. In the specific case of Klippel-Feil syndrome, these malformations can affect several vertebral levels in a continuous or discontinuous manner, but also the vertebral body and vertebral arch in a variable way. Thus, establishing a reliable prognosis in the coronal and sagittal planes is a complex undertaking. While technical mastery of certain osteotomy procedures has led to advances in the surgical treatment of rigid deformities of the cervical spine, the indications are still very rare. Nevertheless, the procedure has become safer and more accurate because of technical aids such as surgical navigation, robotics and 3D printed models or patient-specific guides. Occipitocervical transitional anomalies have embryological specificities that can explain the bony malformations seen at this level. However, most are rare, and the main concern is identifying any instability that justifies surgical stabilization. The presence of a cervical spine anomaly should trigger the search for occipitocervical instability and vice-versa.

Basilar invagination without atlantoaxial dislocation: treatment by correction of clivus canal angle with interfacet distraction and fixation

BACKGROUND

This study reports on the surgical technique used and clinical outcomes obtained during the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) without atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) through the correction of the clivus canal angle (CCA) using interfacet distraction and fixation.

METHODS

Nineteen cases with BI without AAD treated by the correction of the clivus canal angle were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans and three-dimensional reconstruction views were obtained to measure the size of the CCA, pB-C2 distance, and degree of BI. Chiari malformation and syringomyelia were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The clinical outcomes for all patients were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale. The CCA was corrected by using interfacet distraction and fixation techniques. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare pre- and postoperative measurements.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up for 24.95 ± 5.22 months (range 12-36 months); no patient suffered intraoperative nerve or vascular injury. Clinical symptoms improved in 17 patients (89.5%). The mean JOA score increased from 12.32 ± 1.89 to 14.37 ± 1.30 (Z = -3.655, P < 0.001). The mean CCA improved from 129.34 ± 8.52° preoperatively to 139.75 ± 8.86° postoperatively (Z = -3.824, P < 0.001). The mean pB-C2 decreased from 7.47 ± 2.21 to 5.68 ± 3.13 (Z = -3.060, P = 0.002). Syringomyelia was significantly reduced in 10 out of 13 patients by the first follow-up year. All patients achieved bony fusion.

CONCLUSION

Posterior interfacet distraction and fixation to correct the CCA is a feasible and effective method for treating BI without AAD.

Posterior two-step distraction and reduction for basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation: a novel technique for precise control of reduction degree without traction

PURPOSE

The pathological changes of basilar invagination (BI) and atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) include vertical and horizontal dislocations. Current surgical techniques have difficulty in accurately controlling the degree of reduction in these two directions and often require preoperative traction, which increases patients' pain, hospital stay, and medical cost. This study aimed to introduce a novel technique for accurately reducing horizontal and vertical dislocation without preoperative traction and report the radiological and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, patients with BI and AAD underwent posterior two-step distraction and reduction (TSDR) and occipitocervical fixation. Radiological examination was used to evaluate the reduction degree (RD) and compression. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients with BI and AAD underwent TSDR and occipitocervical fusion. The clinical symptoms of 98.2% of them improved. JOA score increased significantly after the operation. Appropriate (50% ≤ RD < 80%) or satisfactory (RD ≥ 80%) horizontal reduction was achieved in 92.7% of patients, and 90.9% obtained appropriate or satisfactory vertical reduction. Thirty-one patients did not undergo preoperative skull traction. There was no significant difference in radiological outcomes or JOA scores between the traction and non-traction groups. However, the length of hospital stay in the traction group was longer than that in the non-traction group.

CONCLUSION

TSDR enables horizontal and vertical reduction. It is a safe, simple, and effective technique for patients with BI and AAD. Despite the absence of preoperative skull traction, the degree of reduction and clinical outcomes were satisfactory.

Are plain radiographic measurements still consistent with a diagnosis of basilar invagination in the era of cross-sectional images?

Retrospective cross-sectional study To evaluate the validity and obtain optimal cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements for the diagnosis of basilar invagination (BI). Two hundred seventy-six patients (46 patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion for BI and 230 patients who were treated for minor cervical trauma) seen in a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016 were included in this study. Age, sex, and body mass index were adjusted for the patients. The Ranawat index (RI), modified Ranawat method (MRM), and Redlund-Johnell method (RJM) were used to diagnose BI on plain radiographs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio of 3 radiologic measurements were compared. We also calculated the optimized cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements using the receiver operating characteristic curve in our patients. The mean age of the 130 women and 146 men was 58.3 ± 14.5 years. The mean values of RI, MRM, and RJM in the BI group were 12.5 ± 3.3, 23.1 ± 3.8, and 27.3 ± 3.6 in women and 13.6 ± 2.6, 26.8 ± 4.2, and 34.7 ± 5.1 in men. There was a significant difference between the sexes (P < .05). The accuracies of RI, MRM, and RJM were 95%, 89.6%, and 92.3% in women and 93%, 68.2%, and 85.4% in men, respectively. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 38 mm in men. Three radiologic measurements (RI, MRM, and RJM) are reliable for the diagnosis of BI even in the era of cross-sectional images. The validity of these measurements depends on sex and particular radiologic measurement. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 37 mm in men. These cutoff values showed high validity when compared to the CT and MRI findings.

Relevance of C1/2 facet configurations and clivus-canal-angles for adult patients with Chiari I malformation with and without basilar invagination

OBJECTIVE

C1/2 facet configurations and clivus-canal angles (CXA) have been proposed as criteria for posterior fusion in Chiari I malformation (CMI).

METHODS

340 adults with CMI without basilar invagination (BI), 111 with CMI with BI and 100 age and sex matched controls were studied using sagittal T2-weighted MRI scans analyzing pre- and postoperative values with their impact on progression-free survival rates.

RESULTS

For CMI without BI, C1/2 facet configurations and CXA were similar to controls (142+11° and 144+10°, respectively) with low rates for posterior C1 displacements (7.1% and 10%, respectively). In CMI with BI, C1 facet displacements were common (54.9%) with lower CXA (120+15°). After foramen magnum decompression (FMD) in CMI without BI (n = 169), 1.8% developed posterior C1 facet displacements without CXA changes and a 97% progression-free survival rate for 10 years. In CMI with BI, patients without ventral compression or instability underwent FMD without fusion (n = 19). 5.3% developed a posterior C1 facet displacement without CXA changes and a 94% progression-free survival rate for 10 years. The remainder of CMI with BI underwent FMD with C1/2 fusion (n = 48). Among these, CXA values increased with 10 year progression-free survival rates of 74% and 93% with and without ventral compression, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For adult CMI without BI, C1/2 facet configurations and CXA are irrelevant. FMD alone provides excellent long-term outcomes. In CMI with BI, anterior C1 facet displacements indicate C1/2 instability. Posterior fusions can be reserved for patients with ventral compression or C1/2 instability.

Syringomyelia: diagnosis and management

In the pre-MR era syringomyelia often presented late, as a crippling neurological disorder. Today, most cases are diagnosed earlier, with less pronounced deficits. We are therefore presented with new challenges, including understanding the significance of various presenting symptoms, knowing when surgery might help and being aware of other treatments that could benefit someone living with the effects of syringomyelia, or its underlying cause.

Endoscopic Transnasal Odontoidectomy for Ventral Decompression of the Craniovertebral Junction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome in a Case Series of 19 Patients

BACKGROUND

Abnormalities and pathologies of the craniovertebral junction as well as space-occupying lesions of the odontoid process can result in myelopathy symptoms. A staged procedure with posterior stabilization and anterior transnasal endoscopic decompression is recently considered a less invasive alternative to the transoral approach. We present a considerably large case series focused on the operative technique and the long-term neurological clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of odontoidectomy performed via an endoscopic transnasal approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated in our neurosurgical department from January 2009 to January 2020. Demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical status, and operative technique and complications were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 22 transnasal operations were performed in 19 patients from January 2009 to January 2020. All but one patient underwent posterior C1-C2 instrumentation prior to the anterior transnasal computed tomography (CT)-navigated full-endoscopic decompression. The median duration of symptoms before surgery was 3 mo. Complications occurred in 1 patient who died from septic organ failure because of his initial diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Postoperative CT imaging showed sufficient decompression in 16 patients, and 3 patients underwent a transnasal endoscopic re-decompression (16%).

CONCLUSION

Transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy presents a safe procedure with a satisfying clinical and radiological postoperative outcome.

Surgical treatment for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation vs occipitocervical fixation

BACKGROUND

Transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) fixation or occipitocervical fixation (OF) is an effective treatment for basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). But, all current clinical studies involved a single surgical procedure. The clinical effects of TARP and OF operation for BI with IAAD have yet to be compared. We therefore present this report to compare the treatment of TARP and OF procedure for BI with IAAD.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with BI with IAAD who underwent TARP or OF operation from June 2011 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 35 patients underwent TARP operation (TARP group), and 21 patients underwent OF operation (OF group). We compared the difference of clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes between the TARP and OF groups postoperatively.

RESULTS

Compared with OF group, the operative time and blood loss in TARP group were lower. There was no statistical difference in the atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus canal angle (CCA), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the TARP and OF groups preoperatively, but the improvements of these parameters in the TARP group were superior to those in the OF group postoperatively. The fusion rates were higher in the TARP group than those in the OF group at the early stage postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

TARP and OF operations are effective surgical treatment for BI with IAAD, but the performance of reduction and decompression and earlier bone fusion rates of TARP procedure are superior to those of OF.

Occipitocervical fusion combined with 3-dimensional navigation and 3-dimensional printing technology for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation with basilar invagination: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Basilar invagination (BI) is a common deformity in the occipitocervical region. The traditional surgical method of BI is direct transoral decompression followed by posterior decompression and fixation. Posterior-only decompression and fixation have achieved good efficacy in the treatment of BI in recent years, but complications are common due to the operation in the upper cervical vertebra and the medulla oblongata region. Moreover, posterior-only occipitocervical fusion combined with an intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) navigation system is relatively rare, and reports of this procedure combined with 3D printing technology have not been published. We present a case of BI treated with posterior-only occipitocervical fusion combined with 3D printing technology and 3D navigation system to reduce the risk of surgical complications.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 55-year-old patient with a history of neck pain and numbness of the extremities for 6 years developed a walking disorder for 1 year.

DIAGNOSES

Atlantoaxial dislocation with BI.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent posterior-only occipitocervical fusion combined with intraoperative 3D navigation system and 3D printing technology.

OUTCOMES

The patient's walking disorder was resolved and he was able to walk approximately 100 m by himself when he was allowed to get up and move around with the help of a neck brace. At 6 months postoperatively, the patient reported that the numbness of the limbs was reduced, and he could walk >500 m by himself.

CONCLUSION

Occipitocervical fusion is one of the established techniques for the treatment of BI. The biggest advantage of the 2 technologies was that it ensured precise implant placement. The advantages of intraoperative 3D navigation systems are as follows: real-time intraoperative monitoring of the angle and depth of implant placement; the best nailing point can be determined at the time of implantation, rather than according to the operator's previous experience; and the extent of screw insertion is visible to the naked eye, rather than being dependent on the "hand feel" of the surgeon. At the same time, the 3D printing technology can be applied to clarify the relationship between blood vessels and bone around the implant to minimize injury to important structures during implantation.

Clinical Analysis of Radiologic Measurements in Patients with Basilar Invagination

OBJECTIVE

To investigate correlations between radiologic measurements and clinical outcomes in patients with basilar invagination (BI).

METHODS

The medical records and radiologic data of 46 patients (27 women) who had undergone posterior atlantoaxial fusion or occipitocervical fusion for BI from January 2010 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients under 15 years old or with a polytraumatic, tumorous, or infectious pathology were excluded. The modified Ranawat method (MRM) and the Redlund-Johnell method (RJM) were used to obtain radiographic measurements of basilar invagination preoperatively, subacute postoperatively, and at 3-month and last follow-up. Visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were also assessed. Correlations between MRM and RJM measurements and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 59.9 ± 16.5 years, mean body mass index was 23.5 ± 4.6 kg/m², and mean follow-up was 37.9 ± 23.8 months. Postoperative radiologic measurements increased about 36% of preoperative radiologic measurements. Subsidence at the C1-2 joint occurred in most patients at 3 months postoperatively, but clinical outcomes did not deteriorate. JOA scores were linearly correlated with percentage increases in both radiologic measurements subacute postoperatively (P < 0.05), but this significance was not maintained until the last follow-up. Occipital numbness and neuralgia were most common postoperative complications. One case of neurovascular injury and 3 cases of postoperative dysphagia occurred postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The subacute postoperative neurological outcomes of BI patients are significantly related to the amount of vertical reduction.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Craniovertebral Junction Surgery

Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery encompasses a wide spectrum of neurosurgical procedures ranging from transoral approaches for CVJ bone anomalies to surgery for intramedullary tumours. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been increasingly used in recent years because of its ability to prevent neurological complications during surgery. In CVJ surgery the risk of neurological injuries is related first to the positioning of the patient and then to the surgical procedure. Application of IONM during the positioning of the patient permits fast recognition of impending causes of neurological injury. During surgery, continuous IONM permits real-time assessment of the functional integrity of the spinal tracts and provides useful feedback during surgical manoeuvres. The applications of IONM are mainly related to intradural procedures, but wider application of these techniques during surgery for CVJ instability and degenerative disorders has recently been described, leading also to better understanding of the pathophysiology of spinal cord injuries. In this paper we review and discuss the principal IONM techniques used during surgery around the CVJ.

Significance of Multimodal Intraoperative Monitoring During Surgery in Patients with Craniovertebral Junction Pathology

OBJECTIVE

Although many studies have investigated the benefits of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgery, the benefits of MIOM in craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery remain unclear. The objectives of the present study were to report our clinical experience in CVJ surgery with the use of MIOM and to identify risk factors that could affect MIOM changes during surgery of CVJ pathology.

METHODS

We reviewed the MIOM records of 146 patients who had undergone high cervical spinal surgery. The patients were grouped by the MIOM data recorded during surgery; the patients were included in either the MIOM or non-MIOM change group. The analyzed risk factors included demographic, myelopathy, preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, spinal cord diameter, and surgical factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for changes in MIOM data during surgery and postoperative neurological deficits.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was 4.1% after CVJ surgery; this rate was significantly greater in the MIOM change group than in the non-MIOM change group (21.7% vs. 0.8%; P < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis revealed that preoperative myelopathy, preoperative JOA score, and congenital anomaly/tumor were independently associated with MIOM changes during surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative neurological complications are not uncommon after CVJ surgery, and the incidence was significantly greater in the MIOM change group. Preoperative myelopathy, preoperative JOA score, and CVJ pathology related to congenital anomaly or tumor were independent risk factors for changes in MIOM data during surgery.

Endoscopic endonasal transclival transodontoid approach for ventral decompression of the craniovertebral junction: operative technique and nuances

The transoral approach is considered the gold-standard surgical route for performing anterior odontoidectomy and ventral decompression of the craniovertebral junction for pathological conditions that result in symptomatic cervicomedullary compression, including basilar invagination, rheumatoid pannus, platybasia with retroflexed odontoid processes, and neoplasms. Extended modifications to increase the operative corridor and exposure include the transmaxillary, extended "open-door" maxillotomy, transpalatal, and transmandibular approaches. With the advent of extended endoscopic endonasal skull base techniques, there has been increased interest in the last decade in the endoscopic endonasal transclival transodontoid approach to the craniovertebral junction. The endonasal route represents an attractive minimally invasive surgical alternative, especially in cases of irreducible basilar invagination in which the pathology is situated well above the palatine line. Angled endoscopes and instrumentation can also be used for lower-lying pathology. By avoiding the oral cavity and subsequently using a transoral retractor, the endonasal route has the advantages of avoiding complications related to tongue swelling, tracheal swelling, prolonged intubation, velopharyngeal insufficiency, dysphagia, and dysphonia. Postoperative recovery is quicker, and hospital stays are shorter. In this report, the authors describe and illustrate their method of purely endoscopic endonasal transclival odonotoidectomy for anterior decompression of the craniovertebral junction and describe various operative pearls and nuances of the technique for avoiding complications.

Basilar Invagination: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Basilar invagination is a rare clinical condition characterized by upward protrusion of the odontoid process into the intracranial space, leading to bulbomedullary compression. It is often encountered in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Transoral microscopic or endonasal endoscopic decompression may be pursued, with or without posterior fixation. We present a case of basilar invagination with C1-C2 autofusion and discuss an algorithm for choice of anterior versus posterior approaches.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 47-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis presented with severe occipital and cervical pain, dysphagia, hoarseness, and arm paresthesias. Findings on magnetic resonance imaging revealed moderate cranial settling with the odontoid indenting the ventral medulla but no posterior compression. Computed tomography demonstrated bony fusion at C1-C2 without lateral sag. Given autofusion of C1-C2 in proper occipitocervical alignment and the absence of posterior compression, the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy without further posterior fusion, with satisfactory resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy offers a safe and effective method for anterior decompression of basilar invagination. Preoperative assessment for existing posterior fusion, absence of posterior compression, and preservation of the anterior C1 ring during operative decompression help stratify the need for lone anterior approach versus a combined anterior and posterior treatment.