Variation in global treatment for subaxial cervical spine isolated unilateral facet fractures

Delayed Unilateral Facet Interlocking After a Stable Superior Articular Process Fracture of the Cervical Spine: A Case Report

A 42-year-old man presented with neck pain after a fall from a tree. Spine computed tomography (CT) illustrated the right C5 superior articular process fracture without displacement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the fracture and injury of the posterior ligament complex. Initially he was managed conservatively with a neck brace as there were no signs of instability or vertebral body misalignment. However, three days after discharge, right shoulder weakness and numbness of the right upper arm became prominent. X-rays and CT showed anterior slippage of the C4 vertebral body and locked C4/5 facet ??a fractured bony fragment of the C5 superior articular process was pushed forward by the locked inferior articular process of C4 and invaded the neural foramen. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was performed using allograft and plate/screws fixation. Although initial imaging showed no evidence of subluxation, surgeons should be aware of occult instability and the possibility of delayed dislocation associated with the unilateral cervical facet fracture.

The Surgical Algorithm for the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System

STUDY DESIGN

Global cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Spine Sacral Injury Classification System.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification has been validated across an international audience of surgeons, a consensus on a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures using the Sacral AO Spine Injury Score (Sacral AOSIS) has yet to be developed.

METHODS

A survey was sent to general orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons, and neurosurgeons across the five AO spine regions of the world. Descriptions of controversial sacral injuries based on different fracture subtypes were given, and surgeons were asked whether the patient should undergo operative or nonoperative management. The results of the survey were used to create a surgical algorithm based on each subtype's sacral AOSIS.

RESULTS

An international agreement of 70% was decided on by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts to indicate a recommendation of initial operative intervention. Using this, sacral fracture subtypes of AOSIS 5 or greater were considered operative, while those with AOSIS 4 or less were generally nonoperative. For subtypes with an AOSIS of 3 or 4, if the sacral fracture was associated with an anterior pelvic ring injury (M3 case-specific modifier), intervention should be left to the surgeons' discretion.

CONCLUSION

The AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System offers a validated hierarchical system to approach sacral injuries. Through multispecialty and global surgeon input, a surgical algorithm was developed to determine appropriate operative indications for sacral trauma. Further validation is required, but this algorithm provides surgeons across the world with the basis for discussion and the development of standards of care and treatment.