Ultrasonic bone scalpel: utility in cervical corpectomy. A technical note

The Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel does not Outperform the High-Speed Drill: A Single Academic Experience

BACKGROUND

Spinal decompression and osteotomies are conventionally performed using high-speed drills (HSDs) and rongeurs. The ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) is a tissue-specific osteotome that preferentially cuts bone while sparing the surrounding soft tissues. There is ongoing investigation into its ability to optimize peri- and postoperative outcomes in spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative metrics and complications during a transition period from HSD to UBS.

METHODS

A single-institution, single-surgeon retrospective analysis was conducted of patients undergoing spine surgery from January 2020 to December 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to detect associations between the surgical technique and outcomes of interest. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 193 patients met the inclusion criteria (HSD, n = 100; UBS, n = 93). Multivariate logistic regression revealed similar durotomy (P = 0.10), nerve injury (P = 0.20), and reoperation (P = 0.68) rates. Although the estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of stay were similar, the operative time was significantly longer with the UBS (192.81 vs. 204.72 minutes; P = 0.03). Each subsequent surgery using the UBS revealed a 3.1% decrease in the probability of nerve injury (P = 0.026) but had no significant effects on the operative time, EBL, or probability of durotomy or reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

The UBS achieves outcomes on par with conventional tools, with a trend toward a lower incidence of neurologic injury. The expected reductions in EBL and durotomy were not realized in our cohort, perhaps because of a high proportion of revision surgeries, although these might be dependent on surgeon familiarity, among other operative factors. Future prospective studies are needed to validate our results and further refine the optimal application of this device in spine surgery.

Improving Surgeon Well-Being: Ergonomics in Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders are common among surgeons, and affect most neurosurgeons over the course of their career. Although all subspecialist neurosurgeons may be affected by physical strain, spine surgeons and skull base surgeons have a high propensity for workplace injury as a result of long procedures with repetitive movements in strained physical positions.

METHODS

In this review, the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery, the state of innovation to improve ergonomics in the operating room for neurosurgeons, and potential limitations in advancing technology with the goal of maximizing neurosurgeon longevity are discussed.

RESULTS

Innovations such as robotics, the exoscope, and handheld devices with more degrees of freedom have allowed surgeons to maneuver instruments without exerting excessive effort, all while maintaining neutral body positioning, avoiding joint and muscle strain.

CONCLUSIONS

As new technology and innovation in the operating room develop, there has been a larger emphasis placed on maximizing surgeon comfort and neutral positioning, by minimizing force exertion and fatigue.

Ultrasonic bone scalpel in spine surgery

Background

Spine surgery has always been considered technically demanding even in the hands of the most experienced surgeon on account of close proximity of vital soft tissue structures. Technical advancements over the last few decades have been crucial for the progress of this complex speciality which not only increased the surgical accuracy, but patient safety as well. Ultrasonic devices are one such innovation based on piezoelectric vibrations, patented by Fernando Bianchetti, Domenico Vercellotti, and Tomaso Vercellotti in 1988.

Methods

We did an extensive literature search on ultrasonic devices and their applications in the field of spine surgery.

Results

We present the various ultrasonic bone devices available including their physical, technologic and clinical aspects in spine surgery. We also attempt to cover the limitations and future advances of Ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) in particular, which would be interesting and informative for any spine surgeon who is novice in this field.

Conclusion

UBS has been found to be safe and effective in all forms of spine surgeries offering distinct advantages over conventional instruments, although limited by an inherent learning curve.

Ergonomics in Spine Surgery

As physician burnout and wellness become increasingly recognized as vital themes for the medical community to address, the topic of chronic work-related conditions in surgeons must be further evaluated. While improving ergonomics and occupational health have been long emphasized in the executive and business worlds, particularly in relation to company morale and productivity, information within the surgical community remains relatively scarce. Chronic peripheral nerve compression syndromes, hand osteoarthritis, cervicalgia and back pain, as well as other repetitive musculoskeletal ailments affect many spinal surgeons. The use of ergonomic training programs, an operating microscope or exoscope, powered instruments for pedicle screw placement, pneumatic Kerrison punches and ultrasonic osteotomes, as well as utilizing multiple surgeons or microbreaks for larger cases comprise several methods by which spinal surgeons can potentially improve workspace health. As such, it is worthwhile exploring these areas to potentially improve operating room ergonomics and overall surgeon longevity.

Drilling Speed and Bone Temperature of a Robot-assisted Ultrasonic Osteotome Applied to Vertebral Cancellous Bone

STUDY DESIGN

An experimental investigation of a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome applied to vertebral cancellous bone.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various ultrasonic parameter settings on temperature in the drilling site and penetration time and determine the most suitable parameters for efficient and safe robot-based ultrasonically assisted bone drilling in spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome device may be safe and effective for spinal drilling.

METHODS

Sixty specimens of bovine vertebral cancellous were randomly assigned to one of six groups, which varied by mode of ultrasonic vibration (L-T and L) and feed rate (one percent [0.8 mm/s], two percent [1.6 mm/s], and three pecent [2.4 mm/s]). Maximum temperature in the drilling site and penetration time was recorded.

RESULTS

Maximum temperature in the drilling site decreased as output power increased for L-T and L modes, was significantly lower for L-T compared to L mode at each feed rate and power setting, was significantly different at feed rates of 1.6 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s and 2.4 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s for L-T mode at an output power of 60 W and 84 W, but was not influenced by feed rate for L mode. Penetration time did not significantly improve as output power increased for both L-T and L modes, was significantly decreased with increased feed rates, but was not significantly different between L-T and L modes.

CONCLUSION

The optimal parameters for applying a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome to vertebral cancellous bone are L-T mode, maximum output power of 120 W, and maximum feed rate of 2.4 mm/s.Level of Evidence: 4.

Thoracic Spine Stenosis: Does Ultrasonic Osteotome Improve Outcome in Comparison to Conventional Technique?

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the efficacy of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel (UBS) in thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) in comparison to traditional technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 55 patients who had undergone conventional surgery (Group A) are compared with 45 patients of UBS (Group B) in TSS. The primary outcome measure of Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (m JOA) with neurological complications and dural injury were assessed. Secondary outcome measures of total blood loss (TBL), time duration of surgery (ORT) and length of hospital stay (LHS) were analysed.

RESULTS

The pre-operative mJOA score 5.00(4.00-6.00) in the group A and 5.00(4.00-6.00) in the group B improved to 7.00(7.00-8.00) in the group A and 9.00(9.00-10.00) in the group B, respectively (P<0.001) at final average follow-up of 117.55 months for group A and 75.69 months in group B. More significant grade of myelopathy improvement and mJOA recovery rate (RR) were noted in group B. The TBL, ORT and LHS were more favourable in group B as compared to group A (p<0.0001). The group A had 9 (16.36%) neurological deficits compared to 2 (4.44%) in group B (p<0.001). Dural tears occurred in both groups (A=11, B=9). It was more frequent and not repairable in group A but without significant statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

UBS can reduce neurological deficits and improve outcomes in TSS. Secondarily, reduced blood loss, lesser surgical time and reduced LHS are significant added advantages of this new technology.

Cancelloplasty for Treatment of Osteomyelitis of the Calcaneus: A Novel Technique and Case Report

Calcaneal osteomyelitis has the potential to cause limb- and life-threatening complications. The anatomic and biomechanical attributes of the heel make limb salvage in the setting of bone infection complex. Current treatment options include surgical resection of part or all of the calcaneus, lower extremity amputation, or prolonged intravenous antibiotic usage. Each modality has its own inherent disadvantages. We present a novel surgical technique using antibiotic-impregnated calcium phosphate as an alternative treatment option coupled with ultrasonic bone dissection as a method for enhancing delivery of antibiotics, while mitigating tissue damage and maintaining osseous integrity. The details of the surgical technique are discussed along with a single case example.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel Versus Conventional Method in Cervical Laminectomy: A Retrospective Study of 311 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the results of cervical laminectomy (CL) performed with ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) or conventional method (CM).

METHOD

This study comprised 311 CL performed by a single surgeon between January 2004 and December 2017. Group A (GpA) comprised 124 cases of CL performed using UBS, while Group B (GpB) comprised 187 cases of CL performed using CM. These 2 groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics of patients, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

GpA included 112 males and 12 females, mean age being 61.18 years. GpB comprised 166 males and 21 females, mean age being 62.04 years. Mean duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay was 65.52/70.87 minutes, 90.24/98.40 mL, and 4.80/4.87 days in GpA and GpB, respectively. Six patients were reported to have dural injuries in each group. In GpA, 2 cases of C5 palsy and 1 nerve root injury was observed, while in GpB, 3 cases of C5 palsy and no nerve root injury was reported. One patient had developed transient neurological deterioration postsurgery in GpA as against 11 patients in GpB.

CONCLUSION

Neurological complications observed in CM leads to intensive care unit admission, additional morbidity, and additional expenditure, whereas UBS provides a safe, rapid, and effective means of performing CL, thereby decreasing the rate of surgical complications and postoperative morbidity.

The Efficacy of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel for Unilateral Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In cervical open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy, a high-speed rotatory drill and rongeurs are used to make unicortical troughs and bicortical openings in the laminae. The lamina is reflected at the trough to enlarge the spinal canal, followed by bone healing on the hinge side to stabilize laminoplasty. The ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) has been used due to theoretical advantages including a better hinge union rate, less soft tissue trauma, less neurological injury, and shorter operative time.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the superiority of UBS for hinge union compared to the drill through randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

In 190 randomly allocated cervical myelopathy patients, the trough and opening at the lamina were made using either the drill (n = 95) or UBS (n = 95) during 2015 to 2018. The primary outcome was the hinge union rate on 6-mo postoperative computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the hinge union rate at 12 mo, the operative time, intraoperative/postoperative bleeding, neurological injury, complications, and clinical outcomes over a 24-mo follow-up.

RESULTS

Hinge union in all laminae was achieved in 60.0% (drill) and 43.9% (UBS) of patients at 6 mo (intention-to-treat analysis; P = .02; odds ratio, 2.1) and in 91.9% (drill) and 86.5% (UBS) at 12 mo. Dural injury only occurred in the drill group (2.1%), and the UBS group showed significantly less intraoperative bleeding (P < .01). The other secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

The hinge union rate was inferior in the UBS group at 6 mo postoperatively, but UBS was efficacious in reducing dural injuries and bleeding.

Use of image-guided bone scalpel for resection of spine tumors: technical note

In the literature, the use of navigation for spine tumor surgery has largely centered on implant placement. We describe the cases of two patients with spinal tumors on whom we utilized our resection technique of registering an ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) to a navigation system. In both cases, we achieved a satisfactory tumor resection with negative margins and excellent neurologic outcomes. We feel that using the navigation-registered UBS is a valuable tool to increase the operator's ability to achieve desired resections while minimizing the neurologic deficits and operative morbidity associated with these challenging surgical cases.