1
|
Master H, Coronado RA, Whitaker S, Block S, Vanston SW, Pennings JS, Gupta R, Robinette P, Stephens B, Abtahi A, Schwarz J, Archer KR. Combining Wearable Technology and Telehealth Counseling for Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spine Surgery: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Physical Activity Intervention. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzad096. [PMID: 37478463 PMCID: PMC10851843 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a wearable device and telehealth counseling physical activity intervention early after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS Sixteen patients were randomized to an 8-session physical activity intervention or to usual postoperative care after surgery. The intervention included a wearable device (ie, Fitbit) and telehealth counseling by a licensed physical therapist. The feasibility of study procedures was assessed through recruitment, randomization, retention, and participation rates. Acceptability was assessed through a satisfaction survey and median within-participant change in objective physical activity (steps per day and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS Of 64 participants who were eligible, recruitment and randomization rates were 41 and 62%, respectively. Retention for objective physical activity and patient-reported outcomes was 94 and 100%, respectively, at 6-month follow-up. Seven (88%) participants in the intervention group completed all telehealth sessions, and 6 (75%) met step goals over the 8 sessions. All participants in the intervention group found the wearable device and telehealth counseling to be helpful and reported it much or somewhat more important than other postoperative services. Median within-participant change for steps per day improved from baseline (preoperative) to 6 months after surgery for both the intervention (1070) and usual care (679) groups, while MVPA only improved for the intervention group (2.2. minutes per day). Improvements in back and leg pain and disability were noted for both groups. No adverse events were reported in the study. CONCLUSION Combining wearable technology and telehealth counseling is a feasible approach to promote the physical activity during the early postoperative period after spine surgery. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of leveraging wearables and telehealth during postoperative rehabilitation. IMPACT This study has implications for the clinical dissemination of physical activity strategies in the rehabilitation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiral Master
- Vanderbilt Institute of Clinical & Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rogelio A Coronado
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sarah Whitaker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shannon Block
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Susan W Vanston
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacquelyn S Pennings
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rishabh Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Payton Robinette
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Byron Stephens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amir Abtahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacob Schwarz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kristin R Archer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karlsson E, Hanafi R, Brisby H, Fors A, Kemani M, Hedman H, Nijs J, Lundberg M. Get Back, a person-centred digital programme targeting physical activity for patients undergoing spinal stenosis surgery-a study protocol of a randomized feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:16. [PMID: 38279131 PMCID: PMC10811854 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01433-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal stenosis is the most common reason for elective spine surgery, and the cardinal symptom is leg pain and discomfort when walking. Patients with spinal stenosis have a decreased level of physical activity and thereby an increased risk of poor health. Get Back is a person-centred digital programme that strives to support patients being physically active after surgery. The aim is to explore if Get Back, in its present format (referred to as Get Backfeasibility), is feasible and contributes to detectable change in variables related to intervention content. METHODS Thirty patients planned for decompression surgery due to central lumbar spinal stenosis who present with low physical activity, pain catastrophizing or fear of movement, will be included in a randomized feasibility study. All patients will be randomly allocated to either Get Backfeasibility or usual physical therapy. Get Backfeasibility aims to increase the patient's physical activity level by combining a person-centred and cognitive behavioural approach. It comprises 10 video and telephone sessions led by a physical therapist over 12 weeks (pre/postoperatively). Outcomes are treatment fidelity (treatment dose, adherence, and content), process feasibility (recruitment, intervention use, and acceptability of measurements and intervention), and variables related to the intervention content (steps per day, physical activity level, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and general self-efficacy). Treatment fidelity and feasibility data will be assessed during the full study period (12 weeks). Physical activity, physical capacity, and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed digitally at baseline (2 weeks preoperatively) and 11-12 weeks postoperatively. Variables related to the intervention content will be monitored weekly through a digital application. Feasibility data will be analysed descriptively and inferentially using a nonparametric approach, data from repeated measures will be displayed graphically and data from telephone interviews will be analysed using content analysis with a descriptive manifest approach. DISCUSSION The results will provide information on whether Get Back in its present format is feasible and can be evaluated for effectiveness in a larger randomized controlled trial, for patients with a low physical activity level and a high fear of movement who are undergoing decompression surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrails.gov 04/08/2023, registration no. NCT05806593.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emelie Karlsson
- Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
| | - Rikard Hanafi
- Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- Karolinska University Hospital, Theme Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals, Medical Unit Medical Psychology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Helena Brisby
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Fors
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mike Kemani
- Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Theme Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals, Medical Unit Medical Psychology, Solna, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Håkan Hedman
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mari Lundberg
- Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferrari S, Cedraschi C, Mapelli N, Baram A, Costa F, Gatti R, Fornari M. Thoughts and concerns of patients at hospital discharge after lumbar spine surgery. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:4048-4057. [PMID: 36866445 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2148761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The increased rate of surgical interventions point to the necessity to investigate the patient's experience from a biopsychosocial perspective. The aim of this study was to investigate the thoughts and concerns of patients undergoing spinal surgery for lumbar degenerative disease at the time of their discharge from hospital. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 patients. The questions investigated possible concerns associated to discharging them home. A content analysis was performed by a multidisciplinary group to identify the main themes that emerged from the interviews. RESULTS The patients were satisfied with the surgeons' preoperative explanations and description of expected prognosis. However, they were disappointed with the lack of information at hospital discharge, in particular regarding practical and behavioral recommendations. The patients expressed clear concerns about being left alone to deal with possible complications or difficulties they may encounter when returning home. CONCLUSION This study underlined the patients' need for a comprehensive psychological guidance and possibly a person of reference during the post-operative process. Discussing discharge with the patient was emphasized as an important issue to improve patients' compliance to the recovery process itself. Putting these elements into practice should help spine surgeons to manage better hospital discharge.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA comprehensive discussion with the patient at the time of hospital discharge is clearly stressed as an important issue to improve patients' adherence to the recovery process.The patients complained of a lack of information when returning home, in particular regarding practical and behavioral recommendations.The patients expressed clear concerns about possible complications or difficulties they may encounter when returning home and they expressed their need to know whom they can contact for help if needed.A better understanding of the thoughts and concerns of patients undergoing spinal surgery at the time of their discharge from hospital should help spine surgeons to improve the management of hospital discharge and the post-operative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ferrari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - C Cedraschi
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N Mapelli
- Personal Studio s.s.d a.r.l, Lecco, Vercurago, Italy
| | - A Baram
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - F Costa
- Spine Surgery Unit - NCH4 - Department of Neurosurgery - IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - R Gatti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Physiotherapy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Fornari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jakobsson M, Hagströmer M, Lotzke H, von Rosen P, Lundberg M. Fear of movement was associated with sedentary behaviour 12 months after lumbar fusion surgery in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc disorder. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:874. [PMID: 37950235 PMCID: PMC10636920 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06980-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Movement behaviours, such as sedentary behaviour (SB) and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), are linked with multiple aspects of health and can be influenced by various pain-related psychological factors, such as fear of movement, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy for exercise. However, the relationships between these factors and postoperative SB and MVPA remain unclear in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative conditions. This study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative pain-related psychological factors and postoperative SB and MVPA in patients with low back pain (LBP) and degenerative disc disorder at 6 and 12 months after lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS Secondary data were collected from 118 patients (63 women and 55 men; mean age 46 years) who underwent lumbar fusion surgery in a randomised controlled trial. SB and MVPA were measured using the triaxial accelerometer ActiGraph GT3X+. Fear of movement, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy for exercise served as predictors. The association between these factors and the relative time spent in SB and MVPA 6 and 12 months after surgery was analysed via linear regression models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Preoperative fear of movement was significantly associated with relative time spent in SB at 6 and 12 months after surgery (β = 0.013, 95% confidence interval = 0.004 to 0.022, p = 0.007). Neither pain catastrophising nor self-efficacy for exercise showed significant associations with relative time spent in SB and MVPA at these time points. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that preoperative fear of movement was significantly associated with postoperative SB in patients with LBP and degenerative disc disorder. This finding underscores the potential benefits of preoperative screening for pain-related psychological factors, including fear of movement, preoperatively. Such screenings could aid in identifying patients who might benefit from targeted interventions to promote healthier postoperative movement behaviour and improved health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Jakobsson
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maria Hagströmer
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- The Back in Motion Research group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, Stockholm, SE, 11486, Sweden
| | - Hanna Lotzke
- Department of Rehabilitation, Ängelholm Hospital, Ängelholm, Sweden
| | - Philip von Rosen
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Mari Lundberg
- The Back in Motion Research group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, Stockholm, SE, 11486, Sweden.
- Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Briguglio M, Wainwright TW, Southern K, Riso P, Porrini M, Middleton RG. Healthy Eating for Elective Major Orthopedic Surgery: Quality, Quantity, and Timing. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:2081-2090. [PMID: 37521366 PMCID: PMC10377616 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s415116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Improvements to enhanced recovery pathways in orthopedic surgery are reducing the time that patients spend in the hospital, giving an increasingly vital role to prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation after surgery. Nutritional support is an important tenant of perioperative medicine, with the aim to integrate the patient's diet with food components that are needed in greater amounts to support surgical fitness. Regardless of the time available between the time of contemplation of surgery and the day of admission, a patient who eats healthy is reasonably more suitable for surgery than a patient who does not meet the daily requirements for energy and nutrients. Moreover, a successful education for healthy food choices is one possible way to sustain the exercise therapy, improve recovery, and thus contribute to the patient's long-term health. The expected benefits presuppose that the patient follows a healthy diet, but it is unclear which advice is needed to improve dietary choices. We present the principles of healthy eating for patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery to lay the foundations of rational and valuable perioperative nutritional support programs. We discuss the concepts of nutritional use of food, requirements, portion size, dietary target, food variety, time variables of feeding, and the practical indications on what the last meal to be consumed six hours before the induction of anesthesia may be together with what is meant by clear fluids to be consumed until two hours before. Surgery may act as a vital "touch point" for some patients with the health service and is therefore a valuable opportunity for members of the perioperative team to promote optimal lifestyle choices, such as the notion and importance of healthy eating not just for surgery but also for long-term health benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Briguglio
- IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Laboratory of Nutritional Sciences, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas W Wainwright
- Bournemouth University, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth, UK
- University Hospitals Dorset, NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | - Kate Southern
- Bournemouth University, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth, UK
- Nuffield Health Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Patrizia Riso
- University of Milan, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Milan, Italy
| | - Marisa Porrini
- University of Milan, Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Milan, Italy
| | - Robert G Middleton
- Bournemouth University, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth, UK
- University Hospitals Dorset, NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| |
Collapse
|