Cervical and postural strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic adults

The Reduction of Cervical Hyperlordosis and Resolution of Craniocervical Symptoms in an Adolescent Female: A Chiropractic Biophysics Case Report With Long-Term Follow-Up

Cervical hyperlordosis is a rare condition in the pediatric population. We present a unique case of the application of Chiropractic Biophysics® (CBP®) technique protocols to reduce a hyperlordotic cervical spine corresponding with many craniocervical symptoms, including chronic migraines and neck pain. A 15-year-old female presented with chronic headaches, neck pain, and neck stiffness among other complaints following a martial arts sprain injury several months prior. There were many positive orthopedic tests and limited range of motion. Radiographs revealed a cervical hyperlordosis and a right lateral head translation. CBP® treatment was given and involved cervical distraction traction as well as corrective exercises twice a week for 12 weeks, and then monthly for one year with a complementary home program. After 12 weeks, there was a full recovery from migraines and neck pain correlating with an 8° reduction in lordosis and correction of head translation. At 15 months, the patient remained well and achieved a 13° total reduction in the neck curve. This is the first case documenting the successful application of CBP® methods to reduce cervical spine hyperlordosis in peer-reviewed literature. We propose too much curve may be as detrimental as too little curve in the cervical spine with respect to causing adverse stresses and strains in the surrounding soft tissues leading to pathological processes and nociceptive tendencies.

Latest knowledge on a comprehensive understanding of cervical deformity and selection of effective treatment methods using recent classification systems: a narrative review

Surgical treatment for patients with cervical spine deformities is challenging for both patients and doctors. For successful surgical treatment, mastery of processes is important to objectively evaluate and classify the degree of deformity. Recently, efforts have been increasing to systematically understand, evaluate, and effectively treat complex cervical spine deformities. Various parameters are being developed to quantify and objectively evaluate the degree of cervical spine deformity, and classification methods are being introduced to help establish the treatment scope by categorizing it according to the degree of deformity. However, a comprehensive and systematic understanding of complex deformities using only the currently introduced classification methods and related knowledge is not easy. Through this review, we aimed to introduce various classification methods and their pros and cons to evaluate cervical deformities, analyze their meaning, and provide a basic understanding of the evaluation and classification of patients with cervical spine deformities. This review also aimed to aid in the decision-making process for the treatment of cervical spine deformities by presenting a structured treatment algorithm based on recently known classification systems and lay the foundation for efficient treatment.

Horizontal Gaze Assessment: An Extensive Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

Bipedalism was a significant milestone in the evolutionary development of Homo sapiens sapiens, influencing neocortical evolution and subsequent behavioral changes. Coordinated visual and sensory inputs are crucial for posture, environmental interaction, and surgical planning, with horizontal gaze being a pivotal parameter. This narrative review aims to explore various geometric measures used to assess horizontal gaze in patients, highlighting their applications in surgical planning.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in indexed databases using Mesh terms like "Cervical Vertebrae" and "Visual Fields" along with keywords such as "horizontal gaze" and "sagittal spine parameters." Among 477 initially identified articles, 41 were selected for inclusion after rigorous filtering.

RESULTS

The most recognized method for assessing horizontal gaze is the Chin Brow Vertical Angle (CBVA), initially described in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical photography is employed as a tool for CBVA calculation, while other measures like McGregor slope and Slope of the Line of Sight have been considered as alternatives to CBVA. Each method presents its unique advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the need for further research into horizontal gaze measurement methods. Developing novel approaches to determine horizontal gaze can significantly enhance surgical planning and, consequently, improve patient outcomes. The ongoing exploration of these geometric measures offers promising prospects for advancing the field and optimizing patient care.

Upper and lower cervical alignment parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging with the occipital slope as a key marker of cervical alignment

Objectives

Cervical spine alignment is evaluated by measuring the cervical angles or parameters on standing plain radiography. In this study, we aimed to evaluate mainly the upper cervical alignment and the correlation between upper and lower cervical sagittal parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

Cervical MRIs of 210 outpatients were reviewed to measure the upper and lower cervical sagittal parameters. Their mean values were compared with normative values measured on standing X-ray from the literature. Correlations between the parameters were analyzed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results

The C0 slope was correlated with all other parameters, except for the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. The strongest correlations (r > 0.500) were between the CL and C2 slope, between the CO2 and C0 slope, and between the C2 slope and C0 slope.

Conclusion

On supine MRI, the C0 slope is a key marker of cervical spinal alignment. A strong correlation was observed between the C2 slope and C0 slope; therefore, the relationship between upper and lower cervical alignment could be assessed using slopes on MRI.

Analysis of Components of Upper Cervical Lordosis in Asymptomatic Lordotic and Kyphotic Subjects

BACKGROUND

Upper cervical lordosis (CL) can be divided into 2 components: C2 slope (C2S) and McGregor slope (MGS) or C0-1 and C1-2 angles. The aim of this study was to investigate the components of upper CL in asymptomatic kyphotic and lordotic subjects.

METHODS

CL, C0-2 Cobb angle, MGS, C2S, C1 Slope, C0-1 Cobb angle, C1-2 Cobb angle, T1 slope angular parameters, and the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis distance of 78 asymptomatic subjects were measured.

RESULTS

Sixty subjects had lordotic curvature and 18 had kyphotic curvature. There was a significant difference between the kyphotic and lordotic groups in all parameters, except for C0-1 Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. In lordotic subjects, MGS and C2S accounted for 58% and 42% of the C0-2 angle, whereas in kyphotic subjects, 86% of C0-2 was accounted for by C2S. There was a strong negative correlation between C2S and MGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic subjects, as CL decreases, MGS decreases, C2S increases, and the C0-2 angle turns down on the horizontal plane to maintain the horizontal gaze. Turning down the C0-2 angle is more important than its value for maintaining horizontal gaze; thus, the slopes (MGS and C2S) can better represent the upper and lower cervical alignment than angle values can. The relationship between upper and lower cervical alignment should be evaluated in terms of slope angles rather than simple angles. The lack of significant difference between the C0-1 angles in the kyphotic and lordotic groups suggests that only the C1-2 angle is involved in the compensatory mechanism for the horizontal gaze.

Extension of decompression to C2 doesn't affect the spinal sagittal parameters compared with standard open-door laminoplasty

We modified and extended laminoplasty to the upper cervical spine on patients with canal stenosis associated with upper cervical spinal ossified lesions. However, whether the extended decompression range of laminoplasty can cause further effects on cervical stability is rarely studied at present. A retrospective study to analyze the relationship between the surgical levels and cervical sagittal parameters effects was performed in patients with cervical spondylosis myelopathy who had undergone posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty with/without extending to C2. In total, 64 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical levels. Radiologic outcomes of occipito-cervical angle (C0-2 Cobb angle), CL C27 Cobb angle, cervical sagittal vertical alignment, T1-Slope (T1S), T1S minus CL (T1S-CL), spino-cranial angle and center of the sella turcica-C7 SVA (St-SVA) were evaluated on lateral X-rays of the cervical spine at pre-operation, post-operation, and 2-year follow-up. The patient's health-related quality of life was obtained including neck disability index, Japanese orthopaedic association scores, and visual analog scale. Changes in sagittal parameters were observed in both groups after surgery. T1S, cervical sagittal vertical alignment, and T1S-CL significantly increased and CL decreased in 2 groups of patients postoperative. After a 2-year follow-up period, the C0-2 Cobb angle was found to increase compared to preoperative records. In addition, there were no significant differences in spino-cranial angle and st-SVA between preoperative and 2 years follow-up measurements. Health-related quality of life was improved in both groups and was not significantly different. Herein, the parameters indicated a tilting forward of the lower cervical spine and a more lordotic upper cervical spine to maintain a horizontal gaze in patients. However, C2 to 7 laminoplasty was performed to achieve satisfactory clinical results without significantly changing the spinal sagittal parameters.

Reciprocal Changes Following Cervical Realignment Surgery

Over the last few decades, the importance of the sagittal plane and its contour has gained significant recognition. Through full-body stereoradiography, the understanding of compensatory mechanisms, and the concept of global balance and reciprocal change has expanded. There have been a few reports describing how cervical realignment surgery affects global spinal alignment (GSA) and global balance. Despite the research efforts, the concept of reciprocal change and global balance is still perplexing. Understanding the compensatory status and main drivers of deformity in a patient is vital because the compensatory mechanisms may resolve reciprocally following cervical realignment surgery. A meticulous preoperative evaluation of the whole-body alignment, including the pelvis and lower extremities, is paramount to appreciate optimal GSA in the correction of spinal malalignment. This study aims to summarize relevant literature on the reciprocal changes in the whole body caused by cervical realignment surgery and review recent perspectives regarding cervical compensatory mechanisms.

Proximal and distal reciprocal changes following cervical deformity malalignment correction

OBJECTIVE

Hyperextension of C0-2 is a debilitating compensatory mechanism used to maintain horizontal gaze, analogous to high pelvic tilt in the lumbopelvic complex to maintain an upright posture. This study aims to investigate the impact of cervical deformity (CD) correction on this hyperextension. The authors hypothesize that correction of cervical sagittal malalignment allows for relaxation of C0-2 hyperextension and improved clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a multicenter database of patients with CD undergoing spinal realignment and fusion caudal to C2 and cephalad to the pelvis. Range of motion (ROM) and reserve of extension (ROE) were calculated across C2-7 and C0-2. The association between C2-7 correction and change in C0-2 ROE was investigated while controlling for horizontal gaze, followed by stratification into ΔC2-7 percentiles.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included (mean age 61.8 ± 9.6 years, 68% female). At baseline, patients had cervical kyphosis (C2-7, -11.7° ± 18.2°; T1 slope-cervical lordosis mismatch, 38.6° ± 18.6°), negative global alignment (sagittal vertical axis [SVA] -12.8 ± 71.2 mm), and hyperlordosis at C0-2 (mean 33.2° ± 11.8°). The mean ROM was 25.7° ± 17.7° and 21.3° ± 9.9° at C2-7 and C0-2, respectively, with an ROE of approximately 9° for each segment. Limited C0-2 ROM and ROE correlated with the Neck Disability Index (r = -0.371 and -0.394, p < 0.01). The mean number of levels fused was 7.0 ± 3.1 (24.6% anterior, 43.1% posterior), with 87.7% undergoing at least an osteotomy. At 1 year, mean C2-7 increased to 5.5° ± 13.4°, SVA became neutral (11.5 ± 54.8 mm), C0-2 hyperlordosis decreased to 27.8° ± 11.7°, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) increased to -49.4° ± 18.1° (all p < 0.001). Concurrently, mean C0-2 ROM increased to 27.6° ± 8.1° and C2-7 ROM decreased significantly to 9.0° ± 12.3° without a change in ROE. Controlling for horizontal gaze, change in C2-7 lordosis significantly correlated with increased TK (r = -0.617, p < 0.001), decreased C0-2 (r = -0.747, p < 0.001), and increased C0-2 ROE (r = 0.550, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CD correction can significantly impact cephalad and caudal compensation in the upper cervical and thoracic spine. Restoration of cervical alignment resulted in increased C0-2 ROE and TK and was also associated with improved clinical outcome.

[Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to the whole spine balance: Based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the normal distribution of cervical sagittal alignment and the relationship between cervical alignment and global spine balance in asymptomatic young adults.

METHODS

A cohort of 272 asymptomatic Chinese adults (including 161 males and 111 females, with an average age of (23.2±4.4) years, ranging from 18 to 45 years) were prospectively recruited from November 2011 to December 2014. The C₀-C₂ angle, disk angles from C₂-C₃ to C₆-C₇, vertebral angles from C₃ to C₇, T₁ slope, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), C₂-C₇ sagittal vertical axis (C₂-C₇SVA), center of gravity of head to C₇SVA (CGH-C₇SVA), C₇-S₁SVA were measured and statistically analyzed. All the subjects were categorized with the Roussouly classification and the cervical morphologies were evaluated as lordotic, straight, sigmoid or kyphotic. Spinal sagittal alignment parameters were compared between different sexes and Roussouly classifications with independent student t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Chi-square test. Correlations between cervical sagittal alignment and global spine sagittal alignment were calculated using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient. Linear regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven males and 59 females aged from 18 to 30 years old were included in the study. The mean value of C₀-C₇ was 26.0°±12.8°, composed of 15.2°±6.7° for C₀-C₂, 9.1°±12.1° for sum of disk angles from C₂-C₃ to C₆-C₇, and 1.4°±10.2° for sum of vertebral angles from C₃ to C₇. C₂-C₇SVA [(18.6±7.9) mm] and CGH-C₇SVA [(22.9±12.3) mm]were offset ideally by C₇-S₁SVA [(-21.6±31.0) mm]. Males had a larger T₁ slope (P < 0.05) and accordingly, a larger cervical lordosis C₂-C₇ (P < 0.01) and C₀-C₇ angle (P < 0.01) than females. Males had a smaller C₇-S₁SVA (P < 0.01) and accordingly, a smaller CGH-C₇SVA (P=0.165) than females. Significant difference was found between cervical alignment of different Roussouly types (P < 0.01). In general, a larger LL was consistent with a set of larger TK, C₂-C₇angle, C₀-C₇ angle, and vice versa. There was no significant correlation between cervical morphology and the Roussouly classification (Chi-square=10.548, P=0.308). There was significant correlation between cervical alignment and T₁ slope (P < 0.01), TK (P < 0.01). There was significant correlation between adjacent segmental angles from T₁ slope up to C₀-C₂ angle (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Normative values of each vertebral angle and disk angle were established. The cervical lordosis occurred mainly at C₀-C₂ and disk levels, which was influenced by parameters of other parts of the spine, such as T₁ slope, TK and the Roussouly classification. There was significant correlation between adjacent disk angles.

The Pre-Operative Duration of Symptoms: The Most Important Predictor of Post-Operative Efficacy in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Objective. To explore the most important predictors of post-operative efficacy in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Methods. From January 2013 to January 2019, 284 patients with DCM were enrolled. They were categorized based on the different surgical methods used: single anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) (n = 80), double ACDF (n = 56), three ACDF (n = 13), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) (n = 63), anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion (ACHDF) (n = 25), laminoplasty (n = 38) and laminectomy and fusion (n = 9). The follow-up time was 2 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the mJOA recovery rate at the last follow-up: Group A (the excellent improvement group, mJOA recovery rate >50%, n = 213) and Group B (the poor improvement group, mJOA recovery rate ≤50%, n = 71). The evaluated data included age, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms (months), smoking, drinking, number of lesion segments, surgical methods, surgical time, blood loss, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), CCI classification, imaging parameters (CL, T1S, C2-7SVA, CL (F), T1S (F), C2-7SVA (F), CL (E), T1S (E), C2-7SVA (E), CL (ROM), T1S (ROM) and C2-7SVA (ROM)), maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC), maximum canal compromise (MCC), Transverse area (TA), Transverse area ratio (TAR), compression ratio (CR) and the Coefficient compression ratio (CCR). The visual analog score (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) and mJOA recovery rate were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life. Results. We found that there was no significant difference in the baseline data among the different surgical groups and that there were only significant differences in the number of lesion segments, C2−7SVA, T1S (F), T1S (ROM), TA, CR, surgical time and blood loss. Therefore, there was comparability of the post-operative recovery among the different surgical groups, and we found that there were significant differences in age, the duration of symptoms, CL and pre-mJOA between Group A and Group B. A binary logistic regression analysis showed that the duration of the symptoms was an independent risk factor for post-operative efficacy in patients with DCM. Meanwhile, when the duration of symptoms was ≥6.5 months, the prognosis of patients was more likely to be poor, and the probability of a poor prognosis increased by 0.196 times for each additional month of symptom duration (p < 0.001, OR = 1.196). Conclusion. For patients with DCM (regardless of the number of lesion segments and the proposed surgical methods), the duration of symptoms was an independent risk factor for the post-operative efficacy. When the duration of symptoms was ≥6.5 months, the prognosis of patients was more likely to be poor, and the probability of a poor prognosis increased by 0.196 times for each additional month of symptom duration (p < 0.001, OR = 1.196).

Statistical modelling of how the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and how scoliosis surgery changes that

The relationship between the sagittal shape of the cervical spine and that of the thoracolumbar spine is established in the normal spine. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is recognised as a change in the shape of the spine in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The effects of AIS on the alignment of the cervical spine, including the effects of surgery, has been less well studied. The objective of this study was to identify, using regression analysis, the significant relationships between the alignment of the thoracolumbar spine, in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS. This study used coronal and sagittal radiographic measures from a group with AIS, both pre and post-operatively, which were analysed using multiple linear regression methods to identify significant parameters that explain the sagittal shape of the cervical spine. There were 51 pairs of pre and post-operative radiographs analysed, 40 of which were Lenke 1 curves and 11 Lenke 3 curves. Posterior spinal fusion was performed for all. The significant parameters pre-operatively were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and SVA with an R2 value of 78%. Post-operatively, the significant parameters were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and thoracolumbar scoliosis with an R2 of 63%. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS is related to the shape of key parameters in the rest of the spine. Changes in the cervical sagittal shape occur to compensate for changes in shape to the rest of the spine that occur as a consequence of surgery. This has implications for the understanding of how the compensatory mechanisms of the spine are used to maintain a horizontal gaze, along with prediction of the effects of surgery on the shape of the spine.

The Difference of Sagittal Correction of Adult Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery According to Age: A Retrospective Study

Objective

At present, the true sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is uncertain, resulting in no standard reference for subaxial cervical surgery. So, we aimed to explore the age difference of normal cervical sagittal alignment and to further investigate the mid‐and long‐term changes of sagittal alignment after subaxial cervical spine surgery.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study and 1223 asymptomatic volunteers and 79 patients undergoing subaxial cervical spine surgery were retrospectively reviewed in total. Asymptomatic volunteers and patients were divided into six subgroups: 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and ≥70 groups. The age difference and trend with age of cervical sagittal parameters of asymptomatic volunteers were assessed by cervical lateral radiography and analyzed by ANOVA test, and the regression equation of C2‐7 Cobb was established via multiple linear regression. Based on the C2‐7 Cobb regression equations of different ages, the theoretical value, deviation value, loss value of the C2‐7 Cobb, and JOA recovery rate of patients were calculated, and the correlation among the loss value, deviation value of the C2‐7 Cobb, and JOA recovery rate of the 79 patients was evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

For the asymptomatic volunteers, the C0‐2 Cobb decreased gradually with increasing age. The C2‐7 Cobb, C2‐7 SVA, T1S, NT, and TIA increased gradually with increasing age. The CBVA fluctuated with increasing age. T1S demonstrated a moderate correlation with C2‐7 Cobb (r = 0.60, p < 0.01); C0‐2 Cobb, C2‐7 SVA, CBVA, and TIA demonstrated a fair correlation with C2‐7 Cobb (r = −0.30, −0.33, 0.41, 0.40, p < 0.01); age demonstrated a poor correlation with C2‐7 Cobb (r = 0.19, p < 0.01). The regression equations of C2‐7 Cobb were established using C0‐2 Cobb, C2‐7 SVA, CBVA, and T1S. For the patients with subaxial cervical spine surgery, the loss of C2‐7 Cobb was moderately correlated with the deviation of C2‐7 Cobb (r = 0.33, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The age difference of cervical sagittal alignment was obvious, and the C2‐7 Cobb increased with age especially. The closer the postoperative C2‐7 Cobb was to the theoretical value of corresponding age, the smaller the loss of correction angle was, and the better the mid‐ and long‐term outcomes. The personalized sagittal reconstruction should be performed according to age difference for subaxial cervical spine surgery.

Analysis of the risk factors for increasing cervical sagittal vertical axis after cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

INTRODUCTION

The cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) as another aspect of cervical alignment been recognized as one of the important factors affecting the pain and disability outcomes of cervical spine surgery. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the risk factors for increasing cSVA after cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 110 consecutive patients (68 males and 42 females, average age 72.6 years) who underwent laminoplasty for CSM between January 2007 and June 2018. We recorded the operative time, blood loss, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the recovery rate. Radiological measurements were performed to analyze the following parameters: pre- and 1-year postoperative McGregor's slope (McGS), occiput to C2 Cobb angle (O-C2 angle), C2-C7 Cobb angle (C2-7 angle), T1-slope (T1S), C2-7 SVA (cSVA) and calculated the change (Δ). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether ΔcSVA was positive or negative. We also used Spearman's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

ΔC2-7 angle, ΔT1S-preoperative C2-7 angle, ΔO-C2 angle were different between the two groups significantly. Correlation analysis between the ΔcSVA and the various sagittal parameters showed some independent explanatory factors including the ΔC2-7 angle (r = - 0.25, p = 0.010), T1S-preoperative C2-7 angle (r = - 0.28, p = 0.004), postoperative O-C2 angle (r = 0.26, p = 0.007), ΔO-C2 angle (r = 0.37, p = 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that ΔcSVA was associated with the T1S-preoperative C2-7 angle (β = - 0.25, p = 0.034) and ΔO-C2 angle (β = 0.32, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The imbalance between T1S and preoperative C2-7 angle influences the change of cSVA after cervical laminoplasty. If cSVA increases postoperatively, the O-C2 angle increases to compensate and maintain the horizontal gaze.

Comparison of Radiographic Reconstruction and Clinical Improvement between Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Background

The surgical management of cervical degenerative disc degeneration (CDDD) has not reached a consensus. Artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) has been shown to be efficient in reducing symptoms after CDDD, although the topic remains highly controversial in this field. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ACDR on the treatment of CDDD on the aspect of radiographic reconstruction and clinical improvement compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study with 47 patients who underwent single-level ACDR and 46 patients who underwent single-level ACDF. The radiographic reconstruction was assessed by the cervical sagittal alignment parameters, consisting of two aspects, distance and angle, such as cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1s), and intervertebral space height (ISH). The clinical improvement was assessed by patient-related outcomes (PROs), consisting of two aspects, relief of axial neck pain and recovery of cervical dysfunction, measured through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA).

Results

Significant variations were achieved on aspects of radiographic reconstruction and clinical improvement after ACDR (P < 0.05), which were similar to that of the ACDF group (P < 0.05). A significantly larger postoperative range of motion (ROM) was found in patients less than 45 years of age in the ACDR group (P < 0.05). In addition, a significantly better postoperative JOA was found in patients with a preoperative ISH less than 4 mm in the ACDF group than that in the ACDR group (P < 0.05). Other than that mentioned above, no significant variations in radiographic and clinical outcomes were found between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, this study showed that a similar capability in terms of radiographic reconstruction and clinical improvement was found between the two methods. Specific concerns should be analyzed while choosing between an ACDR and an ACDF. It should be pointed out that, based on our experience, if the patient is younger, ACDR is recommended; for patients with preoperative ISH less than 4 mm, ACDF is more recommended.

Improving the cervical lordosis relieves neck pain and chronic headaches in a pediatric: a Chiropractic Biophysics® (CBP®) case report with a 17-month follow-up

[Purpose] To present the case of a dramatic improvement in the cervical lordosis and relief from chronic headaches and neck pain in a pediatric having a recent neck trauma. [Participant and Methods] A 10 year old male presented with recent neck trauma, neck pain and pre-existing chronic headaches. Cervical range of motion was limited with pain. X-ray analysis showed dramatic loss of cervical lordosis and an acute atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. Chiropractic Biophysics technique methods incorporating spinal manual adjustments, cervical extension traction and corrective exercises were used to restore normal cervical lordosis. Treatments were performed intensively over 6.5-weeks, with a 17-month long-term follow-up. [Results] The pediatric patient responded well to treatment with near complete resolution of cranio-cervical complaints. The cervical lordosis was corrected to age-appropriate magnitude, the coronal symmetry was restored, and both were maintained after nearly 1.5 years. [Conclusion] Chiropractic Biophysics technique which includes the cervical extension traction using the pediatric Denneroll orthotic was effective in restoring lordosis in a pediatric patient with cervical kyphosis and chronic headaches presenting with recent neck pains from a traumatic origin. Routine X-ray of the cervical spine is recommended for patients presenting with craniocervical symptoms as spine alignment is often overlooked as pathognomonic for these conditions.

Audit and Comparison Between Radiographic Markers of Gaze Direction Using EOS Imaging - An Essential Step to Streamline Existing Methods

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study on prospectively implemented EOS protocol.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to audit and compare existing radiological definitions of gaze direction-chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), McGregor slope (McGS), slope of line of sight (SLS), orbital-internal occipital protuberance (OIOP) slope angle, and Tangent to the hard palate (THP) in a neutral, healthy, and asymptomatic cohort.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The ability to accurately define direction of gaze is the first step when striving for horizontal gaze restoration in any affected individual with rigid sagittal deformity. Yet, the radiological definition of gaze direction remains poorly standardized.

METHODS

Hundred healthy subjects who could achieve horizontal gaze underwent whole-body standing EOS radiographs taken under a strictly standardized protocol. Radiographic measurements of global spinal sagittal parameters and surrogate measures of horizontal gaze were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The mean age was 45 ± 15.9 years, with a balanced male-to-female-ratio. Their C7 SVA was -7.7 mm ± 24.8 mm, PI was 51.0o ± 11.4o, PI-LL was -0.9o ± 13.0o and T1-slope was 21.2o ± 9.2o. Measured horizontal gaze parameters were as follows: CBVA (1.07o ± 5.48o), McGS (-3.23o ± 5.63o), SLS (0.45o ± 5.34o), OIOP (5.03o ± 4.66o), THP (-0.17o ± 6.27o). CBVA correlated strongly with McGS (r = 0.679, P < 0.001), SLS (r = 0.592, P < 0.001), OIOP (r = 0.697, P < 0.001), and THP (r = -0.504, P < 0.001). OIOP had the lowest variance amongst all parameters and showed less variability compared to CBVA (SD 4.66 Var 21.69 vs. SD 5.48 Var 30.08, P = .012). Multivariate analysis showed that C2-7 angle was the only parameter found to be associated with OIOP values (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

OIOP is the least variable, and most robust radiological method in determining gaze direction. It uses easily recognizable anatomical landmarks and an angular criterion, which makes it advantageous both with x-rays or slot scanners.Level of Evidence: 3.

Reliability assessment of cervical spine parameters measured on full-body radiographs in asymptomatic subjects and patients with spinal deformity

BACKGROUND

Cervical spinal alignment is usually assessed on full-body radiographs allowing for the concomitant evaluation of possible compensatory mechanisms that may occur at any level in the setting of postural malalignment.

HYPOTHESIS

Cervical parameters measured on full-body radiographs are reliable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 70 subjects were included and divided in 3 groups: asymptomatic adults (n=21), adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (n=20), and adults with spinal deformity (n=29), for whom full-body low-dose biplanar radiographs were obtained. Eighteen cervical parameters including gaze and cervical curvature, upper cervical spine, global cervical alignment, thoraco-cervical and cervico-pelvic parameters were measured by 4 operators, three times each. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) where calculated for each parameter and compared between the 3 groups.

RESULTS

ICC and the 95% CI were similar between the 3 groups. The measured parameters showed a very high repeatability (ICC>0.8) except for C0-C2, which presented an average repeatability (ICC=0.57). The cSVA, CTPA, C2-SPi, cranial offset, T1-SPi, CBVA and cranial tilt had a 95% CI<2 (° or cm). The TIA, T1-CL and C0-C2 had a 95% CI>6°.

DISCUSSION

The poor visibility of the foramen magnum, hard palate, C7, T1, and the sternum on radiographs could explain why certain parameters showed a higher measurement error. The assessment of these error margins is essential for an accurate evaluation of cervical spinal deformities and a proper therapeutic approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Restoring cervical lordosis by cervical extension traction methods in the treatment of cervical spine disorders: a systematic review of controlled trials

[Purpose] To systematically review the literature on the use of cervical extension traction methods for increasing cervical lordosis in those with hypolordosis and cervical spine disorders. [Methods] Literature searches for controlled clinical trials were performed in Pubmed, PEDro, Cochrane, and ICL databases. Search terms included iterations related to the cervical spine, neck pain and disorders, and extension traction rehabilitation. [Results] Of 1,001 initially located articles, 9 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The trials demonstrated increases in radiographically measured lordosis of 12-18°, over 5-15 weeks, after 15-60 treatment sessions. Untreated controls/comparison groups not receiving extension traction showed no increase in cervical lordosis. Several trials demonstrated that both traction and comparison treatment groups experienced immediate pain relief. Traction treatment groups maintained their pain and disability improvements up to 1.5 years later. Comparative groups not receiving lordosis improvement experienced regression of symptoms towards pre-treatment values by 1 years' follow-up. [Conclusion] There are several high-quality controlled clinical trials substantiating that increasing cervical lordosis by extension traction as part of a spinal rehabilitation program reduces pain and disability and improves functional measures, and that these improvements are maintained long-term. Comparative groups who receive multimodal rehabilitation but not extension traction experience temporary relief that regresses after treatment cessation.

Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to global spine balance: based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults

PURPOSE

To explore the normal distribution of cervical sagittal alignment and the relationship between cervical alignment and global spine balance in asymptomatic young adults.

METHODS

A total of 67 males and 59 females aged from 18 to 30 years old were recruited from 11/2011 to 12/2014. The C₀-C₂ angle, disk angles from C₂-C₃ to C₆-C₇, vertebral angles from C₃ to C₇, T₁ slope, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, C₂-C₇ sagittal vertical axis (SVA), center of gravity of head to C₇ SVA (CGH-C₇SVA), C₇-S₁SVA were measured and statistically analyzed. The Roussouly classification was utilized.

RESULTS

Mean value of C₀-C₇ was 26.0° ± 12.8°, composed of 15.2° ± 6.7° for C₀-C₂, 9.1° ± 12.1° for sum of disk angles from C₂-C₃ to C₆-C₇, and 1.4° ± 10.2° for sum of vertebral angles from C₃ to C₇. C₂-C₇SVA (18.6 mm ± 7.9 mm) and CGH-C₇SVA (22.9 mm ± 12.3 mm) were offset ideally by C₇-S₁SVA (-21.6 mm ± 31.0 mm). Significant difference was found between cervical alignment of different Roussouly types (p < 0.01). There was significant correlation between cervical alignment and T₁ slope (p < 0.01), TK (p < 0.01). There was significant correlation between adjacent segmental angles from T₁ slope up to C₀-C₂ angle (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Normative values of each vertebral angle and disk angle were established. The cervical lordosis occurred mainly at C₀-C₂ and disk levels, which was influenced by parameters of other parts of the spine, such as T₁ slope, TK and the Roussouly classification. There was significant correlation between adjacent disk angles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Cervical Deformity Arising From Upper Thoracic Malalignment

This study aims to describe the surgical management of cervical deformity arising from outside the cervical spine because of upper thoracic malalignment, using pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). Cervical spine deformity is a complex topic and it can be generally divided into 2 categories, the first category is when the primary deformity is inside the cervical spine and the treatment will focus on the cervical spine itself, whereas the second category is when the primary deformity is outside the cervical spine usually in the adjacent upper thoracic area, the cervical deformity is a compensation for the adjacent malalignment, and thus in this situation, the management will occur in the upper thoracic area. Description of a single surgeon’s technique for performing PSO to treat rigid upper thoracic deformity. PSO in the upper thoracic spine is a safe and effective procedure and can result in satisfying clinical and radiological outcome with indirect correction of the compensatory cervical deformity. Cervical deformity arising from upper thoracic malalignment should be dealt with by treating the problem at its origin outside the cervical spine by performing a PSO in the upper thoracic spine.

The 3 Sagittal Morphotypes That Define the Normal Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review of the Literature and an Analysis of Asymptomatic Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Cervical alignment is vital for maintaining horizontal gaze and sagittal balance. The aims of this study were to summarize previously published descriptions of normative cervical alignment and to analyze a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers in order to identify natural clusters of normal radiographic parameters.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature on radiographic measurements of asymptomatic volunteers through a search of MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. We then performed an analysis of demographic and radiographic parameters of volunteers without back or neck complaints. Only subjects with a chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) within previously published normal limits were retained for analysis. A 2-step cluster analysis was used to find natural groups of cervical alignment. Differences among groups were investigated with a post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

We included 37 articles in our analysis. There was a broad spectrum of both C2-C7 lordosis-kyphosis and T1 slope across ages and sexes. Of the 119 asymptomatic volunteers who were available for analysis, 84 (with a mean age [and standard deviation] of 49.0 ± 17.1 years) had a CBVA ranging from -4.7° to 17.7°. The cluster analysis identified 3 alignment groups based on cervical lordosis-kyphosis and T1 slope (silhouette measure of cohesion, >0.6). Twenty-seven volunteers (32.1%) were identified as the "kyphotic curve cohort" (KCC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, -8.6° ± 7.3°; mean T1 slope, 17.4° ± 6.6°), 43 volunteers (51.2%) were identified as the "medium lordosis cohort" (MLC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, 8.7° ± 7.2°; mean T1 slope, 26.6° ± 4.0°), and 14 volunteers (16.7%) were identified as the "large lordosis cohort" (LLC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, 21.2° ± 7.2°, mean T1 slope, 39.5° ± 6.4°) (p < 0.001 for both). Moving from KCC to LLC, there was a significant decrease in C0-C2 lordosis (p = 0.016). Examination of the cervical vertebral orientation demonstrated that C4 had a constant orientation relative to the horizontal (p = 0.665). Correlation analysis between C2-C7 and vertebral orientations again demonstrated that C4 orientation was independent of C2-C7 alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 3 morphotypes of the cervical spine based on C2-C7 alignment and T1 slope. These findings demonstrate the broad definition of normal cervical alignment and the range of cervical lordosis-kyphosis that is acceptable.

Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions

Cervical alignment as a concept has come to the forefront for spine deformity research in the last decade. Studies on cervical sagittal alignment started from normative data, and expanded into correlation with global sagittal balance, prognosis of various conditions, outcomes of surgery, definition and classification of cervical deformity, and prediction of targets for ideal cervical reconstruction. Despite the recent robust research efforts, the definition of normal cervical sagittal alignment and cervical spine deformity continues to elude us. Further, many studies continue to view cervical alignment as a continuation of thoracolumbar deformity and do not take into account biomechanical features unique to the cervical spine that may influence cervical alignment, such as the importance of musculature connecting cranium-cervical-thoracic spine and upper extremities. In this article, we aim to summarize the relevant literature on cervical sagittal alignment, discuss key results, and list potential future direction for research using the '5W1H' framework; "WHO" are related?, "WHY" important?, "WHAT" to evaluate and "WHAT" is normal?, "HOW" to evaluate?, "WHEN" to apply sagittal balance?, and "WHERE" to go in the future?

Motor style at rest and during locomotion in human

Humans exhibit various motor styles that reflect their intra- and interindividual variability when implementing sensorimotor transformations. This opens important questions, such as, At what point should they be readjusted to maintain optimal motor control? Do changes in motor style reveal the onset of a pathological process and can these changes help rehabilitation and recovery? To further investigate the concept of motor style, tests were carried out to quantify posture at rest and motor control in 18 healthy subjects under four conditions: walking at three velocities (comfortable walking, walking at 4 km/h, and race walking) and running at maximum velocity. The results suggest that motor control can be conveniently decomposed into a static component (a stable configuration of the head and column with respect to the gravitational vertical) and dynamic components (head, trunk, and limb movements) in humans, as in quadrupeds, and both at rest and during locomotion. These skeletal configurations provide static markers to quantify the motor style of individuals because they exhibit large variability among subjects. Also, using four measurements (jerk, root mean square, sample entropy, and the two-thirds power law), it was shown that the dynamics were variable at both intra- and interindividual levels during locomotion. Variability increased following a head-to -toe gradient. These findings led us to select dynamic markers that could define, together with static markers, the motor style of a subject. Finally, our results support the view that postural and motor control are subserved by different neuronal networks in frontal, sagittal, and transversal planes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY During human locomotion, motor control can be conveniently decomposed into a static and dynamic components. Variable dynamics were observed at both the intra- and interindividual levels during locomotion. Variability increased following a head-to-toe gradient. Finally, our results support the view that postural and motor control are subserved by different neuronal networks in the frontal, sagittal, and transversal planes.