A systematic review and meta-analysis on the management of accidental dural tears in spinal surgery: drowning in information but thirsty for a clear message

Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature

STUDY DESIGN

: Retrospective Chart Review.

OBJECTIVES

Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.

RESULTS

We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Management of Incidental Durotomies During Open Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Incidental durotomy is a common intraoperative complication of lumbar spine surgery. Intra and postoperative protocols in the management of this common complication vary considerably, with no consensus in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review (1) lumbar dural repair techniques for open degenerative procedures; (2) review described postoperative protocols after lumbar dural repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed for all articles published from inception until September 2022 using Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify articles assessing the management of durotomy in open surgery for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Two independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Outcomes included persistent leaks, return to the operating room, recurrent symptoms, medical complications, or patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 10,227 articles were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 9 studies were included (n=1270 patients) for final review. Repair techniques included; no primary repair, suture repair in running or interrupted manner with or without adjunctive sealants, sealants alone, or patch repair with muscle, fat, epidural blood patch, or synthetic graft. Postoperative protocols included the placement of a subfascial drain with varying durations of bed rest. Notable findings included no benefit of prolonged bedrest compared with early ambulation ( P =0.4), reduced cerebrospinal fluid leakage with fat graft compared with muscle grafts ( P <0.001), and decreased rates of revision surgery in studies that used subfascial drains (1.7%-2.2% vs 4.34%-6.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in intraoperative durotomy repair techniques and postoperative protocols exists. Primary repair with fat graft augmentation seems to have the highest success rate. Postoperatively, the use of a subfascial drain with early ambulation reduces the risk of pseudomenignocele formation, medical complications, and return to the operating room. Further research should focus on prospective studies with the goal to standardize repair techniques and postoperative protocols.

Early ambulation versus prolonged bed rest for incidental durotomies in spine procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incidental durotomies are frequent complications of spine surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak-related symptoms. Management typically involves prolonged bed rest to reduce CSF pressure at the durotomy site. However, early ambulation may be a safer, effective alternative. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies comparing early ambulation (bed rest ≤ 24 h) with prolonged bed rest (> 24 h) for patients with incidental durotomies in spine surgeries. The outcomes of interest were CSF leak, hypotensive headache, additional surgical repair, pseudomeningocele, and pulmonary complications. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We included a total of 704 patients from 6 studies. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary complications (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.67; p = 0.007) in the early mobilization group. The incidence of CSF leak (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.83-2.14; p = 0.23), hypotensive headache (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.27-1.90; p = 0.50), additional repair surgery (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.2; p = 0.35), and pseudomeningocele (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.20-8.48; p = 0.79) did not differ significantly. In patients with incidental durotomy following spinal surgery, early mobilization was associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications as compared with prolonged bed rest. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CSF leak, need for additional repair, pseudomeningocele, and hypotensive headache.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Incidental Durotomy during Lumbar Spine Decompression with or without Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for incidental durotomies during lumbar decompression surgeries. In addition, we aimed to determine the changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) based on incidental durotomy status.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

There is limited literature investigating the affect of incidental durotomy on patient reported outcome measures. While the majority of research does not suggest differences in complications, readmission, or revision rates, many studies rely on public databases, and their sensitivity and specificity for identifying incidental durotomies is unknown.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar decompression with or without fusion at a single tertiary care center were grouped based on the presence of a durotomy. Multivariate analysis was performed for length of stay (LOS), hospital readmissions, and changes in PROMs. To identify surgical risk factors for durotomy, 3:1 propensity matching was performed using stepwise logistic regression. The sensitivity and specificity of the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes (G96.11 and G97.41) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 3,684 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar decompressions, 533 (14.5%) had durotomies, and a complete set of PROMs (preoperative and 1-year postoperative) were available for 737 patients (20.0%). Incidental durotomy was an independent predictor of increased LOS but not hospital readmission or worse PROMs. The durotomy repair method was not associated with hospital readmission or LOS. However, repair with collagen graft and suture predicted reduced improvement in Visual Analog Scale back (β =2.56, p=0.004). Independent risk factors for incidental durotomies included revisions (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; p<0.001), levels decompressed (OR, 1.11; p=0.005), and preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis or thoracolumbar kyphosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes were 5.4% and 99.9%, respectively, for identifying durotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

The durotomy rate for lumbar decompressions was 14.5%. No differences in outcomes were detected except for increased LOS. Database studies relying on ICD codes should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sensitivity in identifying incidental durotomies.

Dural injury following elective spine surgery - A prospective analysis of risk factors, management and complications

Incidental dural tears being a familiar complication in spine surgery could result in dreaded postoperative outcomes. Though the literature pertaining to their incidence and management is vast, it is limited by the retrospective study designs and smaller case series. Hence, we performed a prospective study in our institute to determine the incidence, surgical risk factors, complications and surgical outcomes in patients with unintended durotomy during spine surgery over a period of one year. The overall incidence in our study was 2.3% (44/1912). Revision spine surgeries in particular had a higher incidence of 16.6%. The average age of the study population was 51.6 years. The most common intraoperative surgical step associated with dural tear was removal of the lamina, and 50% of the injuries were during usage of kerrison rongeur. The most common location of the tear was paramedian location (20 patients) and the most common size of the tear was about 1 mm-5mm (31 patients). We observed that the dural repair techniques, placement of drain and prolonged post-operative bed rest didnot significantly affect the post-operative outcomes. One patient in our study developed persistent CSF leak, which was treated by subarachnoid lumbar drain placement. No patients developed pseudomeningocele or post-operative neurological worsening or re-exploration for dural repair. Wound complications were noted in 4 patients and treated by debridement and antibiotics. Based on our study, we have proposed a treatment algorithm for the management of dural tears in spine surgery.

Clinical management of dural defects: A review

Dural defects are common in spinal and cranial neurosurgery. A series of complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, occur after rupture of the dura. Therefore, treatment strategies are necessary to reduce or avoid complications. This review comprehensively summarizes the common causes, risk factors, clinical complications, and repair methods of dural defects. The latest research progress on dural repair methods and materials is summarized, including direct sutures, grafts, biomaterials, non-biomaterial materials, and composites formed by different materials. The characteristics and efficacy of these dural substitutes are reviewed, and these materials and methods are systematically evaluated. Finally, the best methods for dural repair and the challenges and future prospects of new dural repair materials are discussed.

Open epidural blood patch to augment durotomy repair in lumbar spine surgery: surgical technique and cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Incidental durotomy during elective spine surgery is relatively common. While usually benign and self-limited, it can be associated with morbidity, increased cost, and medicolegal ramifications. Dural repair typically involves performing a primary closure using a suture or dural staple; repairs are then frequently augmented with a sealant, patch, or fat/fascial graft. Although primary repair of an incidental durotomy is standard practice, the ideal secondary sealant or augment choice remains unclear. A wide variety of commercially available dural sealant options exist, and while none have demonstrated consistent superiority, all are associated with single-use costs in the hundreds to thousands of dollars and have concerns regarding swelling, local inflammation, or short-lived dural adherence.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to compare the results of dural repair augmentation using an open intraoperative epidural blood patch to a hydrogel technique.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative cohort study at an academic referral center PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery from March 2017 to January 2021 who sustained an incidental durotomy. Patients undergoing surgery for infection were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was failure of the repair as determined by a return to the operating room for re-exploration of a persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak within 30 days of the index procedure. A secondary outcome was the incidence of a postoperative positional headache, and if present, the method used to obtain resolution. The primary predictor was use of a suture and hydrogel technique ("hydrogel" group), or the use of an epidural blood patch ("EBP" group).

METHODS

The method for applying an open epidural blood patch is presented in detail and involves primarily repairing the durotomy followed by allowing whole blood to pool and clot in the operative field until the durotomy is completely covered. This was compared with a group of patients undergoing secondary augmentation with commercially available hydrogel. In both groups, mechanical resistance to CSF leakage was confirmed with direct visualization and a Valsalva maneuver, respectively. Patients were instructed to remain flat until the morning after surgery. Chart review was used for data abstraction on preoperative, demographic, perioperative, and postoperative clinical factors. To compare between the hydrogel and EBP group, Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was used to test for non-parametric comparisons of means, and chi-square testing between binomial data.

RESULTS

Of 732 patients during the study period, forty-eight patients met study criteria. Twenty-five patients were in the hydrogel group and 23 in the EBP group. Mean age was 69.3 years (standard error 1.3 years). Patients were predominantly female (n = 31, 64.6%) with a mean BMI of 29.5 (SE 0.8), with no significant baseline differences between the hydrogel and EBP groups. Two patients in the hydrogel group (8.0%) and two in the EBP group (8.7%) had mild positional headaches postoperatively that resolved without intervention within 24 hours. One (4.3%) patient in the EBP group had positional headaches following an initial headache-free period; this patient was returned to the operating room and no evidence of a persistent CSF leak was found despite meticulous exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

An open, intraoperatively placed epidural blood patch may be an efficacious and cost-effective way to manage an incidental durotomy. This method merits further study as an allergy-free, no swell, cost-neutral method of dural repair augmentation.

High efficacy of tetra-PEG hydrogel sealants for sutureless dural closure

Advances in meticulous dural closure technique remain a great challenge for watertight dural closure in the aged society, because the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after spinal surgery is often accompanied with the disgusting wound infection, meningitis and pseudomeningocele. Here, a tetra-poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogel sealant is developed with collective advantages of facile operation, high safety, quick set time, easy injectability, favorable mechanical strength and powerful tissue adhesion for effective sutureless dural closure during the surgery procedure. Impressively, this tetra-PEG sealant can instantaneously adhere to the irregular tissue surfaces even in a liquid environment, and effectively prevent or block off the intraoperative CSF leakage for sutureless dural closure and dura regeneration. Together, this sutureless tetra-PEG adhesive can be utilized as a very promising alternative for high-efficient watertight dural closure of the clinical patients who incidentally or deliberately undergo the durotomy during the spinal surgery.

Thecal sac ligation for the treatment of post-infectious intrathecal-prevertebral CSF fistula in a paraplegic patient

The occurrence of a symptomatic post-infectious intrathecal to prevertebral fistula is rare. We report the presentation and management of a 38-year-old chronically paraplegic male with longstanding thoracic osteomyelitis and epidural infection who developed a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula causing symptomatic intracranial hypotension (IH). During an interventional radiology (IR)-guided aspiration of what was thought to be residual abscess, pulsatile, clear fluid was observed. A subsequent CT myelogram showed air in the spinal canal and a CSF fistula between the thecal sac and the pre-vertebral space. Upon intraoperative exploration, a large ventral dural defect was identified with insufficient native dura for primary closure and the thecal sac was tied off cranial to the level of the fistula. Given the large ventral dural defect, the fistula was likely the result of longstanding infection in the epidural space rather than the IR guided aspiration. The aspiration likely transgressed an existing fistula and may have exacerbated the symptoms of IH by providing another route for CSF egress. The patient's postural headaches completely resolved post-operatively. Thecal sac ligation is a viable treatment option in select circumstances with symptomatic CSF fistula.

Risk Factors for Accidental Dural Tears in Spinal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural tears (DTs) are familiar complications of spinal surgery. Their reported incidence varies widely, and several risk factors have been proposed in the literature. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of DTs and assess their associated risk factors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using specific MeSH and Text terms. Only articles with prospective data reporting the incidence and risk factors were selected and reviewed based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. The reported incidence rate ranged from 0.4% to 15.8%, giving an overall pooled incidence rate of 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-7.3). The incidence rate varied in relation to the part of the spine and the type of surgery. Three factors were associated with a high rate of DTs: age (overall mean difference of 3.04, 95% CI 2.49-3.60), revision surgery (overall odds ratio of 2.28, 95% CI 1.84-2.83), and lumbar stenosis (overall odds ratio of 2.03, 95% CI 1.50-2.75). Diabetes was weakly associated with DTs, with an odds ratio of 1.40 (95% CI 1.01-1.93). The overall effects of sex and obesity were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Advancing age, revision surgery, and lumbar stenosis were significantly associated with increased risk of DTs. These factors should be taken into consideration during the consenting process for spinal surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Risk of dural tear during spine surgery.

Incidental Durotomy in Lumbar Spine Surgery; Risk Factors, Complications, and Perioperative Management

Incidental durotomy (ID) can occur in up to 14% of all lumbar spine surgeries. The risk of this complication is markedly higher among elderly patients with advanced spinal pathology. In addition, revision cases and other more invasive procedures increase the risk of ID. When unrepaired, IDs can increase the risk of developing meningitis and can lead to the formation of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and pseudomeningoceles. Intraoperative recognition and repair are essential to ID management, although repair techniques vary considerably. Although primary suture repair is considered the "benchmark," indirect repair alone has shown comparable outcomes. Given the concern for infection after ID, many have indicated for prolonged prophylactic antibiotic regimens. However, there is little clinical evidence that this is necessary after adequate repair. The addition of subfascial drains have been shown to promote wound healing and early ambulation, whereas no consensus on duration of indwelling drains exists and such management is largely case dependent. Early ambulation after surgery has not shown to be associated with increased risk of further ID complications and decreases rehabilitation time, length of stay, and risk of venous thromboembolism. However, there remains a role for conservation mobilization protocols in more severe cases where notable symptoms are observed.

Herniation of the cauda equina into the facet joint through a pseudomeningocele: A case report and literature review

Background

Incidental durotomy is a well-known complication of spinal surgery. It can lead to persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage resulting in significant secondary complications. Here, we present a case in which the cauda equina herniated into a pseudomeningocele that penetrated a facet joint, leading to lower extremity radiculopathy warranting surgical correction.

Case Description

One year ago, a 67-year-old male underwent a partial left L4-L5 laminectomy. At surgery, a durotomy was repaired with a nylon suture and reinforced with a fat patch. He subsequently presented with severe left lower extremity radiculopathy and a partial cauda equina syndrome. On MR, the cauda equina had herniated into a pseudomeningocele that penetrated the left facet joint. Once the defect was repaired at surgery, the patient's symptoms improved.

Conclusion

It is critical to correctly repair an intraoperative durotomy to avoid further neurological deficits that may include cauda equina herniation into pseudomeningoceles penetrating facet joints.