Surgical management of thoracic disc herniation

Posterolateral approaches to the thoracic spine for calcific disc herniation: is wider exposure always better?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costotransversectomy (CTV) and transpedicular (TP) approaches versus the transfacet (TF) approach for the surgical treatment of calcific thoracic spine herniations (cTDH), in terms of surgical and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Surgical approaches for cTDH are debated. Anterior approaches are recommended, while posterolateral approaches are preferred for non-calcific, paramedian, and lateral hernias. Currently, there is limited evidence about the superiority of a more invasive surgical approach, such as CTV or TP, over TF, a relatively less invasive approach, in terms of neurological outcome, pain, and surgical complications, for the treatment of cTDH.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, monocentric study was conducted on patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic approaches for symptomatic cTDH, between 2010 and 2023, at our institute. Three groups were drafted, based on the surgical approach used: TF, TP, and CTV. All procedures were assisted by intraoperative CT scan, spinal neuronavigation, and intraoperative neuromonitoring. Analyzed factors include duration of surgery, amount of bone removal, intraoperative blood loss, CSF leak, need of instrumentation for iatrogenic instability, degree of disc herniation removal, myelopathy recovery. Afterwards, a statistical analysis was performed to investigate the bony resection of the superior posterior edge of the vertebral soma. The primary outcome was the partial or total herniation removal.

RESULTS

This study consecutively enrolled 65 patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic surgery for cTDH. The TF approach taking the least, and the CTV the longest time (p < 0.01). No statistical difference was observed between the three mentioned approaches, in terms of intraoperative blood loss, dural leakage, post-resection instrumentation, total herniation removal, or myelopathy recovery. An additional somatic bony resection was successful in achieving total herniation removal (p < 0.01), and the extent of bony resection was directly proportional to the extent of hernia removal (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were highlighted between the TP, TF, and CTV regarding the extent of cTDH removal, the postoperative complications, and the neurological improvement. The described somatic bone resection achieved significant total herniation removal and was directly proportional to the preop against postop anteroposterior diameter difference.

Surgical strategy and outcomes for thoracolumbar disc herniation with Autologous Bone-Fusion or Cage-Fusion surgery: case series and literature review

To analyze the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of TLDH with Autologous Bone-Fusion for T10-L1 TLDH or Cage-Fusion for T12-L3 TLDH. This is a retrospective multi-center clinical study, involving a total of 43 patients with TLDH who underwent surgery in our institutions from December 2013 to January 2021. In all, 15 of 43 patients (34.9%) with T10-11(2)/T11-12(5)/T12-L1 (8) TLDH underwent Autologous Bone-Fusion surgery and 28 of 43 patients (65.1%) with T12-L1(3)/L1-L2(12)/L2-L3(13) TLDH underwent Cage-Fusion surgery. Demographic data, clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes were recorded. During the follow-up, pre- to post-operative ODI, VAS back and leg pain scores significantly decreased (P1.2 = 0.001) and the score changes had no significant difference between two groups (P3 = 0.81, 0.59, 0.68). The intraoperative blood loss and operation time showed no significant difference between two groups (P = 0.056, 0.072). The patients showed prominent improvement of hypokinesia and satisfactory rate in two groups (5/7, 71.4% VS 9/12, 75.0%, P = 0.633; 11, 73.3% VS 25, 89.3%, P = 0.281). Notably, no recurrence and severe complications were reported. The choice of surgery approach should be individualized by clinical characteristics and radiology. Selectively Autologous Bone-Fusion for T10-L1 TLDH or Cage-Fusion for T12-L3 TLDH provided adequate nerve decompression and immediate stability. The overall fusion surgical outcomes were satisfactory without major complications during follow-up.

Radiographic and clinical features of thoracic disk disease associated with myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of 257 cases

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical and radiographic characteristics of thoracic disk disease associated with myelopathy (TDM).

METHODS

This is a retrospective clinical review of prospectively collected imaging data based at a single institute. Based on preoperative CT and MRI, we classified TDM as thoracic disk herniation (TDH), THD with ossification (THDO), TDH with posterior bony avulsions of the vertebrae (TDH with PBA), TDH with posterior vertebral osteophytes (TDH with PVO), giant thoracic osteophyte and calcific discitis with herniation (CDH). Patient characteristics and radiographic data were compared between different types of TDM.

RESULTS

Among the 257 patients included, 12.06% of patients presented with symptoms after traumatic events. The most frequent complaint at onset and preoperative was back pain (29.2%) and subjective lower limb weakness (75.5%), respectively. All TDH with PBA is distributed at the lower thoracic segments, while CDH predominantly in the middle and lower thoracic segments. TDH with PBA was more frequent in men than TDH and CDH. Compared with TDH, TDHO, and TDH with PVO, TDH with PBA was younger in surgery age, and TDH and CDH had lower preoperative JOA scores than TDH with PBA. CDH had a larger ventral occupying ratio than TDH, TDHO, and TDH with PBA.

CONCLUSIONS

The onset of TDM was generally insidious but may be triggered acutely by apparently trivial events. With a low prevalence, TDM varied clinical symptoms. Different types of TDM had various clinical features, which might indicate different pathological mechanisms.

The projection of the thoracic nerve roots and their connection with intervertebral discs: a cadaver and radiological study

BACKGROUND

The anatomical features of the thoracic nerve roots in connection with intervertebral discs may prevent surgery-related complications and improve patients' neurological functional status during thoracic spine surgery. There is limited literature evidence regarding this concept using cadavers.

PURPOSE

To elucidate the qualitative anatomical features of the thoracic nerve roots in connection with intervertebral discs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen formalin-preserved spine specimens were used in this study. Small pieces of stainless-steel wires were placed along the root sleeves from their points of origin, after exposing the dural sac and bilateral nerve roots. The standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken after the placement of the wires. Measurements were done on radiographs using the picture archiving communication system.

RESULTS

Take-off angles of the nerve roots at the coronal plane gradually increased from the level of T2 (36.1°±2.72°) to T9 (84.1°±1.84°) and from T9, it decreased to T12 (46.3° ± 2.67°). Similar variation tendency was discovered in take-off angles of the nerve roots at the sagittal plane. No consistent tendency was found both in the distance from the origin of the root sleeve to its superior and inferior vertebral endplate. Distance from the origin of the root sleeve to the posterior midline (DM) exponentially decreased from T1 (8.2 ± 0.87 mm) to T4 (6.0 ± 0.93 mm). It slowly increased from T5 (5.5 ± 0.68 mm) to T12 (10.9 ± 1.79 mm), with T5 having the smallest DM. Distance between the origins of neighboring nerve roots showed an obvious increase from the T1-T2 interval (23.1 ± 2.22 mm) to T7-T8 interval (30.9 ± 2.68 mm). However, it progressively decreased at the T10-T11 interval (26.0 ± 2.40 mm).

CONCLUSION

The dimensions of the thoracic nerve roots vary greatly from T1 to T12 intervertebral discs. Sound knowledge of these anatomical features of the thoracic nerve is mandatory for the thoracic spine surgery, especially in the posterolateral approach and transforaminal endoscopic surgery.

Trans-thoracic versus retropleural approach for symptomatic thoracic disc herniations: comparative analysis of 94 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The authors illustrate their results in the surgical treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniations (TDHs) by comparing the traditional open to the less invasive retropleural lateral approaches.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 94 consecutive cases treated at a single Institution between 1988 and 2014. Fifty-two patients were males, 42 females, mean age was 53.9 years. Mean follow-up was 46.9 months (12-79 months). 33 patients were diagnosed with a giant thoracic disc herniation (GTDH). Upon admission, the most common symptoms were: motor impairment (91.4%, n = 86), neuropathic radicular pain with VAS > 4 (50%), bladder and bowel dysfunction (57.4% and 41.4% respectively) and sensory disturbances (29.7%). The surgical approach was based upon level, laterality and presence or absence of calcified lesions.

RESULTS

Decompression was performed in 7 cases via a thoraco-laparo-phrenotomy and in 87 cases via an antero-lateral thoracotomy. Out of the latter cases, 49 (56%) were trans-thoracic trans-pleural approaches (TTA) and 38 (44%) were less invasive retropleural approaches (MIRA). At follow-up, there were 59.5% neurologically intact patients according to the McCormick Scale, while 64.8% and 67% had no bladder or bowel dysfunction respectively. Complications occurred in 24 patients (25.5%). Pulmonary complications were the commonest (12.7%) with pleural effusion being significantly more common in patients treated with TTA compared to MIRA (20% vs 5.2%: X² 4.13 P:0.042). Severe post-operative neuralgia (VAS 7-10) was also significantly more frequent in the TTA group (22.4% vs 2.6% X² 7.07 p 0.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

MIRA is a safe and effective technique to obtain adequate TDH decompression and is associated with lower morbidity compared to TTA.

Non-neurological outcomes of anterior and posterolateral approaches in the surgical treatment of thoracic disc disease: a retrospective study

Background

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is rare, and for those patients that fail conservative treatment, two main categories of surgical approaches exist-anterior and posterolateral. In many cases either approach would be considered equally appropriate. Recommendations in support of either anterior or posterolateral approaches are currently based on case series and expert opinion. Here, we utilize National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to determine and compare the rates of complication associated with anterior or posterolateral approaches in the treatment of TDH.

Methods

An analysis of NSQIP data from 2005 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were included based on a combination of a postoperative diagnosis of TDH. Patients were then grouped according to anterior or posterior approaches on the basis of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Propensity score matching was performed to account for baseline demographics [sex, race, age, obesity, diabetes, smoking, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of CHF, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class]. The 30-day outcome measures of these patients were analyzed.

Results

A total of 432 patients were identified, 80.3% underwent posterolateral and 19.7% anterior interventions. There were no significant differences in 30-day outcome measures between the anterior or posterior intervention groups. Within the matched group of 170 patients, the anterior group had significantly longer lengths of stay (5.49±3.96 vs. 4.01±4.81, P<0.0001), but there were no observed significant differences in the rate of occurrences of UTIs, pneumonias, sepsis, bleeding, intubation, or death.

Conclusions

Posterolateral and anterior approaches carry an equal non-neurological perioperative complication profile. Posterolateral approaches may carry shorter hospital stays compared to anterior interventions.

Combined intra-extradural approach for posterolateral thoracic disk herniations. Preliminary study and technical note

Purpose Thoracic disk herniation is uncommon. It still represents a challenge for spinal surgeons. Multiple surgical strategies are available and, often, they are matter of debate. We describe a preliminary experience about a combined extra-intra dural approach for posterolateral disk herniation in patients affected by spinal cord compression.

METHODS

We performed a combined extra-intra dural approach in two preliminary cases. We performed bilateral laminectomy of adjacent vertebrae and unilateral partial medial arthrectomy of the involved segment. After a lateral extradural diskectomy, we, subsequently, performed a median longitudinal durotomy. The conflict between disk herniation and spinal cord was identified. We removed disk herniation moving disk fragments in the extradural compartment without ventral spinal dura opening.

RESULTS

We solved spinal cord compression in both cases. Postoperative neurological improvement was observed in both cases. No major complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results are probably insufficient to establish surgical criteria but offer another surgical perspective to especially treat patients with contraindication to anterior approaches.