Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index

Risk Factors for Cervical Deformity After Posterior Cervical Decompression Surgery: A Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

Posterior decompression surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a common surgery; however, it can cause postoperative cervical deformity (CD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for CD.

METHODS

The participants were 193 patients underwent laminoplasty or laminectomy for CSM or OPLL. CD was defined as a C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 40 mm or a cervical lordosis angle (CL) ≤ -10°. The participants were divided into 2 groups: NCD (without CD before surgery), CD (with CD before surgery). NCD group was divided based on the presence of CD 1 year after surgery as follows: postoperative CD (PCD) and no PCD (NPCD).

RESULTS

There were 153 patients (NCD), 40 (CD), 126 (NPCD), and 27 (PCD). There was significant difference in the number of decompressed lamina (NPCD: PCD = 4.1:4.5), the presence of C2 decompression (2: 11%), and C5 palsy (0: 11%). The risk factors for onset of CD, PCD, and CL ≤ -10° as assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis were preoperative C2-7 SVA ≥ 30 mm (odds ratio [OR]: 19.0), decompression of C2 or C7 lamina (OR 3.1), and preoperative CL ≤ 2° (OR 42.0), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent postoperative CD, it is important to avoid decompression of the C2 or C7 lamina. Moreover, in case with C2-7 SVA ≥ 30 mm or CL ≤ 2° before surgery, it is important to explain the risks and consider adding fusion surgery.

Characteristics affecting cervical sagittal alignment in patients with chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND

Sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have been reported in the past, which may also affect cervical spine lesions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cervical alignment in patients with CLBP.

METHOD

Of the patients who visited an orthopedic specialist due to low back pain lasting more than three months, 121 cases (average 71.5-years-old, 46 male and 75 female) with whole standing spinal screening radiographs were reviewed (CLBP group). Cervical parameters included cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), and the T1 slope minus CL (T1S-CL). Cervical spine deformity was defined as C2-7 SVA >4 cm, CL <0°, or T1S-CL ≧20°. We compared the cervical alignment of these patients with 121 age and gender matched volunteers (control group).

RESULTS

The prevalence of cervical spine deformity was significantly higher in the CLBP group than in the control group (20.7% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.034). The mean CL was smaller in the CLBP group than in the control group (16.1° vs. 21.4°, P = 0.002). The mean C2-7 SVA was 17.6 mm vs. 18.7 mm in the CLBP group and in the control group, respectively (P = 0.817). The mean T1S-CL was larger in the CLBP group than in the control group (9.1° vs. 3.5°, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that people with CLBP were more likely to have cervical deformities than people without CLBP (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.006 to 4.637).

CONCLUSIONS

This study results suggest that people with CLBP present with worse cervical sagittal alignment and higher prevalence of cervical spine deformities than age and gender matched volunteers with no CLBP. This means CLBP impacts cervical spine lesions negatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Ⅳ.

Spinal Sagittal Alignment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores, and Patient-Reported Outcome among People with Sporting Activity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate how participation in sporting activity affects patient-reported outcome (PRO), including Neck Disability Index (NDI), in males and females.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Previously, our study reported that factors with a negative influence on the NDI in females were a lack of sporting activities. However, it was still unclear why it affected poor scores of NDI.

METHODS

The subjects were 473 volunteers. They were divided into two groups (activity and non-activity) according to participation or non-participation in sporting activities using a self-filled questionnaire. The evaluation items were height, weight, grip strength, bone density, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, standing radiographic parameters, PRO (evaluated by EuroQol-5 dimension [EQ-5D], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and NDI.

RESULTS

There were 101 males in the non-activity group and 69 in the activity group and 178 females in the non-activity group and 125 in the activity group. For the males, the evaluation items with significant influence were cervical lordosis (non-activity group:activity group, 17°:22°) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (10°:6°, p <0.05). For the females, the evaluation items with significant influence were sagittal vertical axis (28:14 mm), HADS (10.4:8.4), EQ-5D (0.79:0.86), ODI (17:12), and NDI (12:9, p <0.01). HADS and PRO in the females were significantly correlated with the EQ-5D (-0.40), ODI (0.43), and NDI (0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Males who participated in sporting activities had better cervical spine alignment but no effect on PRO. Females with sporting activities had better spinal global alignment and less mental stress. It is suggested that sporting activity in females might be associated with PRO because HADS highly correlates with PRO.