Surgical approaches to L5 corpectomy: a systematic review

Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes of Lower Lumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse with Symptomatic Stenosis: A Surgical Strategy from a Multicenter Case Series

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter case series was conducted.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of lower lumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse (LL-OVC) with symptomatic stenosis based on various surgical procedures and classify them using the newly developed collapse severity criteria.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The surgical outcomes of LL-OVC with symptomatic stenosis remain unclear.

METHODS

We investigated patients who underwent surgical intervention for LL-OVC (L3, L4, and/or L5) with symptomatic foraminal and/or central stenosis from eight spine centers. Only patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year were included. We developed new criteria to grade vertebral collapse severity (grade 1, 0%-25%; grade 2, 25%-50%; grade 3, 50%-75%; and grade 4, 75%-100%). The clinical features and outcomes were compared based on the collapse grade and surgical procedures performed (i.e., decompression alone, posterior lateral fusion [PLF], lateral interbody fusion [LIF], posterior/transforaminal interbody fusion [PLIF/TLIF], or vertebral column resection [VCR]).

RESULTS

In this study, 59 patients (average age, 77.4 years) were included. The average follow-up period was 24.6 months. The clinical outcome score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score) was more favorable in the LIF and PLIF/TLIF groups than in the decompression alone, PLF, and VCR groups. The use of VCR was associated with a high rate of revision surgery (57.1%). No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the collapse grades; however, grade 4 collapse was associated with a high rate of revision surgery (40.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

When treating LL-OVC, appropriate instrumented reconstruction with rigid intervertebral stability is necessary. According to our newly developed criteria, LIF may be a surgical option for any collapse grade. The use of VCR for grade 4 collapse is associated with a high rate of revision.

Total en bloc spondylectomy for the L5 metastasis of a carcinoid tumor: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) was designed to achieve oncological complete tumor resection in a vertebral compartment. Because of the special anatomy of the lumbosacral junction, TES procedure at the L5 level is a challenge, and it has been explained in few reports in the literature. Performing TES in the lower lumbar region, as normal, is accomplished by using a combined approach.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors presented the case of a 20-year-old man with an isolated spinal metastasis at the L5 level of carcinoid tumor of jejunum, limited to the vertebral body. Due to good long-term prognosis, after multidisciplinary evaluation the authors decided to treat the patient with TES through a combined posteroanterior approach, with posterior instrumentation and anterior reconstruction. Nine years after surgery, the patient was asymptomatic, with no sign of local recurrence.

LESSONS

TES is a feasible technique to provide long-term survival in a select subgroup of patients, reducing the risk of local recurrence. The authors presented some anatomical and biomechanical factors that must be considered at the lumbosacral region. Despite the high rates of complication associated with TES, most patients benefit from local control provided by the technique.

Multilevel L4 and L5 Corpectomy for Burst Fracture via an Anterior Transperitoneal Approach Followed by Posterior Stabilization: Technical and Anatomic Considerations

Lower lumbar spine burst fractures make up only 1% of all lumbar spine fractures. A burst fracture with neurological compromise, ligamentous injury, severe kyphotic deformity, or loss of anterior column support typically requires surgical stabilization. Treatment options at the L4 and L5 levels are challenging and often require an anterior/posterior approach. Very little has been reported on anterior approaches to the L4 and L5 levels when a corpectomy is required. Hence, we present a patient with a complex burst fracture of L4 and L5. She underwent a corpectomy of L4 and L5 and placement of an expandable cage through a window created between the aorta and the inferior vena cava via an anterior transperitoneal abdominal approach followed by posterior stabilization and fusion from L2 to the pelvis.

Minimally Invasive L5 Corpectomy with Navigated Expandable Vertebral Cage: A Technical Note

Background: Conventional L5 corpectomy requires a large incision and an extended period of intraoperative fluoroscopy. We describe herein a new L5 corpectomy technique. Methods: A 79-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for leg pain and lower back pain due to an L5 vertebral fracture. Her daily life had been affected by severe lower back pain and sciatica for more than 2 months. We initially performed simple decompression surgery, but this proved effective for only 10 months. Results: For revision surgery, the patient underwent minimally invasive L5 corpectomy with a navigated expandable cage without fluoroscopy. The second surgery took 215 min, and estimated blood loss was 750 mL. The revision surgery proved successful, and the patient could then walk using a cane. In terms of clinical outcomes, the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 66% to 24%, and the visual analog scale score for lower back pain improved from 84 to 31 mm at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: Minimally invasive L5 corpectomy with a navigated expandable vertebral cage is effective for reducing cage misplacement and surgical invasiveness. With this new technique, surgeons and operating room staff can avoid the risk of adverse events due to intraoperative radiation exposure.

Treatment Tactics for Patients with Isolated Injuries of the Fifth Lumbar Vertebra

The major management technique for lumbar burst fractures is transpedicular fixation (TPF). However, in relation to fractures of the L₅ vertebra, this tactic often has no advantages over conservative treatment, and, therefore, it is expected to be supplemented with anterior decompression and reconstruction of the anterior column of the L₅ vertebra.

The aim of the study was to determine the most optimal treatment tactics for patients with isolated burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra.