Designing patient-specific solutions using biomodelling and 3D-printing for revision lumbar spine surgery

Evolution of the Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): From Open to Percutaneous to Patient-Specific

The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has seen significant evolution since its early inception, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques, patient safety, and outcomes. Originally described as an improvement over the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), the TLIF began as an open surgical procedure, that notably reduced the need for the extensive neural retractation that hindered the PLIF. In line with the broader practice of surgery, trending toward minimally invasive access, the TLIF was followed by the development of the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), a technique that further decreased tissue trauma and postoperative complications. Subsequent advancements, including Trans-Kambin's Triangle TLIF (percLIF) and transfacet LIF, have continued to refine surgical access, minimize surgical footprint, and reduce the risk of injury to the patient. The latest evolution, as we will describe it, the patient-specific TLIF, is a culmination of the aforementioned adaptations and incorporates advanced imaging and segmentation technologies into perioperative planning, allowing surgeons to tailor approaches based on individual patient anatomy and pathology. These developments signify a shift towards more precise methods in spine surgery. The ongoing evolution of the TLIF technique illustrates the dynamic nature of surgery and emphasizes the need for continued adaptation and refinement.

Rapid Implementation of a 3-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Sacrum Implant for Severe Neuropathic Spinal Arthropathy and Guide to Compassionate US Regulatory Approval

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rapid design and production of patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed implants (3DPIs) present a novel opportunity to restore the biomechanically demanding integrity of the lumbopelvic junction. We present a unique case of a 61-year-old patient with severe neuropathic spinal arthropathy (Charcot spine) who initially underwent a T4-to-sacrum spinal fusion. Massive bone destruction led to dissociation of his upper body from his pelvis and legs. Reconstruction of the spinopelvic continuity was planned with the aid of a personalized lumbosacral 3DPI.

METHOD

Using high-resolution computed tomography scans, the custom 3DPI was made using additive titanium manufacturing. The unique 3DPI consisted of (1) a sacral platform with iliac screws, (2) modular corpectomy device with rigid connection to the sacral platform, and (3) anterior plate connection with screws for proximal fixation. The procedures to obtain compassionate use Food and Drug Administration approval were followed. The patient underwent debridement of a chronically open wound before undertaking the 3-stage reconstructive procedure. The custom 3DPI and additional instrumentation were inserted as part of a salvage rebuilding procedure.

RESULTS

The chronology of the rapid implementation of the personalized sacral 3DPI from decision, design, manufacturing, Food and Drug Administration approval, and surgical execution lasted 28 days. The prosthesis was positioned in the defect according to the expected anatomic planes and secured using a screw-rod system and a vascularized fibular bone strut graft. The prosthesis provided an ideal repair of the lumbosacral junction and pelvic ring by merging spinal pelvic fixation, posterior pelvic ring fixation, and anterior spinal column fixation.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a multilevel lumbar, sacral, and sacropelvic neuropathic (Charcot) spine reconstruction using a 3DPI sacral prosthesis. As the prevalence of severe spine deformities continues to increase, adoption of 3DPIs is becoming more relevant to offer personalized treatment for complex deformities.

3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects

Background

Currently, metal implants are widely used in orthopedic surgeries, including fracture fixation, spinal fusion, joint replacement, and bone tumor defect repair. However, conventional implants are difficult to be customized according to the recipient's skeletal anatomy and defect characteristics, leading to difficulties in meeting the individual needs of patients. Additive manufacturing (AM) or three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, an advanced digital fabrication technique capable of producing components with complex and precise structures, offers opportunities for personalization.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature on 3D printing orthopedic metal implants over the past 10 years. Relevant animal, cellular, and clinical studies were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. In this paper, we introduce the 3D printing method and the characteristics of biometals and summarize the properties of 3D printing metal implants and their clinical applications in orthopedic surgery. On this basis, we discuss potential possibilities for further generalization and improvement.

Results

3D printing technology has facilitated the use of metal implants in different orthopedic procedures. By combining medical images from techniques such as CT and MRI, 3D printing technology allows the precise fabrication of complex metal implants based on the anatomy of the injured tissue. Such patient-specific implants not only reduce excessive mechanical strength and eliminate stress-shielding effects, but also improve biocompatibility and functionality, increase cell and nutrient permeability, and promote angiogenesis and bone growth. In addition, 3D printing technology has the advantages of low cost, fast manufacturing cycles, and high reproducibility, which can shorten patients' surgery and hospitalization time. Many clinical trials have been conducted using customized implants. However, the use of modeling software, the operation of printing equipment, the high demand for metal implant materials, and the lack of guidance from relevant laws and regulations have limited its further application.

Conclusions

There are advantages of 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic applications such as personalization, promotion of osseointegration, short production cycle, and high material utilization. With the continuous learning of modeling software by surgeons, the improvement of 3D printing technology, the development of metal materials that better meet clinical needs, and the improvement of laws and regulations, 3D printing metal implants can be applied to more orthopedic surgeries.

The translational potential of this paper

Precision, intelligence, and personalization are the future direction of orthopedics. It is reasonable to believe that 3D printing technology will be more deeply integrated with artificial intelligence, 4D printing, and big data to play a greater role in orthopedic metal implants and eventually become an important part of the digital economy. We aim to summarize the latest developments in 3D printing metal implants for engineers and surgeons to design implants that more closely mimic the morphology and function of native bone.

Properties and Implementation of 3-Dimensionally Printed Models in Spine Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Review With Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Spine surgery addresses a wide range of spinal pathologies. Potential applications of 3-dimensional (3D) printed in spine surgery are broad, encompassing education, planning, and simulation. The objective of this study was to explore how 3D-printed spine models are implemented in spine surgery and their clinical applications.

METHODS

Methods were combined to create a scoping review with meta-analyses. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to 7 September 2021. Results were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Studies utilizing 3D-printed spine models in spine surgery were included. Articles describing drill guides, implants, or nonoriginal research were excluded. Data were extracted according to reporting guidelines in relation to study information, use of model, 3D printer and printing material, design features of the model, and clinical use/patient-related outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty articles were included in the review, 3 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Primary use of the spine models included preoperative planning, education, and simulation. Six printing technologies were utilized. A range of substrates were used to recreate the spine and regional pathology. Models used for preoperative and intraoperative planning showed reductions in key surgical performance indicators. Generally, feedback for the tactility, utility, and education use of models was favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

Replicating realistic spine models for operative planning, education, and training is invaluable in a subspeciality where mistakes can have devastating repercussions. Future study should evaluate the cost-effectiveness and the impact spine models have of spine surgery outcomes.

Virtual Scoliosis Surgery Using a 3D-Printed Model Based on Biplanar Radiographs

The aim of this paper is to describe a protocol that simulates the spinal surgery undergone by adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by using a 3D-printed spine model. Patients with AIS underwent pre- and postoperative bi-planar low-dose X-rays from which a numerical 3D model of their spine was generated. The preoperative numerical spine model was subsequently 3D printed to virtually reproduce the spine surgery. Special consideration was given to the printing materials for the 3D-printed elements in order to reflect the radiopaque and mechanical properties of typical bones most accurately. Two patients with AIS were recruited and operated. During the virtual surgery, both pre- and postoperative images of the 3D-printed spine model were acquired. The proposed 3D-printing workflow used to create a realistic 3D-printed spine suitable for virtual surgery appears to be feasible and reliable. This method could be used for virtual-reality scoliosis surgery training incorporating 3D-printed models, and to test surgical instruments and implants.

Practical Use of Augmented Reality Modeling to Guide Revision Spine Surgery: An Illustrative Case of Hardware Failure and Overriding Spondyloptosis

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Augmented reality (AR) is a novel technology with broadening applications to neurosurgery. In deformity spine surgery, it has been primarily directed to the more precise placement of pedicle screws. However, AR may also be used to generate high fidelity three-dimensional (3D) spine models for cases of advanced deformity with existing instrumentation. We present a case in which an AR-generated 3D model was used to facilitate and expedite the removal of embedded instrumentation and guide the reduction of an overriding spondyloptotic deformity.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A young adult with a remote history of a motor vehicle accident treated with long-segment posterior spinal stabilization presented with increasing back pain and difficulty sitting upright in a wheelchair. Imaging revealed pseudoarthrosis with multiple rod fractures resulting in an overriding spondyloptosis of T6 on T9. An AR-generated 3D model was useful in the intraoperative localization of rod breaks and other extensively embedded instrumentation. Real-time model thresholding expedited the safe explanation of the defunct system and correction of the spondyloptosis deformity.

CONCLUSION

An AR-generated 3D model proved instrumental in a revision case of hardware failure and high-grade spinal deformity.

Three-Dimensional Printing of Medical Devices Used Directly to Treat Patients: A Systematic Review

Until recently, three-dimensional (3D) printing/additive manufacturing has not been used extensively to create medical devices intended for actual clinical use, primarily on patient safety and regulatory grounds. However, in recent years there have been advances in materials, printers, and experience, leading to increased clinical use. The aim of this study was to perform a structured systematic review of 3D-printed medical devices used directly in patient treatment. A search of 13 databases was performed to identify studies of 3D-printed medical devices, detailing fabrication technology and materials employed, clinical application, and clinical outcome. One hundred and ten papers describing one hundred and forty medical devices were identified and analyzed. A considerable increase was identified in the use of 3D printing to produce medical devices directly for clinical use in the past 3 years. This is dominated by printing of patient-specific implants and surgical guides for use in orthopedics and orthopedic oncology, but there is a trend of increased use across other clinical specialties. The prevailing material/3D-printing technology used were titanium alloy/electron beam melting for implants, and polyamide/selective laser sintering or polylactic acid/fused deposition modeling for surgical guides and instruments. A detailed analysis across medical applications by technology and materials is provided, as well as a commentary regarding regulatory aspects. In general, there is growing familiarity with, and acceptance of, 3D printing in clinical use.

Patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial surgery: A manufacturer's experience

Additive manufacturing technologies have enabled the development of customised implants for craniomaxillofacial applications using biomaterials such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE), and titanium mesh. This study aims to report an Australian manufacturer's experience in developing, designing and supplying patient-specific craniomaxillofacial implants over 23 years and summarise feedback received from clinicians. The authors conducted a retrospective review of the manufacturer's implant database of orders placed for custom craniomaxillofacial implants between 1996 and 2019. The variables collected included material, country of order, gender, patient age, and reported complications, which included a measure of custom implant "fit" and adverse events. The development of critical checkpoints in the custom manufacturing process that minimise clinical or logistical non-conformities is highlighted and discussed. A total of 4120 patient-specific implants were supplied, of which 2689 were manufactured from PMMA, 885 from titanium mesh, and 546 from pHDPE. The majority of the implants were used in Australia (2260), United Kingdom (412), Germany (377), and New Zealand (338). PMMA was the preferred material for cranial implants whereas pHDPE was preferred for maxillofacial applications. Age or gender did not influence the material choice. Implant "fit" and adverse outcomes were used as a metric of implant performance. Between 2007 and 2019 there were 37 infections (0.98%) and 164 non-conformities recorded of which 75 (1.8%) were related to implant 'fit'. Our experience demonstrates a safe, reliable, and clinically streamlined manufacturing process which supports surgeons that require bespoke craniomaxillofacial solutions for reconstruction surgery.

3D-printed Patient-specific Spine Implants: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current clinical use of 3-dimensional printed (3DP) patient-specific implants in the spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Additive manufacturing is a transformative manufacturing method now being applied to spinal implants. Recent innovations in technology have allowed the production of medical-grade implants with unprecedented structure and customization, and the complex anatomy of the spine is ideally suited for patient-specific devices. Improvement in implant design through the process of 3DP may lead to improved osseointegration, lower subsidence rates, and faster operative times.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and other sources that resulted in 1842 unique articles. All manuscripts describing the use of 3DP spinal implants in humans were included. Two independent reviewers (N.W. and N.E.S.) assessed eligibility for inclusion. The following outcomes were collected: pain score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, subsidence, fusion, Cobb angle, vertebral height, and complications. No conflicts of interest existed. No funding was received for this work.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 35 patients. Only case series and case reports were identified. Follow-up times ranged from 3 to 36 months. Implant types included vertebral body replacement cages, interbody cages, sacral reconstruction prostheses, iliolumbar rods, and a posterior cervical plate. All studies reported improvement in both clinical and radiographic outcomes. 11 of 35 cases showed subsidence >3 mm, but only 1 case required a revision procedure. No migration, loosening, or pseudarthrosis occurred in any patient on the basis of computed tomography or flexion-extension radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the systematic review indicate that 3DP technology is a viable means to fabricate patient-matched spinal implants. The effects on clinical and radiographic outcome measures are still in question, but these devices may produce favorable subsidence and pseudoarthrosis rates. Currently, the technology is ideally suited for complex tumor pathology and atypical bone defects. Future randomized controlled trials and cost analyses are still needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-systematic review.

Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomic Modeling for Surgical Planning and Real-Time Operative Guidance in Complex Primary Spinal Column Tumors: Single-Center Experience and Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a visualization tool for clinicians and patients. We sought to use patient-specific 3D-printed anatomic modeling for preoperative planning and live intraoperative guidance in a series of complex primary spine tumors.

METHODS

Over 9 months, patients referred to a single neurosurgical provider for complex primary spinal column tumors were included. Most recent spinal magnetic resonance and computed tomography (CT) imaging were semiautomatically segmented for relevant anatomy and models were printed using polyjet multicolor printing technology. Models were available to surgical teams before and during the operative procedure. Patients also viewed the models preoperatively during surgeon explanation of disease and surgical plan to aid in their understanding.

RESULTS

Tumor models were prepared for 9 patients, including 4 with chordomas, 2 with schwannomas, 1 with osteosarcoma, 1 with chondrosarcoma, and 1 with Ewing-like sarcoma. Mean age was 50.7 years (range, 15-82 years), including 6 males and 3 females. Mean tumor volume was 129.6 cm³ (range, 3.3-250.0 cm³). Lesions were located at cervical, thoracic, and sacral levels and were treated by various surgical approaches. Models were intraoperatively used as patient-specific anatomic references throughout 7 cases and were found to be technically useful by the surgical teams.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the largest case series of 3D-printed spine tumor models reported to date. 3D-printed models are broadly useful for operative planning and intraoperative guidance in spinal oncology surgery.

Overview of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has continued to evolve over the past few decades, with significant advancements in technology and technical skills. From endonasal cervical approaches to extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusions, MISS has showcased its usefulness across all practice areas of the spine, with unique points of access to avoid pertinent neurovascular structures. Adult spine deformity has also recognized the importance of minimally invasive techniques in its ability to limit complications and to provide adequate sagittal alignment correction and improvements in patients' functional status. Although MISS has continued to make significant progress clinically, consideration must also be given to its economic impact and the learning curve surgeons experience in adding these procedures to their armamentarium. This review examines current innovations in MISS, as well as the economic impact and future directions of the field.

Measuring the performance of patient-specific solutions for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery

Pre-surgical planning using 3D-printed BioModels enables the preparation of a "patient-specific" kit to assist instrumented spinal fusion surgery. This approach has the potential to decrease operating time while also offering logistical benefits and cost savings for healthcare. We report our experience with this method in 129 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) over 27 months at a single centre and performed by a single surgeon. Patient imaging and surgical planning software were used to manufacture a 3D-printed patient-specific MIS TLIF kit for each patient consisting of a 1:1 scale spine BioModel, stereotactic K-wire guide, osteotomy guide, and retractors. Pre-selected pedicle screws, rods, and cages were sourced and supplied with the patient-specific kit. Additional implants were available on-shelf to address a size discrepancy between the kit implant and intraoperative measurements. Each BioModel was used pre-operatively for surgical planning, patient consent and education. The BioModel was sterilised for intraoperative reference and navigation purposes. Efficiency measures included operating time (153 ± 44 min), sterile tray usage (14 ± 3), fluoroscopy screening time (57.2 ± 23.7 s), operative waste (19 ± 8 L contaminated, 116 ± 30 L uncontaminated), and median hospital stay (4 days). The pre-selected kit implants exactly matched intraoperative measurements for 597/639 pedicle screws, 249/258 rods, and 46/148 cages. Pedicle screw placement accuracy was 97.8% (625/639) on postoperative CT. Complications included one intraoperative dural tear, no blood products administered, and six reoperations. Our experience demonstrates a viable application of patient-specific 3D-printed solutions and provides a benchmark for studies of efficiency in spinal fusion surgery.

Three-Dimensional Printing in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the recent advances in 3D printing technology as it relates to spine surgery and how it can be applied to minimally invasive spine surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most early literature about 3D printing in spine surgery was focused on reconstructing biomodels based on patient imaging. These biomodels were used to simulate complex pathology preoperatively. The focus has shifted to guides, templates, and implants that can be used during surgery and are specific to patient anatomy. However, there continues to be a lack of long-term outcomes or cost-effectiveness analyses. 3D printing also has the potential to revolutionize tissue engineering applications in the search for the optimal scaffold material and structure to improve bone regeneration without the use of other grafting materials. 3D printing has many potential applications to minimally invasive spine surgery requiring more data for widespread adoption.

Modeling three-dimensional-printed trabecular metal structures with a homogenization approach: Application to hemipelvis reconstruction

The application of three-dimensional printing technologies to metal materials allows us to design innovative, low-weight, patient-specific implants for orthopedic prosthesis. This is particularly true when the reconstruction of extensive metastatic bone defect is planned. Modeling complex three-dimensional-printed highly repetitive trabecular-like structures based on finite elements is computationally demanding, while homogenization algorithms offer the advantage of reduced simulation cost and time, allowing an effective evaluation of new personalized design suitable for clinical needs. This article describes and discusses the implementation of a reliable method for the multiscale modeling of trabecular structures by means of asymptotic expansion homogenization. Following the material characterization of the Ti6Al4V alloy obtained by electron beam melting technology, the asymptotic expansion homogenization was applied to two alternative low-density cell-unit designs. Model predictions demonstrated satisfactory agreement with compressive experimental tests and cantilever bending tests performed on both designs (differences lower than 5.5%). The method was extended to a real patient-specific hemipelvis reconstruction, exploiting the capability of the asymptotic expansion homogenization approach in quantitatively describing the effect of cell-unit designs and three-dimensional-printing stack direction (i.e. cell-unit orientation) both on the overall mechanical response of the implant and on the stress distribution. The hemipelvis implant filled with the higher density cell unit demonstrated to be 14% stiffer than using the lower density one, while changing the cell-unit orientation affected the stiffness up to 10%. The maximum stress values reached at the anchors were affected in a minor extent by the investigated design parameters.