1
|
Baroudi M, Daher M, Parks RD, Gregoryczyk JG, Balmaceno-Criss M, McDonald CL, Diebo BG, Daniels AH. Cutibacterium acnes in spine surgery: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Spine J 2024; 24:1545-1552. [PMID: 38679079 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) previously named Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) has been increasingly recognized by spine surgeons as a cause of indolent postsurgical spinal infection. Patients infected with C. acnes may present with pseudarthrosis or nonspecific back pain. Currently, microbiological tissue cultures remain the gold standard in diagnosing C. acnes infection. Ongoing research into using genetic sequencing as a diagnostic method shows promising results and may be another future way of diagnosis. Optimized prophylaxis involves the use of targeted antibiotics, longer duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, antibacterial-coated spinal implants, and evidence-based sterile surgical techniques all of which decrease contamination. Antibiotics and implant replacement remain the mainstay of treatment, with longer durations of antibiotics proving to be more efficacious. Local guidelines must consider the surge of antimicrobial resistance worldwide when treating C. acnes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makeen Baroudi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Russell D Parks
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Jerzy George Gregoryczyk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Christopher L McDonald
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Ave, Providence, RI 02914, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirghaderi P, Gholamshahi H, Jahromi A, Iranmehr A, Dabbagh-Ohadi MA, Eshraghi N. Unexpected positive culture (UPC) in adults revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors, and management. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:3129-3147. [PMID: 38573385 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08229-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Without clear signs of infection, spinal implant failure is attributed to mechanical overloads and aseptic loosening. However, how low-grade infections contribute to seemingly aseptic implant failure is unclear. PURPOSE The systematic review examined unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) in revision spine surgery regarding prevalence, isolated pathogens, risk factors, and strategies to reduce infection among asymptomatic patients undergoing revision spine surgery. METHODS We followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched four main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science) comprehensively until January 2023 for articles reporting UPC after presumed aseptic adult revision spine surgery. The UPC rates were pooled, and risk factors were compared with the culture-negative control group and represented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). RESULTS Fifteen studies of 1057 individuals were included in two groups: culture-positive or UPCs (n = 317) and culture-negative or control (n = 740). The overall UPC prevalence was 33.2% (317/1057, range: 0 to 53%, 95% CI = 30.2%-36.4%), and Cutibacterium acnes (43.0%, 95% CI = 37.4%-48.8%), Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), (39.5%, 95% CI = 33.2%-46.2%), and Staphylococcus species in general (49.5%, 95%CI = 43.7%-55.4%) were reported the most common isolated microbes. 16.1% of the UPCs were polymicrobial. Risk factors associated with UPC rates were female sex (OR = 2.62, 95%CI = 1.76-3.90, P < 0.001), screw loosening (OR = 4.43, 95%CI = 1.31-15.02, P = 0.02), number of operated levels (MD = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.33-1.22, P = 0.0007), and shorter time since index surgery (MD = - 8.57 months, 95%CI = - 14.76, -2.39, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS One-third of patients undergoing spine revision surgery revealed UPC in this study. Each UPC pathogen interpretation and antibiotic use decision should be interpreted case by case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peyman Mirghaderi
- Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Hediye Gholamshahi
- Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Jahromi
- Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arad Iranmehr
- Neurosurgery Department, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Dabbagh-Ohadi
- Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nasim Eshraghi
- Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Song J, Lu Y, Yi M, Xu X, Ding L. A practical method for the retrieval of tulip-head polyaxial pedicle screw by reusing the rod in revision and implants removal surgery: introduction of technique and evaluation of clinical outcomes. BMC Surg 2023; 23:152. [PMID: 37280570 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02063-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The removal of spinal implants is needed in revision surgery or in some cases whose fracture had healed or fusion had occurred. The slip of polyaxial screw or mismatch of instruments would make this simple procedure intractable. Here we introduce a simple and practical method to address this clinical dilemma. METHODS This is a retrospective study. The patients underwent new technique for retrieving the implants from July 2019 to July 2022 were labeled as group A, while the patients underwent traditional implants retrieval technique from January 2017 to January 2020 were labeled as group B. Patients in each group were subdivided into revision surgery group (r group) and simple implants removal group (s group) according to the surgery fashion. For the new technique, the retrieved rod was cut off to a proper length which was matched with the size of tulip head, and was replaced into the tulip head. After tightened with nut, a monoaxial screw-rod "construct" was formed. Then the "construct" can be retrieved by a counter torque. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative bacteria culture, hospital stay and costs were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 116 polyaxial screws with difficult retrieval (43 screws in group A, 73 screws in group B) in 78 patients were recorded, in which 115 screws were successfully retrieved. Significant differences were found in the mean operation duration, intraoperative blood loss when comparing the r group in group A and B, as well as the s group in group A and B (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in hospital stay and costs between group A and B. Three patients were found positive bacteria culture of drainage tube/tape in group A (3/30), while 7 patients in group B (7/48). The most prevalent bacteria was Propionibacterium acnes. CONCLUSION This technique is practical and safe in retrieving tulip head poly-axial screw. Reduced operation duration and intraoperative bloods loss may potentially alleviate the hospitalization burden of patients. Positive bacterial cultivation results are common after implants removal surgery, but they rarely represent an organized infection. A positive culture with P. acnes or S. epidermidis should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Zhang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian street, Haidian District, Beijing, 10038, People's Republic of China
| | - Jipeng Song
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian street, Haidian District, Beijing, 10038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuzheng Lu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian street, Haidian District, Beijing, 10038, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng Yi
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian street, Haidian District, Beijing, 10038, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohang Xu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, No. 717, Jinbu Street, Yantai, Shandong, 264000, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixiang Ding
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian street, Haidian District, Beijing, 10038, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aldahamsheh O, Burger LD, Evaniew N, Swamy G, Jacobs WB, Thomas KC, Nicholls F. Unexpected intraoperative positive culture (UIPC) in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 2023; 23:492-503. [PMID: 36336255 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Unexpected intraoperative positive culture (UIPC) has recently become increasingly common in revision spine surgery, being implicated as an etiological factor in revision spine surgery indications such as implant failure or pseudoarthrosis. PURPOSE Utilizing the available literature, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of UIPC, and its clinical importance in patients following presumed aseptic revision spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis and systematic review. METHODS Multiple databases and reference articles were searched until May 2022. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of UIPC, and the secondary outcomes were the microbiological profile of UIPC, the risk factors of UIPC, and the clinical fate of UIPC. RESULTS Twelve studies were eligible for meta-analysis, with a total of 1,108 patients. The pooled rate of UIPC was 24.3% (95% CI=15.8%-35.5%) in adult patients, and 43.2% (95% CI=32.9%-54.2%) in pediatric patients. The UIPC rate was higher when both conventional wound culture and sonication were used together compared to sonication alone or conventional wound culture alone. The rates were 28.9%, 23.6%, and 15.5 %, respectively. In adult and pediatric patients, the most commonly cultured organism was Cutibacterium acnes (42.5% vs 57.7%), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (39.9% vs 30.5%). Male patients had a higher rate of UIPC (OR= 2.6, 95% CI=1.84-3.72, p<.001), as did patients with a longer fusion construct (MD=0.76, 95% CI=0.27-1.25, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS The pooled rate of UIPC in aseptic spine revision surgery was 24.3% and 43.2% in adult and pediatric patients respectively. The most common organisms were C. acnes and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. The impact of UIPC on patients` clinical outcomes is not fully understood. We are not able to recommend routine culture in revision spine surgery, however, adding sonication may aid in the diagnosis of UIPC. There is not enough evidence to recommend specific treatment strategies at this time, and further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Aldahamsheh
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Lukas D Burger
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ganesh Swamy
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - W Bradley Jacobs
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kenneth C Thomas
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fred Nicholls
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery-Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1403 - 29 St, NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clinical relevance of occult infections in spinal pseudarthrosis revision. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2022; 12:100172. [PMID: 36185342 PMCID: PMC9520268 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Occult infections in spinal pseudarthrosis revisions have been reported in the literature, but the relevance of such an infection on patient outcomes is unknown. We aimed to elucidate clinical outcomes and re-revision risks between patients with and without occult infections in spinal revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. Methods In this matched case-control study, we identified 128 patients who underwent thoracolumbar revision surgery from 2014–2019 for pseudarthrosis of the spine. Among them, 13 (10.2%) revealed an occult infection (defined by at least two positive intraoperative tissue samples with the same pathogen), and nine of these 13 were available for follow-up. We selected 18 of the 115 controls using a 2:1 fuzzy matching based on fusion length and length of follow-up. The patients were followed up to assess subsequent re-revision surgeries and the following postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): overall satisfaction, Oswestry Disability Index, 5-level EQ-5D, and Short Form 36. Results Patient characteristics, surgical data, and length of follow-up were equal between both study groups. The rate of re-revision free survival after the initial pseudarthrosis revision surgery was higher in the occult infection group (77.8%) than the non-infectious controls (44.4%), although not significantly (0.22). The total number of re-revision surgeries, including re-re-revisions, was thirteen (in ten patients) in the control and two (in two patients) in the occult infection group (p = 0.08) after a median follow-up of 24 months (range 13-75). Four cases in the control group underwent re-revision for pseudarthrosis compared to none in the infected group. Satisfactory scores were recorded in all PROMs, with similar scores between the two groups. Conclusions The presence of an occult infection accompanying spinal pseudarthrosis revision was not inferior to non-infected pseudarthrosis revisions in a matched, small sample size cohort study. This may be explained due to the possibility of targeted treatment of the identified cause of pseudarthrosis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Occult infection in pseudarthrosis revision after spinal fusion. Spine J 2021; 21:370-376. [PMID: 33080375 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Pseudarthrosis after attempted spinal fusion is yet not sufficiently understood and presents a surgical challenge. Occult infections are sometimes observed in patients with pseudarthrosis and no inflammatory signs of infection. The prevalence of such occult infection and its association with patient demographics and inflammatory markers are largely unknown. PURPOSE To determine the prevalence of unexpected low-grade infection in spinal pseudarthrosis revision surgery, and to evaluate whether such infection is associated with patient demographics and inflammatory markers. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE One-hundred-and-twenty-eight patients who underwent thoracolumbar revision surgery due to presumed aseptic pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation. OUTCOME MEASURES Culture-positive infections or noninfectious pseudarthrosis. METHODS Samples were routinely taken for microbiological examination from all adults (n=152) who underwent revision surgery for presumed aseptic thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis between 2014 and 2019. A full intraoperative microbiological workup (at least three intraoperative tissue samples) was done for 128 (84%) patients, and these patients were included in further analyses. Patient characteristics, medical history, inflammatory markers, and perioperative data were compared between those with and without microbiologically-confirmed infection based on samples obtained during pseudarthrosis revision. RESULTS The microbiological workup confirmed infection in 13 of 128 cases (10.2%). The predominant pathogen was Cutibacterium acnes (46.2%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (38.5%). The presence of infection was associated with the body mass index (30.9±4.7 kg/m2 [infected] vs. 28.2±5.6 kg/m2 [controls], p=.049), surgery in the thoracolumbar region (46% vs. 18%, p=.019), and a slightly higher serum C-reactive protein level on admission (9.4±8.0 mg/L vs. 5.7±7.1 mg/L, p=.031). Occult infection was not associated with age, sex, prior lumbar surgeries, number of fused lumbar levels, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, presence of diabetes mellitus, and smoking status. CONCLUSIONS Occult infections were found in 10% of patients undergoing pseudarthrosis revision after spinal fusion, even without preoperative clinical suspicion. Occult infection was associated with higher body mass index, fusions including the thoracolumbar junction, and slightly higher C-reactive protein levels. Intraoperative microbiological samples should be routinely obtained to exclude or identify occult infection in all revision surgeries for symptomatic pseudarthrosis of the spine, as this information can be used to guide postoperative antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
|