Correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with congenital scoliosis, and healthy individuals

Evaluating Pelvic Tilt Using the Pelvic Antero-Posterior Projection Images: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pelvic tilt (PT) is a routinely evaluated parameter in hip and spine surgeries, and is usually measured on a sagittal pelvic radiograph. This may not always be feasible due to limitations such as landmark visibility, pelvic anomaly, and hardware presence. Tremendous efforts have been dedicated to using pelvic antero-posterior (AP) radiographs for assessing sagittal PT. Thus, this systematic review aimed to collect these methods and evaluate their performances.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases in June 2023 with backward reference trailing (Google Scholar archive). There were 30 studies recruited. Risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. The relevant data were tabulated in a standardized form for evaluating either the absolute PT or relative PT. Disagreement was resolved by discussing with the senior author.

RESULTS

There were 19 parameters from pelvic AP projection images involved, with 4 studies which used artificial intelligence, eyeball, or statistical shape method not involving a specific parameter. In comparing the PT values from pelvic sagittal images with those extrapolated from antero-posterior projection images, the highest correlation coefficient was found to be 0.91. The mean absolute difference (error) was 2.6°, with a maximum error reaching 10.9°. Most studies supported the feasibility of using AP parameters to calculate changes in PT.

CONCLUSIONS

No individual AP parameter was found to precisely estimate absolute PT. However, relative PT can be derived by evaluating serial AP radiographs of a patient in varying postures, employing any AP parameters.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients).

RESULTS

The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

The accuracy in determining pelvic tilt from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting hip arthroplasty

Spinopelvic mobility affects outcome after THA. Whether the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, measured on AP radiographs, can be reliably used to estimate pelvic tilt (PT) in hip osteoarthritis patients is unknown. This study aimed to (1) validate the use of the SFP angle in the calculation of PT from AP radiographs, and (2) identify individual patient factors affecting the estimation of PT. A cohort of 100 patients awaiting THA for end-stage hip osteoarthritis was prospectively studied. AP and lateral radiographs, taken in the standing and relaxed-seated positions were evaluated for spinopelvic measurements (SFP, PT, and pelvic incidence [PI]). To validate the SFP angle, estimated PT values using the formula [PT = 75°-SFP] were compared to the true, measured values from the lateral radiographs. Despite good agreement for the estimated and true PT (16.2 ± 5.9° vs. 15.5 ± 8.6°; p = .315), a significantly poorer agreement could be found between the two methods at high or low values of PT. Patient-specific PI correlated with the difference between the two measurement methods (Pearson's r = -0.644; p < .001). However, the change in SFP angle equaled approximately the change in pelvic tilt (∆PT = 2°-∆SFP; Pearson's r = -0.934; p < .001). Absolute values for the sagittal PT should not be estimated from AP pelvic radiographs in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty. However, the relative change in PT between different positions equals approximately the change in SFP angle. This may allow functional cup orientation after THA to be determined between different postures from an AP radiograph of the pelvis. The SFP angle has moderate accuracy in determining a patient's pelvic tilt; however, it can accurately determine a patient's change in pelvic tilt in different positions.

Effects of posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion on the evolution of sagittal balance in children with congenital scoliosis

There is a paucity of data describing sagittal alignment changes in children with congenital scoliosis (CS) treated by hemivertebra (HV) resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of posterior HV resection on spine sagittal alignment in children with CS. This is a retrospective analysis of 31 children with CS (mean age at surgery: 49.61 ± 10.21 months; range, 39-72; mean follow-up time: 5.16 ± 1.21 years; range: 3-7) treated at our Institution. Only patients with single thoracic or single lumbar, fully segmented HV managed by posterior HV resection and two segments fusion with four screws and two robs were included. According to the anatomical location of the HV, patients were divided into two groups: thoracic (group A) and lumbar (group B). Thoracic kyphosis (T1-T12; TK) and lumbar lordosis (L1-S1; LL) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 6 months interval. Postoperative TK and LL were 30.3 ± 11.47 and 28.8 ± 9.47, and were 31.98 ± 9.66 and 46.7 ± 11.37 at the last follow-up visit, respectively. The incidence of thoracic hypokyphosis in group B was 53.3%, and it was significantly higher compared to group A (12.5%, P = 0.04). During follow-up, TK changes were comparable between the two groups of patients while LL improved in all patients 6 months after surgery, and continued to improve thereafter. Posterior HV resection and short segment fusion have limited impact on the evolution of TK; in particular, children with lumbar HV were more likely to be hypokyphotic preoperatively, but less likely postoperatively with an increase in LL and a stabilization of TK.

The effect of Cobb angle correction on spinal length gain in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The relationship between curve correction and spinal length gain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was examined. A total of 102 patients who underwent posterior spinal correction and fusion alone or in combination with anterior spinal correction and fusion (ASF) were studied. The Cobb angle correction, increase in the main thoracic length, T1-L5 spinal length gain, and T1-L5 spinal length gain/Cobb angle correction were reported. The length gain/Cobb angle correction value was not significantly associated with sex, fusion approach, and the number of fused levels. Surgical T1-L5 spinal length gain (mm) equaled (70.20)-(3.51)×(degrees of Cobb angle correction)+(0.08)×(degrees of Cobb angle correction).

The Berbeo-Sardi Angle (BSA): An Innovative Method to Effectively Estimate Pelvic Retroversion in Anteroposterior Radiographs-A Correlation With Traditional Parameters

STUDY

Design: Diagnostic studies-concordance between diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel spinopelvic parameter (Berbeo-Sardi angle [BSA], the angle formed at the intersection of a line that connects the inferior margin of the sacroiliac joint to the midpoint of a horizontal line joining both femoral heads) measurable in anteroposterior radiographs that indirectly estimates pelvic retroversion and correlates with traditional measurements like pelvic tilt (PT).

SUMMARY

Sagittal balance appraisal and surgical planning rely on the interpretation of spinopelvic parameters. An increased PT reflects pelvic retroversion as a compensatory mechanism to limit sagittal imbalance and correlates with increased pain and disability. However, poor imaging techniques and incorrect patient positioning frequently hamper landmark identification in lateral radiographs, and with no measurable angles in anteroposterior radiographs, it is often impossible to determine PT and pelvic retroversion.

METHODS

Whole-spine radiographs from 105 consecutive patients were used to retrospectively measure conventional spinopelvic parameters and the BSA. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess a quantitative correlation between the PT and BSA as indirect measures of pelvic retroversion.

RESULTS

Average values for pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, PT, and BSA were 46.5° (±10.23), 48.56° (±12.30), 29.97° (±9.77), 16.94° (±8.03), and 54.47° (±4.05), respectively. We encountered a moderately strong correlation (r = -0.66) between PT and BSA. Receiver operating characteristic plot analysis revealed that a BSA threshold of 46° has a sensitivity of 90% to identify pathologic PT values (>20°), whereas a BSA ≥60° has a specificity of 90% to rule out pelvic retroversion using anteroposterior radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a moderately strong correlation between the BSA, an innovative spinopelvic parameter measurable in anteroposterior radiographs, and PT. BSA seems to show great promise in simplifying spinopelvic appraisal by easily estimating pelvic retroversion associated with sagittal imbalance, while avoiding image-quality issues often encountered in lateral radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Assessment of the Relationship between Pelvic Tilt and the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle in Middle-Aged and Elderly Asian Individuals

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pelvic tilt (PT) and the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, which is easier to identify than PT, in middle-aged and elderly Asian subjects from the general population.

Overview of Literature

Measuring PT is important in the diagnosis and treatment of adult spinal deformity. However, identifying femoral heads, which are necessary to determine PT, using sagittal radiographs is often difficult.

Methods

Standing coronal and sagittal pelvic radiographs of individuals aged more than 50 years were taken during a local medical examination. The subjects were divided into female, male, and total groups at the time of evaluation. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between PT and the SFP angle, which were obtained from the X-rays.

Results

The present study included 291 subjects. There were no statistically significant differences between the left and right SFP angles, and there was gender difference regarding the SFP angle. However, a gender difference was observed regarding PT. The correlation between PT and the SFP angle was substantiated in each group. Pearson's correlation coefficients between PT and the SFP angle in the total, female, and male groups were 0.696, 0.853, and 0.619, respectively. In the linear regression analysis, PT was calculated as follows: PT=60.1-0.77×(SFP angle) in the total group, PT=62.8-0.80×(SFP angle) in the female group, and PT=51.5-0.64×(SFP angle) in the male group.

Conclusions

A significant correlation between PT and the SFP angle was observed in middle-aged and elderly Asian subjects from the general population.

Orientation of the facet joints in degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis: an MR study on 52 patients

BACKGROUND

Because of a degenerative component, degenerative rotatory scoliosis seems different from congenital and idiopathic subtypes of the disease. This study aims to examine the orientation of facet joints, as a known cause of degeneration, in patients with degenerative rotatory scoliosis.

METHODS

Lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) images and plain radiographs of 52 symptomatic patients (mean age, 50.17 years) with degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis (mean curve, 19.22 degrees) and 50 healthy individuals were reviewed. Facet joint angles in rotated segments and the minimum neural foramen width at all lumbar levels were measured by three observers and the average was recorded.

RESULTS

The maximum vertebral rotation was most frequent at L4-L5 (75 %), and the majority was of type I (84.6 %) according to the Nash-Moe classification. At all lumbar spinal levels the mean facet joint angles were significantly higher on the side of rotation (L2-L3, 57.92 degrees; L3-L4, 45.00 degrees; L4-L5, 43.88 degrees) compared to those on the contralateral side (L2-L3, 20.42 degrees; L3-L4, 15.48 degrees; L4-L5, 13.12 degrees) and in controls (L2-L3, 30.21 degrees; L3-L4, 40.81 degrees; L4-L5, 45.20 degrees) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The mean facet joint angle increased significantly from L4-L5 to L2-L3 in cases and reversely in controls. The mean minimum neural foramen width was 1.29 ± 0.85 mm on the side of rotation, 5.50 ± 1.09 mm on the contralateral side, and 6.78 ± 1.75 mm in controls (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial asymmetries and abnormal orientations in facet joints were documented in patients with degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis. Such asymmetries may adversely affect neural foramen width.