Dose, image quality and spine modeling assessment of biplanar EOS micro-dose radiographs for the follow-up of in-brace adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

Health technology assessment in musculoskeletal radiology: the case study of EOSedge™

OBJECTIVES

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a systematic process used to evaluate the properties and effects of healthcare technologies within their intended use context. This paper describes the adoption of HTA process to assess the adoption of the EOSedge™ system in clinical practice.

METHODS

The EOSedge™ system is a digital radiography system that delivers whole-body, high-quality 2D/3D biplanar images covering the complete set of musculoskeletal and orthopedic exams. Full HTA model was chosen using the EUnetHTA Core Model® version 3.0. The HTA Core Model organizes the information into nine domains. Information was researched and obtained by consulting the manufacturers' user manuals, scientific literature, and institutional sites for regulatory aspects.

RESULTS

All nine domains of the EUnetHTA Core Model® helped conduct the HTA of the EOSedge, including (1) description and technical characteristics of the technology; (2) health problem and current clinical practice; (3) safety; (4) clinical effectiveness; (5) organizational aspects; (6) economic evaluation; (7) impact on the patient; (8) ethical aspects; and (9) legal aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

EOS technologies may be a viable alternative to conventional radiographs. EOSedge has the same intended use and similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and operation principles as the EOS System and provides significant dose reduction factors for whole spine imaging compared to the EOS System without compromising image quality. Regarding the impact of EOS imaging on patient outcomes, most studies aim to establish technical ability without evaluating their ability to improve patient outcomes; thus, more studies on this aspect are warranted.

Clinical application of EOS imaging system: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to examine and map the existing literature on the clinical application of the EOS imaging system and to identify related evidence gaps.

INTRODUCTION

The EOS imaging system was originally developed to conduct imaging for medical conditions, such as scoliosis and anisomelia. However, recent research suggests that the modality has other clinical uses that may benefit patients via reduced radiation dose and, thus, improve patient safety.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This scoping review will consider all quantitative study designs, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Imaging phantom studies and conference abstracts will be excluded.

METHODS

Databases that will be searched include Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Academic Search Premier, and OpenGrey. Relevant secondary material will be identified using citation searching (backwards and forwards) of included studies through Google Scholar. In addition, we will search by author name where more than 3 included studies from the same first author are identified. Articles published from 2003 in English, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, French, and German will be included. Two independent reviewers will perform title/abstract screening, followed by full-text screening. Data extraction will include study type and design, age of participants, anatomical/physiological region, pathology, clinical endpoint, outcome measures, sample size, and clinical application. Data will be presented in tabular format and as a narrative summary.

REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/yc85j/.

The Adolescent Spine

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most characteristic disorder of the adolescent spine. It is a three-dimensional (3D) disorder that occurs from 10 years of age and comprises 90% of all idiopathic scolioses. Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with AIS. Modern imaging offers 3D assessment of scoliosis with less radiation exposure. Imaging helps rule out occult conditions that cause spinal deformity. Various imaging methods are also used to assess skeletal maturity in patients with AIS, thus determining the growth spurt and risk of progression of scoliosis. This article provides a brief overview of the pathophysiology, biomechanics, clinical features, and modern imaging of AIS relevant to radiologists in clinical settings.

Technical evaluation of a clinical, bi-planar, digital and upright X-ray imaging unit

We describe the technical evaluation of the commercially available, clinical, bi-planar, low dose, digital X-ray system (EOS System, EOS imaging, France). The unit is used for upright, weight-bearing musculoskeletal pathologies, in particular, in the spine and lower limbs. The evaluation incorporated tests on the X-ray generator performance, radiation/imaging field alignment, dose area product accuracy and image quality. The assessment methodology was based on objective parameters and required equipment readily available for technical evaluation of other radiological equipment. Results demonstrated that the system performs well within acceptable performance criteria with regard to X-ray generator performance, radiation/imaging field alignment and dose area product accuracy. In addition, results from the image-quality assessment were aligned with previously published work. The work presented in this article can be used for the technical evaluation of the EOS System at other clinical sites.

Biplanar Low-Dose Radiograph Is Suitable for Cephalometric Analysis in Patients Requiring 3D Evaluation of the Whole Skeleton

BACKGROUND

The biplanar 2D/3D X-ray technology (BPXR) is a 2D/3D imaging system allowing simultaneous stereo-corresponding posteroanterior (PA) and lateral 2D views of the whole body. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of cephalometric analysis based on the BPXR lateral skull view to accurately characterize facial morphology.

METHOD

A total of 17 landmarks and 11 angles were placed and/or calculated on lateral BPXR and lateral cephalograms of 13 patients by three investigators. Five methods of angle identification were performed: the direct construction of straight lines on lateral cephalograms (LC-A) and on BPXR (BPXR-A), as well as the calculation of angles based on landmark identification on lateral cephalograms (LA-L) and on BPXR with the PA image (BPXR-LPA) or without (BPXR-L). Intra- and interoperator reliability of landmark identification and angle measurement of each method were calculated. To determine the most reliable method among the BPXR-based methods, their concordance with the reference method, LC-A, was evaluated.

RESULTS

Both imaging techniques had excellent intra- and interoperator reliability for landmark identification. On lateral BPXR, BPXR-A presented the best concordance with the reference method and a good intra- and interoperator reliability.

CONCLUSION

BPXR provides a lateral view of the skull suitable for cephalometric analysis with good reliability.

Quantitative imaging of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: shifting the paradigm from diagnostic to comprehensive prognostic evaluation

PURPOSE

We aimed to provide a perspective review of the available quantitative imaging modalities of the spine for prognostic evaluation of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A technical description of the current imaging technologies for quantitative assessment of the pediatric spine with scoliosis was provided, and the pros and cons of each method were discussed. Imaging modalities that quantify the overall 3D alignment of the spine as well as the structural specification of the spinal bone, intervertebral disc, endplates, and ligaments as it pertains to development and progression of the idiopathic spinal deformities in adolescents were discussed.

RESULTS

Low-dose and microdose stereoradiography, ultrasound, and rasterstereography provide quantitative imaging of the 3D spinal alignment with low or no radiation in standing posture which allows repetitive imaging for early detection of the curve development. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, including ultrashort dual-echo time and T1-rho can provide quantitative assessment of the spinal tissues relevant to development of idiopathic spinal deformity in pediatric population. New computed tomography scans that uses dual-energy can provides high-resolution measure of the current-state of the bone quality and morphology as well as the osteogenic properties of the bone by quantitative evaluation of the bone marrow.

CONCLUSION

The presented imaging modalities can provide a wide spectrum of quantifiable information relevant to development and progression of the spinal deformity. Clinical application of these technologies can change the paradigm in clinical assessment of the pediatric scoliosis by improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of the idiopathic scoliosis.

REDUCING PELVIS RADIOGRAPH EXPOSURE IN CHILDREN USING A DOSE SIMULATION X-RAY RESEARCH SOFTWARE

Pelvis radiography is a frequent X-ray examination. The objective of our study was to determine the minimum dose to be delivered without reducing the quality. We included 60 children having a pelvis X-ray in four groups that were equally represented by weight ranges. A software simulated, for each radiograph, six additional simulated photonic noise images corresponding to 100, 80, 64, 50, 40 and 32% of the initial dose. The 360 radiographs were blindly scored by two radiologists using a semi-quantitative Likert scale. There was no significant difference in scoring between the reference radiograph and simulated radiographs at 80% of the dose in children between 0 and 15 kg and over 35 kg. Inter-observer reproducibility was moderate to very good. Pelvis X-ray doses might be reduced by 20% in children in our institution. Software that produces simulated X-ray with decreasing dose might be a useful tool for an optimization process.

Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging in Idiopathic Scoliosis: What the Surgeon Wants to Know

The term idiopathic scoliosis covers a broad spectrum of spinal deformities in the pediatric population without an underlying congenital anomaly of the spine. Depending on the age of presentation, it has both characteristic clinical and imaging features and a different prognosis. The radiologist should provide the surgeon with critical information to assess the degree of deformity and eventually plan surgery. Thoracic deformities and lung volume must also be part of the preoperative assessment. Imaging has a critical role in postsurgical follow-up and in surgical complications. This review highlights the importance of common terminology and measurement methods to avoid incongruences. The different imaging modalities are discussed with their indications and limitations. We pay special attention to imaging modalities that can help the surgeon assess skeletal maturation reliably and thus predict the prognosis of scoliosis. Radiation protection and the risk of cumulative radiation exposure in these patients is emphasized.

Is the Cranial Sagittal Vertical Axis (Cr-SVA) a Better Midterm Predictor of Clinical Results Than C7-SVA in Adult Patients Operated on Spinal Deformity After a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up?

STUDY DESIGN

This is nonconcurrent prospective study approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine if the cranial sagittal vertical axis (Cr-SVA) measured in full spine standing radiographs is a better predictor of clinical results than the C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA) in adult patients operated on spinal deformity with a minimum 2-year follow-up after surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Cr-SVA has recently been described as a better predictor of health-related quality of life outcomes than the C7-SVA for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) before undergoing surgery. This has not been confirmed in patients after ASD surgery.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were age at surgery more than 25 years and a minimum 2-year follow-up after a ≥5 level fusion for ASD. Full-length standing lateral radiographs (including nasion-inion line, spine, and femoral heads) and Scoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire and SF36 questionnaires were available for every patient at the final follow-up. The distance from the Cr-SVA to the posterior corner of S1 (Cr-SVA-S) and to the centers of the hip (Cr-SVA-H) was measured and also the C7-SVA, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and PI-LL.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (58 female individuals) operated on ASD in a single institution were included. Age at surgery was 61 years (26-67). The mean follow-up was 53 months (24-120). Spearman rank-order test showed several significant correlations. After multivariable analysis, only Cr-SVA-S and age persisted as predictors for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) image scores, Cr-SVA-H for SRS satisfaction, Cr-SVA-H and age for SRS total scores, Cr-SVA-H and age for SF36 Physical Function, Cr-SVA-S for SF36 Role Physical, Cr-SVA-H for SF36 Bodily Pain, and Cr-SVA-H for SF36 Role Emotional.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cr-SVA measured in full spine standing radiographs seems to be a better predictor of health-related quality of life outcomes than the C7-SVA for adults operated on spinal deformity >2 years after surgery.

Radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion using a low-dose slot-scanning radiographic system (EOS®)

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular retroversion is assessed using pelvic X-ray. Cross-over-sign (COS), posterior-wall-sign (PWS) and ischial-spine-sign (ISS) are important radiographic signs of the condition. The pelvic area is sensitive to radiation and thus, possibilities to reduce dose should be considered. The purpose was to compare radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion on conventional pelvic anteroposterior (AP) X-rays with a low-dose slot-scanning system (EOS) in a sample of patients with retroversion of the acetabulum and to compare the radiation doses.

METHODS

34 participants with radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion in one or both hips on conventional pelvic X-ray were consecutively recruited. Pelvic EOS-images were acquired in each patient and COS, PWS, ISS, COS-ratio and PWS-ratio was assessed. Radiation dose comparison of X-ray vs. EOS was performed using Dose-Area Products.

RESULTS

Retroversion was present in 57 out of 68 hips. The absolute agreement was 91%, 84% and 76% for COS, PWS and ISS, respectively. No statistically significant differences were present between COS-ratio and PWS-ratio in either modality and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were narrow. The mean radiation dose was 1053 mGy*cm² in X-ray and 593 mGy*cm² in EOS (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that pelvic EOS provides diagnostic qualities similar to conventional X-ray using 44% less radiation when radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion are assessed.

Cobb angle measurement with a conventional convex echography probe and a smartphone

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Serial X-rays are needed during the follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. They are done every 6 or 3 months in cases of high risk of progression. Thanks to the advances in ultrasound techniques, deformity measurement systems free from ionizing radiations have been validated, although spinal surgeons did not use them routinely due to the need of special software.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our work is to assess the reproducibility and correlation of an ultrasound measuring system based on the positioning of the transverse processes.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, single center, randomized, triple blinded.

METHODS

Two independent researchers trained in ultrasound examined the spinal deformities of 31 children. The measurements were compared against those performed with an X-ray by three scoliosis expert surgeons. Statistics were performed by an independent researcher. Parametric methods were used.

RESULTS

We found a 95% [(0.91-0.97) p < 2.2e^-16] correlation between the degree of scoliosis measured with the proposed ultrasound system and the 30 cm × 90 cm X-rays in standing position. There was an intra-observer reliability of 97% [r-squared = 0.97; CI 95% (0.95-0.98) p < 2.2e^-16] and an inter-observer reliability of 95% [r-squared = 0.95; CI 95% (0.90-0.97) p < 2.2e^-16].

CONCLUSIONS

An approximation of the Cobb angle measure is possible with ultrasound by using the transverse processes as reference. This is a very rapid and simple system for assessing the principal spinal deformity measure in young people, although it does not allow estimating the associated axial or sagittal rotation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Agreement Between Manual and Computerized Designation of Neutral Vertebra in Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Survey-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe interobserver agreement among experienced spine surgeons in choosing neutral vertebra (NV) based on manual measurements from radiographs. Secondarily, to use axial vertebral rotation (AVR) values obtained from low-dose stereoradiography (SR) post-processing software (SterEOS 2D/3D) to separately designate the NV in subject cases and to compare manually derived and software-derived NV designations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Investigators have previously suggested that parameters such as Lenke classification, stable vertebra level, end vertebra level, and NV level be used to decide on fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Studies have revealed suboptimal interobserver reliability in these vertebral designations. SR post-processing software may represent a useful tool for standardizing NV designation.

METHODS

Thirty-two subjects with idiopathic scoliosis and Lenke 1-4 curves were assessed. Experienced surgeons (range of 7-35 years in practice) assigned NV based on preoperative radiographs. Interobserver reliability was quantified using the Fleiss Kappa statistic. Surgeon responses were compared with NV designations made using AVR values provided by SR postprocessing software. Agreement between these values was quantified using percentage agreement.

RESULTS

Surgeons exhibited moderate agreement in choosing NV based on radiographs (Kappa 0.444). Surgeon responses agreed with the SR-derived NV in 26.9% of cases, lay within 1 level in 82.1% of cases, and lay within 2 levels in 97.5% of cases. Surgeons were more likely to choose distal to the SR NV rather than proximal.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in instrumented level selection and outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis may be partially related to inconsistency in selection of the NV. The use of SR post-processing software may provide a more reliable method for choosing NV.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.