Internal fixation with occipital hooks construct for occipito-cervical arthrodesis. Results in 14 young or small children

Cranio-cervical decompression associated with non-instrumented occipito-C2 fusion in children with mucopolysaccharidoses: Report of twenty-one cases

BACKGROUND

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a multisystemic storage disorder of glycosaminoglycan deposits. Infiltration of the dura mater and supporting ligaments caused spinal cord compression and consecutive myelopathy, especially at the cranio-cervical junction (CCJ). Craniocervical instability and posterior decompression often raise the problem of fixation in children. The main purpose of this paper was to report the result of an original technique of occipito-cervical arthrodesis using a cranial halo-cast system in pediatric population.

METHODS

We recorded 21 patients with cervical myelopathy. All of them had spinal cord decompression by enlargement of the foramen magnum, C1 laminectomy, and occipito-C2 fusion using corticocancellous bone graft. Only one child has an extended laminectomy from C1 to C3. The occiput-C2 arthrodesis was stabilized by the cranial halo-cast system. This immobilization was performed preoperatively and kept for three months then switched to rigid cervical collar. Clinical assessment, including the Goel grade and mJOA, radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging were performed before surgery. The occipito-cervical arthrodesis was controlled by standard X-rays and CT scan.

RESULTS

According to the type of mucopolysaccharidosis, the patients were divided into MPS type I: n= 3, II: n=7, IV: n=11. The mean age of patients at surgery was 6.76 years. All mucopolysaccharidoses cases required a foramen magnum decompression by craniectomy, C1 laminectomy and occipito-C2 arthrodesis. As major complications, a child had immediate post-operative paraplegia due to spinal cord ischemia. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 4 years, with an average of 3.3 years. The average preoperative mJOA score was 8.9, and it improved to 14 points at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory fusion and good clinical results were obtained with the 2-stage approach to CCJ anomalies.

Craniovertebral junction fixation in children less than 5 years

PURPOSE

Whilst rigid fixation for craniovertebral instability is the gold standard, in very young, small children conventional management may have to be modified. We present a single-centre experience of craniocervical fixation in children under 5 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review of cases that had undergone atlantoaxial (AA) or occipitocervical (OC) fixation aged under 5 years. Fusion was assessed using computerised tomography or flexion extension X-rays.

RESULTS

Twenty-six children (median age 2.3, range 0.8-4.9 years, 19 under the age of 3) underwent OC (n = 19) or AA (n = 7) fusion between 1999 and 2016. Pathology comprised 17 congenital, five trauma, two tumour and two post-infection cases. Twenty-one patients underwent sublaminar cable fixation with calvarial, autologous bone graft and halo-body orthosis immobilisation. An occipital plate and rods to sublaminar wire construct were used in four cases. A rigid instrumented fixation with occipital plate and C2 pedicle screws was utilised in one case. Follow-up was for a median of 2.8 years (range 0.03-16.3 years). Initial fusion rate was 91%, reaching 100% following two re-operations. Ninety-two per cent of patients were neurologically stable or improved following surgery. Twenty-one patients had a good overall outcome. Two patients had post-operative neurological deteriorations, and four died due to non-procedure related causes. Pin site morbidity secondary to halo use occurred in five cases.

CONCLUSION

High fusion rates with good outcomes are achievable using semi-rigid fixation in the under 5-year-olds. Full thickness, autologous calvarial bone graft secured with wire cables and halo external orthosis offers a safe and effective alternative technique when traditional screw instrumentation is not feasible. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Occiput-to-Pelvis Spinal Arthrodesis: A Case Series

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the indications, operative course, and outcomes in eight pediatric patients who underwent occiput-to-pelvis (O-P) spinal arthrodesis.

SUMMARY

Spinal arthrodesis from the occiput to pelvis is needed for some children with extensive spine deformity. There are few reports of patients with O-P arthrodesis.

METHODS

We reviewed records of pediatric patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis to treat spine deformity between 1987 and 2017 at one institution. Eight patients (six girls) who underwent staged O-P arthrodesis were identified. Underlying conditions, indications for surgery, medical comorbidities, operative courses, complications, and imaging of these patients were recorded.

RESULTS

Diagnoses were neuromuscular disorders in five patients and syndromic disorders in three patients. Mean ages were 9.7 ± 4.1 years at index surgery and 16.8 ± 4.6 years at completion of O-P arthrodesis. Patients underwent a mean of three operations (range, two to five). Occipitocervical arthrodesis was the final operation in six of eight patients (all but the two patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome). Mean follow-up after the last procedure was 8.5 ± 7.1 years. Two patients underwent revision for protruding occipital implants, and one patient underwent revision for thoracic pseudarthrosis. No patients developed postoperative infections or new neurologic deficits. At final follow-up, Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire scores were lowest for Function (2.6 ± 1.0 of 5 possible points) and highest for Satisfaction (4.1 ± 1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

O-P arthrodesis can benefit patients with extensive spine deformity from neuromuscular or syndromic causes. Patients were young at first operation, which may suggest that younger patients are at higher risk than older patients of major progression of deformity in other spinal regions after deformity correction. Health-related quality of life and radiographic outcomes suggest that patients who underwent O-P arthrodesis had satisfactory outcomes and maintenance of correction during a mean of 8.5 years of follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Outcomes of Surgical Correction of Atlantoaxial Instability in Patients with Down Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is a common cause of neurologic dysfunction and pain in patients with Down syndrome (DS), frequently requiring instrumented fusion of the upper cervical spine. Despite this, optimal treatment strategy is controversial.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement to identify patients with AAI and DS were treated with upper cervical spine fusion. Patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, fixation type, and outcome measures including complications, neurologic outcomes, and bony fusion status were gathered for patients in the included publications. Meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes of different types of fixation constructs.

RESULTS

Of the 1191 publications retrieved, 51 met inclusion criteria, yielding 137 patients. Six fixation strategies were identified: noninstrumented (n = 6), wiring (n = 77), wiring with rods (n = 14), screw fixation (n = 33), hook and rod fixation (n = 2), and screw and wire fixation (n = 5). Constructs with screws and rods had greater bony union (P = 0.003) and a lower rate of revision surgery (P = 0.047), loss of reduction or pseudoarthrosis (P = 0.009), halo utilization (P < 0.001), and early neurologic decline (P = 0.004) compared with wiring alone. Constructs with wires and rods had greater bony union (P = 0.036) than wiring alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous fixation strategies exist for AAI in patients with DS. Using a combination of screws, rods, and wiring in appropriately selected patients may help reduce the high rate of surgical complications in these patients.

Instrumented arthrodesis for non-traumatic craniocervical instability in very young children

PURPOSE

Occipitocervical instrumentation is infrequently required for stabilization of the axial and subaxial cervical spine in very young children. However, when it is necessary, unique surgical considerations arise in children when compared with similar procedures in adults.

METHODS

The authors reviewed literature describing fusion of the occipitocervical junction (OCJ) in toddlers and share their experience with eight cases of young children (age less than or equal to 4 years) receiving occiput to axial or subaxial spine instrumentation and fixation. Diagnoses and indications included severe or secondary Chiari malformation, skeletal dysplastic syndromes, Klippel-Feil syndrome, Pierre Robin syndrome, Gordon syndrome, hemivertebra and atlantal occipitalization, basilar impression, and iatrogenic causes.

RESULTS

All patients underwent occipital bone to cervical spine instrumentation and fixation at different levels. Constructs extended from the occiput to C2 and T1 utilizing various permutations of titanium rods, autologous rib autografts, Mersilene sutures, and combinations of autografts with bone matrix materials. All patients were placed in rigid cervical bracing or halo fixation postoperatively. No postoperative neurological deficits or intraoperative vascular injuries occurred.

CONCLUSION

Instrumented arthrodesis can be a treatment option in very young children to address the non-traumatic craniocervical instability while reducing the need for prolonged external halo vest immobilization. Factors affecting fusion are addressed with respect to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative decision-making that may be unique to the toddler population.

Spinal instrumentation in infants, children, and adolescents: a review

OBJECTIVEThe evolution of pediatric spinal instrumentation has progressed in the last 70 years since the popularization of the Harrington rod showing the feasibility of placing spinal instrumentation into the pediatric spine. Although lacking in pediatric-specific spinal instrumentation, when possible, adult instrumentation techniques and tools have been adapted for the pediatric spine. A new generation of pediatric neurosurgeons with interest in complex spine disorder has pushed the field forward, while keeping the special nuances of the growing immature spine in mind. The authors sought to review their own experience with various types of spinal instrumentation in the pediatric spine and document the state of the art for pediatric spine surgery.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed patients in their practice who underwent complex spine surgery. Patient demographics, operative data, and perioperative complications were recorded. At the same time, the authors surveyed the literature for spinal instrumentation techniques that have been utilized in the pediatric spine. The authors chronicle the past and present of pediatric spinal instrumentation, and speculate about its future.RESULTSThe medical records of the first 361 patients who underwent 384 procedures involving spinal instrumentation from July 1, 2007, to May 31, 2018, were analyzed. The mean age at surgery was 12 years and 6 months (range 3 months to 21 years and 4 months). The types of spinal instrumentation utilized included occipital screws (94 cases); C1 lateral mass screws (115 cases); C2 pars/translaminar screws (143 cases); subaxial cervical lateral mass screws (95 cases); thoracic and lumbar spine traditional-trajectory and cortical-trajectory pedicle screws (234 cases); thoracic and lumbar sublaminar, subtransverse, and subcostal polyester bands (65 cases); S1 pedicle screws (103 cases); and S2 alar-iliac/iliac screws (56 cases). Complications related to spinal instrumentation included hardware-related skin breakdown (1.8%), infection (1.8%), proximal junctional kyphosis (1.0%), pseudarthroses (1.0%), screw malpositioning (0.5%), CSF leak (0.5%), hardware failure (0.5%), graft migration (0.3%), nerve root injury (0.3%), and vertebral artery injury (0.3%).CONCLUSIONSPediatric neurosurgeons with an interest in complex spine disorders in children should develop a comprehensive armamentarium of safe techniques for placing rigid and nonrigid spinal instrumentation even in the smallest of children, with low complication rates. The authors' review provides some benchmarks and outcomes for comparison, and furnishes a historical perspective of the past and future of pediatric spine surgery.

Instrumented cervical spinal fusions in children: indications and outcomes

PURPOSE

To report indications, outcomes and complications of instrumented cervical spinal fusion in a consecutive series of children at major university hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective, single surgeon series identified 35 consecutive children with a mean follow-up (FU) of 2.5 years undergoing instrumented cervical spinal fusion between 2005 and 2015.

RESULTS

The main indications were skeletal dysplasia and trauma associated cervical instability. Surgical complications were observed in 12 (34%) patients with multiple complications in four (11%). Four (11%) children required at least one revision surgery, three for nonunion and one for graft dislodgement. All were fused at FU. Surgical complications were more common in children undergoing occipitocervical (OC) fusion than in those avoiding fusion of the OC junction (60% versus 24%) (p = 0.043). Complications were found significantly more in children operated on under the age of ten years than above (50% versus 18%) (p = 0.004). The risk of complications was not dependent on the indications for surgery (skeletal dysplasia versus trauma) (p = 0.177).

CONCLUSION

Skeletal dysplasia associated cervical instability and cervical spine injuries represented the most common indications for instrumented cervical spinal fusion in children. Complications were observed in one-third of these children and 11% required revision surgery for complications. OC spinal fusion and spinal fusion before the age of ten years are associated with higher risk of surgical complications and increased mortality than non-OC fusions and cervical spinal fusions at an older age. We urge surgeons to employ caution to the patient, timing and procedure selection when treating paediatric cervical spine.