Letter to the Editor concerning "The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system" by A. R. Vaccaro et al. Eur Spine J (2016);25(4):1087-1094

Is the AO spine thoracolumbar injury classification system reliable and practical? a systematic review

Controversy surrounding the classification of thoracolumbar injuries has given rise to various classification systems over the years, including the most recent AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (ATLICS). This systematic review aims to provide an up-to-date evaluation of the literature, including assessment of a further three studies not analysed in previous reviews. In doing so, this is the first systematic review to include the reliability among non-spine subspecialty professionals and to document the wide variety between reliability across studies, particularly with regard to sub-type classification. Relevant studies were found via a systematic search of PubMed, EBESCO, Cochrane and Web of Science. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted in line with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Twelve articles assessing the reliability of ATLICS were included in this review. The overall inter-observer reliability varied from fair to substantial, but the three additional studies in this review, compared to previous reviews, presented on average only fair reliability. The greatest variation of results was seen in A1 and B3 subtypes. Least reliably classified on average was A4 subtype. This systematic review concludes that ATLICS is reliable for the majority of injuries, but the variability within subtypes suggests the need for further research in assessing the needs of users in order to increase familiarity with ATLICS or perhaps the necessity to include more subtype-specific criteria into the system. Further research is also recommended on the reliability of modifiers, neurological classification and the application of ATLICS in a paediatric context.

Back to the future in traumatic fracture shapes of lumbar spine: An analysis of risk of kyphosis after conservative treatment

Introduction:

Nonosteoporotic burst vertebral fracture could commonly be treated with conservative or surgical approach. Currently, decision-making process is based on thoracolumbar (TL) AO spine severity injury score. However, some factors could affect posttraumatic kyphosis (PTK) and could be taken into account. The aim of the present study is to identify if axial and sagittal fracture shape and initial kyphosis are the risk factors for PTK.

Materials and Methods:

All consecutive patients treated between 2016 and 2017 for TL vertebral fracture with conservative treatment were retrospectively evaluated in the study. Only type A3 and A4 vertebral fractures were included in the study. Patients suffering from osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease, aged above 60 years old were excluded from the study. Initial and 6 months X-ray from injury were analyze to evaluate local kyphosis and region of injury while initial assessment was performed with computed tomography to better identify fracture type and in some cases magnetic resonance imaging to exclude posterior ligament complex injury. Axial and sagittal view of the vertebral plate was analyzed and classified in three shapes according to fragment comminution and dislocation. Statistical analysis was performed trough STATA13 software. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the differences between initial and follow up kyphosis; odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate the role of initial kyphosis, vertebral sagittal and axial fracture shape as a risk factor for PTK. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess the differences among vertebral shape fractures and final kyphosis. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the differences between fracture patterns and final kyphosis.

Results:

An initial kyphosis >10° (OR 36.75 P = 0.015), shape c vertebral plate (OR 147 P = 0.0015), and sagittal shape 3 (OR 32.25 P = 0.0025) are strongly related with PTK. Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference among axial fracture shape (P < 0.0001) and sagittal fracture shape (P = 0.004) and also for initial kyphosis >10° (P < 0.0001). Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference for final kyphosis among pattern c3 and other patterns of fracture (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions:

A burst type lumbar vertebral fracture affecting a patient with initial local kyphosis >10° and comminution and displacement of vertebral plate and vertebral body is at high risk to develop a local kyphosis >20° in the follow-up if treated conservatively.

Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population

PURPOSE

Thoracolumbar fractures are the most common kind of spine injury in children. Several types of spine injury can occur, and for this reason, treatment algorithms have been put in place for the management of these patients. At present, the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score system (TLICS) and the thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score (AOSpine score) aimed at providing treatment recommendations. We aimed to assess the reliability, in children, of the TLICS scoring and AOSpine scoring systems, and to define the superiority of one of the methods of scoring, to spread its use in routine clinical management in the pediatric spine trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of consecutive children admitted to a Level 1 trauma center for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, between 2006 and 2019, was performed. We compared the management we performed in clinical practice in children with spine trauma, to the decisional algorithms based on the TLICS and AOSpine scores. According to these scores, surgical treatment should be performed when the TLICS score ≥ 5 and the AOSpine score > 5; and surgical or conservative treatment was considered reasonable when the TLICS score = 4 and the AOSpine score = 4 or 5. Surgical indications were based on the clinical status, the anatomy of the fracture, and the risk of sagittal imbalance of the growing spine.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. We demonstrated that both the AOSpine score and the TLICS scores had a significant correlation for surgical management decision of spine trauma (p < 0.0001). We found a high concordance between surgical decision making in the pediatric clinical practice and the TLICS score. In our pediatric cohort, there were significantly more patients with TLICS ≥ 5 (n = 47, 87%) than with AOSpine score > 5 (n = 26, 46%, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more patients with TLICS ≥ 4 (n = 53, 98%), than with AOSpine score ≥ 4 (n = 42, 77%, p = 0.001). ConclusionsThe TLICS score was significantly more appropriate than the AOSpine score, for the surgical treatment decision in children, especially when considering the future risk of sagittal imbalance.