A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh versus bone graft alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis

Biomechanical comparison of polyetheretherketone rods and titanium alloy rods in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods have potential as an alternative to titanium alloy (Ti) rods in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) remains unclear, especially in cases with insufficient anterior support due to the absence of a cage. The purpose of this study was to investigate biomechanical differences between PEEK rods and Ti rods in TLIF with and without a cage.

METHODS

An intact L1-L5 lumbar finite element model was constructed and validated. Accordingly, four TLIF models were developed: (1) Ti rods with a cage; (2) PEEK rods with a cage; (3) Ti rods without a cage; and (4) PEEK rods without a cage. The biomechanical properties were then compared among the four TLIF constructs.

RESULTS

With or without a cage, no obvious differences were found in the effect of PEEK rods and Ti rods on the range of motion, adjacent disc stress, and adjacent facet joint force. Compared to Ti rods, PEEK rods increase the average bone graft strain (270.8-6055.2 µE vs. 319.0-8751.6 µE). Moreover, PEEK rods reduced the stresses on the screw-rod system (23.1-96.0 MPa vs. 7.2-48.4 MPa) but increased the stresses on the cage (4.6-35.2 MPa vs. 5.6-40.9 MPa) and endplates (5.7-32.5 MPa vs. 6.6-37.6 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of whether a cage was used for TLIF, PEEK rods theoretically have the potential to serve as an alternative to Ti rods because they may provide certain stability, increase the bone graft strain, and reduce the posterior instrumentation stress, which might promote bony fusion and decrease instrumentation failure.

Selection of bone graft type for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis based on the spinal instability neoplastic score: a retrospective single-center cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish a standard for selecting bone graft type for thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis surgery based on the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS).

METHODS

Patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis who underwent one-stage debridement posteriorly and instrumentation were divided into a structural bone graft group (SBG) (51 cases) and a non-structural bone graft group (NSBG) (54 cases) according to their SINS. SBG was performed when the SINS was ≥ 13 and NSBG was performed when it was 7 ≤ SINS ≤ 12. Baseline data, clinical outcomes, and imaging outcomes were collected and statistically analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in clinical and imaging outcomes were achieved in both groups. Compared to the SBG group, the operation time of the NSBG group was shorter, the intraoperative blood loss of the NSBG group was less, the bone fusion time of the NSBG group was faster.

CONCLUSION

Non-structural and structural bone grafting can achieve comparable therapeutic effects in patients with spinal tuberculosis, and a suitable selection of bone grafts based on quantitative SINS will make full use of the advantages of different bone grafts.

Structural Versus Nonstructural Bone Grafting Via the Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Bone grafting is necessary in spinal tuberculosis surgery. Structural bone grafting is considered the gold standard treatment for spinal tuberculosis bone defects; however, nonstructural bone grafting via the posterior approach has recently gained attention. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of structural versus nonstructural bone grafting via the posterior approach in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.

METHODS

Studies comparing the clinical efficacy of structural and nonstructural bone grafting via the posterior approach in spinal tuberculosis surgery were identified from 8 databases from inception to August 2022. Study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias were performed, and meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 528 patients with spinal tuberculosis were enrolled. Meta-analysis revealed no between-group differences in fusion rate (P = 0.29), complications (P = 0.21), postoperative Cobb angle (P = 0.7), visual analog scale score (P = 0.66), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.74), or C-reactive protein level (P = 0.14) at the final follow-up. Nonstructural bone grafting was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.00001), shorter operation time (P < 0.0001), shorter fusion time (P < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.00001), while structural bone grafting was associated with lower Cobb angle loss (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques can achieve a satisfactory bony fusion rate for spinal tuberculosis. Nonstructural bone grafting has the advantages of less operative trauma, shorter fusion time, and shorter hospital stay, making it an attractive option for short-segment spinal tuberculosis. Nevertheless, structural bone grafting is superior for maintaining corrected kyphotic deformities.

Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgical safety among three bone graft modalities in spinal tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autogenous granular bone graft (AG), autogenous massive bone graft (AM), and titanium mesh bone graft (TM) are the three commonly utilized bone implant methods for spinal tuberculosis. However, the gold standard is still controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and surgical safety of three primary bone graft modalities.

METHODS

For systematic literature review, several databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched up to December 2022. Stata (version 14.0) was employed for data analysis.

RESULTS

Our network meta-analysis included 517 patients from 7 articles whose qualities are acceptable based on our quality assessment criteria. In direct comparison, AG was associated with a shorter operation time (MD = 73.51; CI 30.65-116.37) and a lesser blood loss (MD = 214.30; CI 7.17-421.44) than AM. TM had fewer loss of Cobb angle than AG (MD = 1.45; CI 0.13-2.76) and AM (MD = 1.21; CI 0.42-1.99). Compared with AG, TM (MD = 0.96; CI 0.06-1.87) was related to a shorter bone graft fusion time. In indirect comparison, for the clinical parameters, the rank of CRP (from best to worst) was as follows: TM (58%) > AM (27%) > AG (15%), the rank of ESR (from best to worst) was as follows: AG (61%) > AM (21%) > TM (18%), and the rank of VAS (from best to worst) was as follows: AG (65%) > TM (33%) > AM (2%). In the aspect of surgical data, what is noteworthy is that AG showed less blood loss [AG (93%) > TM (6%) > AM (1%)], operative time [AG (97%) > TM (3%) > AM (0)], and complications [AG (75%) > TM (21%) > AM (4%)] than AM and TM. As for imaging parameters, the rank of the loss of Cobb angle (from best to worst) was as follows: TM (99%) > AM (1%) > AG (0). Moreover, TM showed a shorter bone graft fusion time than AM and AG: TM (96%) > AM (3%) > AG (1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that AG might be the optional treatment for spinal tuberculosis owing to the outcomes of surgical safety. Moreover, TM is another right choice which can significantly reduce the loss of Cobb angle and shorten bone graft fusion time with long-term follow-up.

Expression and Clinical Significance of lncRNA NEAT1 in Patients with Spinal Tuberculosis

Background

Spinal tuberculosis (STB) often leads to irreversible neurological injury, resulting in serious social and economic problems. With the emergence of drug resistance, the management becomes even more challenging, given the treatment courses are generally longer for skeletal than pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). The development and validation of nonsputum biomarkers for diagnosis and tailoring of treatment duration to enable personalized and evidence-based management of such diseases to improve treatment outcomes is being called for globally. Studies have demonstrated that lncRNA NEAT1 was highly expressed in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and was related to its progression and recovery. However, the expression and clinical significance of lncRNA NEAT1 in STB remains unclear.

Methods

The relative expression of lncRNA NEAT1 was quantified by relative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The prognostic value was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient and chi-square test were used to analyze the correlation between the lncRNA NEAT1 expression and the clinical characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze independent predictors of STB recurrence.

Results

Compared with normal healthy individuals, the expression level of lncRNA NEAT1 in peripheral blood and granulomatous tissues of STB patients was significantly increased. The results of the in vitro Mycobacterium tuberculosis- (Mtb-) infected cell model showed that the expression level of lncRNA NEAT1 was significantly upregulated in macrophages infected with Mtb, and the difference was statistically significant compared with Mtb-uninfected group. The expression level of lncRNA NEAT1 in granulomatous tissue of STB was significantly higher than that in peripheral blood. The expression of lncRNA NEAT1 was related to segments of the lesions, paraspinal abscesses, anti-TB treatment, drug resistance, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Multivariate analysis results showed that relatively high expression of lncRNA NEAT1_1, the shorter transcript of the NEAT1 gene, was an independent prognostic factor of STB outcome.

Conclusion

LncRNA NEAT1 was highly expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and granulomatous tissue from patients with STB, as well as in Mtb-infected THP-1 cell lines. LncRNA NEAT1 expression was significantly associated with clinical characteristics (paraspinal abscesses, segments of the lesions and anti-TB treatment, IL-6, CRP, and ESR) of patients in STB. Increased expression of lncRNA NEAT1_1 predicted good prognosis of STB and might become a prognostic biomarker for STB.

Spinous Process Combined With a Titanium Mesh Cage as a Bone Graft in the Stability Reconstruction of Lumbar or Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis

Background

Autogenous bone grafts, such as iliac bone or rib struts, have been used in the anterior reconstruction of spinal tuberculosis (STB) and have their own benefits and limitations. Here, we introduced a new method, the spinous process (SP), combined with a titanium mesh cage (TMC) as a bone graft in the stability reconstruction of lumbar or lumbosacral STBs. By retrospectively comparing patients who received SP+TMC to traditional TMC bone grafts or allogeneic bone grafts in terms of safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness, we aimed to evaluate whether SP+TMC could be a possible alternative method.

Methods

From 2010 to 2018, 69 patients who underwent one-stage posterior debridement with grafts and internal fixation within a single lumbar or lumbosacral segment were included in this study. Twelve patients who received SP combined with a TMC (SP+TMC, group A), 30 patients who received a TMC only (group B), and 27 patients who received allografts (group C) were included. Measurements including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, final follow-up (FFU) duration and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiological measurements, including the number of segments fixated, the number of pedicle screws used, the Cobb angle, pelvic parameters, and the bony fusion time, were reviewed. All outcomes were analyzed using SPSS 25.

Results

We found that the SP+TMC group had fewer fixation segments, fewer pedicle screws implanted, a shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and a considerably lower hospital cost than allografts. In addition, the TMC group had a comparable clinical outcome with the TMC group regarding lower economic cost.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that compared to a TMC or allograft, the use of SP combined with a TMC as a bone graft is an effective and reliable approach for the surgical management of one-level lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis, leading to effective restoration of spinal stability. Furthermore, this approach is a cost-effective structural bone grafting method, especially for patients in developing countries.