Local and systemic diffusion of antineoplastic drugs following vertebroplasty using acrylic cement mixed with cisplatin or methotrexate: experimental study in pigs

Tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral metastases: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of metastatic vertebral fractures without neural compression is performed with percutaneous cementation techniques. The increase in intratumoral pressure by these techniques can send tumor cells into the bloodstream. To prevent this dissemination and improve pain treatment, ablation techniques have been introduced that would allow the creation of a cavity in the tumor prior to cementation or directly necrosing the metastasis when its size is small.

MATERIAL

We present the experience with ablation of two hospitals and two different ablation techniques. The first group used radiofrequency ablation (A) in 14 patients (26 vertebrae), 4 of whom underwent vertebral arthrodesis. The second group used microwave ablation (B) in 93 patients (129 lesions) without associated vertebral instrumentation.

RESULTS

In group A pain improvement in VAS was 7.7-2.6 at 6 weeks. There were no complications derived from the ablation. In most cases cementation was associated. In the group B pain improvement in VAS went from 6.8-1.7 at 6 weeks. Cementation was associated in all cases. There were no complications derived from the ablation.

CONCLUSION

The association of ablation techniques with vertebral cementation is a safe technique that significantly improves the patient's pain and can help control the disease.

[Translated article] Tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral metastases: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of metastatic vertebral fractures without neural compression is performed with percutaneous cementation techniques. The increase in intratumoral pressure by these techniques can send tumor cells into the bloodstream. To prevent this dissemination and improve pain treatment, ablation techniques have been introduced that would allow the creation of a cavity in the tumor prior to cementation or directly necrosing the metastasis when its size is small.

MATERIAL

We present the experience with ablation of two hospitals and two different ablation techniques. The first group used radiofrequency ablation (A) in 14 patients (26 vertebrae), 4 of whom underwent vertebral arthrodesis. The second group used microwave ablation (B) in 93 patients (129 lesions) without associated vertebral instrumentation.

RESULTS

In group A pain improvement in VAS was 7.7-2.6 at 6 weeks. There were no complications derived from the ablation. In most cases cementation was associated. In the group B pain improvement in VAS went from 6.8 to 1.7 at 6 weeks. Cementation was associated in all cases. There were no complications derived from the ablation.

CONCLUSION

The association of ablation techniques with vertebral cementation is a safe technique that significantly improves the patient's pain and can help control the disease.

A Toolbox of Bone Consolidation for the Interventional Radiologist

Bone consolidation is increasingly used in the treatment of both benign and malignant bone conditions. Percutaneous vertebroplasty, for example, has been shown to be useful in vertebral compression fractures in the VAPOUR trial which showed its superiority to placebo for pain reduction in the treatment of acute vertebral compressive fractures. Further tools have since been developed, such as kyphoplasty, spinal implants, and even developments in bone cements itself in attempt to improve outcome, such as chemotherapy-loaded cement or cement replacements such as radio-opaque silicon polymer. More importantly, bone fixation and its combination with cement have been increasingly performed to improve outcome. Interventional radiologists must first know the tools available, before they can best plan for their patients. This review article will focus on the tool box available for the modern interventional radiologist.

Comprehensive evaluation and advanced modification of polymethylmethacrylate cement in bone tumor treatment

Bone tumors are invasive diseases with a tendency toward recurrence, disability, and high mortality rates due to their grievous complications. As a commercial polymeric biomaterial, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement possesses remarkable mechanical properties, injectability, and plasticity and is, therefore, frequently applied in bone tissue engineering. Numerous positive effects in bone tumor treatment have been demonstrated, including biomechanical stabilization, analgesic effects, and tumor recurrence prevention. However, to our knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of the application of the PMMA cement in bone tumor treatment has not yet been reported. This review comprehensively evaluates the efficiency and complications of the PMMA cement in bone tumor treatment, for the first time, and introduces advanced modification strategies, providing an objective and reliable reference for the application of the PMMA cement in treating bone tumors. We have also summarized the current research on modifications to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of the PMMA cement, such as drug carriers and magnetic hyperthermia.

Clinical Outcome and Histological Findings After Induced Leakage of PMMA Loaded With Methotrexate and Cisplatin During Vertebroplasty: Experimental Model in Pigs

STUDY DESIGN

Animal experimental model.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical behavior and histological changes in the spinal cord, nerve roots and perivertebral muscles of the spine after induced leakage of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) loaded with antiblastic drugs during vertebroplasty in an animal model of pigs.

METHODS

We performed vertebroplasty on 25 pigs. The animals were divided into 3 groups: vertebroplasty with PMMA alone (control group), vertebroplasty with PMMA loaded with methotrexate (MTX) and vertebroplasty with PMMA loaded with cisplatin (CYS). At 2 vertebral levels, epidural and prevertebral, massive cement leaks were induced. Animals were evaluated daily. Two weeks later, the pigs were sacrificed, and the tissues that came in contact with the cement were analyzed.

RESULTS

The clinical results for each of the groups were reported. The control group had no clinical alterations. In the MTX group, 2 pigs died before 1 week due to pneumonitis. In the CYS group, 4 animals had motor impairment, and 3 of the 4 had paraplegia. The histological results were as follows: the control and MTX groups showed synovial metaplasia, inflammatory reaction, crystal deposits, and giant cell reaction in the dura mater and muscle and all the animals in the CYS group had spinal cord and muscular necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Massive cement leak after vertebroplasty with PMMA loaded with cisplatin is extremely toxic to the spinal cord and muscles around the spine. Therefore, its use cannot be recommended for the treatment of vertebral metastases. Using PMMA loaded with methotrexate seems to be a safe procedure, but further research is needed.

Dual-functional porous and cisplatin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement for reconstruction of load-bearing bone defect kills bone tumor cells

Malignant bone tumors are usually treated by resection of tumor tissue followed by filling of the bone defect with bone graft substitutes. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement is the most commonly used bone substitute in clinical orthopedics in view of its reliability. However, the dense nature of PMMA renders this biomaterial unsuitable for local delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to limit the recurrence of bone tumors. Here, we introduce porosity into PMMA cement by adding carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) to facilitate such local delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs, while retaining sufficient mechanical properties for bone reconstruction in load-bearing sites. Our results show that the mechanical strength of PMMA-based cements gradually decreases with increasing CMC content. Upon incorporation of ≥3% CMC, the PMMA-based cements released up to 18% of the loaded cisplatin, in contrast to cements containing lower amounts of CMC which only released less than 2% of the cisplatin over 28 days. This release of cisplatin efficiently killed osteosarcoma cells in vitro and the fraction of dead cells increased to 91.3% at day 7, which confirms the retained chemotherapeutic activity of released cisplatin from these PMMA-based cements. Additionally, tibias filled with PMMA-based cements containing up to 3% of CMC exhibit comparable compressive strengths as compared to intact tibias. In conclusion, we demonstrate that PMMA cements can be rendered therapeutically active by introducing porosity using CMC to allow for release of cisplatin without compromising mechanical properties beyond critical levels. As such, these data suggest that our dual-functional PMMA-based cements represent a viable treatment option for filling bone defects after bone tumor resection in load-bearing sites.

•

Dual-functional porous PMMA cements are developed by introducing CMC as both pore generator and drug vehicle for cisplatin.

•

PMMA-based cements containing ≥3% CMC release sufficient amounts of chemotherapeutically active cisplatin.

•

PMMA-based cements containing ≤3% CMC retain sufficient mechanical properties for bone reconstruction at load-bearing sites.

PMMA Bone Cement Composite Functions as an Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Platform for Localized and Multi-Window Release During Bone Reconstruction

Primary bone tumor resections often result in critical size defects, which then necessitate challenging clinical management approaches to reconstruct. One such intervention is the Masquelet technique, in which poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement is placed as a spacer temporarily while adjuvant chemotherapeutics are administered systemically. The spacer is later removed and replaced with bone autograft. Local recurrence remains an important and devastating problem, therefore, a system capable of locally delivering chemotherapeutics would present unique advantages. In this work, a refillable chemotherapeutic (doxorubicin, DOX) delivery platform comprised of PMMA bone cement and insoluble γ-cyclodextrin (γ-CD) polymeric microparticles is developed and explored towards application as a temporary adjuvant chemotherapeutic spacer. The system is characterized for porosity, mechanical strength, DOX filling and refilling capacity, elution kinetics, and cytotoxicity. Since residual chemotherapeutics could adversely impact bone healing, it is important that virtually all DOX be released from material. Composites containing 15wt% γ-CD microparticles demonstrate 100% DOX release within 100 days, whereas only 6% DOX is liberated from PMMA with free DOX over same period. Refillable properties of PMMA composite system may find utility for customizing dosing regimens. Findings suggest that PMMA composites could have potential as chemotherapeutic delivery platforms to assist in bone reconstruction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Bone cement as a local chemotherapeutic drug delivery carrier in orthopedic oncology: A review

Metastatic bone lesions are common among patients with advanced cancers. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be prescribed immediately after diagnosis, the majority of severe metastatic bone lesions are treated by reconstructive surgery, which, in some cases, is followed by postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. However, despite recent advancements in orthopedic surgery, patients undergoing reconstruction still have the risk of developing severe complications such as tumor recurrence and reconstruction failure. This has led to the introduction and evaluation of poly (methyl methacrylate) and inorganic bone cements as local carriers for chemotherapeutic drugs (usually, antineoplastic drugs (ANPDs)). The present work is a critical review of the literature on the potential use of these cements in orthopedic oncology. While several studies have demonstrated the benefits of providing high local drug concentrations while minimizing systemic side effects, only six studies have been conducted to assess the local toxic effect of these drug-loaded cements and they all reported negative effects on healthy bone structure. These findings do not close the door on chemotherapeutic bone cements; rather, they should assist in materials selection when designing future materials for the treatment of metastatic bone disease.

Drug-eluting implants for the suppression of metastatic bone disease: current insights

INTRODUCTION

The fixation of impending or pathologic fractures is challenging and their successful management can have a favourable impact on the quality of life of the patient. The progression of the metastatic bone disease can cause significant pain and disability but also could result in the loosening and subsequent failure of the implants. To prevent the additional local growth, postoperative radiotherapy is often recommended, and many patients receive endocrine or chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Several reports support the antineoplastic drugs to bone cement as an adjuvant to improve implant stability as well as to prevent local cancer progression and failure of reconstructive devices used to treat patients with pathologic fractures. The aim of the present review is to present our current understanding on the effect of local delivery of antineoplastic drugs at the bone site.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Encouraging evidence support the application of bone cement loaded with antineoplastic drugs to fill defects and strengthen the fixation of orthopaedic implants. This is an inexpensive and safe method that can improve implant stability, prevent local cancer progression and failure of reconstructive devices. To fully evaluate its clinical effectiveness randomized clinical studies are needed.