A novel tool to provide predictable alignment data irrespective of source and image quality acquired on mobile phones: what engineers can offer clinicians

Landet: an efficient physics-informed deep learning approach for automatic detection of anatomical landmarks and measurement of spinopelvic alignment

PURPOSE

An efficient physics-informed deep learning approach for extracting spinopelvic measures from X-ray images is introduced and its performance is evaluated against manual annotations.

METHODS

Two datasets, comprising a total of 1470 images, were collected to evaluate the model's performance. We propose a novel method of detecting landmarks as objects, incorporating their relationships as constraints (LanDet). Using this approach, we trained our deep learning model to extract five spine and pelvis measures: Sacrum Slope (SS), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), and Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA). The results were compared to manually labelled test dataset (GT) as well as measures annotated separately by three surgeons.

RESULTS

The LanDet model was evaluated on the two datasets separately and on an extended dataset combining both. The final accuracy for each measure is reported in terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Standard Deviation (SD), and R Pearson correlation coefficient as follows: [ S S ∘ : 3.7 ( 2.7 ) , R = 0.89 ] ,[ P T ∘ : 1.3 ( 1.1 ) , R = 0.98 ] , [ P I ∘ : 4.2 ( 3.1 ) , R = 0.93 ] , [ L L ∘ : 5.1 ( 6.4 ) , R = 0.83 ] , [ S V A ( m m ) : 2.1 ( 1.9 ) , R = 0.96 ] . To assess model reliability and compare it against surgeons, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) metric is used. The model demonstrated better consistency with surgeons with all values over 0.88 compared to what was previously reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The LanDet model exhibits competitive performance compared to existing literature. The effectiveness of the physics-informed constraint method, utilized in our landmark detection as object algorithm, is highlighted. Furthermore, we addressed the limitations of heatmap-based methods for anatomical landmark detection and tackled issues related to mis-identifying of similar or adjacent landmarks instead of intended landmark using this novel approach.

VertXNet: an ensemble method for vertebral body segmentation and identification from cervical and lumbar spinal X-rays

Accurate annotation of vertebral bodies is crucial for automating the analysis of spinal X-ray images. However, manual annotation of these structures is a laborious and costly process due to their complex nature, including small sizes and varying shapes. To address this challenge and expedite the annotation process, we propose an ensemble pipeline called VertXNet. This pipeline currently combines two segmentation mechanisms, semantic segmentation using U-Net, and instance segmentation using Mask R-CNN, to automatically segment and label vertebral bodies in lateral cervical and lumbar spinal X-ray images. VertXNet enhances its effectiveness by adopting a rule-based strategy (termed the ensemble rule) for effectively combining segmentation outcomes from U-Net and Mask R-CNN. It determines vertebral body labels by recognizing specific reference vertebral instances, such as cervical vertebra 2 ('C2') in cervical spine X-rays and sacral vertebra 1 ('S1') in lumbar spine X-rays. Those references are commonly relatively easy to identify at the edge of the spine. To assess the performance of our proposed pipeline, we conducted evaluations on three spinal X-ray datasets, including two in-house datasets and one publicly available dataset. The ground truth annotations were provided by radiologists for comparison. Our experimental results have shown that the proposed pipeline outperformed two state-of-the-art (SOTA) segmentation models on our test dataset with a mean Dice of 0.90, vs. a mean Dice of 0.73 for Mask R-CNN and 0.72 for U-Net. We also demonstrated that VertXNet is a modular pipeline that enables using other SOTA model, like nnU-Net to further improve its performance. Furthermore, to evaluate the generalization ability of VertXNet on spinal X-rays, we directly tested the pre-trained pipeline on two additional datasets. A consistently strong performance was observed, with mean Dice coefficients of 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. In summary, VertXNet demonstrated significantly improved performance in vertebral body segmentation and labeling for spinal X-ray imaging. Its robustness and generalization were presented through the evaluation of both in-house clinical trial data and publicly available datasets.

A Systematic Review of Outpatient Telemedicine Use in Neurosurgery Since the Start of Coronavirus Disease 2019

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has sparked interest in telemedicine, resulting in an increase in neurosurgical publications focused on it. We summarize this new literature to evaluate telemedicine applications to neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for journal articles published after January 1, 2020. All journal articles that included data after the start of COVID-19 and evaluated any aspect of telemedicine relevant to outpatient neurosurgical visits were included. The premise and key findings of each included study were extracted, as well as patient and provider satisfaction with and preference for telemedicine.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Four studies proposed and evaluated a remote neurologic examination. Two studies reported similar postvisit outcomes between remote and in-person visits. Twenty-four studies reported a combination of patient and provider opinions toward telemedicine. Of 9834 patients and 116 providers, 82.4% and 65.2% were satisfied overall with telemedicine, respectively. Of 3526 patients and 168 providers, 57.0% and 66.5% preferred telemedicine to in-person visits, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, most patients and providers have a high opinion of telemedicine for outpatient visits, and increasing evidence suggests that remote visits yield favorable clinical outcomes. The high rates of patient and provider satisfaction and preference may be considered for further adoption of remote neurosurgical visits beyond the COVID-19 era.

Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation

PURPOSE

To summarize and critically evaluate the existing studies for spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance that are based on deep learning (DL).

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, WoS and Scopus) were queried for records using keywords related to DL and measurement of sagittal balance. After screening the resulting 529 records that were augmented with specific web search, 34 studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the final review, and evaluated from the perspective of the observed sagittal spinopelvic parameters, properties of spine image datasets, applied DL methodology and resulting measurement performance.

RESULTS

Studies reported DL measurement of up to 18 different spinopelvic parameters, but the actual number depended on the image field of view. Image datasets were composed of lateral lumbar spine and whole spine X-rays, biplanar whole spine X-rays and lumbar spine magnetic resonance cross sections, and were increasing in size or enriched by augmentation techniques. Spinopelvic parameter measurement was approached either by landmark detection or structure segmentation, and U-Net was the most frequently applied DL architecture. The latest DL methods achieved excellent performance in terms of mean absolute error against reference manual measurements (~ 2° or ~ 1 mm).

CONCLUSION

Although the application of relatively complex DL architectures resulted in an improved measurement accuracy of sagittal spinopelvic parameters, future methods should focus on multi-institution and multi-observer analyses as well as uncertainty estimation and error handling implementations for integration into the clinical workflow. Further advances will enhance the predictive analytics of DL methods for spinopelvic parameter measurement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.