Anterior management of C2 fractures using miniplate fixation: outcome, function and quality of life in a case series of 15 patients

Fracture of the Dens Axis Due to Spinal Manifestation of Sarcoidosis: Treatment Option and Review of the Literature

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

We present a case of a pathologic unstable fracture of the odontoid process due to vertebral osseous sarcoidosis. The surgical management of this unreported pathology is described and a review of the literature is given.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease of unknown etiology, characterized by multiorgan noncaseating granulomatous infiltrations. It affects primarily the lungs, lymphatic system, eyes, skin, heart, and nervous system. Osseous sarcoidosis is usually clinically asymptomatic and therefore frequently under-diagnosed. When it does affect the skull or vertebral column, specific surgical therapy is only necessary in cases with nonmanageable pain or where structural integrity is threatened.

METHODS

Our patient underwent a so-called semiconservative approach, consisting of a minimally invasive transoral-transpharyngeal approach, surgical debridement of the lytic bony lesion, transplantation of cancellous homologous bone, and carbon chest halo-immobilization. Halo-immobilization was left for 8 weeks, followed by a further 6 weeks with a hard cervical collar.

RESULTS

Routine computed tomography scans 3 days, 6, 12, 18 weeks, and 1 year after surgery showed good filling of the original defect with cancellous bone, correct alignment of the upper cervical spine, and progressive fracture consolidation and stability. Surgical site infection (SSI) was not observed. The patient had no neurological postoperative deficits. After initial dysphagia, swallowing was not permanently impaired.

CONCLUSION

Sarcoidosis-induced odontoid fractures can be managed successfully using a semiconservative approach, consisting of transoral-transmucosal, minimally invasive surgical procedure for debridement of the lesion and transplantation of cancellous bone with additional halo-immobilization. Permanent fusion of C1-2 with loss of the cervical range of motion is avoided. Despite performing bone surgery in a potentially markedly contaminated site, bacterial infection was not an issue, possibly supported by the temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents and the prudent use of antibiotics.Level of Evidence: 4.

Proposal of New Radiological Classification and Treatment Strategy for Transverse Fractures of the C2 Axis Body

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of transverse fractures of the C2 axis body diagnosed on sagittal computed tomography (CT) and to propose new classification and appropriate treatment strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed by enrolling 49 patients (26 men and 23 women) with transverse fractures of the C2 axis body who were treated at four national trauma centers of tertiary university hospitals from January 2000 to December 2017. The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years (ranging from 21 to 90 years). We classified 49 transverse fractures of the C2 body into three types based on fracture trajectories involving superior articular facet (SAF) and lateral cortex (LC) of the C2 body on coronal CT as follows: Type 1, involvement of C2 SAF on both sides; Type 2, unilateral involvement of C2 SAF on one side and LC on the other side; Type 3, involvement of LC on both sides. The characteristics, treatment methods, and results of 49 transverse fractures of the C2 body were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 12.6 months (ranging from 12 to 26 months).

RESULTS

Twenty-six (53.1%) patients were Type 1, 21 (42.9%) were Type 2, and 2 (4.0%) were Type 3. Correlation coefficients for intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of classification were 0.723 and 0.598 (both, P < 0.001), respectively. About 40.8% (7 Type 1 and 13 Type 2) of the patients had fracture displacement >3 mm; Incidence of fracture displacement >3 mm was higher in Type 2 than Type 1 (61.9% vs 26.9%, P < 0.05). About 79.6% (20 Type 1, 17 Type 2 and 2 Type 3) of the patients were treated conservatively, and 20.4% (6 Type 1 and 4 Type 2) underwent surgery. At last follow-up, 47 out of 49 patients achieved fusion; overall fusion rate was 95.9%. All conservatively treated Type 1 and Type 3 patients achieved fusion. Out of 17 conservatively treated Type 2 patients, 15 achieved fusion but two developed nonunion; however, two nonunion patients opted not to undergo surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that Philadelphia brace caused nonunion significantly in fracture displacement >3 mm compared to Minerva brace/Halovest (100% vs 0%, P < 0.05). All surgically treated Type 1 and 2 patients achieved fusion. In terms of clinical outcomes, neck pain visual analog scale and neck disability index were significantly improved (both, P < 0.01). According to Odom's criteria, 93.9% (46/49) of the patients achieved satisfactory outcomes. No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of transverse fractures of C2 body can be treated conservatively. However, surgery or rigid Minerva brace/Halovest should be considered for Type 2 transverse fractures of the C2 body with fracture displacement >3 mm.

Does fracture-extension into the pars interarticularis alter outcomes in odontoid failure? a technical note on pars interarticularis osteotomy and atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis

PURPOSE

Odontoid process fractures can extend rostral into the C2 arch. We investigated the clinical impact of a concurrent fracture of the pars interarticularis on odontoid failure. To overcome the surgical challenges related to the morphology of these fractures, we describe a novel surgical strategy using atlantoaxial joint distraction arthrodesis.

METHODS

We conducted a single centre cohort study of 13 consecutive patients with odontoid fractures extending into the pars treated between June 2016 and June 2018. Criteria for a stable fibrous non-union were: Atlanto-Dens Interval (ADI) < 3 mm, Posterior Atlanto-Dens Interval (PADI) > 14 mm and lack of symptomatic motion at the fracture site. Atlantoaxial instability was defined as greater than 50% subluxation across the C1-C2 joint. Return to pre-injury performance status was considered a satisfactory clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patient population was 77.2 years (SD 11.9). The mean follow-up time was 15 months (SD 5.2). 69% had an associated atlantoaxial instability (P-value 0.0005). Cervical orthosis treatment was associated with a high non-union rate (70%) (P-value 0.04) although it did not affect the overall clinical outcome. 2 cases presented with cord compression were treated surgically with pars interarticularis osteotomy and atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Odontoid fracture with extension into the pars interarticularis often present with atlantoaxial instability and may result in stable fibrous non-union if treated non-operatively. The C1-C2 segment can be stabilised with atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis achieved through an osteotomy of the pars interarticularis.