Causal factors for position-related SSEP changes in spinal surgery

Neuromonitoring Identifies Occlusion of Femoral Artery in STA-MCA Bypass Procedure: A Case Report

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is a technique used to assess the somatosensory and gross motor systems during surgery. While it is primarily used to detect and prevent surgically induced nervous system trauma, it can also detect and prevent injury to the nervous system that is the result of other causes such as trauma or ischemia that occur outside of the operative field as a result of malpositioning or other problematic physiologic states. We present a case study where a neuromonitoring alert altered the surgical procedure, though the alert was not correlated to the site of surgery. A 69-year-old male with a history of bilateral moyamoya disease and a left middle cerebral artery infarct underwent a right-sided STA-MCA bypass and encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) with multimodal IONM. During the procedure, the patient experienced a loss of motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings in the right lower extremity. Blood pressure was elevated, which temporarily restored the potentials, but they were lost again after the angiography team attempted to place an arterial line in the right femoral artery. The operation was truncated out of concern for left hemispheric ischemia, and it was later discovered that the patient had an acute right external iliac artery occlusion caused by a fresh thrombus in the common femoral artery causing complete paralysis of the limb. This case highlights the importance of heeding IONM alerts and evaluating for systemic causes if the alert is not thought to be of surgical etiology. IONM can detect adverse systemic neurological sequelae that is not necessarily surgically induced.

A novel approach of using brachial plexus blockade as an experimental model for diagnosis of intraoperative nerve dysfunction with somatosensory evoked potentials: a blinded proof-of-concept study

PURPOSE

Intraoperative nerve dysfunction has been difficult to investigate because of its rarity and unpredictable occurrence. The diagnostic test attributes of nerve function monitors have not been clearly defined. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the feasibility of using brachial plexus blockade (BPB) in awake patients as an experimental model for nerve dysfunction to characterize the diagnostic test attributes of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).

METHODS

We obtained baseline SSEPs and neurologic function in patients and subsequently placed BPBs (experimental model) to generate progressive states of nerve dysfunction. We monitored SSEP changes (index test) and neurologic symptoms (reference standard) simultaneously during the onset of BPB to determine the temporal relationships and diagnostic test attributes of SSEPs.

RESULTS

Brachial plexus blockade produced differential motor and sensory dysfunction that allowed simultaneous clinical and neurophysiologic assessment. One hundred and fifty-seven pairs of multiple data points from 14 patients were included for final analysis. The onset of abnormal SSEP signals almost always preceded the onset of neurologic symptoms. The sensitivities and specificities of SSEP to detect the impairment of power (motor rating score ≤ 4/5), cold sensation, and two-point discrimination were 100% and 67%, 99% and 55%, and 100% and 46%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study found that BPB can produce sufficient differential nerve dysfunction to allow adequate evaluation of the diagnostic test attributes of SSEPs as a nerve monitor. The results of this study may stimulate further work on refining intraoperative nerve dysfunction models and diagnostic nerve function monitors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03409536); registered 24 January 2018.

Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Broad narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the current literature on guidelines, outcomes, techniques and indications surrounding multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.

METHODS

A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the guidelines, outcomes, techniques, and indications for multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.

RESULTS

There is a large body of literature that provides a consensus on guidelines regarding the appropriate timing of discontinuation of anticoagulation, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and herbal supplements prior to surgery. Additionally, there is a more heterogenous discussion the utility of preoperative autologous blood donation facilitated by erythropoietin and iron supplementation for healthy patients slated for procedures with high anticipated blood loss and for whom allogeneic transfusion is likely. Intraoperative maneuvers available to minimize blood loss include positioning and maintaining normothermia. Tranexamic acid (TXA), bipolar sealer electrocautery, and topical hemostatic agents, and hypotensive anesthesia (mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg) should be strongly considered in cases with larger exposures and higher anticipated blood loss. There is strong level 1 evidence for the use of TXA in spine surgery as it reduces the overall blood loss and transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

As the volume and complexity of spinal procedures rise, intraoperative blood loss management has become a pivotal topic of research within the field. There are many tools for minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. The current literature supports combining techniques to use a cost- effective multimodal approach to minimize blood loss in the perioperative period.

The Significance of Upper Extremity Neuromonitoring Changes During Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective matched-pair cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of upper extremity (UE) neuromonitoring changes in patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery in prone position.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Peripheral nerve injuries in the UEs due to the prone positioning during prolonged thoracolumbar spinal procedures can cause diminished postsurgical outcomes. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has been utilized to alert the surgeon of the development of such injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who developed intraoperative ulnar somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) signal changes during posterior thoracolumbar surgery were identified and compared with a group of patients who did not develop such signal changes. The patients in 2 groups were pair-matched on the number of vertebral levels undergoing surgery. Data regarding intraoperative attempts to resolve signal changes and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 843 patients underwent thoracic, lumbar, or thoracolumbar spine surgeries in the prone position with intraoperative ulnar SSEPs neuromonitoring data available. Of these, 37 patients (4.4%) had intraoperative signal changes in the UEs. An equal number of patients without signal changes were also selected. In each group, 6 patients underwent thoracic, 20 patients underwent lumbar, and 11 patients underwent thoracolumbar procedures. In 8 patients (21.6%), there was no resolution of SSEP signal changes despite intraoperative attempts. The 2 groups were similar with respect to age and comorbidities. There was no significant difference in the mean body mass index (P=0.22). The mean duration of the procedures was 324 minutes in the SSEP signal change patients and 260 minutes in the patients without SSEP signal changes (P=0.03). No patient with UE SSEP changes had a clinically detectable neurological deficit postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

UE SSEP signal changes during multilevel posterior thoracolumbar procedures are more likely to occur as the duration of the operation increases. The presence of UE signal changes does not coincide with clinically significant peripheral neuropathies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.